ライフサイエンスコーパス: chain reaction

1 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction).

2 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

3 transcription using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

4 munosorbent assay, and CMV DNA by polymerase chain reaction.

5 s was investigated with real-time polymerase chain reaction.

6 y flow cytometry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

7 acid-based quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

8 nalyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

9 tional analyses, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

10 which in turn may cause further events in a chain reaction.

11 immunofluorescence assay (DFA) or polymerase chain reaction.

12 tors was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

13 ens were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

14 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

15 ated by immunoassay and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

16 uantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

17 y real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

18 (HHVs) were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

19 ere quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

20 rRNA sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

21 uantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

22 everse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

23 everse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

24 everse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

25 nucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

26 everse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

27 LTL was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

28 nfusion by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

29 uantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

30 ally and by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

31 mined with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

32 ut Low-Density Array quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

33 the use of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

34 uantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

35 y real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

36 itted with influenza confirmed by polymerase chain reaction.

37 emistry, histology, and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

38 issue, determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

39 A and genomic DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

40 or ocular chlamydial infection by polymerase chain reaction.

41 ography and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

42 yzed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

43 cleic acid molecules amplified by polymerase chain reactions.

44 ecades since the discovery of the polymerase chain reaction, a progression of remarkable technical ad

45 ates were efficiently prepared by polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by site-specific n

46 Giardia isolates was performed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a fragment of tpi and bg

47 identify gametocyte carriers use polymerase chain reaction amplification of the gametocyte-specific

48 and CLN3 transcript analysis with polymerase chain reaction amplification were performed in a subset

49 A), which is a method to assemble polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments into a plasmid withou

50 immunoprecipitation quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses in Huh-7 cells.

51 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of CB1190 abundance, oxidation-r

52 everse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of rectal RNA from an independen

53 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the expression of sphingosine

54 unohistochemical and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses show expression of the amylin re

55 unohistochemical and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses to examine expression of the amy

56 ometry and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analyses to quantify DNA methylation chan

57 CRE) isolates were evaluated with polymerase chain reaction analysis for carbapenemase genes, and iso

58 MRD was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction analysis of Ig/TCR gene rearrangements, a

59 was calculated with quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal

60 dium falciparum, using an RDT and polymerase chain reaction analysis, and were followed until deliver

61 Isolates were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis, slide agglutination, and whole-

62 e analyzed using semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

63 dation by standard and long-range polymerase chain reaction and amplicon resequencing with maize, one

64 g real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and an IgM antibody-capture enzyme-linked

65 expression levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry.

66 Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot analysis were used to meas

67 n were analyzed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting, respectively.

68 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence analyses of colon

69 ing duct cells using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining.

70 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry subsequently con

71 everse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction and mRNA microarray, respectively, on lun

72 enes was measured by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and no apparent differences were found am

73 ons, can be derived using digital polymerase chain reaction and other technologies.

74 immunohistochemical quantitative polymerase chain reaction and sphingosine kinase activity assays.

75 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and transcriptome analyses suggested nons

76 which were confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and were significantly higher from day 4.

77 ionic currents, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting to investigate chang

78 Real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were used to evaluat

79 ber (genotyped by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction) and obesity traits in 4800 individuals w

80 gulated at the gene (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) and protein (enzymatic activity) levels

81 n (determined by 16S quantitative polymerase chain reaction), and specific microbial operational taxo

82 uantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and cell death assays.

83 uantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and DNA methylation was quantified at 7

84 cytometry, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunoassay.

85 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry analyses.

86 y, luciferase activity, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and multiplex assays.

87 field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), polymerase chain reaction, and pertactin gene sequencing.

88 cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and reciprocal bone marrow transplantati

89 h real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and virus culture and isolates were char

90 ression was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction; and data from The Cancer Genome Atlas HN

91 everse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction array to analyze messenger RNA (mRNA) exp

92 METHODS AND Using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction array, we found that histone methyltransf

93 es evaluating these tests against polymerase chain reaction as the reference standard.

