ライフサイエンスコーパス: cesarean delivery

1 The only related obstetric event was a cesarean delivery.

2 ry 8 hours for a total of 48 hours following cesarean delivery.

3 ising in parallel with the increased rate of cesarean delivery.

4 d with hypertensive disease of pregnancy and cesarean delivery.

5 ronidazole vs placebo for 48 hours following cesarean delivery.

6 Cesarean delivery.

7 ital stays, and significantly higher risk of cesarean delivery.

8 as been associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.

9 The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery.

10 organ/space infections within 30 days after cesarean delivery.

11 Thirty-four percent of women had elective cesarean delivery.

12 atient factors that affect the likelihood of cesarean delivery.

13 with an overall decrease in the incidence of cesarean delivery.

14 3.07) compared with women having no previous cesarean delivery.

15 k of surgical site infection (SSI) following cesarean delivery.

16 f whom 70 were delivered vaginally and 32 by cesarean delivery.

17 microbiota during vaginal delivery, but not Cesarean delivery.

18 prevention of surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery.

19 Exposure: Birth by cesarean delivery.

20 male), 4921 individuals (22.3%) were born by cesarean delivery.

21 The primary outcome was cesarean delivery.

22 been reported for offspring born by planned cesarean delivery.

23 5% CI, 0.96-1.91) for women having 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

24 ing diagnosis related groups for vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

25 ccurred in the ICU, including four emergency cesarean deliveries.

26 85 (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.55; P<.001) for cesarean deliveries.

27 y and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.65) for 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

28 pared with those born to women with repeated cesarean deliveries.

29 arean delivery, and 724 (9.4%) had 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

30 .546 +/- 0.146; P = 0.0002), and unscheduled cesarean delivery (0.387 +/- 0.162; P = 0.02) were assoc

31 o was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.75) for elective cesarean delivery, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.22) for emergen

32 1.54), and 1.37 (1.30 to 1.44); for primary cesarean delivery, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.15), 1.10 (1.

33 1.9%, respectively; odds ratio with planned cesarean delivery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 t

34 (n = 56,015 [17.4%]), those born by planned cesarean delivery (12,355 [3.8%]) were at no significant

35 Women with CHD were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (1357 [39.3%] vs 1 164 509 women witho

36 ant between-group differences in the rate of cesarean delivery (16.9% and 16.2%, respectively; P=0.30

37 usion criteria, 5267 (68.5%) had no previous cesarean delivery, 1694 (22.0%) had 1 cesarean delivery,

38 r than in women undergoing repeated elective cesarean delivery (2.9 percent vs. 1.8 percent), as was

39 .3%), shoulder dystocia (1.5% vs. 4.0%), and cesarean delivery (26.9% vs. 33.8%).

40 7% (1674 of 1919 infants]; P < .001), as did cesarean delivery (44% [625 of 1431 births] to 64% [1227

41 ith 48%, P = 0.02; with exclusion of planned cesarean deliveries: 5% compared with 53%; P = 0.002).

42 ospital stay (>6 days) among both women with cesarean deliveries (adjusted OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 2.03-2.2

43 adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13) or any cesarean delivery (adjusted OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.13)

44 utilization, including an increased risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.38-1.42]

45 er among women without known indications for cesarean delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.

46 mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2) or those having cesarean delivery also had elevated rates up to 6 weeks

47 liveries involving either induction or first cesarean delivery also increased from 21.9% to 27.3% bet

48 The odds ratio for cesarean delivery among women in the fourth quartile, as

49 an additional cost of $8.7 million, vs 2345 cesarean deliveries and $4.9 million with the 4000-g pol

50 However, more favorable ratios for both cesarean deliveries and cost per permanent injury avoide

51 dds ratios of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.37) for 1 cesarean delivery and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.65) for 2 or

52 5 fetuses) were randomly assigned to planned cesarean delivery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to plann

53 of celiac disease in individuals exposed to cesarean delivery and adverse fetal events (ie, low Apga

54 monitored areas subject to overuse, such as cesarean delivery and angioplasty rates, more than areas

55 ts whose mothers underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery and in 12 infants born at term whose m

56 ound a positive association between elective cesarean delivery and later celiac disease (adjusted odd

57 It can also be reduced by cesarean delivery and limiting the use of invasive monit

58 s; quality criteria; and outcomes, including cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

59 yond is associated with a decreased risk for cesarean delivery and meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

60 higher BMI was related to increased rates of cesarean delivery and obesity-related high-risk conditio

61 The risk of emergency cesarean delivery and of delivering LGA infants increase

62 In recent decades rates of cesarean delivery and preterm birth survival have increa

63 Cesarean delivery and preterm delivery rates did not dif

64 Some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery and request it without maternal or fet

65 clampsia lead to early induction of labor or cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.

