ライフサイエンスコーパス: caregiving

1 t temperament, but was partially mediated by caregiving.

2 b stress, marital unhappiness, and burden of caregiving.

3 nces for intergenerational relationships and caregiving.

4 to create appropriate care plans to support caregiving.

5 graphical implications for intergenerational caregiving.

6 or reduce employment owing to the demands of caregiving.

7 but not with more global aspects of observed caregiving.

8 e a prerequisite of sensitive and responsive caregiving.

9 its applicability to the domain of parental caregiving.

10 pendently inversely correlated with paternal caregiving.

11 alth care utilization, and need for informal caregiving.

12 These caregivers expressed no positives in caregiving.

13 re other-focused, and not highly burdened by caregiving.

14 Four-year mortality, based on level of caregiving: (1) spouse not disabled; (2) spouse disabled

15 at baseline, answered questions on informal caregiving; 1,700 incident breast cancer cases accrued o

16 at an elevated risk of experiencing multiple caregiving abuses, including physical maltreatment, high

17 urred more often in females, those without a caregiving adult in the household, and individuals with

18 oth "indiscriminate friendliness" toward non-caregiving adults and altered amygdala development.

19 Cross-sectional analyses of caregiving and endogenous sex steroid hormones were also

20 to examine the relationship between years of caregiving and FMD.

21 They described mixed emotions about caregiving and had difficulty accepting that their partn

22 h depressive symptoms lead to high levels of caregiving and should examine whether successful treatme

23 e effects on the hippocampus are mediated by caregiving and stressful life events suggest that attemp

24 Here we discuss how caregiving and the accompanying experiential and hormona

25 rd and motivation system--predicted paternal caregiving and was negatively related to testes volume.

26 rishment, disability, isolation, relocation, caregiving, and bereavement-contributes to physiological

27 prolonged distress, the physical demands of caregiving, and biological vulnerabilities of older care

28 , nutrition, security and safety, responsive caregiving, and early learning.

29 with previous literature on race and family caregiving, and indicate that cultural values regarding

30 children have least access to individualised caregiving, and when deprivation coincides with early de

31 or the education of mothers about responsive caregiving, appear to be effective in reducing maternal

32 Caregivers who report strain associated with caregiving are more likely to die than noncaregiving con

33 his is consistent with conceptualizations of caregiving as a dynamic, learning process in humans.

34 quality, social support, and level of unmet caregiving assistance needs were better for participants

35 Caregiving associated with depressive symptoms in elderl

36 Maternal sensitivity and the quality of caregiving behavior are likely determined by the respons

37 ome vagal cardiac tone) associated with male caregiving behavior may allow males to both nurture and

38 ement and mentalization, as well as specific caregiving behavior toward the child.

39 Research has examined which caregiving behaviors support the frequency of behavioral

40 teract with the systems involved in maternal caregiving behaviors, mother-infant interactions are hig

41 etter understanding of variation in parental caregiving behaviour and its potential for modulation by

42 trition) had significantly better responsive caregiving behaviours at 4 years of child age than those

43 ucation were both associated with protective caregiving behaviours, including vitamin A capsule recei

44 his report describes a case that exemplifies caregiving burden and discusses the importance of identi

45 These caregivers reported significant caregiving burden.

46 ole for Oxytocin (OT) in mediating sensitive caregiving but no study has examined the relationship be

47 Caregiving by nonparents (alloparenting) and fathers is

48 Caregiving can also be extremely stressful, and many car

49 eded by a protracted and stressful period of caregiving, caregivers reported considerable relief at t

50 reported sociodemographic, psychosocial, and caregiving characteristics; cancer characteristics were

51 ces represent violations of species-expected caregiving conditions, thereby imposing challenges to th

52 How caregiving contributes to human hippocampal developmenta

53 of caregiving hours, and the average annual caregiving cost per case (assuming an average hourly wag

54 Informal caregiving costs are substantial and should be considere

55 he same time, it should be acknowledged that caregiving could affect the carer negatively and cause e

56 mental health status, intrafamily conflict, caregiving demands, and financial hardship.

57 no racial difference in negative aspects of caregiving, depression, or anxiety.

58 care recipient, higher number of hours spent caregiving, depression, social isolation, financial stre

59 Stress from caregiving did not appear to increase breast cancer risk

60 g other than for exercise, volunteering, and caregiving did not differ significantly across the activ

61 e parent's disorder and help with associated caregiving difficulties.