94 hly sensitive and allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assays that we developed for Bru

95 uantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay confirmed by a second analysis poin

96 A quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of US17, which correlated with clin

97 real-time reverse- transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.

98 ent microsphere, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays at loci associated with drug resis

99 uantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays were developed to quantify female

100 1, major groove binder real-time-polymerase chain reaction assays, and original Xpert EBOV assay), t

101 antified in reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction assays.

102 ions, we developed a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based approach to determine the precise s

103 ssion by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction-based DNA genotyping have emerged as powe

104 ntroduce a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction-based environmental DNA (eDNA) approach t

105 Using genomic sequence data and polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping, we identified nonsynony

106 echniques, like flow cytometry or polymerase chain reaction-based methods, has been challenging becau

107 A polymerase chain reaction-based miRNA array of plasma, sampled at t

108 amples from reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed cases including 20 primary ZIKV

109 n (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in w

110 hort of infants whose mothers had polymerase chain reaction-confirmed Zika virus infection during pre

111 Of the 112 with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed Zika virus infection in materna

112 The cure rate (ie, polymerase chain reaction-corrected adequate clinical and parasitol

113 reported a novel droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay targeting the mitochondrial

114 I digestion and CMV quantitative polymerase chain reaction (DNase-CMV-qPCR) was developed to differe

115 Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) end point platforms directly estim

116 ined using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, dual-labeling immunofluorescent staining

117 Real-time polymerase chain reaction, (far) Western blot, immunoprecipitation,

118 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and Western blotting-in

119 y analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, fluorescent in situ hybridization, lenti

120 semiquantitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction followed by immunoblotting and immunofluo

121 single-cell reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction followed by reexpression, which has ident

122 swab specimens were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction followed by type-specific hybridization.

123 sted using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for 17 viruses.

124 tools were tested by quantitative polymerase chain reaction for 32 enteropathogens with the use of a

125 olars were subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction for assessment of osteoprotegrin, runt-re

126 s, inflammation (IL-8), real-time polymerase chain reaction for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

127 In a subgroup, polymerase chain reaction for HEV was performed.

128 We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction for multiple enteropathogens on 878 acute

129 centa samples tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction for Zika virus.

130 ities and confirmed by culture or polymerase chain reaction from July 1996 to December 2016 were anal

131 n real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction from respiratory samples, variability in

132 DNA by employing the nonlinear hybridization chain reaction (HCR) amplification.

133 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, IL-6 immunostaining, activation of IL-6/

134 from the tissues by quantitative polymerase chain reaction illuminated sites of viral persistence.

135 easurement, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunoblot, immunohistochemistry, enzyme

136 uantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence.

137 uantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, immunocytochemistry, and confocal imagin

138 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence, and immunoblot analy

139 cted and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry

140 ses of RSV and HRV codetection by polymerase chain reaction in 2 prospective birth cohort studies (th

141 uantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in 350 subjects from the same cohort.

142 D We measured LTL by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 566 outpatients (age: 63+/-9 years; 76

143 everse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction in an independent cohort of 71 patients,

144 y real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in C cases presenting between January 200

145 everse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction in healthy controls (n = 10) and pretreat

146 fied using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in human postmortem dorsolateral prefront

147 er applied quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in independent samples for validation (40

148 ella zoster virus (VZV) by weekly polymerase chain reaction in plasma.

149 d xenodiagnosis with quantitative polymerase chain reaction in skin biopsies from 3 patients with mac

150 ctivity that eliminates potential polymerase chain reaction-induced biases.

151 leic acid-based assays, including polymerase chain reaction, isothermal amplification, ligation, and

152 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction JCPyV was used prospectively and retrospe

153 e often based on species-specific polymerase chain reaction, limited to detecting species targeted by

154 y titers, and by genetic testing (polymerase chain reaction/loop-mediated isothermal amplification).

155 l and DFT studies indicate a light-initiated chain reaction mechanism propagated by (.) Mn(CO)5 .

