ライフサイエンスコーパス: cell isolation

1 d chromatin-binding proteins in vivo without cell isolation.

2 structures inside a microfluidic channel for cell isolation.

3 llected and used for histologic analysis and cell isolation.

4 ogenic-specific Cre-loxP lineage marking for cell isolation.

5 eld (100%), and viability (94-100%) for rare cell isolation.

6 the cancer target HER2 (ErbB2) for magnetic cell isolation.

7 finity, improving antibody affinity improved cell isolation.

8 that enables cell-specific profiling without cell isolation.

9 Nestin prevents its use for prospective live cell isolation.

10 d as an alternative to antibodies for cancer cell isolation.

11 ny of the limitations of current methods for cell isolation.

12 y robust surface marker profile for CRC stem cell isolation.

13 r the utilization of frozen tissues for stem cell isolation.

14 rming the basis for improved methods of stem cell isolation.

15 genome expression analysis, histology, and T-cell isolation.

16 samples that avoids the need for mononuclear cell isolation.

17 minimize development of LPS tolerance during cell isolation.

18 stocyst development (62%) and embryonic stem cell isolation (38%) rates were comparable to controls.

19 steps for SOP implementation, namely timely cell isolation after sampling, use of appropriate lysis

20 als with 0.5% (R)-alpha-lipoic acid prior to cell isolation almost completely reversed the age-associ

21 at cord blood was a superior source for Treg-cell isolation and cell line generation compared with ad

22 ells and could be applied to facilitate stem cell isolation and characterization.

23 imitation have primarily consisted of cancer cell isolation and culture directly from human PC specim

24 e develop a novel program for semi-automated cell isolation and culture equipment to permit complete

25 Establish a robust cardiac stem cell isolation and culture protocol to consistently gene

26 Following cell isolation and culture, 63 +/- 23% of the isolated P

27 However, lack of proper cell isolation and enrichment techniques hinder downstre

28 Advances in hematopoietic stem cell isolation and ex vivo manipulation has kept pace wi

29 and human liver and pancreas organoids, from cell isolation and long-term expansion to genetic manipu

30 extensive sample preparation, except for the cell isolation and matrix application.

31 Here, using four-way liver cell isolation and parallel comparison of candidate anti

32 two key steps in genetic testing procedures, cell isolation and PCR and promises to be adaptable for

33 s in and out of an 8--9 microL dual-purpose (cell isolation and PCR) glass-silicon microchip.

34 y steps in the analytical procedure, namely, cell isolation and PCR.

35 silicone molds, microfluidic patterning and cell isolation and seeding takes approximately 7 days.

36 Approximately 5-12 d after cell isolation and seeding, preparations develop electri

37 ars, the implementation of high-throughput B-cell isolation and sequencing assays and of screening me

38 human tissues for subsequent post-natal stem cell isolation and tissue regeneration.

39 Cell isolation and transplant studies demonstrated CD62L

40 s 5 kDa smaller than protein from epithelial cells; isolation and sequencing of the monocyte CADTK cD

41 n and preservation in cardiac myocytes after cell isolation are not well documented.

42 Ordered single-cell isolation arrays allow for high-density microscopic

43 ables automated quantitation and prospective cell isolation as a function of chromatin accessibility,

44 olymerization did not have a major effect on cell isolation, but isolation was inhibited by cholester

45 ESCs) has been extensively studied since the cells' isolation, but the necessity for cell-secreted fa

46 application for evaluating the efficiency of cell isolation by collagenases.

47 hair cells, we developed a protocol for hair cell isolation by FACS.

48 onmental microbes via high-throughput single-cell isolation by FACS.

49 Clara cell isolation by flow cytometry sorting is a useful met

50 Direct comparisons with cell isolation by fluorescence-activated cell sorting an

51 Cell isolation can be completed in less than 4 h.

52 les and overview its applications for single cell isolation, cell focusing and sorting, cell washing

53 The protocol describes gill cell isolation, cultured gill epithelium formation, main

54 ignificantly improve the sensitivity of rare cell isolation devices by increasing the processed whole

55 e insights should guide future approaches to cell isolation, either magnetically or using other means

56 generation of embryoid bodies or prospective cell isolation, entails four stages with different cultu

57 these findings for vaccine development and T cell isolation/enumeration are discussed.

58 l differentiation using a three-step system (cell isolation/expansion/differentiation).

59 Cell isolation experiments from psoriatic tissue showed

60 The muscle specimen was shipped to a cell isolation facility where myoblasts were isolated an

61 apture microdissection instrument for single-cell isolation, followed by reverse transcription via Mo

62 ardiography and peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation for expression profiling and 112 patients

63 ntages of nanoscale reagents in molecule and cell isolations for both research and clinical applicati

64 Current methods for cell isolation from complex samples are largely dependen

65 osis and have proved to be very effective in cell isolation from minimally processed primary tissue.

66 Population analyses rely on cell isolation from whole organs, and interpretation is

67 Microfluidic systems for affinity-based cell isolation have emerged as a promising approach for

68 Kupffer cell isolation in IL-6(-/-) females receiving IL-6(+/+)

69 on of zIAA8 is up-regulated within 3 h after cell isolation in inductive medium, indicating that cell

70 ike cell markers and suitable procedures for cell isolation in order that the correct populations are

71 and are widely employed for biomolecule and cell isolations in research laboratories, clinical diagn

72 Advances in cell isolation, in vitro culture techniques, and genetic

73 Successful single-cell isolation is a primary step for subsequent chemical

74 Conventional single-cell isolation methods often encounter operational compl

75 (1) Islet-cell isolation: miniature swine underwent either partial

76 onsequence of tissue injury sustained during cell isolation or organ retrieval and ischemia reperfusi

77 man whole blood (<3 microL) in an integrated cell isolation--PCR microchip containing a series of 3.5

78 We have now developed a simple cell isolation procedure to obtain and culture viable bi

79 ation systems demonstrated that the microcup cell isolation procedure yielded higher purity, yield, a

80 As only one mouse is needed for each cell isolation procedure, this protocol will be particul

81 d induction of stress-inducible genes during cell isolation procedures.

82 Leukapheresis followed by a two-step cell isolation process yielded a CD34+ Thy-1+ cell popul

83 A refined cell isolation protocol and an improved flow cytometry a

84 The embryo cell isolation protocol can be completed in 5-6 h.

85 Our cell isolation protocol employed human fetal calvaria ti

86 D34 and CD45, we have developed a rapid oval cell isolation protocol with high yields of greater than

87 in vitro drug testing, cryopreservation, and cell isolation/purification.

88 itations, especially the lack of suture stem cell isolation, reconstruction of large craniofacial bon

89 pture, efficient cellular manipulation, rare-cell isolation, selective analytical separation of biolo

90 However, current methods for single cell isolation struggle to phenotypically differentiate

91 an donor bone marrow using an immunomagnetic cell isolation system.

92 The proposed target cell isolation technique can provide a practical means t

93 lls from 36 of 37 human hearts using primary cell isolation techniques and magnetic cell sorting tech

94 After cell isolation, the number of surface-sarcolemmal caveol

95 The entire process, from primary cell isolation to establishment of an immortal cell line

96 The overall procedure from T-cell isolation to RV transduction takes 2 d, and enrichm

97 avoiding transcriptional changes induced by cell isolation trauma, as well as the identification of

98 Cell isolation via antibody-targeted magnetic beads is a

99 s using uterine artery Doppler RI before dNK cell isolation, we have identified that impaired dNK-tro

100 ol (despite the long and invasive process of cell isolation) when metabolic rate at the physiological