66 compared with offspring born by unscheduled cesarean delivery and with offspring delivered vaginally

67 ion between mode of delivery (vaginal versus cesarean delivery) and risk for transmission.

68 ticosteroid use, induced preterm deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and surfactant use increased signif

69 ery, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.22) for emergency cesarean delivery, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.12) for ope

70 evious cesarean delivery, 1694 (22.0%) had 1 cesarean delivery, and 724 (9.4%) had 2 or more cesarean

71 rs, including maternal fever, preterm labor, cesarean delivery, and antibiotic or acid suppressant us

72 EXIT procedure differs significantly from a cesarean delivery, and caution must be taken to avoid ma

73 Studies regarding nutrition, fertility, cesarean delivery, and contraception were limited.

74 Among mothers: preterm birth, cesarean delivery, and hypertensive diseases of pregnanc

75 isks of fetal overgrowth, shoulder dystocia, cesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders.

76 in early labor did not increase the rate of cesarean delivery, and it provided better analgesia and

77 th weight, small-for-gestational-age births, cesarean delivery, and low Apgar score.

78 at increased risk of placental abruption and cesarean delivery, and their infants were at increased r

79 her than that associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery, and there was a marked excess of deat

80 aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.06-4.48), intrapartum (cesarean delivery: aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.09), and i

81 al studies have shown that offspring born by cesarean delivery are at increased risk of ill health in

82 ciations were strengthened only for elective cesarean delivery (aRR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.97).

83 a trial of labor in women with a history of cesarean delivery, as compared with elective repeated ce

84 Cesarean delivery, as opposed to vaginal delivery, was a

85 The rates of cesarean delivery associated with the separate indicatio

86 Of 24,077 repeat cesarean deliveries at term, 13,258 were performed elect

87 women with a singleton gestation and a prior cesarean delivery at 19 academic medical centers.

88 We assessed associations between elective cesarean delivery at term (37 weeks of gestation or long

89 y is an independent predictor of the risk of cesarean delivery at term in primiparous women.

90 The rate of cesarean delivery at term was lowest (16.0%) among women

91 Elective repeat cesarean delivery before 39 weeks of gestation is common

92 s) and medically indicated preterm delivery (cesarean delivery before onset of labor or induced onset

93 he difference in the probability of having a cesarean delivery between hospitals was 25 percentage po

94 gnificant difference in the overall rates of cesarean delivery between the open and masked groups (26

95 e with diagnosis codes for obstetric trauma, cesarean delivery, birth injury, preterm birth, hypoglyc

96 ecific absolute adjusted risks for emergency cesarean delivery, birth of a small-for-gestational-age

97 rly-life factors (antibiotic use in infancy, cesarean delivery, breast-feeding, neonatal intensive ca

98 orphine is commonly used for analgesia after cesarean delivery, but is frequently associated with pos

99 Furthermore, cesarean delivery (CD) is increasing and may affect brea

100 Cesarean delivery (CD) perturbs the assembly of the neon

101 ttle known about healing of the uterus after Cesarean delivery (CD).

102 90th percentile for gestational age, primary cesarean delivery, clinically diagnosed neonatal hypogly

103 s in Scotland between 1993 and 2007, planned cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (but no

104 , the risk of neuroblastoma was elevated for cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (OR = 1

105 onates (65 with vaginal delivery and 23 with cesarean delivery) completed the MR imaging evaluation.

106 Planned cesarean delivery comprises a significant proportion of

107 t not from nonelective mothers who underwent cesarean delivery contained a different bacterial commun

108 t twin in the cephalic presentation, planned cesarean delivery did not significantly decrease or incr

109 irth, indicated preterm birth, and unplanned cesarean delivery) differed according to maternal race/e

110 ould be associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery during labor at term.

