コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eased with increasing grade of the articular cartilage lesion.
2 itional surgically confirmed focal articular cartilage lesion.
3 e noncanonical signaling Wnt5a did not cause cartilage lesions.
4 l degeneration, is a predisposing factor for cartilage lesions.
5 utine MR arthrography protocol for depicting cartilage lesions.
6 in the ACL increased with the development of cartilage lesions.
7 in parameters between methods for detecting cartilage lesions.
8 he routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions.
9 ed over the same interval were evaluated for cartilage lesions.
10 method could thus be used for the repair of cartilage lesions.
11 luation with particular emphasis on bone and cartilage lesions.
12 aps in the detection of surgically confirmed cartilage lesions.
13 her specificity (P < .01) for helping detect cartilage lesions (92.2% for VIPR-SSFP and 88.4% for rou
15 opment of osteoarthritis and correlates with cartilage lesions and clinical osteoarthritis scores.
17 ignificantly lower specificity for detecting cartilage lesions and higher accuracy for grading cartil
18 curacy of both imaging methods for detecting cartilage lesions and meniscal tears were determined.
19 ogic changes seen in OA, including articular cartilage lesions and osteophytes, were present in the m
20 f anterosuperior labral tear, anterosuperior cartilage lesion, and abnormal alpha angle was recorded.
21 ted significantly (P <.05) with the grade of cartilage lesions, and a substantially higher percentage
22 y two musculoskeletal radiologists to detect cartilage lesions, anterior and posterior cruciate ligam
23 tine MR imaging protocol in the detection of cartilage lesions, anterior cruciate ligament tears, and
24 R imaging at 3.0 T increased the accuracy of cartilage lesion assessment when compared with imaging a
26 int space narrowing and with the presence of cartilage lesions at baseline and worsening during follo
28 ere obtained and analyzed by two readers for cartilage lesions, bone marrow edema pattern, and ligame
30 a routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions, cruciate ligament tears, collateral l
33 Caspase inhibitors reduced the severity of cartilage lesions in experimental OA, suggesting that th
36 ore rapid progression of cartilage loss than cartilage lesions in the anterior and posterior portions
38 utine MR imaging protocol was used to detect cartilage lesions, ligament tears, meniscal tears, and b
42 cy causes an increased severity of articular cartilage lesions of OA without the bony lesions normall
43 ion of matrix turnover that is seen in early cartilage lesions of the ankle would appear to represent
44 gery to determine the presence or absence of cartilage lesions on each articular surface, first by us
46 ol contralateral joints, including articular cartilage lesions, osteophyte formation, and pathologic
51 nges and to determine their correlation with cartilage lesion patterns at all stages of osteoarthriti
52 em enabled significantly higher detection of cartilage lesion progression than did WORMS or BLOKS sys
54 labral lesions, paralabral cysts, articular cartilage lesions, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, and s
55 lage lesions and higher accuracy for grading cartilage lesions than did a routine MR arthrography pro
56 system is a reproducible scoring system for cartilage lesions that yields an improved detection rate
57 ture knee joints most often causes articular cartilage lesions, this study was undertaken to characte
58 At the time of arthroscopy, each articular cartilage lesion was graded by using the Noyes classific
59 he sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions was 74% and 77%, respectively, for IDE
60 ower specificity of IDEAL-SPGR for detecting cartilage lesions was not seen in experienced readers.
62 cificity, and accuracy for detecting all 192 cartilage lesions were 68.5%, 92.6%, and 84.5% for IDEAL
63 ty, and accuracy of MR imaging for detecting cartilage lesions were 69.3%, 78.0%, and 74.5% at 1.5 T
64 vity and specificity in the detection of 351 cartilage lesions were 74.6% and 97.8%, respectively, fo
65 he 1.5- and 3.0-T MR protocols for detecting cartilage lesions were determined by using arthroscopy a
68 MR imaging provides superior delineation of cartilage lesions when compared with two other sequences
70 0 T improved sensitivity in the detection of cartilage lesions within the knee joint from 74.6% to 88
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。