ライフサイエンスコーパス: ceiling effect

1 nterrater reliability from the outset (ie, a ceiling effect).

2 changed with fear conditioning, suggesting a ceiling effect.

3 t elevated aggression, which could reflect a ceiling effect.

4 Lidocaine also had a ceiling effect.

5 on with validated AD outcomes, and floor and ceiling effects.

6 To avoid ceiling effects, 2 subgroups of patients with VA worse t

7 WCWs were associated with ceiling effects: 31.6% (study A) and 37.5% (study B) of

8 ted 488 nm AF increased early in life with a ceiling effect after 6 months.

9 in exposure to rifampin without an apparent ceiling effect and a greater estimated fall in bacterial

10 However, ceiling effects and burden of data collection can limit

11 abnormally distributed items and items with ceiling effects and empty response categories.

12 erimetric sensitivities successfully avoided ceiling effects and were highly correlated with absolute

13 d in this in vivo experiment may be due to a ceiling effect, and further experimentation is warranted

14 sociation between PWV and mortality showed a ceiling effect, and PWV was truncated at 12 m/sec.

15 No statements had floor or ceiling effects, and all statements had acceptable test-

16 eliability, frequency analysis for floor and ceiling effects, and Spearman rho for test-retest reliab

17 gnitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest imp

18 an immediate drop in abuse rates, a definite ceiling effect appeared over time, beyond which no furth

19 ng success, but current evidence points to a ceiling effect as newer neurohormonal targets are exploi

20 animals (SHM+SAL), which was likely due to a ceiling effect as performance reached high levels early

21 ns across items, and less than 10% floor and ceiling effects, (b) Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.

22 ime, high levels of patients' morbidity, and ceiling effects because of the high quality of standard

23 CBCM and antidepressants) likely produced a ceiling effect beyond which omega-3 PUFAs, even if effec

24 nfluence student responses, perhaps due to a ceiling effect created by the large number of students w

25 t of less than 0.2 SD provides evidence that ceiling effects do not occur in these trials.

26 This might point to a ceiling effect for enteral protein intake with respect t

27 ne and placebo groups as well as a potential ceiling effect for item recall, both of which likely con

28 termination of age moderation, and potential ceiling effects for the memory measure.

29 les showed good variability, small floor and ceiling effects, high internal consistency (Cronbach's a

30 n (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibited a ceiling effect in almost half of the respondents.

31 enal clearance act additively to produce the ceiling effect in plasma concentrations.

32 gnificantly increase TST, potentially due to ceiling effects in good sleepers.

33 Ceiling effects may occur at late stages, for both scale

34 Quantile regressions suggested that ceiling effects might have modestly biased effect estima

35 However, morphine displayed ceiling effect not seen when it was administered systemi

36 d spatial fidelity of signaling in vivo, the ceiling effect of the allosteric cooperativity which may

37 igher than expected, it is unclear whether a ceiling effect of the high level of psychological interv

38 ur within the CoG and does not result from a ceiling effect on projection neuron firing frequency.

39 uprenorphine-induced antinociception display ceiling effects or are bell shaped, which have been attr

40 None of the measures had notable floor or ceiling effects or missing data.

41 Twenty-six items were excluded due to floor/ceiling effects, poor response rates, or high item-item

42 r warfarin complications, widening the floor ceiling effects that limit the use of TTR and INR variab

43 s may have impact on the treatment response (ceiling effect), there is an ongoing need for research i

44 As a consequence of this ceiling effect, there is no pharmacokinetic justificatio

45 asures and the rehabilitation potential (ie, ceiling) effects they may impose on LVR are important co

46 tial model for BCVA change balancing for the ceiling effect was constructed.