62 nts (N=80) of standardized case scenarios of caregiving dyads.

63 g whether randomized placement into a family caregiving environment alters development of the autonom

64 evidence for a causal link between the early caregiving environment and stress response system reacti

65 ates the influence of social context and the caregiving environment and suggests that the relation be

66 e symptomatic than girls regardless of their caregiving environment and, unlike girls, had no reducti

67 The caregiving environment had a medium effect size of 0.3 f

68 The authors assessed the quality of the caregiving environment through maternal reports and inte

69 The quality of the caregiving environment was the strongest independent pre

70 stitutional rearing is considered an adverse caregiving environment, but few studies have systematica

71 bly because maternal depression disrupts the caregiving environment.

72 y compared the developmental outcomes in and caregiving environments provided to children by depresse

73 with significantly higher levels of informal caregiving, even after the effects of major coexisting c

74 established that personality influences the caregiving experience, carer well-being and outcomes suc

75 to attenuate the stress associated with the caregiving experience.

76 The interview questions centered on family caregiving experiences and on how these caregivers made

77 pecify mechanisms of brain malleability with caregiving experiences in human fathers.

78 ng older persons varies as a function of the caregiving experiences that precede the death.

79 entia can be encouraged toward more positive caregiving experiences through empathy-building interven

80 le with dementia describe a wide spectrum of caregiving experiences, from very negative to very posit

81 udy of individuals subjected to nonnormative caregiving experiences.

82 h the maternal brain, and its sensitivity to caregiving experiences.

83 mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving

84 To determine whether a chronic stressor (caregiving for a spouse with a progressive dementia) is

85 L-6 production in 119 men and women who were caregiving for a spouse with dementia and 106 noncaregiv

86 ch demonstrating the psychological burden of caregiving for advanced cancer patients, limited informa

87 nce, time, and cost associated with informal caregiving for elderly cancer patients.

88 e weekly hours and imputed costs of informal caregiving for elderly people with no depressive symptom

89 ional time and cost associated with informal caregiving for older Americans with depressive symptoms.

90 gy and behavior emphasize the brain basis of caregiving for the cross-generation transmission of huma

91 Whereas the adjusted probability of informal caregiving for those respondents reporting NC and CNT wa

92 k of access to care, specifically beneficial caregiving from friends, relatives, and adult children.

93 had more negative appraisals of illness and caregiving, greater uncertainty, and more hopelessness c

94 P =.005), while the strained and nonstrained caregiving groups did not show significant weight change

95 ssness, and negative appraisal of illness or caregiving had detrimental effects.

96 Although family caregiving has been intensively studied in the past deca

97 The pathophysiological consequences of caregiving have not been fully elucidated.

98 m of the hidden curriculum--it can symbolize caregiving hierarchies and spheres of practice, the soci

99 caregiving fathers (SC-Fathers), and primary-caregiving homosexual fathers (PC-Fathers) rearing infan

100 High numbers of caregiving hours and self-reported stress did not predic

101 eived more than twice the number of informal caregiving hours per week (P < 0.001), at an annual cost

102 informal care, the average weekly number of caregiving hours, and the average annual caregiving cost

103 ctivities of daily living), and (2) informal caregiving (hours of caregiving provided by a primary in

104 were not evident for more generic aspects of caregiving in this urban sample of 76 postpartum mothers

105 d, and childhood) and also between places of caregiving (including households and communities, outpat

106 This 1999-2004 US study examined caregiving intensity and 2-year change in performance-ba

107 Caregiving intensity status and physical performance sco

108 e results suggest that the chronic stress of caregiving is associated with impaired endothelial funct

109 serious and life-threatening illness, family caregiving is typically at the core of what sustains pat

110 If caregivers' well-being is compromised by caregiving, it may bode poorly for transplant recipients

111 imary endpoint for mothers was wellbeing and caregiving knowledge, practices, and skills when the chi

112 institutionalization-results from increased caregiving load and increased illness severity over time

113 correlates of a specific component of human caregiving: maternal mental state talk, reflecting a mot

114 dicate that cultural values regarding family caregiving may be important in arthritis care.

115 king speed in older women, and the stress of caregiving may have exacerbated its impact.

116 motherhood, and the resultant experience of caregiving, may change the way women respond to affectiv

117 The caregiving model developed from the data illustrated tha

118 their firstborn infant: heterosexual primary-caregiving mothers (PC-Mothers), heterosexual secondary-

119 nvolving child behavior problems and extreme caregiving need.

