ライフサイエンスコーパス: carotid artery stenosis

1 my (CEA) for the prevention of stroke due to carotid artery stenosis.

2 ical guideline on screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

3 most meaningful risk factor was ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis.

4 provider-induced demand in the management of carotid artery stenosis.

5 agnostic criteria used to classify degree of carotid artery stenosis.

6 reatment for patients presenting symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

7 scularization for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

8 ts, and stroke alone, in symptomatic >/= 50% carotid artery stenosis.

9 ons about optimal management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

10 atients with symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

11 /low (0-15 years) SHS exposure and < or =25% carotid artery stenosis.

12 method of revascularization for extracranial carotid artery stenosis.

13 oppler US for assistance in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.

14 ffective as CEA for treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

15 ents that are impacting on the management of carotid artery stenosis.

16 mp index and SP are related to contralateral carotid artery stenosis.

17 symptomatic or asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis.

18 Of 10579 individuals with a diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis (4615 women and 5964 men; mean [

19 endarterectomy are both options for treating carotid-artery stenosis, an important cause of stroke.

20 ic velocity ratio for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis and decrease some of the reporte

21 In our trial of patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and increased surgical risk, no

22 Internal carotid artery stenosis and intima-media thickness of th

23 nt and decline associated with left internal carotid artery stenosis and intima-media thickness, afte

24 The incidence of carotid artery stenosis and plaques, cardiac embolic sou

25 teries of 120 patients with suspected severe carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral isch

26 recently symptomatic patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and to compare this with their c

27 utcome in a clinical subset of patients with carotid artery stenosis and transient systemic hypotensi

28 ars, range, 59.4-69.7) with ipsilateral >70% carotid artery stenosis and who underwent carotid endart

29 Twenty patients with > or =50% internal carotid artery stenosis and with > or =3 embolic signals

30 Among patients with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carot

31 iabetes mellitus, blood lipids, asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis), and 4 lifestyle factors (cigar

32 omy for symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis, and a marginal benefit for asym

33 attack, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension; carotid artery stenosis; ankle-arm blood pressure index;

34 Adults with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis are at increased risk for ipsila

35 Atrial fibrillation and severe carotid-artery stenosis are well-characterised risk fact

36 tid artery stenosis with 70%-89% and 50%-69% carotid artery stenosis at presentation.

37 y was queried for individuals diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis between October 1, 2006, and Sep

38 an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis but there are scarce long-term e

39 ternative to endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis, but long-term efficacy is uncer

40 orders including coronary artery disease and carotid artery stenosis, but their association with Alzh

41 uld be offered CAS as a treatment option for carotid artery stenosis by vascular surgeons or interven

42 ry disease (PAD), and ultrasound imaging for carotid artery stenosis (CAS) >50% and abdominal aortic

43 okes attributable to previously asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is low.

44 mately 10% of ischemic strokes are caused by carotid artery stenosis (CAS).

45 tions: atrial fibrillation, Crohn's disease, carotid artery stenosis, coronary artery disease, multip

46 carotid endarterectomy only with substantial carotid artery stenosis disease progression.

47 d need to improve selection of patients with carotid artery stenosis for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)

48 tid disease was defined as cervical internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%) or occlusion.

49 ects with >25 years of SHS exposure and >25% carotid artery stenosis had a 3-fold increase (hazard ra

50 rgence of percutaneous revascularization for carotid artery stenosis has raised further questions abo

51 arterectomy, medical therapy of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis has reduced rates of stroke to a

52 ndomized trial for treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis have helped to establish the ind

53 Women with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis have less stroke risk reduction

54 t hazard ratios for 1-year mortality whereas carotid artery stenosis, hyperlipidemia, and hypertensio

55 efficacious alternative for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in a veteran population and outc

56 and cost-effective screening examination for carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic populations.

57 ecommends against screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general adult population.

58 Patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis included in the International Ca

59 edical therapy in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is predicated upon a life expect

60 monocular blindness associated with internal-carotid-artery stenosis is a risk factor for stroke.

61 stroke ipsilateral to severe atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis is offset by complications durin

62 ugh many factors influence the management of carotid artery stenosis, it is not well understood wheth

63 n significant variation in classification of carotid artery stenosis, likely leading to differences i

64 Patients with carotid artery stenosis may be particularly susceptible

65 tool to identify patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis most likely to benefit from caro

66 rent cerebral ischemic events in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (odds ratio = 12.2, 95% CI = 5.5

67 with established coronary artery disease or carotid artery stenosis of 15% or greater determined by

68 endarterectomy who had either a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50% of the luminal d

69 tid artery revascularisation or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50%), or coronary ar

70 Thirty-one (40%) had carotid artery stenosis of at least 70%.

71 on of echolucent atherosclerotic lesions and carotid artery stenosis of different degrees.

72 arterectomy and who had either a symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis of at least 50 percent of the lu

73 tigated the impact of contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis on carotid artery stump pressure

74 The degree of carotid artery stenosis on histology correlated well wit

75 Carotid artery stenosis on the involved side was worse i

76 l/6J mice were subjected to bilateral common carotid artery stenosis or a sham operation and fed norm

77 hemia (OR, 7.67; CI, 5.31-11.07; P < 0.001), carotid artery stenosis (OR, 7.52; CI, 6.22-9.09; P < 0.

78 ndard surgical risk with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis randomly assigned to carotid art

79 mal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis remains unclear.

80 TBRmax was not significantly correlated to carotid artery stenosis (rho=0.506, P=0.135).

81 Future RCTs of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis should explore whether revascula

82 tion of stroke for patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, surgical intervention as a part

83 agreement between the tests for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to compare ipsilateral with con

84 pective analysis of patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis treated with CEA or CAS by a vas

85 outcomes in high-surgical-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTE

86 Thirty-one patients with 50%-99% internal carotid artery stenosis underwent dynamic contrast-enhan

87 Mean carotid artery stenosis was 78 +/- 10% before (95 CI 58

88 stenting for symptomatic > or =70% internal carotid artery stenosis were randomized in a double-blin

89 Patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1

90 ith cerebral embolic protection for internal carotid artery stenosis were randomly assigned to proxim

91 ompared CAS against CEA for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis were selected.

92 Among patients with carotid-artery stenosis who had been randomly assigned t

93 were modeled for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with 70%-89% and 50%-69% carotid

94 s, the benefits of treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA

95 ich the subset of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with IPH on MR images would unde