ライフサイエンスコーパス: cathodal

1 Single, nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic, cathodal 100 and 200 J applications were delivered at 2

2 id not affect any of the TVA parameters, but cathodal 2 mA stimulation significantly enhanced top-dow

3 ronary arteries were targeted with a single, cathodal 200 J application.

4 Nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic, cathodal 50, 100, and 200 J electroporation applications

5 n pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, mid-cycle cathodal activation (0.3 ms) or end-cycle anodal black (

6 l bodies, but not axons, thresholds for both cathodal and anodal stimulation were dependent on the se

7 Both cathodal and anodal stimuli evoked a neural response in

8 emonstrate a pro-inflammatory effect of both cathodal and anodal tDCS, and a polarity-specific migrat

9 tive activated microglia occurred after both cathodal and anodal tDCS.

10 Passive and 2-mA iontophoretic (both cathodal and anodal) transport experiments were conducte

11 n significantly decreased TST, compared with cathodal and sham stimulation.

12 10 healthy subjects before and after anodal, cathodal and sham transcranial direct current stimulatio

13 The influence of current polarity (anodal vs cathodal) and electrode location (left vs right hemisphe

14 approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5 level on

15 ithmetic problems before and after receiving cathodal, anodal or sham tDCS to the left DLPFC.

16 Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent inc

17 dium nitroprusside (SNP; administered with a cathodal charge) are unclear.

18 ibition is neutralized with an extracellular cathodal current pulse, subthreshold auditory stimuli ar

19 h anodal current pulses; in the other cells, cathodal current pulses were used.

20 Cathodal DCS in vitro induces a long-term depression (DC

21 lectrodes before sleep (anodal 'activation', cathodal 'deactivation', and sham stimulation).

22 The cathodal directional cue therefore requires Cdc42 GTP hy

23 loon Analog Risk Task: (1) right anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPF

24 t cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPFC tDCS, or (3) sham tDCS.

25 ion but larger in the leg ipsilateral to the cathodal ear.

26 The cathodal effect on CBI was found to be dependent on stim

27 llary organ electroreceptors excited by weak cathodal electric fields are used for hunting by both ca

28 l tDCS over the right or left DLPFC with the cathodal electrode over the contralateral supraorbital a

29 esults were obtained when the skin under the cathodal electrodes was anaesthetized.

30 an EF and NGs were superimposed in parallel, cathodal electrotaxis along NGs was enhanced compared to

31 establishment in an applied electric field, cathodal emergence of hyphae was lost when either of the

32 Lampreys showed preferences for the cathodal end of the testing aquarium after electric stim

33 Within a range of cathodal fields (-0.1 to -30.0 mu-V/cm), lampreys exhibi

34 left temporal fossa, responses to 1 mA left cathodal galvanic vestibular stimulation were of similar

35 unlike both the sham and anodal groups, the cathodal group exhibited no RIF.

36 n GS-DeltaV(m); (2) for intermediate shocks, cathodal GS-DeltaV(m) became multiphasic, whereas SS-Del

37 ained monophasic; and (3) for strong shocks, cathodal GS-DeltaV(m) became uniformly negative, whereas

38 Cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation to the contralesional

39 We used anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), and sham transcranial direct curr

40 ent 1, participants received sham and active cathodal-inhibitory tDCS over the left occipital cortex,

41 ent 2, participants received sham and active cathodal-inhibitory tDCS over the vertex, to exclude any

42 phere anodal-excitatory and right hemisphere cathodal-inhibitory tDCS, compared to sham stimulation.

43 ed from the sclera in approximately 2h after cathodal iontophoretic delivery of the micellar carrier

44 The greatest cathodal migration in response to a DC electric field wa

45 dc42 in cells overexpressing NIPP1 recovered cathodal migration.

46 movement, it was essential for directional (cathodal) migration in the absence of epidermal growth f

47 When this cathodal (negative) electrode is connected to a regulate

48 cols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the contralesional hemisphere, or bilateral;

49 ing behavior compared with left anodal/right cathodal or sham stimulation.

50 ts received excitatory (anodal), inhibitory (cathodal), or sham stimulation before completing three s

51 le participants completed the tasks, anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS was applied over the right dlPFC.

52 kward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS.

53 , and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulatio

54 rticipants were randomly assigned to anodal, cathodal, or sham-control groups.

55 the angle of migration in relation to anodal-cathodal orientation.

56 y received either anodal over the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with

57 er the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with cathodal over the right DLPFC, or sham stimulation.

58 The cathodal pathway involves GPCR/purinergic signaling and

59 forms with the same tilts for anodal but not cathodal phase 1 at the right ventricular electrode.

60 e membrane lipids asymmetrically, leading to cathodal polarization and enhanced activation of the MAP

61 ting proteins, Rga2 and Bem3, also abolished cathodal polarization, but this was not rescued by Ca(2+

62 ar pH in this scenario led to restoration of cathodal polarization.

63 CS (F(1,9) = 7.15, P < 0.03, mean difference cathodal pre-post: 0.65 muV).

64 dal pulses and positive (depolarized) during cathodal pulses.

65 shift of DBP-actin complexes to an even more cathodal region of the gels.

