戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pressure and body motion at the level of the cervical spine.
2  fracture after a penetration gunshot to the cervical spine.
3 ped progressive dwarfism and lordosis of the cervical spine.
4 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine.
5 men, and a head phantom containing the upper cervical spine.
6 sis on acute management and clearance of the cervical spine.
7 synthesis in imaging of the breast and upper cervical spine.
8 grades 3-4), 11 had abnormal findings in the cervical spine, 16 in the thoracic spine, and 23 patient
9  NC+ patients had isolated head (37) or high cervical spine (3) injury, and 11 of that group (27.5%)
10 cal to arriving at the correct diagnosis for cervical spine abnormalities.
11 69 patients who underwent radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.
12 bly the patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.
13 nt surgery for rheumatoid involvement of the cervical spine, after development of objective signs of
14 recalled-echo sequences for MR evaluation of cervical spine anatomy and abnormalities.
15 t spastic gait caused by misalignment of the cervical spine and die because of starvation.
16 rst 20 years of the disease, after which the cervical spine and lumbar spine were equally involved.
17 d as a well-circumscribed fatty area between cervical spine and posterior muscles.
18                                              Cervical spine and spinal cord injuries are rare in pedi
19  limited evidence of specific changes to the cervical spine and the surrounding tissues in patients w
20  decrease estimates of activity of the upper cervical spine, and the lower cervical/upper thoracic ve
21 EMG, videofluoroscopic swallow and CT of the cervical spine, and were selected for surgery on the bas
22                           PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical spine anomalies in paediatric patients are diff
23                            The main types of cervical spine anomalies seen in paediatric patients are
24 spiratory insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, and cervical spine anomalies.
25 s of 0.83-0.89 suggested that the lumbar and cervical spine BASRI scores were disease specific.
26  findings missed at autopsy (fracture of the cervical spine, bullet fragments in the posterior area o
27      SCIWORA lesions are found mainly in the cervical spine but can also be seen, although much less
28 d scouting and scanning body segments (head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) individually
29                                  The lack of cervical spine clearance and inability to extend the nec
30  safely performed in trauma patients without cervical spine clearance and neck extension, including p
31                                              Cervical spine clearance in obtunded adults after blunt
32                                              Cervical spine clearance protocols are controversial for
33 common and resulted in significant delays to cervical spine clearance.
34 the radiographic or clinical status of their cervical spine: cleared and noncleared.
35                                     A missed cervical spine (CS) injury can have devastating conseque
36 a, readers 2 and 3 reviewed in consensus the cervical spine CT (reference for fracture and luxation)
37 trauma aged 18 years and older who underwent cervical spine CT scans from March 2014 to March 2015 at
38 hanced brain CT in pediatric patients, adult cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C
39  observed for pediatric unenhanced brain CT, cervical spine CT, and adult cervical and intracranial C
40  least 20 minutes after initial brain and/or cervical spine CT, and no evidence of bodily injury at p
41 ormone deficiency and also abnormal neck and cervical spine development.
42 seen with scalp dysesthesia, 14 patients had cervical spine disease confirmed by imaging.
43 calp aponeurosis secondary to the underlying cervical spine disease may lead to the symptoms of scalp
44 packages was generally very good, except for cervical spine examinations where one software package d
45 hiplash and degenerative disturbances of the cervical spine, four reviews were published concerning u
46 were reviewed for 20 potential predictors of cervical spine fracture in this retrospective case-contr
47                                Predictors of cervical spine fracture included severe head injury (adj
48                                     Absolute cervical spine fracture probabilities were calculated by
49 ife-threatening condition was diagnosed (eg, cervical spine fracture, skull fracture, intracranial bl
50  can be used to determine the probability of cervical spine fracture.
51 rauma patients at high and moderate risk for cervical spine fracture.
52 considered: high, moderate, and low risk for cervical spine fracture.
53 gression was used to determine predictors of cervical spine fracture.
