ライフサイエンスコーパス: cell envelope

1 form multi-protein assemblies that span the cell envelope.

2 drugs and other harmful compounds across the cell envelope.

3 lasmic membrane and its transport across the cell envelope.

4 sis of major components of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

5 megadalton nanomachine that spans the entire cell envelope.

6 ntified are known or predicted to affect the cell envelope.

7 as well as the architecture of the bacterial cell envelope.

8 cts the speciation of U(VI) on the bacterial cell envelope.

9 I) surface complexes formed on the bacterial cell envelope.

10 panning the inner and outer membranes of the cell envelope.

11 nts, intercellular lipids, and the cornified cell envelope.

12 glycolipids/lipoglycans of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

13 d the transport of TbpB across the bacterial cell envelope.

14 ecific phenotypes consistent with an altered cell envelope.

15 the presence of key genes suggests a diderm cell envelope.

16 at affect immunomodulatory components of the cell envelope.

17 hat the gene products are distributed in the cell envelope.

18 as for the anchoring of the holdfast to the cell envelope.

19 ers and by changing the composition of their cell envelope.

20 hat mostly target elements in the parasite's cell envelope.

21 partite pumps thus span the entire bacterial cell envelope.

22 cted, restricted localization of TonB in the cell envelope.

23 e to host factors that disrupt the bacterial cell envelope.

24 proteins and coordinated constriction of the cell envelope.

25 esponse because it affects the mycobacterial cell envelope.

26 represents the hallmark of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

27 glycolipid composition of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

28 e study of the biosynthesis of the bacterial cell envelope.

29 c spindle controls cytokinetic events at the cell envelope.

30 ducing disulphide bonds into proteins in the cell envelope.

31 charide is the most exposed component of the cell envelope.

32 erentially to type I cohesins located at the cell envelope.

33 ence factors across their highly hydrophobic cell envelope.

34 ssemble a structure, the pseudopilus, in the cell envelope.

35 s, dramatically modified the M. tuberculosis cell envelope.

36 lationships of the various components of the cell envelope.

37 rowth rate and increased permeability of the cell envelope.

38 e crescentin structure to associate with the cell envelope.

39 rovides a route for LPS transport across the cell envelope.

40 maintenance of OM connections throughout the cell envelope.

41 urbing the assembly of the Corynebacterineae cell envelope.

42 teins serve essential roles in the bacterial cell envelope.

43 are independent of its association with the cell envelope.

44 hich are key components of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

45 the divisome, for proper constriction of the cell envelope.

46 e cytotoxic domain of the colicin across the cell envelope.

47 DNA transfer and that LpqM is located in the cell envelope.

48 tiple genes with putative association to the cell envelope.

49 otics because of its durable and impermeable cell envelope.

50 c levels by mediating drug efflux across the cell envelope.

51 f functional properties of the Gram-positive cell envelope.

52 he mechanical integrity of the Gram-negative cell envelope.

53 Escherichia coli are protected by a complex cell envelope.

54 ria to secrete proteins across their complex cell envelope.

55 glycolipids/lipoglycans of the mycobacterial cell envelope.

56 tiation and incorporation into the cornified cell envelope.

57 elope compared to those with a Gram-negative cell envelope.

58 septal peptidoglycan and constriction of the cell envelope.

59 ridazine, agents that impact M. tuberculosis cell-envelope.

60 the primary and outermost boundary of their cell envelopes.

61 cteria is critical for the assembly of their cell envelopes.

62 ricrin is a major component of the cornified cell envelope, a highly insoluble structure composed of

63 ses that it is important to define bacterial cell envelopes according to whether they have one (monod

64 cible by, and confers resistance to, several cell envelope-acting antibiotics.

65 Cell envelope active compounds, including detergents, ac

66 sigma(W), and sigma(X)) mediate responses to cell envelope-active antibiotics.

67 e proteins, which are transported across the cell envelope after their synthesis.

68 Overall diffusion rates across the cell envelope also occur at similar rates but unexpected

69 nthesis and translocation of peptides to the cell envelope, an essential physiological function.

70 isolate--had changes in the structure of the cell envelope and alterations in membrane permeability a

71 ntly have an uneven distribution through the cell envelope and are only found at one or both poles in

72 l to the integrity of the highly impermeable cell envelope and are potential therapeutic targets.

73 s, which we show is associated with both the cell envelope and cytoplasm.

74 ivo, relating to its capacity to remodel the cell envelope and direct rod formation.

75 flux complex that spans the entire bacterial cell envelope and exports Cu I and Ag I ions.

76 , even such key ones as the structure of the cell envelope and Gram-staining pattern.

