ライフサイエンスコーパス: catheter placement

1 intraperitoneal hemorrhage on the day after catheter placement.

2 s in 143 patients with a history of dialysis catheter placement.

3 tem, and the risk increases with duration of catheter placement.

4 ore than 10 mL/d for more than 4 weeks after catheter placement.

5 st patients were discharged within 2 days of catheter placement.

6 ified blunt dilating instrument, followed by catheter placement.

7 with internal jugular and subclavian venous catheter placement.

8 atypical findings of NMI in association with catheter placement.

9 43 mGy) were observed for tunneled dialysis catheter placements.

10 is often prolonged and may require multiple catheter placements.

11 In procedures that required catheter placement, 10 of 11 placements (91%) were achie

12 mechanical ventilation (3% to 47%), arterial catheter placement (4% to 46%), central venous catheter

13 e patient required fluoroscopic transvaginal catheter placement after opacification of the collection

14 idance increased the use of internal jugular catheter placement and decreased artery punctures.

15 be taken even with ultrasound-guided central catheter placement and that alternative ultrasound guida

16 temic absorption, technical challenges of IP catheter placement and the incidence of IP catheter-rela

17 icile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy.

18 on, infusion of 2 L of fluid, central venous catheter placement, and antibiotic administration, were

19 traindications, technical aspects of feeding catheter placement, and complications.

20 , regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment

21 Postoperative catheter placement appears to be important for optimal d

22 As early as 1 month after catheter placement, atherosclerotic plaque formed around

23 ) increased patient risk of pulmonary artery catheter placement; b) ability to measure similar variab

24 is the preferred site for tunneled infusion catheter placement because of the lower incidence of sym

25 cific issues, such as difficulty turning and catheter placement challenges.

26 practice" checklists were developed: central catheter placement, consultation, family discussions, re

27 During ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement, correct positioning of central venou

28 rotid sheath insertion during central venous catheter placement could lead to serious complications.

29 ); incidence of infection was 0.93 per 1,000 catheter-placement days.

30 tions and infections associated with central-catheter placement did not differ significantly between

31 ation against landmark-guided central venous catheter placement during inpatient medical emergencies.

32 rests and secondary access if central venous catheter placement failed during noncardiac arrest emerg

33 Right or left internal jugular vein catheter placement followed by a postprocedural chest ra

34 The mean duration of catheter placement for all patients was 57.5 months (ran

35 d <6 months) undergoing cardiac surgery with catheter placement for PD were approached for inclusion.

36 The effectiveness of the trocar technique of catheter placement for transvaginal sonographically guid

37 Subclavian catheter placement had the longest dwell time with a med

38 th an increased rate of early central venous catheter placement identified after 2007.

39 in 77 patients and percutaneous transhepatic catheter placement in 24 patients).

40 limit of guidewire introduced during central catheter placement in adults.

41 was predictive of unsuccessful hemodialysis catheter placement in one patient.

42 As shown previously, catheter placement induced an inflammatory response resu

43 Central venous catheter placement is a common procedure performed on cr

44 aneous revascularization procedures, guiding catheter placement is associated with scraping debris fr

45 Intrapancreatic lavage catheter placement is essential to the success of this p

46 nneled catheter placement versus nontunneled catheter placement (<.001 to .027).

47 y catheter, or peripherally inserted central catheter placement; lumbar puncture; thoracentesis; para

48 venography (n = 3), attempted central venous catheter placement (n = 3), or surgery (n = 6).

49 -square test) between catheter type, side of catheter placement, number of catheter lumens, site of c

50 ressure monitor, placement of a jugular bulb catheter, placement of a pulmonary artery catheter, crit

51 out continuous infusions for the duration of catheter placement or discharge from intensive care unit

52 lacement, number of catheter lumens, site of catheter placement, or NC placement duration and positiv

53 ransfusion of blood products, central venous catheter placement, presence of pelvic or lower extremit

54 ccurred frequently after peritoneal dialysis catheter placement (prevalence 10% to 34%) and after gas

55 After anesthesia and catheter placement, rabbits were tracheotomized, paralyz

56 When used for vessel location and catheter placement real-time, ultrasound guidance or Dop

57 ion compared with radial artery for arterial catheter placement (relative risk, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.32-2.

58 oor anatomical landmarks, number of previous catheter placements, resistance to wire or catheter adva

59 concentration as well as assisted and ideal catheter placement techniques including ultrasound.

60 Median time from catheter placement to initial failure was 3.5 months (ra

61 ay reduce the need for invasive testing (ie, catheter placement, urodynamics), and prompt early treat

62 burn to a patient's forearm, we instituted a catheter placement verification protocol.

63 fferences in dose were observed for tunneled catheter placement versus nontunneled catheter placement

64 CED is a complex delivery method requiring catheter placement via a second procedure to achieve acc

65 the top quartile for in-ICU pulmonary artery catheter placement (vs the bottom quartile) using chi-sq

66 The success rate for catheter placement was 100%.

67 The mean duration of catheter placement was 4 days (range, 2-14 days).

68 Mean duration of catheter placement was 92 days.

69 d right internal jugular vein central venous catheter placement was 96.9% with an average of 1.3 atte

70 Catheter placement was curative in six of seven patients

71 Catheter placement was successful in 25 (96%) of 26 kidn

72 The two most common guidance methods of catheter placement were ultrasound localization and fluo

73 Fifteen studies with 1,553 central venous catheter placements were identified with a pooled sensit

74 placement and peripherally inserted central catheter placement) were compared with a one-way analysi

75 from presumed sepsis following intravascular catheter placement, whereas Clcn3(+/+) littermates survi

76 its in terms of speed and ease of continuous catheter placement while reducing the necessary number o

77 for patients having elective central venous catheter placement with a platelet count less than 20 x