54 groups with a wide range of probabilities of cervical spine fracture.
55 lunt trauma patients 65 years and older with cervical spine fractures and on randomly selected contro
56        Radiographs of 97 patients with acute cervical spine fractures were matched with those of 92 p
57 traumatized or soiled airways, patients with cervical spine fractures, and patients who have undergon
58 reened population included all patients with cervical spine fractures, LeFort II or III facial fractu
59                      Of the 13 patients with cervical spine fractures, six patients had been stabiliz
60 sisted of 28 patients, 13 of which had known cervical spine fractures; 27 noncleared patients were ma
61 to undergo splenectomy for Felty's syndrome, cervical spine fusion for myelopathy, or total knee arth
62                                 For anterior cervical spine fusion, rhBMP-2 was associated with incre
63 t headache pathogenesis and how a history of cervical spine hypermobility may be a needed predisposin
64 nts with scalp dysesthesia also had abnormal cervical spine images.
65                                     In upper cervical spine imaging, digital circular tomosynthesis e
66 prehospital setting to evaluate the need for cervical spine immobilization in children, regardless of
67        Half (316 [50.0%]) were admitted with cervical spine immobilization, and 38 (12%) of these wer
68  patients (n = 15 lesions), in the lumbar or cervical spine in 9 patients (n = 22 lesions), and in pe
69 rmal multi-detector row CT scan of the total cervical spine in obtunded and/or "unreliable" patients
70             Due to the unique anatomy of the cervical spine in paediatric patients, radiographic inte
71     There is a consensus on how to clear the cervical spine in patients who are alert, but in patient
72 natomic variations in the radiography of the cervical spine in small infants and children can help av
73 n, involving the lumbar spine in one and the cervical spine in the other, are described.
74 alled-echo sequence for MR evaluation of the cervical spine in the transverse plane.
75  and the inability to "clinically" clear the cervical spine in young children.
76 tion and CT scan findings were evaluated for cervical spine injuries (CSI) and the incidence of misse
77                                              Cervical spine injuries occur in 2-5% of blunt trauma pa
78  approximately three times the rate of acute cervical spine injuries reported in the literature.
79                                              Cervical spine injuries were present in 71% of patients,
80 een advocated, particularly in patients with cervical spine injuries, the appropriate therapy of lesi
81  of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine injuries.
82       Because clinicians fear missing occult cervical-spine injuries, they obtain cervical radiograph
83 ed research regarding the diagnosis of blunt cervical spine injury (CSI) in children.
84 (OR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.42-27.27; P = .02), and cervical spine injury (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.41-13.50; P =
85  obtunded patients with blunt trauma in whom cervical spine injury could not be excluded with physica
86 f intubation of the patient with a potential cervical spine injury fails, or appropriate experienced
87                               Probability of cervical spine injury was determined by reviewing emerge
88  no complications in the seven patients with cervical spine injury who were stabilized with a cervica
89 ng to a level 1 trauma center with suspected cervical spine injury.
90 ion appears to be safe in the patient with a cervical spine injury.
91  and 100% (366 of 366 patients) for unstable cervical spine injury.
92 tified all but 8 of the 818 patients who had cervical-spine injury (sensitivity, 99.0 percent [95 per
93 MRI showed incidence rates of 0% to 1.5% for cervical spine instability (16 studies; 1799 patients),
94                                        Upper cervical spine instability has the most potential for mo
95 trauma, neck hematoma, laryngeal disruption, cervical spine instability, and head injury all combine
96  is needed because of the associated risk of cervical spine instability.
97               CPPD crystal deposition in the cervical spine is seen with a higher prevalence than pre
98  limited to only one of the three columns of cervical spine ligament support.
99  in 354 of the 366 patients and negative for cervical spine ligamentous injury in 362.