77 o export proteins through their multilayered cell envelope and in some cases into host cells.

78 , transcribes genes required to maintain the cell envelope and is activated by conditions that destab

79 promises the integrity of the S. Typhimurium cell envelope and temporarily renders the bacterium avir

80 undergoes energized motion in the bacterial cell envelope and that ExbBD couples this activity to th

81 ese proteins form a complex that bridges the cell envelope and that has been proposed to cause fusion

82 rved the vital respiratory activities of the cell envelope and the cell's viability.

83 TapA is found in discrete foci in the cell envelope and these foci disappear when cells are tr

84 rgy metabolism genes; and an upregulation of cell envelope and transport and binding genes in the mut

85 VirB10 spans the cell envelope and, in response to sensing of ATP energy

86 -encoded proteins, have severely compromised cell envelopes and strong growth defects.

87 the degraded compound, (2) properties of the cell envelope, and (3) the localization of the reacting

88 n filaments, as a component of the cornified cell envelope, and as a source of natural moisturizing f

89 through several morphological stages of the cell envelope, and FtsZ is required but not sufficient t

90 re essential components of the mycobacterial cell envelope, and their biosynthetic pathway is a well

91 re essential components of the mycobacterial cell envelope, and their biosynthetic pathway is one of

92 escentin structure is stably anchored to the cell envelope, and this cellular organization requires M

93 that it plays a critical role in maintaining cell envelope architecture during growth and division.

94 he pAtC58 megaplasmid, ABC transporters, and cell envelope architecture.

95 ial world and to consider alternative diderm cell envelope architectures.

96 nsaturated fatty acids in the B. burgdorferi cell envelope are potential targets for oxidative damage

97 inery needed for NB translocation across the cell envelope are widespread in Gram-negative bacteria,

98 termediary metabolism, and remodeling of the cell envelope as a means of defending spirochetes agains

99 se proteins, final destination is within the cell envelope as either membrane-anchored or cell wall-a

100 rence for necromass in the form of microbial cell envelopes as well as plankton and algal detritus.

101 ate filament-like protein crescentin forms a cell envelope-associated cytoskeletal structure that con

102 ycans using a series of similarly patterned, cell envelope-associated multiprotein systems.

103 ampens proinflammatory responses through the cell envelope-associated serine hydrolase Hip1 (hydrolas

104 maturation, and Ag presentation through the cell envelope-associated serine hydrolase, Hip1.

105 baumannii are far-reaching - from impacts on cell envelope biogenesis and maintenance, bacterial phys

106 e set of genes encoding products involved in cell envelope biogenesis, peptidoglycan remodeling, upta

107 contrast, BsrG strongly interferes with the cell envelope biosynthesis, causes membrane invagination

108 (PAT) not only play a structural role in the cell envelope but also contribute to the ability of M. t

109 ains enhance the structural integrity of the cell envelope by anchoring the beta-barrels within the p

110 monstrate that disruption of the V. cholerae cell envelope by chemical treatment with polymyxin B sim

111 at ultimately undermine the integrity of the cell envelope by depleting the inner membrane of phospho

112 duct of the biosynthesis of the mycolic acid cell envelope by Mtb's antigen 85 complex.

113 and baseplate components, is anchored to the cell envelope by the membrane subcomplex.

114 aptic cleft, and would depolarize other hair cells enveloped by the same neuritic process increasing

115 A plastic cell envelope called pellicle mediates these deformation

116 ynthesize an appendage-like extension of the cell envelope called the stalk.

117 modifications of components of the bacterial cell envelope can enhance resistance to antimicrobial ag

118 or upregulation of genes associated with the cell envelope can modulate vesicle production or remodel

119 tty-acid availability limits growth rate and cell envelope capacity, revealing that fatty-acid synthe

120 model in which fatty acid availability sets cell envelope capacity, which in turn dictates cell size

121 possible role for these genes in regulating cell envelope characteristics in the intracellular envir

122 nger for microorganisms with a Gram-positive cell envelope compared to those with a Gram-negative cel

123 They are related to cell envelope complexes, which are involved in assembly

124 Often the outermost cell envelope component, S-layers serve diverse function

125 lated cell wall teichoic acid, a minor Ldb17 cell envelope component.

126 stem alters the expression of genes encoding cell envelope components and proteins involved in centra

127 ined, whereas genes underlying production of cell envelope components are especially depleted.

128 Both LPS and PG are essential cell envelope components that are synthesized independen

129 ibition potentially prevents damage of large cell envelope components, but not host digestion.