111 of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture

112 s were restricted to vaginal and nonelective cesarean deliveries, each one-log increase in mean titer

113 ased risk of asthma associated with elective cesarean delivery, especially among children born at ter

114 Women with at least 1 previous cesarean delivery face an increased risk of complication

115 Audits of indications for cesarean delivery, feedback for health professionals, an

116 hout ultrasound; (2) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4000 g o

117 0-g policy); and (3) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4500 g o

118 ronidazole vs placebo for 48 hours following cesarean delivery for the prevention of SSI in obese wom

119 n who are not diabetic, a policy of elective cesarean delivery for ultrasonographically diagnosed fet

120 companied by a decrease in the proportion of cesarean deliveries from 22% on weekdays to 16% on weeke

121 cords of more than 25,000 women with a prior cesarean delivery from 17 community and tertiary-care ho

122 gnificant but small reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery from the preintervention period to the

123 f cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal

124 omposite primary outcome between the planned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery

125 Women in the planned-cesarean-delivery group delivered earlier than did those

126 Women having 2 or more cesarean deliveries had an adjusted odds ratio for recei

127 within-family analysis, individuals born by cesarean delivery had 64% (8%-148%) higher odds of obesi

128 rth among women who had undergone a previous cesarean delivery had a 31% (95% CI, 17%-47%) lower risk

129 men who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of conce

130 Repeated cesarean deliveries have higher rates of operative compl

131 In recent decades, the global rates of cesarean delivery have rapidly increased.

132 appropriateness of charges, and the rates of cesarean delivery, high-risk infant transfer, ultrasound

133 holecystectomy, colorectal cancer resection, cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, knee replacement, hip r

134 The estimated number of cesarean deliveries in 2012 was 22.9 million (95% CI, 22

135 obstetric hospitalizations, deliveries, and cesarean deliveries in women with SLE, RA, pregestationa

136 Offspring born by planned cesarean delivery in a first pregnancy were compared wit

137 th combined rates of planned and unscheduled cesarean delivery in a number of regions approaching 50%

138 ents should weigh this risk when considering cesarean delivery in the absence of a clear indication.

139 To investigate whether previous cesarean delivery increases the risk of reoperation, per

140 A trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery is associated with a greater perinatal

141 Trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of u

142 ssociation with elective, but not emergency, cesarean delivery is consistent with the hypothesis that

143 rates of respiratory complications, elective cesarean delivery is discouraged before 39 weeks of gest

144 iated with trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery is low.

145 Cesarean delivery is the most common inpatient surgery i

146 imen in this high-risk population undergoing cesarean delivery is unknown.

147 stetrical outcomes including maternal death, cesarean delivery, length of stay, preeclampsia, preterm

148 No difference was found for cesarean delivery (low evidence), induction of labor (in

149 In contrast, among elective Cesarean deliveries, maternal body mass index was not as

150 Finally, the risk for persistent pain after cesarean deliveries may be associated with a certain gen

151 iously recommended national target rates for cesarean deliveries may be too low.

152 r clinical factors that increase the risk of cesarean delivery may be methodologically biased and mis

153 d regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postope

154 Cesarean deliveries, multiple births, and births at less

155 gression analyses excluding subjects who had cesarean deliveries (n = 5), markers of both fetal and m

156 here was an equal distribution of vaginal vs cesarean deliveries (n=192 and n=190, respectively).

157 who had a trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery (n = 15 515), the overall rate of deli

158 Compared with offspring born by unscheduled cesarean delivery (n = 56,015 [17.4%]), those born by pl

159 than the risk associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery (n = 9014), more than twice (OR, 2.2;

160 ernal benzodiazepine use was associated with cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.36-4

161 Nonetheless, the influence of cesarean deliveries on surgical complications later in l

162 surgical-site infection within 30 days after cesarean delivery, on the basis of definitions from the

163 ted with a significant change in the rate of cesarean deliveries or the infant's condition at birth.

164 t associated with a reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery or with improvement in the condition o

165 ta previa (OR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.79), cesarean delivery (OR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.80), and

166 re managed expectantly had a higher risk for cesarean delivery (OR, 1.21 [CI, 1.01 to 1.46]), but thi

167 After emergency cesarean delivery, oral dabrafenib treatment was initiat

168 fants birthed vaginally and those birthed by cesarean delivery (P < 0.005).

169 There were 11.7 to 39.3 cesarean deliveries per 100 deliveries performed in low-

170 ve delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers varied w

171 ve delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers were not

172 gestation and before 39 weeks of gestation; cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers).