156 ian time of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction negativity was 46.4 days after symptom on

157 sing Nested-Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (nRT-PCR).

158 pate in the prolongation step of the radical chain reactions occurring in the soil environment.

159 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of extracellular purine degrading enzymes

160 essed by using Cre-reporter mice, polymerase chain reaction of genomic DNA, and quantitation of Bmp6

161 ic cores of advanced solid tumors leads to a chain reaction of stimuli that enhances the expression o

162 everse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction or confocal microscopy.

163 ents, using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction or transcriptome sequencing, we identifie

164 a published reverse transciptase-polymerase chain reaction panel.

165 Peroxidyme Amplified Radical Chain Reaction (PARCR), a novel enzyme-free system that

166 in 2-based RDTs using qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (nested PCR targeting the cytochrom

167 al impact of a targeted panfungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplicon sequencing assay for cultu

168 lysates without DNA extraction or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification in just 75 min.

169 During polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, selective nucleotide

170 ytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis is widely used as a survei

171 rology on patient sera as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and larval identification of the me

172 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other molecular assays have dem

173 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse-transcription (RT) PCR

174 l resistance (AMR), with targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approaches increasingly being incor

175 Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the reference diagnostic techniq

176 itoring by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.

177 for bacteria, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting the 16S ribosomal

178 technologies involving real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays that facilitate direct analy

179 ZIKV-RNA load was quantified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycles in blood/ urine.

180 Detection of pneumococcus by lytA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood had poor diagnostic accura

181 gen detection by both culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in children.

182 ewborns were screened for cCMV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in saliva.

183 Overlapping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a common technique used by resea

184 ) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a marker of central nervous syst

185 Long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a traditional approach to obtain

186 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is dependent on two key hybridizati

187 cies were identified using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of ribosomal RNA genes and a novel

188 on technologies such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or DNA sequencing, which are typica

189 ared cured after 2 negative blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results, face psychosocial disorder

190 Routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping and multiple-locus varia

191 in 1 index sample using specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing and culture.

192 not palpable, and a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for JAK2/V617F was negative.

193 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of aqueous or vitreous humo

194 was established most commonly by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of blood and less often by

195 This approach requires extensive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of the Wolbachia-infection

196 pirate samples were analyzed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for HMPV, RSV, and 17 other p

197 ) in combination with multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was utilized to detect mutations of

198 ostic test (RDT), microscopy, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to detect asymptomatic pa

199 equencing (RNA-seq) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to examine transcriptiona

200 of DNA amplification through the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with thermal cycling among three di

201 nth dry season were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and clinical malaria risk was comp

202 for nucleic acids amplifications, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is significantly limited by the th

203 DNA-based techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real time PCR (RT-PCR) and dot blo

204 kocytes was used for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), RNA sequencing, and comparison of

205 -SSR, which combines multiplexing polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeted deep sequencing and compr

206 proved by use of real-time immuno-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to parasitemia limits of 0.02 para

207 d based on parasite prevalence by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)- and the prevalence of antibodies t

208 ell counters, flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for identification.

209 y used, we explored the extent of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based RSV testing and its impact on

210 jority of surviving mice remained polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-MRD negative after treatment.

211 had collected a lesional swab for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

212 ed for Cryptosporidium species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

213 croparticles are transferred to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

214 ls were tested using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

215 lts, were influenza C-positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

216 HCoV detected in nasal samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

217 r HSV-2 and Treponema pallidum by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

218 n plasma by NGMS and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

219 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

220 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

221 n culture and colony-counting and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

222 irate or pleural fluid culture or polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) compared to "RSV pneumonia" (nasop

223 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction platform, we analyzed miRNA expression in

224 f the AH cfDNA and tumor DNA with polymerase chain reaction primers targeting RB1 gene c.1075A demons

225 expression (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction), protein expression (immunohistochemistr

226 sues was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, protein levels were analyzed by immunobl

227 ured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR).

228 Microarray and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses of Mkx(-/-) PDL revealed

229 gion as the existing quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays of U.S. Environmental Prote

230 n and then real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for 21 candidate genes.

