コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 Comparative case series.
2 Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional case series.
3 spective, noncomparative, single-institution case series.
4 Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series.
5 Prospective observational comparative case series.
6 Retrospective clinical case series.
7 Retrospective comparative case series.
8 Retrospective, interventional case series.
9 Prospective, consecutive, interventional case series.
10 Retrospective multicenter observational case series.
11 TA thresholding in eyes from a retrospective case series.
12 A retrospective observational case series.
13 ive consecutive, interventional, comparative case series.
14 Noncomparative case series.
15 Cross-sectional case series.
16 Prospective case series.
17 Retrospective consecutive interventional case series.
18 Prospective interventional case series.
19 Prospective observational case series.
20 Retrospective, observational case series.
21 Comparative, retrospective, consecutive case series.
22 nd 2010 were screened for this retrospective case series.
23 Descriptive case series.
24 Retrospective, consecutive, observational case series.
25 Retrospective noncomparative case series.
26 omyositis are from anecdotal, non-randomised case series.
27 Cross-sectional, prospective, comparative case series.
28 miology, clinical epidemiology, and surgical case series.
29 , noncomparative, consecutive interventional case series.
30 Prospective, single centre, consecutive case series.
31 ice patterns are based upon relatively small case series.
32 t of 6 eligible patients participated in the case series.
33 e attempted to identify all case reports and case series.
34 ntly based upon anecdotal evidence and small case series.
35 ls, with outcomes similar to those of larger case series.
36 Single-center, retrospective case series.
37 Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series.
38 drome (PRES) was described in an influential case series.
39 dt disease were evaluated in a retrospective case series.
40 , noncomparative, consecutive interventional case series.
41 h people with solid tumours in a consecutive case series.
42 case-control design, and the remainder were case series.
43 Retrospective observational case series.
44 le for cohort studies and the Moga scale for case series.
45 Retrospective non-comparative laboratory case series.
46 Retrospective review of consecutive clinical case series.
47 s, but data are limited to small studies and case series.
48 Single-center retrospective case series.
49 Retrospective consecutive case series.
50 Prospective, observational case series.
51 Prospective, multicenter case series.
52 Multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series.
53 Interventional case series.
54 Retrospective, consecutive case series.
55 Multicenter, prospective interventional case series.
56 ve analysis of a consecutive, interventional case series.
57 Prospective comparative case series.
58 Prospective, fellow eye-matched case series.
59 Prospective, interventional case series.
60 A prospective, consecutive, observational case series.
61 een described in individual case reports and case series.
62 Prospective single center exploratory case series.
63 Retrospective, multicenter case series.
64 Retrospective interventional case series.
65 Prospective, observational, cross-sectional case series.
66 First-in-Humans case series.
67 Retrospective, population-based case series.
68 s a single-center prospective interventional cases series.
72 Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series, 2 patients referred to the dermatology serv
73 Eighty-three studies (54 case reports and case series, 25 cohort, 2 case-control, and 2 registry s
75 3 patients), 1 cohort study (34 patients), 7 case series (44 patients), and 7 case reports (7 patient
76 single-center, prospective, cross-sectional case series, 57 consecutive patients with PXE from a uni
79 limited by the predominance of retrospective case series, absence of comparison groups, short median
80 , was integrated with open-label studies and case series, along with the experience of experts to cre
82 A prospective, longitudinal, observational, case-series analysis of 9 members of an affected family
88 ly available mortality data are derived from case series and may not be generalizable to broader popu
90 controlled trials, along with more than 100 case series and observational studies, support the effic
92 and retrospective cohort studies, as well as case series and reports were identified in a PubMed sear
93 ses and systematic reviews were prioritized; case series and reports were included only for intervent
94 ieved (reviews, guidelines, clinical trials, case series), and their bibliographies were also reviewe
96 clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, case series, and case reports evaluating recession areas
97 ized clinical trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series, and case reports involving laser treatment
102 tand possible determinants, this prospective case series assesses gingival blood perfusion and tissue
113 gnosed from 2004 to 2013 from a clinic-based case series at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).
114 In a single-surgeon prospective comparative case series at the Department of Ophthalmology, Charite-
117 syndrome (OMS) in adults are based on small case series before the era of neuronal cell surface anti
137 sed risk was found using the self-controlled case-series design (multiple sclerosis: incidence ratio,
141 is a prospective consecutive interventional case series examining the feasibility and utility of mic
143 ort histologic findings from a retrospective case series from 1993 to 2010 and suggest a possible mec
148 of STATseq and standard genetic testing in a case series from the NICU and PICU of a large children's
149 systematic reviews, and large retrospective case series (>300 patients) using Medical Subject Headin
152 blications of moderate to large contemporary case series have helped elucidate the early natural hist
159 This is the largest multicentre European case series in food allergy, in which subjects underwent
160 nformation was obtained from a retrospective case series in primary care over the year following disc
168 ticipants: This cross-sectional, consecutive case series included 8 infants (age range, 3.0-5.1 month
182 Single-site, observational, consecutive case series (May 2012-October 2014) involving 102 childr
183 erval method, and a modified self-controlled case series method for each outcome of interest, includi
185 ed risk interval design, the self-controlled case series method, and the case-crossover design, are d
188 The Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Brain Bank case series (n = 3618) was selected regardless of ante-m
189 tudy designs included case reports (n = 28), case series (n = 8), single-patient interventional (n =
201 nd Participants: Single-center retrospective case series of 38 consecutive patients with BAO who unde
207 NTERPRETATION: This study is the first large case series of children who died with community-acquired
210 of consecutive, nonrandomized, longitudinal case series of KPro implantations performed at 5 tertiar
211 -PSMA-617-targeted radionuclide therapy in a case series of mCRPC patients resistant to other treatme
214 SPNs can be considered reliable in a current case series of nodules collected in a non-smoker cohort
216 cells targeting CD19 have shown activity in case series of patients with acute and chronic lymphocyt
225 t the results of a preliminary 5 consecutive cases series of LRH for LDLT and to compare it with a su
228 trials, exploratory comparative studies and case series) on the use of CMR in the diagnostic evaluat
241 5 cohort studies (n = 310 patients) and 156 case series/reports of 183 cases of tension pneumothorax
242 ingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decisi
243 r-reviewed articles, including case reports, case series, retrospective reviews, prospective randomiz
250 ucted a set of bidirectional self-controlled case series studies-one for each antihyperlipidemic.
254 Two randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); 28 case-series studies; and 5 case reports were included.
262 Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series study of 4 participants, the nailfolds in 2
266 Design, Settings, and Participants: In this case series study, 5 patients from 4 families were ident
267 etrospective, non-comparative interventional case series study, in which 20 trabeculectomised and pse
274 , retrospective case series, and prospective case series that used FOLFOXIRI-Bev for the treatment of
290 o identify individuals for inclusion in this case series, we searched two sources of prospectively co
295 Individual case reports and retrospective case series with fewer than 10 patients were excluded.
298 y evidence, consisting almost exclusively of case series with risk of selection bias, indirect patien
300 There were 7 females and 3 males in this case series, with a mean (range) age at last review of 3
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。