130 fication of specific Gram-negative bacterial cell envelope components, such as capsule, O-antigen and

131 erminant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) cell envelope composition and virulence, but the substra

132 Loss of BamE altered cell envelope composition, leading to slower growth and

133 first time, that despite the discrepancy in cell envelope concentrations of FepA and TonB ( approxim

134 tensive and tightly integrated modulation of cell envelope constituents, chemotaxis/motility machiner

135 The Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell envelope contains a wide variety of lipids and glyc

136 entration of U(VI) adsorbed on the bacterial cell envelope control the kinetics of U(VI) bioreduction

137 n physiology are likely general responses to cell envelope damage and are not unique to T2S mutants.

138 which causes septal defects and catastrophic cell envelope damage.

139 antituberculosis drugs which also target the cell envelope, did not induce the expression of MT2816/R

140 f phage Sf6 is ejected through the bacterial cell envelope during infection and its C-terminal knob i

141 lectron microscopy images of the Caulobacter cell envelope exhibited outer membrane disruption, and c

142 ts that a mechanism for transport across the cell envelope exists, yet knowledge of proteins that may

143 centration causes a pressure drop across the cell envelope, followed by an active recovery.

144 K-rich clay occurs within and exterior to cell envelopes, forming where the supply of Fe had been

145 Chp2 is localized to the cell envelope fraction, consistent with its role in DAT

146 to be equally divided between cytosolic and cell envelope fractions, whereas SecA2 was predominantly

147 mongst bacteria and commonly associated with cell envelope function.

148 Within the cell envelope, Galf residues are linked together to affo

149 e the same synthetic interactions with other cell envelope genes.

150 The biosynthesis of the major cell envelope glycoconjugates of Mycobacterium tuberculo

151 This system, which spans the cell envelope, has only one component with a significant

152 (a member of the LiaFSR system that controls cell envelope homeostasis), from daptomycin-resistant En

153 cteria for specific functions in maintaining cell envelope homeostasis.

154 eins from the bacterial cytoplasm across the cell envelope in a single step.

155 e and mechanical properties of the S. aureus cell envelope in both types of clinically relevant strai

156 between the inner and outer membranes of the cell envelope in Gram-negative bacteria, maintains cell

157 nvolved in the formation of the mycolic acid cell envelope in mycobacteria and provides a previously

158 sponse system modulates the integrity of the cell envelope in part by controlling peptidoglycan amida

159 A biofilm is a complex community of cells enveloped in a self-produced polymeric matrix.

160 also incorporated into the loricrin knockout cell envelope, in addition to the small proline rich pro

161 pumps in the overall flux process across the cell envelope, in this study we have carefully studied b

162 dium iodide (PI), was also applied to assess cell envelope integrity after cryopreservation.

163 amnose polysaccharides that are critical for cell envelope integrity and cell shape and also represen

164 ve PBP1B function in vivo and maintenance of cell envelope integrity during division.

165 eling, which in turn affect cell separation, cell envelope integrity, and vibrioid morphology.

166 antagonistically to IreK and interfere with cell envelope integrity, antimicrobial resistance, and G

167 llar motility, exopolysaccharide production, cell envelope integrity, cell division and normal morpho

168 ies have indicated the importance of ECA for cell envelope integrity, flagellum expression, and resis

169 may function in establishing and maintaining cell envelope integrity, polysaccharide biosynthesis, ir

170 OMPs are implicated in the maintenance of cell envelope integrity.

171 ytoskeleton, and its role beyond maintaining cell envelope integrity.

172 ow the molecular components of the bacterial cell envelope interact with each other to mediate cell w

173 ucial virulence factors across their unusual cell envelope into infected host cells.

174 The bacterial cell envelope is a crucial first line of defense for a s

175 The mycobacterial cell envelope is characterized by the presence of a high

176 Therefore, the planctomycetal cell envelope is considered exceptional and their cell p

177 The outermost surface of this cell envelope is formed by capsular polysaccharides that

178 rning activity, and that localization to the cell envelope is not required for patterning of heterocy

179 stinctive component of the Corynebacterineae cell envelope is the mycolyl-arabinogalactan (mAG) compl

180 hich these lipids are transported across the cell envelope is(are) much less known.

181 s, the stalk, a cylindrical extension of all cell envelope layers, is the least well characterized at

182 important roles in invagination of the three cell envelope layers.

183 into Esx-1 export, nonsense suppression, and cell envelope lipid biogenesis.

184 CR signaling is inhibited by M. tuberculosis cell envelope lipoglycans, such as lipoarabinomannan and

185 The LytR-CpsA-Psr proteins are important for cell envelope maintenance in many Gram-positive species.

186 llular functions including sterol uptake and cell envelope maintenance.

