ライフサイエンスコーパス: challenge test

1 d current asthma (questionnaire and exercise challenge test).

2 5% CO2 were reevaluated 1 year following the challenge test.

3 , and he consequently underwent an oral food challenge test.

4 At age 14, he underwent a repeat oral food challenge test.

5 to be a useful tool for use in an oral food challenge test.

6 sustained and did not change with the sting challenge test.

7 The tolerance was then evaluated by a sting challenge test.

8 ithecus aethiops sabaeus) using the Intruder Challenge Test.

9 fter positive results on a double-blind food challenge test.

10 rgy with systemic symptoms through oral food challenge tests.

11 he importance of verification by appropriate challenge tests.

12 d 1, the Bet v 1-homolog in apple, for oral challenge tests.

13 onfirmed in cases of unclear history by oral challenge tests.

14 paired environment during drug-free and drug-challenge tests.

15 controls who maintained normal methacholine challenge tests.

16 ere allergic reactions, BAT ought to precede challenge testing.

17 ewer resources and be more reproducible than challenge testing.

18 ffectiveness; $390 per case), 1-hour glucose challenge test (63% effectiveness; $571), random glucose

19 drinkers, undergoing an initial oral alcohol challenge testing (.8 g/kg alcohol vs. placebo) and an i

20 The exercise challenge test after ingestion of an apple was performed

21 The result of an exercise challenge test after ingestion of egg was negative, and

22 The threshold was determined by an oral food challenge test, after positive results on a double-blind

23 ponsiveness was measured with a methacholine challenge test and bronchial inflammation with fraction

24 We investigated the significance of challenge test and other tests not only to diagnose HWP-

25 ntravenous saline infusion test or captopril challenge test and subtype differentiation was performed

26 h depression (N=162) by using a fenfluramine challenge test and/or measurement of CSF levels of 5-hyd

27 gh-resolution chest tomography, methacholine challenge testing, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bron

28 monitoring, spirometry, and serial bronchial challenge tests, and those participants using daily asth

29 Functional MR-based memory challenge tests are in development as well.

30 o risk nonselective NSAID exposure when oral challenge tests are unavailable.

31 accompanied by conventional microbiological challenge tests, as well as morphological characterizati

32 Challenge test assays and a most probable number approac

33 ty (according to arrival time) who underwent challenge testing at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-collaps

34 e airflow obstruction underwent methacholine challenge tests at baseline.

35 , monthly spirometry, and methacholine (MCh) challenge testing before and after the study.

36 ts who underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge tests both at baseline (1991-1993), when they

37 extremely large kinetic isotope effect, as a challenging test case for our simulation approach.

38 The budding yeast cell cycle is a challenging test case for this approach, because the con

39 an anti-TNF-alpha antibody, D2E7, which is a challenging test case, because D2E7 was highly optimized

40 e application of the model, we apply it to a challenging test case: the catabolite activator protein

41 ptoms of asthma and an abnormal methacholine challenge test (cases) were compared with 92 age- and sm

42 nts (40.9, 19 - 58 years) in whom later food challenge tests confirmed food allergy.

43 denied symptoms and had normal methacholine challenge tests (controls).

44 men the benefits versus risks of skin tests, challenge tests, desensitization, and initiation of immu

45 In challenge tests designed to assess attention in the cont

46 of the cough reflex using citric acid cough challenge tests did not show any significant changes.

47 HCI continues to provide a challenging test domain for applying and developing psyc

48 onitis: nine patients had positive bronchial challenge testing (eight of whom were also IgG positive

49 ts who had a positive result in an oral food challenge test for udon (wheat noodles), informed consen

50 findings clearly show the utility of the FEN challenge test for uncovering in vivo functional deficit

51 at the mechanism, the observations provide a challenging test for mathematical models of chemotaxis.

52 nes from multigene families-perhaps the most challenging test for whole-genome alignments.