66 Six-week treatment of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right prefrontal tDCS (twelve 30-minute session

67 The duration of the vulnerable period during cathodal S2 stimulation is longer for an S1 wavefront pr

68 With cathodal search and stimulation, cell body median thresh

69 2 mA) in two experiments: 1 mA tDCS (anodal, cathodal, sham) did not affect any of the TVA parameters

70 ynesthesia can be selectively augmented with cathodal stimulation and attenuated with anodal stimulat

71 Bi-frontal cathodal stimulation did not significantly increase TST,

72 (n = 16) were randomized to either anodal or cathodal stimulation for either 5 or 10 consecutive days

73 that the often reported inhibitory effect of cathodal stimulation in e.g., motor tasks might not exte

74 issue responses during and immediately after cathodal stimulation in the refractory wake of a propaga

75 taneous anodal stimulation of left DLPFC and cathodal stimulation of right DLPFC (bipolar-balanced mo

76 Both anodal and cathodal stimulation of the left pLPFC disrupted trainin

77 ents with the affected hand during and after cathodal stimulation over the affected cortex and simult

78 As predicted, during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over the DLPFC, participants chose

79 g of pictures, anodal tDCS increased whereas cathodal stimulation reduced the number of false alarms

80 account when choosing to exploit or explore: Cathodal stimulation resulted in an increased focus on t

81 The results suggest that cathodal stimulation should produce lower thresholds, mo

82 Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of bo

83 potassium application or on the incremental cathodal stimulation threshold to evoke CSD.

84 CSD frequency by 40 to 80% and increased the cathodal stimulation threshold, whereas acute treatment

85 stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; cathodal stimulation to the contralesional hemisphere; a

86 Unipolar cathodal stimulation was performed from the distal elect

87 rgic (anodal stimulation) and glutamatergic (cathodal stimulation) activity [5, 6].

88 anied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for

89 Compared with sham or cathodal stimulation, anodal tDCS led to significantly b

90 mere add-on effects of anodal and concurrent cathodal stimulation, but rather by complex network modu

91 After 10 days of cathodal stimulation, proliferating NSC increased by app

92 that depended on the Vm magnitude during S2 cathodal stimulation.

93 ulation and decreased cortical arousal after cathodal stimulation.

94 as always larger from the leg on the side of cathodal stimulation.

95 rently downregulating contralateral M1 using cathodal stimulation.

96 auses locally reduced GABA while inhibitory (cathodal) stimulation causes reduced glutamatergic neuro

97 ent was prevented by anodal, but not sham or cathodal, stimulation of the dlPFC.

98 search and stimulation of matching polarity, cathodal stimuli evoked a ganglion cell response at lowe

99 deep myocardial layers 2-6 mm away from the cathodal surface, contrary to theory.

100 threshold pulse-train was used, subthreshold cathodal tACS decreased cortical excitability and anodal

101 n the contralateral DLPFC was modulated with cathodal tCDS, an important decrease in risk taking was

102 were analyzed for the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (compared with sham tDCS).

103 over design, we applied anodal tDCS (atDCS), cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), and sham tDCS (stDCS) over the le

104 in peak amplitude of somatosensory MMN after cathodal tDCS (F(1,9) = 7.15, P < 0.03, mean difference

105 In contrast, activity-reducing cathodal tDCS apparently acted as a noise filter inhibit

106 The findings support exploration of cathodal tDCS as a treatment of neurologic conditions ch

107 ion being demonstrated after both anodal and cathodal tDCS compared to the period during stimulation.

108 nsity range (0.5-2.0 mA) for both anodal and cathodal tDCS in a sham-controlled repeated measures des

109 Most interestingly, only cathodal tDCS increased the number of endogenous NSC in

110 allows upregulation of brain activity, with cathodal tDCS of the left DLPCF, which downregulates act

111 nodal tDCS over the contralateral cortex and cathodal tDCS over the ipsilateral cortex compared with

112 We conclude that cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC might facilitate the r

113 t dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC for 30 minutes, one o

114 We found that cathodal tDCS resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, where

115 ncreased skill learning relative to sham and cathodal tDCS specifically by increasing on-line rather

116 (mediating sensory input) during anodal and cathodal tDCS suggest that tDCS modifies thalamocortical

117 adaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS

118 Participants who received cathodal tDCS were more likely to solve the problems tha

119 ilitatory effects relative to sham while for cathodal tDCS, only 1.0 mA resulted in sustained excitab

120 by the simultaneous application of anodal or cathodal tDCS, respectively, when stimulation of the whi

121 main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tDCS.

122 ent neuroplastic after-effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

123 TD) evoked in the somatosensory cortex after cathodal tDCS.

124 erved in the somatosensory cortex only after cathodal tDCS.

125 jects were divided into groups of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

126 er limb function, especially for inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS applied over contralesional M1.

127 After anodal, but not cathodal, tDCS, we found a reduced item recognition capa

128 excitations, or hot spots (HS), occurring at cathodal tissue surfaces or large coronary vessels.

129 eversed the polarity of hypha emergence from cathodal to anodal, an effect augmented by Ca(2+).

130 the directional response of HeLa cells from cathodal to slightly anodal in a PP1-dependent manner.

131 Cathodal trans-spinal direct current (c-tsDC) stimulatio

132 e impact on plasticity induced by anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

133 20 mg or placebo medication) with anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS),

134 Interestingly, both the inhibitory effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied

135 ulating neuronal excitability with anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over ri

136 if the magnetic S2 was replaced by anodal or cathodal transcranial electrical stimulation.

137 protocols were repeated in combination with cathodal tsDC application.

138 Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase in DiMEP a

139 Increased tidal volume after cathodal tsDCS opens up the perspective of harnessing re

140 CS would result in an enhancement of CBI and cathodal would decrease it, relative to sham stimulation

141 We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal would decrease risk-taking behavior compared wi