ライフサイエンスコーパス: catheter insertion

1 costal transthoracic echocardiography during catheter insertion.

2 passing score for subclavian central venous catheter insertion.

3 of full barrier precautions during arterial catheter insertion.

4 mmended as a first choice for central venous catheter insertion.

5 erile-practice compliance for central venous catheter insertion.

6 ce-based infection control guidelines during catheter insertion.

7 ere obtained simultaneously with intravenous catheter insertion.

8 on changed dramatically 72 and 120 hrs after catheter insertion.

9 catheter insertion, and area in hospital of catheter insertion.

10 dentifying pneumothorax after central venous catheter insertion.

11 l catheter insertions, and 26 central venous catheter insertions.

12 g staff utilization and time spent to manage catheter insertions.

13 ternal jugular and subclavian central venous catheter insertions.

14 Nine patients had multiple sequential catheter insertions.

15 associated with guidewire exchanges and new catheter insertions.

16 /=3 months) had fewer median (range) central catheter insertions 0 (0-2) vs 3 (0-6); P = .001.

17 the top quartile for in-ICU pulmonary artery catheter insertion (3.4-25.0% of patients) were more oft

18 ons, 1,272 arterial and 2,586 central venous catheter insertions, 457 fiberoptic bronchoscopies, and

19 Seventy-two hours after catheter insertion, a thrombus started to detach.

20 n of the original technique for percutaneous catheter insertion allowed placement of a larger taper-t

21 Data examining the timing of central venous catheter insertion among critically ill patients admitte

22 ng score for internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and 11 (14%) of 76 residents met the

23 initiative aimed at improving central venous catheter insertion and care could decrease the rate of p

24 The mean time between catheter insertion and chest radiograph control (28.3 mi

25 esidents' skills in simulated central venous catheter insertion and decreased complications related t

26 ygiene and best practices for central venous catheter insertion and maintenance can reduce rates of n

27 ighlight correct practice for central venous catheter insertion and maintenance.

28 the association between early central venous catheter insertion and mortality in patients with septic

29 ng score for internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and only 11 of 47 (23.4%) met or exce

30 ure measurement were effective in monitoring catheter insertion and position.

31 on during initial aseptic preparation during catheter insertion and subsequent guidewire exchange.

32 catheterization, using aseptic technique for catheter insertion, and adhering to proper catheter care

33 ired for stem cell mobilization, intravenous catheter insertion, and apheresis and a median of 9 plat

34 uded total catheter days, anatomical site of catheter insertion, and area in hospital of catheter ins

35 ommended barrier precautions during arterial catheter insertion, and only 15% reported using full bar

36 o the chair, touch-screen tasks, intravenous catheter insertion, and tilting.

37 rmed a median of 10 intubations, 14 arterial catheter insertions, and 26 central venous catheter inse

38 ikely than physicians to list central venous catheter insertion as an important barrier (38% vs. 5%;

39 historic controls who had unassisted central catheter insertion at the same sites.

40 e was 1 renal artery dissection during guide catheter insertion, before denervation, corrected by ren

41 rations are significantly more effective for catheter insertion care than povidone-iodine solutions t

42 terventions: educating the staff; creating a catheter insertion cart; asking providers daily whether

43 After catheter insertion, chest radiographs were obtained to a

44 from children with stage 5 CKD at time of PD catheter insertion (CKD5 group), children with establish

45 limited barrier precautions during arterial catheter insertion, consisting of sterile gloves, a surg

46 rtality associated with early central venous catheter insertion decreased after publication of eviden

47 completed a detailed questionnaire for each catheter insertion, designed to detect potential complic

48 Data collected included number and type of catheter insertions, duration of use, reason for removal

49 ed the hypothesis that prompt central venous catheter insertion during hospitalization among patients

50 Consecutive central venous catheter insertions from 12 noon to 12 midnight except S

51 me ultrasound guidance during central venous catheter insertion has become a standard of care, postin

52 by critical care clinicians during arterial catheter insertion in the ICU setting.

53 ased complications related to central venous catheter insertions in actual patient care.

54 Early central venous catheter insertion increased from 5.7% (95% confidence i

55 on the balloon 24 hrs after pulmonary artery catheter insertion, increasing dramatically at 72 and 12

56 le-operator ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion is effective in verifying proper tip

57 tral venous cannulation for pulmonary artery catheter insertion mandates catheter removal and repair

58 Earlier central venous catheter insertion may require systematic changes to mee

59 Central venous catheter insertions may lead to preventable adverse even

60 passing score for subclavian central venous catheter insertion: mean (internal jugular) = 50.6%, SD

61 umber of central venous and pulmonary artery catheter insertions; number of complete blood counts, el

62 tio, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.94-2.94), or central IV catheter insertion (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21)

63 rse containing video clips of central venous catheter insertions on compliance with sterile practice.

64 llometric devices pending the intra-arterial catheter insertion or after its removal.

65 re no complications associated with dialysis catheter insertion or CFPD therapy.

66 tes highly variable simulated central venous catheter insertion performance among a national cohort o

67 tending physicians' simulated central venous catheter insertion performance to the same simulated per

68 ovements in infection control, or changes in catheter insertion practices may be contributing to thes

69 g CR-BSIs; and empowering nurses to stop the catheter insertion procedure if a violation of the guide

70 Intraosseous catheter insertion provides a means for rapid delivery o

71 ions (transseptal puncture, sheath flushing, catheter insertion, pulmonary vein venography, and sheat

72 infection rates and safety outcomes (central catheter insertions, repairs, and hospitalizations) befo

73 x with jugular and subclavian central venous catheter insertions, respectively.

74 ound examination of both legs before femoral catheter insertion revealed no sign of venous thrombosis

75 Twenty-four hours after catheter insertion, scanning electron microscopic images

76 rtality associated with early central venous catheter insertion significantly decreased from a multiv

77 Selection of central venous catheter insertion site in ICU patients could help reduc

78 The impact of catheter insertion site on infection risk remains contro

79 Anisotropy reductions near microdialysis catheter insertion sites were highly correlated with red

80 rom health care worker hands, central venous catheter insertion sites, and medical devices.

81 matter-masked region near the microdialysis catheter insertion sites.

82 ic under occlusion onto the skin surrounding catheter insertion sites.

83 Attending physicians' central venous catheter insertion skills are not assessed routinely.

84 Using a previously published central venous catheter insertion skills checklist, we compared Veteran

85 ll barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; subcutaneous tunneling short-term ca

86 he research and development of catheters and catheter insertion techniques.

87 Average catheter insertion time was 2.3 minutes.

88 mly assigned within 12 hrs of central venous catheter insertion to receive either heparin or 0.9% sod

89 use of ultrasound can reduce central venous catheter insertion to use time, exposure to radiation, a

90 Prolonged dwell time and catheter insertion under emergent conditions increased r

91 tors associated with in-ICU pulmonary artery catheter insertion using multilevel mixed effects logist

92 trasound-guided, right-sided, central venous catheter insertion verifies proper placement and shorten

93 e subset of children for whom central venous catheter insertion was attempted (per-protocol populatio

94 nded sterile practices during central venous catheter insertion was developed.

95 Each catheter insertion was followed by an agitated saline bu

96 P = .04) and an increased number of drainage catheter insertions were noted in group 1 compared with

97 ollowing procedures: turning, central venous catheter insertion, wound drain removal, wound care, tra