120 s (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49), substantial caregiving needs (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17), and pain

121 ctional disability are major determinants of caregiving needs and societal health care costs.

122 likely future survival, general health, and caregiving needs.

123 recipients, and the care recipient's overall caregiving needs.

124 f parenting, here I chart a global 'parental caregiving' network that integrates conserved structures

125 hat parenting implemented a global "parental caregiving" neural network, mainly consistent across par

126 ternal perception of infant temperament, and caregiving observations.

127 ating periods but then declines to allow for caregiving of resulting offspring.

128 ed with decline in walking speed and whether caregiving, often considered an indicator of chronic str

129 The burden of caregiving on the family members remains poorly understo

130 ect (the absence of sensitive and responsive caregiving) or disrupted interaction with offspring indu

131 lness of a spouse can affect the health of a caregiving partner.

132 eceived an average of 10.0 hours of informal caregiving per week, as compared with 6.9 and 6.8 hours

133 ation is affected by infant irritability and caregiving practices.

134 unity, Cancer Care); and collaboration among caregiving, professional, and cancer-related organizatio

135 ving), and (2) informal caregiving (hours of caregiving provided by a primary informal caregiver and

136 it remains unclear whether the distress that caregiving provokes also takes a physiologic toll on the

137 l infant, a circumscribed aspect of maternal caregiving purported to be a prerequisite of sensitive a

138 ty of life, overall quality of patient care, caregiving quality, social support, and level of unmet c

139 onments following interventions that improve caregiving quality.

140 echanism by which baby schema promotes human caregiving, regardless of kinship.

141 iCST appeared to enhance the quality of the caregiving relationship and caregivers' QoL.

142 Secondary outcomes included quality of the caregiving relationship from the perspectives of the per

143 Subgroup analyses by race, sex, caregiving relationship, and caregiving strain failed to

144 parisons of positive and negative aspects of caregiving reported by caregivers of black and white str

145 interviews revealed substantial strain from caregiving responsibilities as well as frequent symptom

146 ch" generation, with its members having dual caregiving responsibilities to both parents and children

147 personality factors shape adjustment to the caregiving role and how these impact on the progression

148 e married, the spouse frequently assumes the caregiving role.

149 n may be the "stretched" generation, because caregiving seems to extend over a long period.

150 vents suggest that attempts to enhance early caregiving should be a focused public health target for

151 rify challenges and opportunities across the caregiving spectrum, including patients who are hospital

152 Among respondents with the same caregiving status at baseline and 1-year interviews, hig

153 ustment for smoking, alcohol use, widowhood, caregiving status, cognitive function, physical disabili

154 s by race, sex, caregiving relationship, and caregiving strain failed to identify any subgroups with

155 echanism explaining the relationship between caregiving stress and cardiovascular morbidity.

156 nvestigated the relationship between chronic caregiving stress and endothelial dysfunction assessed b

157 We examined the relationship between chronic caregiving stress and endothelial function.

158 Evidence suggests that caregiving stress is associated with pathophysiologic pr

159 We evaluated how caregiving, stress, and caregiver strain were associated

160 s if they reported the carers perspective of caregiving - studies that focused mostly on the person w

161 outcomes such as coping ability, burden and caregiving style.

162 verty on hippocampal volume were mediated by caregiving support/hostility on the left and right, as w

163 During caregiving, suppressed adult neurogenesis does not appea

164 ed an informal caregiver to participate in a caregiving survey.

165 of maternal brain structure and function of caregiving systems recently studied in humans as well as

166 unknown whether caregivers who perform more caregiving tasks have a greater decline in health from h

167 survivors reported more positive aspects of caregiving than caregivers of white stroke survivors (6.

168 We describe 5 burdens of family caregiving (time and logistics, physical tasks, financia

169 the need to focus on specific components of caregiving to advance understanding of the maternal brai

170 ant's temperament, and a home observation of caregiving was conducted.

171 the caregiver sample, the number of years of caregiving was significantly related to FMD (r = -0.465,

172 Study) linked to the NSOC (National Study of Caregiving), were used to identify elderly stroke surviv

173 They expressed satisfaction with caregiving, were other-focused, and not highly burdened

174 es conserved structures supporting mammalian caregiving with later-evolving networks and implicates p

175 elf-reported levels of stress from, informal caregiving with prospective breast cancer incidence.