コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n tumors after androgen deprivation therapy (castration).
2 Moreover, phospho-Akt remained high after castration.
3 nts no longer respond to medical or surgical castration.
4 androgen-intact mice and in tumors surviving castration.
5 ne expression patterns normally decreased by castration.
7 ive androgen-deprivation therapy by surgical castration and those who receive gonadotropin-releasing
8 endered susceptible to liver inflammation by castration, and testosterone treatment was sufficient to
10 hese phenotypes were sharply abrogated after castration but restored with exogenous testosterone, sug
11 nd significantly prolongs survival following castration by enhancing p53 and androgen receptor acetyl
12 ssion is related to sexual hormones, as male castration decreased AIRE thymic expression and estrogen
14 e pigs, one of the alternatives for surgical castration, entails the possible occurrence of boar tain
18 n-deprivation therapy (ADT) through surgical castration is equally effective as medical castration in
19 ed expansion of Foxn1(+)Ly51(+)CD80(-) TECs, castration led to expansion of Foxn1(+)Ly51(-)CD80(+) TE
20 ion is rapidly elevated in the prostate upon castration-mediated androgen withdrawal through an undef
21 erapies for advanced prostate cancer include castration modalities that suppress ligand-dependent tra
28 and its level is significantly elevated upon castration of mice carrying xenograft prostate tumors.
31 s sexual dimorphism, as ovariectomy, but not castration, of Nf1-OPG mice normalizes RGC survival and
32 that blockade of AR signaling either through castration or AR-antagonist prevented and reversed cardi
33 tantly, LBH589 treatment in combination with castration prevents mCRPC development and significantly
37 view is to summarize molecular mechanisms of castration resistance and provide an update in the devel
38 ght into the bona fide mechanisms underlying castration resistance and provide the foundation for the
39 tor (AR) transcriptional programs, including castration resistance and subsequent chromosomal translo
40 onally impair HR prior to the development of castration resistance and that, this potentially could b
45 anding the disease biology and mechanisms of castration resistance led to significant advancements an
49 survival, progression-free survival, time to castration resistance, skeletal-related events, and adve
50 to the identification of known mediators of castration resistance, which served to validate the scre
56 dicating this population eventually leads to castration-resistance, owing to the continued survival o
57 ed phase II clinical development in men with castration resistant (advanced) prostate cancer (CRPC).
58 tive prostate cancer typically progresses to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after the an
61 docetaxel cycles in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCPRC) has not bee
63 er, but almost all cancer eventually becomes castration resistant, and the underlying mechanisms are
66 profile is enriched in advanced, anaplastic, castration-resistant and metastatic prostate cancers.
67 n with advanced PC (proven metastatic and/or castration-resistant biochemical progression) were rando
68 We employ lineage tracing to show that these castration-resistant Bmi1-expressing cells (or CARBs) ar
70 at advanced stages including metastatic and castration-resistant cancer remains incurable due to the
72 ficantly elevated in primary PC samples from castration-resistant compared with therapy-naive patient
78 prostate cancer cell motility, invasion, and castration-resistant growth and as a potential therapeut
79 mi1 as a marker for a distinct population of castration-resistant luminal epithelial cells enriched i
80 repressor protein Bmi1 marks a population of castration-resistant luminal epithelial cells enriched i
81 receptor acetylation and in turn sensitizing castration-resistant mesenchymal-like tumor cells to and
82 stinct from the previously described luminal castration-resistant Nkx3.1-expressing cells (CARNs).
83 ly labels a type of luminal stem cells named castration-resistant Nkx3.1-expressing cells (CARNs).
84 he maintenance of daughter cells produced by castration-resistant Nkx3.1-expressing luminal stem cell
85 societies, and those who develop metastatic castration-resistant PC (CRPC) invariably succumb to the
86 as well as a dramatic response of metastatic castration-resistant PC after PSMA radioligand therapy.
