ライフサイエンスコーパス: cemento-enamel junction

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 flaps were replaced slightly coronal to the cemento-enamel junction.

2 number of teeth with alveolar bone crest to cemento-enamel junction (ABC-CEJ) distances >2 mm.

3 Cemento-enamel junction alveolar crest measurements were

4 bjective was to test the association between cemento-enamel junction, alveolar-crest distance (CEJ-AC

5 bitewing radiographs were taken to determine cemento-enamel junction-alveolar crest distances (alveol

6 nd IL-10 analysis, and distances between the cemento-enamel junction and alveolar bone crest were eva

7 Interradicular distance (IRD) at the cemento-enamel junction and alveolar bone levels at base

8 ABL was calculated by measuring cemento-enamel junction and alveolar crest distance.

9 ne dental problem, is often initiated at the cemento-enamel junction and hence is called cat 'neck' l

10 al attachment level > or =4 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction and probing depth > or =4 mm.

11 m natural teeth and dental implants by using cemento-enamel junction and the actual distance between

12 rmined the bucco-lingual measurements of the cemento-enamel junction and the mesial and distal roots

13 Margin cracks appeared to originate from the cemento-enamel junction, and traversed the tooth wall ad

14 This study measures the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar bone crest an

15 The distances between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar process (AP)

16 were used to assess the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar bone leve

17 the distribution of the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar bone leve

18 surface with its coronal edge as near to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) as possible.

19 gingival margin was at or within 1 mm of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) for 58% of the sites treat

20 Although mean GM location was coronal to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) in both groups, gingival m

21 ugh the buccal mucosa: 1) 6 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) of the maxillary fourth pr

22 tal soft tissue (SST); surgical distances of cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to bone crest (CEJ-BC), CE

23 estimated by measuring the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest

24 was estimated by measuring the distance from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar bone crest

25 ificant difference for the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (P =

26 ss of the harvested ramus graft and from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the EOR, the CEJ to the

27 Depth of recession and width of GR below the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) was also determined.

28 evaluated, and measured from cusp tip to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), CEJ to root apex, and cus

29 n on the facial surface as measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).

30 PD [mm]) and the free gingival margin to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ-GM [mm]) were obtained in a

31 d the 26%-28% 3D RSA bone loss apical to the cemento-enamel junction corresponded to a CRR of 1:1, re

32 Cemento-enamel junction distances (ACH) were measured on

33 terior teeth: gingival index, probing depth, cemento-enamel junction-gingival margin distance (attach

34 alipers: 1) furcation entrance/roof (FE); 2) cemento-enamel junction level (CEJ); 3) mesial root widt

35 ce from the lingual nerve to the mid-lingual cemento-enamel junctions of mandibular molars and premol

36 The cemento-enamel junctions of the adjacent teeth were used

37 ured including the lengths from the proximal cemento-enamel junction (pCEJ) to apical contact point (

38 radiographic bone fill as measured from the cemento-enamel junction to base of bony defect and 2) ch

39 ined as >/=30% of sites with a distance from cemento-enamel junction to bone of >/=5 mm, were 11.2% i

40 robing site measurements) were made from the cemento-enamel junction to the alveolar crest.

41 re measured, including: 1) distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the bone crest; 2) tooth torq

42 mean bone loss of 1.01 +/- 0.06 mm from the cemento-enamel junction, whereas all doses of SIM/SIM-mP

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。