53 all women underwent a 50-gram 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) followed by a 75-gram 2-hour oral g

54 The allergen challenge test has been the mainstay of diagnosis of all

55 ues) are still to be refined but most of the challenge tests have safely crossed the border from rese

56 From January 2010 to June 2012, we performed challenge test in 41 cases with positive prick test of G

57 e Japanese Pediatric Guideline for Oral Food Challenge Test in Food Allergy 2009.

58 depletion after an intravenous (IV) fructose challenge test in low- versus high-fructose consumers wa

59 At the oral challenge test in the hospital, 3 g of erythritol induce

60 irect (methacholine) and indirect (mannitol) challenge testing in community managed asthma.

61 h and also the predictive value of capsaicin challenge testing in the assessment of novel antitussive

62 ws straight forward, dose-defined sublingual challenge tests in a high number of birch pollen-allergi

63 standard hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis challenge tests in adult female survivors of childhood a

64 amined the results of an inpatient oral food challenge test involving the use of juice containing who

65 Challenge test is not included in indispensable examinat

66 However, challenge test is still a useful tool for assessing actu

67 feature of asthma pathophysiology, bronchial challenge testing is not routinely used in primary care

68 Of the proapoptotic challenges tested, K17-null skin keratinocytes in primar

69 k-up with several laboratory examination and challenge test may help appropriate diagnosis of HWP-IWA

70 w and abnormal response to the acetazolamide challenge test may require a revascularization procedure

71 The methacholine challenge test (MCT) is commonly used to assess airway h

72 A more challenging test of threading a larger set of test prote

73 A 50-g oral glucose challenge test (OGCT) is a widely accepted screening met

74 blinded, placebo-controlled oral provocation challenge tests (OPCTs) or by self-reported history in p

75 asthma was confirmed by either methacholine challenge testing or test of reversibility to beta-agoni

76 llowed up clinically with repeated bronchial challenge tests over 1 year.

77 ecline in C-peptide response during Sustacal challenge tests over a 6-year period, there was a diminu

78 Furthermore, on the challenge test, OVX+E animals tested without estrogen tr

79 Thirty nine of 41 cases were challenge test positive.

80 17 of 78 patients with a negative penicillin challenge tested positive during challenges with other b

81 essed through blood tests, hypertonic saline challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

82 r of patients presented severe positive food challenge test reactions at low doses of the allergen pr

83 blood flow and normal acetazolamide-enhanced challenge test results will do well after permanent caro

84 In vivo glucose challenge test revealed significantly increased glucose-

85 ation was demonstrated by specific bronchial challenge test (SBCT) with peach leaf extract.

86 siveness as indicated by methacholine (MTCH)-challenge test, serum total immunoglobulin E (TIgE), ser

87 The challenge test set was divided into three subcategories,

88 In an oral food challenge test, she felt abdominal pain and nausea only

89 to LMW and HMW agents by specific inhalation challenge test (SIC).

90 le collection devices in the market severely challenges test success rate.

91 ed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer of specific IgE antibody and/or ba

92 this hypothesis, we employed pharmacological challenge testing to compare serotonin function in patie

93 tests, and a subset (n = 13) underwent oral challenge tests to both formulations of GOS.

94 The bacterial challenge test using pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum revea

95 pete with cocaine in a drug free and cocaine challenge test was sensitive to cocaine dose.

96 Methacholine challenge testing was performed before treatment randomi

97 A lung function test and a methacholine challenge test were performed at EGEA1 and EGEA2.

98 t airway hyperresponsiveness on methacholine challenge testing were compared with 66 age-matched cont

99 cocorticoids (as determined by dexamethasone challenge tests) were reliably found.

100 ial ischemia in rats undergoing a dobutamine challenge test, which can be used to mimic exercise-like

101 cocaine for 10 d, and all groups underwent a challenge test with 10 mg/kg cocaine.

102 rmination, bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial challenge testing with suspected antigens, and re-review