90 protein levels increase with progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) and high levels of Bag-1
91 ckdown occurs in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) cells, although the effe
93 rivation therapy, however, PCa progresses to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), making the development
96 was moderate to test all men with metastatic castration-resistant PCA, regardless of family history,
98 1 inhibition via shRNA or PX-12 reverses the castration-resistant phenotype of CRPC cells, significan
100 The precise molecular alterations driving castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are not clea
101 or, improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) before and a
102 ndrogen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cell lines,
103 rapies have significantly improved survival, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells are ev
104 Finally, androgen-independent AR activity in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells is dri
105 environment, have created the need to revise castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical tri
117 nce of prostate cancer either in the form of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or transdiff
118 used clinical tissue from lethal metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients obt
120 ntinues to have a critical role in promoting castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) survival and
121 the progression of prostate cancer (PCa) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) through upre
122 rk [ACRIN] 6687) to a multicenter metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) tissue bioma
123 ough initially effective, leads to incurable castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) via compensa
124 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) was associat
125 onal therapy for chemotherapy-naive men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who range fr
126 s the first therapeutic approach in treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but tumours
127 efficacy and promotes progression to lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), even when p
128 ing tumors, most patients eventually develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), for which t
129 (LBD) are associated with the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), including r
130 articularly virulent form of this disease is castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), where patie
131 o remission, the disease often progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which is st
148 I]) in patients who have advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and are rec
149 l-related events in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone me
150 established prognostic factors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and the ass
151 o androgen receptor inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and whether
152 clear medicine is theranostics of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) based on mo
153 ist enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is undefine
154 cal decision in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is when to
155 tumor cells (CTC) from 179 unique metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients to
157 rogression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) trials has
158 d Methods Fifty-six patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with osseou
160 precision medicine framework for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we establi
161 -mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which is c
173 The processes associated with transition to castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC) growth are not
175 esponses in asymptomatic men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and also resensitis
176 le for participation if they had: metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and had received no
177 ely active in several malignancies including castration-resistant prostate cancer and has been identi
178 ional program in both androgen-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer and inhibited tumou
179 rs are available to predict the emergence of castration-resistant prostate cancer and no curative opt
180 cruited patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and no previous che
181 sly reported ALSYMPCA trial in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bon
182 ffective and well tolerated in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bon
183 en receptor-regulated miRNA overexpressed in castration-resistant prostate cancer and that miR-32 can
184 role for BAT in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and the optimal str
185 validate the activation function of EZH2 in castration-resistant prostate cancer and to (ii) study t
186 It occurred in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancer and was associated
187 us prednisone in men with chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer at the interim anal
188 (1245A>C) has been mechanistically linked to castration-resistant prostate cancer because it encodes
189 a-118b, a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) of castration-resistant prostate cancer bone metastasis tha
190 tion of survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer but also engage a c
192 occur early are an unmet need in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical research a
193 sponse end points for early-phase metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical trials.
197 rovements to prognostic models in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have the potential
198 y-naive patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in a 1:1 ratio to r
199 hat prolongs survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in whom the disease
200 ion of patients for a specific treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer or the best sequenc
201 PET/CT in the prediction of survival in both castration-resistant prostate cancer patients and hormon
202 e PET/CT as a diagnostic tool for monitoring castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated wi
204 iation therapy in advanced-stage, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with prost
206 overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated
207 raterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after c
208 tandard of care for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after d
209 We enrolled patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after t
210 ults show nelfinavir and its analogs inhibit castration-resistant prostate cancer proliferation by bl
211 1GSC treatments in mouse xenograft models of castration-resistant prostate cancer resulted in signifi
212 with radiographically documented metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed
213 is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed
214 amined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed aft
215 to evaluate BAT in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed aft
217 nhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer through inhibition
219 t randomised clinical trials with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer to estimate the gro
220 gen and antiandrogen therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer to maximise therape
221 ficantly longer for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with this c
222 e 3 clinical trials in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were obtained from
223 e 2 trial in which patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with o
224 USE M1-in which 266 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with p
225 uctive tract tissues and at higher levels in castration-resistant prostate cancer where it is require
226 d no survival benefit in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with the addition o
227 rmed progressive bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with two or more sk
228 patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral me
230 progressing on androgen-deprivation therapy (castration-resistant prostate cancer) has improved subst
231 th metastatic breast and six with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, isolated via CellS
232 chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, radiographic progr
233 hesis and prolongs survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, which is otherwise
234 d and radiographically documented metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with no more than
279 report that approximately 20% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers express neither AR
280 Furthermore, androgen deprivation led to castration-resistant prostate cancers that were composed
282 in human NEPC tumors compared to primary and castration-resistant prostate cancers, and its expressio
283 ate homologous recombination (HR) defects in castration-resistant prostate cancers, rendering these t
286 t upregulation and hyperactivation of YAP in castration-resistant prostate tumors compared to their l
291 observed substantial genomic overlap between castration-resistant tumors that were histologically cha
293 is independent of exogenous androgen in the castration-resistant variants of LNCaP, C4-2 and C4-2B.
294 y to the clinical CRPC, orthotopically grown castration-resistant VCaP (CR-VCaP) xenografts express h
297 Additionally, we imaged one patient with castration-sensitive prostate cancer before and 4 wk aft
300 drogen action in the skin as demonstrated by castration studies and skin-specific androgen receptor d
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。