ライフサイエンスコーパス: cervical spine

1 pressure and body motion at the level of the cervical spine.

2 fracture after a penetration gunshot to the cervical spine.

3 ped progressive dwarfism and lordosis of the cervical spine.

4 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine.

5 men, and a head phantom containing the upper cervical spine.

6 sis on acute management and clearance of the cervical spine.

7 synthesis in imaging of the breast and upper cervical spine.

8 grades 3-4), 11 had abnormal findings in the cervical spine, 16 in the thoracic spine, and 23 patient

9 NC+ patients had isolated head (37) or high cervical spine (3) injury, and 11 of that group (27.5%)

10 cal to arriving at the correct diagnosis for cervical spine abnormalities.

11 69 patients who underwent radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

12 bly the patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

13 nt surgery for rheumatoid involvement of the cervical spine, after development of objective signs of

14 recalled-echo sequences for MR evaluation of cervical spine anatomy and abnormalities.

15 t spastic gait caused by misalignment of the cervical spine and die because of starvation.

16 rst 20 years of the disease, after which the cervical spine and lumbar spine were equally involved.

17 d as a well-circumscribed fatty area between cervical spine and posterior muscles.

18 Cervical spine and spinal cord injuries are rare in pedi

19 limited evidence of specific changes to the cervical spine and the surrounding tissues in patients w

20 decrease estimates of activity of the upper cervical spine, and the lower cervical/upper thoracic ve

21 EMG, videofluoroscopic swallow and CT of the cervical spine, and were selected for surgery on the bas

22 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical spine anomalies in paediatric patients are diff

23 The main types of cervical spine anomalies seen in paediatric patients are

24 spiratory insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, and cervical spine anomalies.

25 s of 0.83-0.89 suggested that the lumbar and cervical spine BASRI scores were disease specific.

26 findings missed at autopsy (fracture of the cervical spine, bullet fragments in the posterior area o

27 SCIWORA lesions are found mainly in the cervical spine but can also be seen, although much less

28 d scouting and scanning body segments (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) individually

29 The lack of cervical spine clearance and inability to extend the nec

30 safely performed in trauma patients without cervical spine clearance and neck extension, including p

31 Cervical spine clearance in obtunded adults after blunt

32 Cervical spine clearance protocols are controversial for

33 common and resulted in significant delays to cervical spine clearance.

34 the radiographic or clinical status of their cervical spine: cleared and noncleared.

35 A missed cervical spine (CS) injury can have devastating conseque

36 a, readers 2 and 3 reviewed in consensus the cervical spine CT (reference for fracture and luxation)

37 trauma aged 18 years and older who underwent cervical spine CT scans from March 2014 to March 2015 at

38 hanced brain CT in pediatric patients, adult cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C

39 observed for pediatric unenhanced brain CT, cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C

40 least 20 minutes after initial brain and/or cervical spine CT, and no evidence of bodily injury at p

41 ormone deficiency and also abnormal neck and cervical spine development.

42 seen with scalp dysesthesia, 14 patients had cervical spine disease confirmed by imaging.

43 calp aponeurosis secondary to the underlying cervical spine disease may lead to the symptoms of scalp

44 packages was generally very good, except for cervical spine examinations where one software package d

45 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine, four reviews were published concerning u

46 were reviewed for 20 potential predictors of cervical spine fracture in this retrospective case-contr

47 Predictors of cervical spine fracture included severe head injury (adj

48 Absolute cervical spine fracture probabilities were calculated by

49 ife-threatening condition was diagnosed (eg, cervical spine fracture, skull fracture, intracranial bl

50 can be used to determine the probability of cervical spine fracture.

51 rauma patients at high and moderate risk for cervical spine fracture.

52 considered: high, moderate, and low risk for cervical spine fracture.

53 gression was used to determine predictors of cervical spine fracture.

54 groups with a wide range of probabilities of cervical spine fracture.

55 lunt trauma patients 65 years and older with cervical spine fractures and on randomly selected contro

56 Radiographs of 97 patients with acute cervical spine fractures were matched with those of 92 p

57 traumatized or soiled airways, patients with cervical spine fractures, and patients who have undergon

58 reened population included all patients with cervical spine fractures, LeFort II or III facial fractu

59 Of the 13 patients with cervical spine fractures, six patients had been stabiliz

60 sisted of 28 patients, 13 of which had known cervical spine fractures; 27 noncleared patients were ma

61 to undergo splenectomy for Felty's syndrome, cervical spine fusion for myelopathy, or total knee arth

62 For anterior cervical spine fusion, rhBMP-2 was associated with incre

63 t headache pathogenesis and how a history of cervical spine hypermobility may be a needed predisposin

64 nts with scalp dysesthesia also had abnormal cervical spine images.

65 In upper cervical spine imaging, digital circular tomosynthesis e

66 prehospital setting to evaluate the need for cervical spine immobilization in children, regardless of

67 Half (316 [50.0%]) were admitted with cervical spine immobilization, and 38 (12%) of these wer

68 patients (n = 15 lesions), in the lumbar or cervical spine in 9 patients (n = 22 lesions), and in pe

69 rmal multi-detector row CT scan of the total cervical spine in obtunded and/or "unreliable" patients

70 Due to the unique anatomy of the cervical spine in paediatric patients, radiographic inte

71 There is a consensus on how to clear the cervical spine in patients who are alert, but in patient

72 natomic variations in the radiography of the cervical spine in small infants and children can help av

73 n, involving the lumbar spine in one and the cervical spine in the other, are described.

74 alled-echo sequence for MR evaluation of the cervical spine in the transverse plane.

75 and the inability to "clinically" clear the cervical spine in young children.