100 ve sleep apnea syndrome, reduced mobility of cervical spine, limited mouth opening); pathology (sever
101                           Radiographs of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, and hips were scor
102 y, two blinded raters independently examined cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) images of 140 hea
103                        Gunshot wounds to the cervical spine most frequently concur with serious injur
104 oscope, the Airtraq and Airwayscope diminish cervical spine motion during elective orotracheal intuba
105 juries on the basis of findings at follow-up cervical spine MR imaging.
106                                     Complete cervical spine MR studies were obtained to evaluate soft
107  The patients had previously undergone total cervical spine multi-detector row CT with normal finding
108 In 513 consecutive patients, CT scans of the cervical spine obtained for acute trauma were retrospect
109 ormed to exclude soft-tissue injuries in the cervical spine of obtunded patients with blunt trauma in
110 ent and expected uniform spine uptake in the cervical spines of normal patients.
111 oints and, similarly, grading the lumbar and cervical spine on a scale of 0-4 (for normal, suspicious
112 5 patients (29%) had undergone biopsy of the cervical spine or paraspinal soft tissue.
113 xtension, including patients with stabilized cervical spine or spinal cord injury.
114 d us to consider SPECT for the management of cervical spine pain.
115 kidney disease, congestive heart failure, or cervical-spine pain and radiculopathy.
116  at computed tomography (CT) of an injury of cervical spine posterior ligamentous complex (PLC).
117 cores of disc degeneration in the lumbar and cervical spine, psychological distress as assessed by th
118 lete physical and neurologic examination and cervical spine radiographs.
119 esource costs of the technical components of cervical spine radiography varied with patient probabili
120      The average technical resource cost for cervical spine radiography was $49.60.
121 nsecutive patients with trauma who underwent cervical spine radiography.
122                                              Cervical spine reconstructions without attenuation corre
123 mGy x cm (head scans), 5.4 microSv/mGy x cm (cervical spine scans), and 18 microSv/mGy x cm (body sca
124 fectiveness of radiography and CT as primary cervical spine screening modalities in trauma patients.
125                          CT is the preferred cervical spine screening modality in trauma patients at
126   Current trauma guidelines dictate that the cervical spine should not be cleared in intoxicated pati
127           Cord injuries were associated with cervical spine spondylosis (P < .05), acute fracture (P
128  indicate that it is preferred for assessing cervical spine stability in obtunded blunt trauma patien
129 mic fluoroscopic or MR imaging assessment of cervical spine stability in patients who sustained blunt
130 al spinal cord in patients with degenerative cervical spine stenosis and symptomatic cervical myelopa
131 ecreases in the rates of hospitalization for cervical spine surgery or total knee arthroplasty (prima
132                        Anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery.
133  trauma patients underwent MR imaging of the cervical spine to evaluate potential cervical spine inju
134 graphs (sacroiliac joints, lumbar spine, and cervical spine) took 30 seconds.
135       Then, in 85 patients with suspicion of cervical spine trauma following high-velocity trauma, re
136 w-velocity trauma and have acute head and/or cervical spine trauma in the absence of evidence of bodi
137 ng criteria: CT-documented acute head and/or cervical spine trauma, CT CAP performed at least 20 minu
138 some clinicians will not clear the patient's cervical spine until full recovery of consciousness.
139 t improvement in the uniformity of estimated cervical spine uptake in normal patients, compared with
140 ive accuracy can be obtained in SPECT of the cervical spine using this simple attenuation estimate.
141                                              Cervical spine vertebroplasty from anterolateral access
142                  Bone age of hand, wrist and cervical spine was assessed.
143                 Multi-detector row CT of the cervical spine was performed with a four- or 16-detector
144 eers, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spine was performed with a magnetization transf
145                            MR imaging of the cervical spine was performed with transverse gradient-ec
146 complement the diagnostics, a CT scan of the cervical spine was performed; the scan confirmed the dia
147  pruritus, magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine with and without contrast was performed,
148 derwent 1.5-T MR imaging examinations of the cervical spine within 48 hours after a motor vehicle acc

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top