187 We show that the cell envelope material properties do not change after hy

188 ns observed in the DeltaMceG mutant, such as cell envelope modifications, suggest a pleiotropic funct

189 esis, surface protein display, and D-alanine cell envelope modifications.

190 The cell envelope-modifying effects of the hydrolases also l

191 Major M.tb-exposed cell envelope molecules, such as lipomannan (LM), contai

192 partially achieved with exposure to symbiont cell-envelope molecules.

193 This coevolution of the rvh T4SS and cell envelope morphology is probably driven by adaptatio

194 enzymatic release of free mycolic acids from cell envelope mycolates during mycobacterial growth.

195 (two membranes) and monoderm (one membrane) cell envelopes occurred in Bacteria.

196 enome sequencing and characterization of the cell envelope of a clinical pair of vancomycin-resistant

197 volvement in conducting electrons across the cell envelope of a Gram-positive bacterium.

198 e present the first detailed analysis of the cell envelope of an important but neglected member of th

199 the transfer of proteins and DNA across the cell envelope of bacteria.

200 ffective longitudinal Young's modulus of the cell envelope of Escherichia coli (50-150 MPa), Bacillus

201 he physical and mechanical properties of the cell envelope of Escherichia coli are poorly understood.

202 members of the Tol-Pal system that spans the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria and contributes

203 em is a multi-protein complex that spans the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria and promotes the

204 Moreover, the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli

205 The cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria, a structure com

206 complex, a widely conserved component of the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria, is required to

207 y in the outer membrane has long defined the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria.

208 haem acquisition and trafficking across the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria.

209 ully coordinate constriction of a tripartite cell envelope of inner membrane, peptidoglycan (PG), and

210 to determine the thiol concentration on the cell envelope of intact Bacillus subtilis to nanomolar c

211 predominant stress-bearing structure in the cell envelope of most bacteria, and also a potent stimul

212 ein (MOSP) is a prominent constituent of the cell envelope of Treponema denticola (TDE) and one of it

213 Cell envelopes of Gram-negative bacteria consist of an o

214 revealed a structural difference between the cell envelopes of L. interrogans and Leptospira biflexa

215 nt properties on the bacterium in respect of cell envelope organisation and interaction with the envi

216 Cell envelope outer membrane lipids change systematicall

217 n as the "tail needle" likely functions as a cell envelope-penetrating device to promote ejection of

218 NA packaging and implicated in Gram-negative cell envelope penetration.

219 antibiotics, virulence factors, peptides and cell envelope precursors.

220 Cell envelope properties and the tetrachloroethene reduc

221 ty of SLO, DNase, and Streptococcus pyogenes cell envelope protease in vitro.

222 e Psp system in persister cell formation and cell envelope protection in bacterial pathogens and prov

223 Bacterial cell envelope protein (CEP) complexes mediate a range of

224 the streptococcal CXC protease, S. pyogenes cell envelope proteinase, we developed a combination vac

225 functional groups are hypothetical proteins, cell envelope proteins and proteins involved in DNA meta

226 mitigation of stress generated by misfolded cell envelope proteins but promotes expression of genes

227 enzymatic subunits, bind cohesin modules of cell envelope proteins, thereby anchoring the cellulosom

228 coli to alleviate stress caused by misfolded cell envelope proteins.

229 n interesting research material for defining cell-envelope proteins without experimental cell disrupt

230 ation and dynamics of glycolipids within the cell envelope remain poorly understood.

231 Transport across this cell envelope requires a dedicated secretion system for

232 cts of the hydrolases on the M. tuberculosis cell envelope resulted in a significant decrease (60-80%

233 ing reveals a novel role for FtsK in linking cell envelope septation events and yields further eviden

234 If antibiotics cross bacterial cell envelopes slowly to reach their target, there is a

235 functionality.IMPORTANCECaudovirales encode cell envelope-spanning proteins called spanins, which ar

236 B7 lipoprotein, and VirB9 interact to form a cell envelope-spanning structural scaffold termed the "c

237 a dynamic bacteriophage-like structure and a cell-envelope-spanning membrane-associated assembly.

238 cross-linked proteins, which together confer cell envelope stability.

239 125 DNA bar-coded mutants to identify novel cell envelope stress and acute acid shock phenotypes ass

240 is important for survival under a number of cell envelope stress conditions and in gastrointestinal

241 t in addition to anaerobiosis, adaptation to cell envelope stress is a critical requirement for E. co

242 se cells display paradoxically low levels of cell envelope stress response activity.