231 cetylene block), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of functional genes in the denitri

232 f portable real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) sensors.

233 g culture, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and whole-genome sequencing were

234 arrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), relevant genes expressed in nonle

235 s study as well as a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based etiology study at a rural Ta

236 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) amplification of miRNA extracte

237 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis.

238 logy using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and RNA in situ hybridization.

239 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) array on 156 samples.

240 uantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), a sensitive method to detect v

241 uantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

242 Polymerase chain reaction results performed in adults during emerge

243 Real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed the downregulation of SPEG mRNA

244 cts, as probable if the identical polymerase chain reaction ribotype was identified in index-contact

245 parable to real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)-based MRD detection via antigen-

246 ed by urine reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in 17 cases and by sero

247 ue and used reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and in situ hybridization to tes

248 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) experiments showed that TGFBR1 a

249 e tested by qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for CMV DNA with quantitative RT

250 singleplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for laboratory-confirmed influen

251 i parasites measured by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic Chagas carriers.

252 egative and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing was not performed, resul

253 d real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to analyse the effects of these

254 , real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PC

255 e, slide agglutination, real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR), and whole genome sequencing.

256 ren aged <18 years with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed EVD were enrolled retr

257 Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)and in situ hybridization assays,

258 scription- quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays and a thorough statistic

259 enes using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assays in Gabonese children wit

260 everse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) platforms for fold change estim

261 miRNAs by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

262 acy against reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed, protocol-defined, inf

263 scence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction screening for relevant abnormalities were

264 Polymerase chain reaction screening of T. cruzi-infected pregnant w

265 characterization was performed by polymerase chain reaction sequencing and samples classified within

266 thromycin 1.5g using quantitative polymerase chain reaction specific for M. genitalium DNA on samples

267 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction studies.

268 ethods (i.e. light microscopy and Polymerase Chain Reaction) suggest exploring new analytic ways to g

269 followed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction suggested that PSS1 is coregulated with A

270 r, and were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction targeting multiple pathogens.

271 ofiled by 16S ribosomal RNA-based polymerase chain reaction-temporal temperature gradient gel electro

272 ed using a commercially available polymerase chain reaction test for 11 periodontal pathogens.

273 s should consider IgM antibody or polymerase chain reaction testing for Zika virus as well as diagnos

274 Polymerase chain reaction testing of ocular fluid is useful in supp

275 were confirmed by biochemical and polymerase chain reaction testing.

276 subsequent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the expression levels of secretin, and V

277 Furthermore, the key step of the proposed chain reaction, the oxidation of CPA 1 to amine radical

278 sues and analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect mutations in KRAS.

279 ormed multiplexed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to detect spontaneous Kras mutations in P

280 used immunoblot and quantitative polymerase chain reaction to evaluate the molecular response to Wnt

281 ce move from targeted culture and polymerase chain reaction to high throughput metagenomics, appropri

282 We used real-time polymerase chain reaction to test nasopharyngeal aspirates for 16 v

283 everse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, to check for concordance with next-gener

284 we have developed T oligo-primed polymerase chain reaction (TOP-PCR) for full-length nonselective am

285 and quantified by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction using human telomerase reverse transcript

286 es were generated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using RNA extracted from bronchoalveolar

287 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed on the tissue specimens and

288 Polymerase chain reaction was used to detect presence of the JP2 ge

289 tudy, BRAF(V600E) allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to map the neoplastic clone in 2

290 Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to measure expression levels of

291 uantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, was higher in subepicardium versus suben

292 HODS AND By reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, we evaluated gene expression variations

293 encing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed on longitudinal isolates.

294 uantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions were used to establish the interaction b

295 uantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry w

296 , real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and zymography.

297 inspired by that in quantitative polymerase chain reactions, where the delay in the amplification cu

298 cation using digital quantitative polymerase chain reaction with an independent cohort of 63 RRMS pat

299 We used 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction with degenerate primers, followed by high

300 simultaneous propagon-induced amplification chain reactions within hundreds to thousands of picolite