76 tion and CT scan findings were evaluated for cervical spine injuries (CSI) and the incidence of misse

77 Cervical spine injuries occur in 2-5% of blunt trauma pa

78 approximately three times the rate of acute cervical spine injuries reported in the literature.

79 Cervical spine injuries were present in 71% of patients,

80 een advocated, particularly in patients with cervical spine injuries, the appropriate therapy of lesi

81 of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine injuries.

82 Because clinicians fear missing occult cervical-spine injuries, they obtain cervical radiograph

83 ed research regarding the diagnosis of blunt cervical spine injury (CSI) in children.

84 (OR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.42-27.27; P = .02), and cervical spine injury (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.41-13.50; P =

85 obtunded patients with blunt trauma in whom cervical spine injury could not be excluded with physica

86 f intubation of the patient with a potential cervical spine injury fails, or appropriate experienced

87 Probability of cervical spine injury was determined by reviewing emerge

88 no complications in the seven patients with cervical spine injury who were stabilized with a cervica

89 ng to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury.

90 ion appears to be safe in the patient with a cervical spine injury.

91 and 100% (366 of 366 patients) for unstable cervical spine injury.

92 tified all but 8 of the 818 patients who had cervical-spine injury (sensitivity, 99.0 percent [95 per

93 MRI showed incidence rates of 0% to 1.5% for cervical spine instability (16 studies; 1799 patients),

94 Upper cervical spine instability has the most potential for mo

95 trauma, neck hematoma, laryngeal disruption, cervical spine instability, and head injury all combine

96 is needed because of the associated risk of cervical spine instability.

97 CPPD crystal deposition in the cervical spine is seen with a higher prevalence than pre

98 limited to only one of the three columns of cervical spine ligament support.

99 in 354 of the 366 patients and negative for cervical spine ligamentous injury in 362.

100 ve sleep apnea syndrome, reduced mobility of cervical spine, limited mouth opening); pathology (sever

101 Radiographs of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, and hips were scor

102 y, two blinded raters independently examined cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) images of 140 hea

103 Gunshot wounds to the cervical spine most frequently concur with serious injur

104 oscope, the Airtraq and Airwayscope diminish cervical spine motion during elective orotracheal intuba

105 juries on the basis of findings at follow-up cervical spine MR imaging.

106 Complete cervical spine MR studies were obtained to evaluate soft

107 The patients had previously undergone total cervical spine multi-detector row CT with normal finding

108 In 513 consecutive patients, CT scans of the cervical spine obtained for acute trauma were retrospect

109 ormed to exclude soft-tissue injuries in the cervical spine of obtunded patients with blunt trauma in

110 ent and expected uniform spine uptake in the cervical spines of normal patients.

111 oints and, similarly, grading the lumbar and cervical spine on a scale of 0-4 (for normal, suspicious

112 5 patients (29%) had undergone biopsy of the cervical spine or paraspinal soft tissue.

113 xtension, including patients with stabilized cervical spine or spinal cord injury.

114 d us to consider SPECT for the management of cervical spine pain.

115 kidney disease, congestive heart failure, or cervical-spine pain and radiculopathy.

116 at computed tomography (CT) of an injury of cervical spine posterior ligamentous complex (PLC).

117 cores of disc degeneration in the lumbar and cervical spine, psychological distress as assessed by th

118 lete physical and neurologic examination and cervical spine radiographs.

119 esource costs of the technical components of cervical spine radiography varied with patient probabili

120 The average technical resource cost for cervical spine radiography was $49.60.

121 nsecutive patients with trauma who underwent cervical spine radiography.

122 Cervical spine reconstructions without attenuation corre

123 mGy x cm (head scans), 5.4 microSv/mGy x cm (cervical spine scans), and 18 microSv/mGy x cm (body sca

124 fectiveness of radiography and CT as primary cervical spine screening modalities in trauma patients.

125 CT is the preferred cervical spine screening modality in trauma patients at

126 Current trauma guidelines dictate that the cervical spine should not be cleared in intoxicated pati

127 Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P

128 indicate that it is preferred for assessing cervical spine stability in obtunded blunt trauma patien

129 mic fluoroscopic or MR imaging assessment of cervical spine stability in patients who sustained blunt

130 al spinal cord in patients with degenerative cervical spine stenosis and symptomatic cervical myelopa

131 ecreases in the rates of hospitalization for cervical spine surgery or total knee arthroplasty (prima

132 Anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery.

133 trauma patients underwent MR imaging of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine inju

134 graphs (sacroiliac joints, lumbar spine, and cervical spine) took 30 seconds.

135 Then, in 85 patients with suspicion of cervical spine trauma following high-velocity trauma, re

136 w-velocity trauma and have acute head and/or cervical spine trauma in the absence of evidence of bodi

137 ng criteria: CT-documented acute head and/or cervical spine trauma, CT CAP performed at least 20 minu

138 some clinicians will not clear the patient's cervical spine until full recovery of consciousness.

139 t improvement in the uniformity of estimated cervical spine uptake in normal patients, compared with

140 ive accuracy can be obtained in SPECT of the cervical spine using this simple attenuation estimate.

141 Cervical spine vertebroplasty from anterolateral access

142 Bone age of hand, wrist and cervical spine was assessed.

143 Multi-detector row CT of the cervical spine was performed with a four- or 16-detector

144 eers, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spine was performed with a magnetization transf

145 MR imaging of the cervical spine was performed with transverse gradient-ec

146 complement the diagnostics, a CT scan of the cervical spine was performed; the scan confirmed the dia

147 pruritus, magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine with and without contrast was performed,

148 derwent 1.5-T MR imaging examinations of the cervical spine within 48 hours after a motor vehicle acc