173 th weight (PR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.38-1.83), and cesarean delivery (PR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) relative

174 ed, including induction of labor, >/=2 prior cesarean deliveries, preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus, an

175 Psoriasis was not associated with cesarean delivery, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and spontaneo

176 Cesarean delivery, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and spontaneo

177 ght-gain z scores in which risk of unplanned cesarean delivery, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-

178 erm IAI was less likely to be managed with a cesarean delivery, prolonged internal monitoring, or ind

179 or prevention of SSI among obese women after cesarean delivery, prophylactic oral cephalexin and metr

180 ervention involved audits of indications for cesarean delivery, provision of feedback to health profe

181 , the ultrasound policies increased both the cesarean delivery rate and costs, while decreasing the r

182 The relationship between population-level cesarean delivery rate and maternal mortality ratios (ma

183 At a country-level, cesarean delivery rate estimates up to 19.1 per 100 live

184 The primary outcome was the cesarean delivery rate in the 1-year postintervention pe

185 g only 76 countries with the highest-quality cesarean delivery rate information had a similar result:

186 The overall cesarean delivery rate was 15.9% and varied (P<.001) fro

187 which 2012 data were not available, the 2012 cesarean delivery rate was imputed from other years.

188 The cesarean delivery rate was significantly reduced among w

189 arean delivery rate (CDRs) of roughly 19.0%, cesarean delivery rates and maternal mortality ratio (MM

190 ectional, ecological study estimating annual cesarean delivery rates from data collected during 2005

191 ivery rate information had a similar result: cesarean delivery rates greater than 6.9 to 20.1 per 100

192 In Canada, cesarean delivery rates have increased substantially ove

193 Cesarean delivery rates of 12.6 to 24.0 per 100 live bir

194 National cesarean delivery rates of up to approximately 19 per 10

195 ld Health Organization (WHO) recommends that cesarean delivery rates should not exceed 10 to 15 per 1

196 Cesarean delivery rates varied across hospitals in a sin

197 Cesarean delivery rates were available for 54 countries

198 Higher cesarean delivery rates were not correlated with materna

199 r times, and a reduction in instrumental and cesarean delivery rates, thought to have been associated

200 ncy, 16 healthy pregnant women scheduled for cesarean delivery received a single application of TFV g

201 a (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14, P = .74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17; P = .

202 was found to be more likely among women with cesarean delivery (RR, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]

203 Decisions regarding cesarean delivery should be based on obstetric considera

204 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cesarean delivery should be performed when indicated.

205 iabetic women, with all 3 policies, rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus

206 Cesarean delivery significantly reduced the HSV transmis

207 ntation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and l

208 lower risk of surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery than did the use of iodine-alcohol.

209 associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of cesarean delivery than was elective induction of labor (

210 ort policies and clinical efforts to prevent cesarean deliveries that are not medically indicated.

211 For women with one prior cesarean delivery, the risk of uterine rupture is higher

212 Furthermore, no data exist on whether cesarean delivery, the standard of care for women with g

213 , avoiding episiotomies or offering elective cesarean delivery to high-risk patients), providing pelv

214 We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery to skin preparation with either chlorh

215 nd health plans are often ranked on rates of cesarean delivery, under the assumption that lower rates

216 Cohort-specific rates of cesarean delivery varied from 9.4% to 37.5%.

217 o of reoperation for women having 1 previous cesarean delivery was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.03-1.68), and the

218 The risk of cesarean delivery was 3% lower in the glyburide group (a

219 The rate of cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-deli

220 Cesarean delivery was associated with significantly incr

221 The increased risk of cesarean delivery was attributable to procedures perform

222 The rate of cesarean delivery was not significantly different betwee

223 delivery (but not compared with unscheduled cesarean delivery) was associated with a small absolute

224 injury prevented by the 4500-g policy, 3695 cesarean deliveries were performed at an additional cost

225 procedure and, to a lesser extent, birth by cesarean delivery were associated; the combination of bo

226 252,917 [78.7%]), offspring born by planned cesarean delivery were at increased risk of asthma requi

227 tion, and the importance of rapid perimortem cesarean delivery when indicated.

228 lbirth, but it also may increase the risk of cesarean delivery, which already is common in this older

229 d to guide the choice of antiseptic agent at cesarean delivery, which is the most common major surgic

230 proximately 60 percent of women with a prior cesarean delivery who become pregnant again attempt labo

231 Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery who received the standard preoperative

232 Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibi

233 has seldom been studied in women undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial morphine.

234 nd were more frequent in women with previous cesarean deliveries, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.16 (

235 te of 1.6 per 1000 among women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor (11 women), 5.2 per 1000

236 t anal sphincter tear (n = 79); and group 3, cesarean delivery without labor (n = 26).

237 ter perinatal risk than is elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, although absolute risks

238 delivery, as compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, are uncertain.

239 ompared with the risk in women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor, uterine rupture was mor

240 and 15,801 women underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

241 labor and women who had an elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

242 or is induced than among those with repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

243 ps of deliveries were compared with repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

244 gnificant but small reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery, without adverse effects on maternal o