243 LiaR is a 'master regulator' of the cell envelope stress response in enterococci and many ot

244 MprAB as part of an evolutionarily conserved cell envelope stress response network and demonstrate th

245 l, these data demonstrate that RpoE is a key cell envelope stress response regulator and, similar to

246 k protein (Psp) system is a highly conserved cell envelope stress response required for virulence in

247 gnal transduction system, which controls the cell envelope stress response system in other gram-negat

248 encodes a homolog of the CpxRA two-component cell envelope stress response system originally characte

249 Although several cell envelope stress response systems have been well des

250 wall and membrane by activating an intricate cell envelope stress response.

251 ling expression of genes not involved in the cell envelope stress response.

252 predicted to encode factors involved in the cell envelope stress response.

253 ss, indicating OmpU is not essential for the cell envelope stress responses or RpoE function.

254 gest that YtrA is an additional regulator of cell envelope stress responses.

255 ECF factors typically respond to cell wall/cell envelope stress, iron levels, and the oxidation sta

256 Following exposure to cell envelope stress, proteins present in the extracytop

257 The analogue also upregulated cell envelope stress-inducible promoters piniBAC and pcl

258 at Amj is expressed under the control of the cell envelope stress-response transcription factor sigma

259 h is activated by and mediates resistance to cell envelope stress.

260 rculosis grown in the absence or presence of cell envelope stress.

261 ignal transduction system that is induced by cell envelope stress.

262 extensive regulon involved in responding to cell envelope stresses.

263 cated in resistance to antibiotics and other cell envelope stressors mediated, in part, by regulation

264 s enhance our understanding of mycobacterial cell envelope structure and dynamics and have implicatio

265 r Tol-Pal complex is thus a key component of cell envelope structure and function, mediating OM const

266 Together, sigma(M) and sigma(X) regulate cell envelope structure to decrease access of nisin to i

267 With functions that range from cell envelope structure to signal transduction and trans

268 rvhB9b), likely a result of modifications to cell envelope structure.

269 the system indicate adaptation to different cell envelope structures, bacterial lifestyles, and/or b

270 t into the evolutionary origins of primitive cell envelope structures, of which the S-layer is consid

271 encing, transcriptomics, ultrastructure, and cell envelope studies were carried out on two relatively

272 e pharmaceutical antibiotics that act on the cell envelope such as vancomycin and daptomycin.

273 coordinated invagination of the multilayered cell envelope such that each daughter receives an intact

274 After blocking the bacterial cell envelope sulfhydryl sites using a qBBr treatment, t

275 tressors mediated, in part, by regulation of cell envelope synthesis and modification enzymes.

276 rease the resistance of B. subtilis to other cell envelope-targeted antimicrobial agents, indicating

277 centration causes a pressure drop across the cell envelope that drives changes in cell shape, such as

278 otected by an unusual and highly impermeable cell envelope that is critically important for the succe

279 comprises the S-layer (surface layer of the cell envelope that is external to the outer membrane), h

280 of proteins located in the Escherichia coli cell envelope that transduces energy and contributes to

281 aerobiales are remnants of an ancient diderm cell envelope that was present in the ancestor of the Fi

282 r adaptive success is linked to their unique cell envelopes that are extremely resistant to chemical

283 urface-associated carbohydrates of the Ldb17 cell envelope: the Gro3P decoration of the major surface

284 encoding proteins that are localized to the cell envelope; these include metallopeptidases, multidru

285 volved in the stress-sensing response of the cell envelope to antibiotics.

286 n of cytoplasmic volume to the growth of the cell envelope to preserve cellular integrity.

287 TolB to facilitate translocation through the cell envelope to reach their cytotoxic site of action.

288 ar bacterial lifestyle, dispersal method, or cell envelope type.

289 This review surveys the diversity of cell envelope types present in these phyla and emphasise

290 s help to clarify fundamental differences in cell envelope ultrastructure between spirochetes and gra

291 ir localization within the loricrin knockout cell envelope via immunoelectron microscopy.

292 To enter cells, enveloped viruses use fusion-mediating glycoprote

293 rs of the Firmicutes with Gram-negative-type cell envelopes, was recently moved from Clostridia to a

294 recognized the peptide-target complex in the cell envelope, we next analyzed substrate binding by the

295 cnes, and complete breaches in the bacterial cell envelope were observed.

296 e to SDS and had unique protrusions from its cell envelope when examined by cryo-electron tomography,

297 at HtaA is associated predominantly with the cell envelope when the organism is grown in minimal medi

298 247 may exert some of its effects within the cell envelope whereas other activities occur in the cyto

299 of periplasmic flagella and the surrounding cell envelope, which enable this enigmatic bacterium to

300 ructions provided detailed structures of the cell envelope, which is significantly different from tha