戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nd 1506.03 respectively for one prescription change.
2 look back, to see how science has and hasn't changed.
3 he conformation of nOVAmax was substantially changed.
4 d persistent diet-responsive transcriptional changes.
5                       While it is clear that changing a protein binding motif will alter protein bind
6 oximately 25 times greater than DNA sequence changes and typically have short half-lives of two to th
7 protect the entire hematopoietic system from changes associated with premature aging.
8  UKGTS treatment arms was enhanced and RNFLT change became a stronger predictor of VF progression.
9  the stability of species range edges with a changing climate.
10 ew studies evaluate interactions among these changing conditions.
11 contrast, randomly oriented mimetics did not change focal adhesion tension sensation or enrich for p3
12 edition staging criteria resulted in a stage change for >35% of patients diagnosed with invasive brea
13 ty, it successfully rejected signals from pH changes, histamine, and H(2)O(2).
14 is could not be attributed conclusively to a change in ownership because differential improvement occ
15  period from 1962 to 2015 and no significant change in Pseudoterranova spp. abundance over a 37 year
16 rrelation of force with position' and SC as 'change in sway'.
17                                A significant change in the lipid-packing order takes place during ass
18 nce, and its significance, in rates of RNFLT change in the UKGTS treatment arms was enhanced and RNFL
19                                              Change in theta, but not alpha power, between meditation
20 BVOCs and the trends of climate and land-use changes in Amazonia is then constructed.
21                     Information on molecular changes in cancer-specific gene expression facilitates e
22  lethal phenotypes are strongly modulated by changes in cellular conditions or genetic context, the l
23                                              Changes in coordination between these two essential orga
24 ng was manifest in the bimanual condition as changes in corticomotor excitability, mu (9-14 Hz), and
25 During adulthood, stress unmasked persistent changes in DHPG-induced LTD and behavior that were not p
26              Purified UNC-45B mutants showed changes in folding and solubility.
27  available that has investigated genome-wide changes in gene expression during the normal physiologic
28 human primates, but there were immunological changes in granulomas and lymph nodes from anti-IL-10-tr
29 tous polymers in cells, often in response to changes in physiological conditions.
30 itor of plasminogen activation, and measured changes in plasmin (ogen) uria.
31                                        Brain changes in response to binge EtOH treatment were more pr
32 autism spectrum disorders and neural circuit changes in several brain areas, but the cellular mechani
33 f the central stalk, inducing conformational changes in the F(1) motor that catalyzes ATP production.
34 dely implicated as the source of large-scale changes in the subpolar marine environment.
35 that cytotoxic chemotherapies induce dynamic changes in the tumor immune microenvironment that vary b
36 l-studied taxa, such as vertebrates, reflect changes in wider biodiversity.
37 ork structure, leading to dramatic community changes, including loss of species and function.
38                                     Land-use change is a major driver of biodiversity loss worldwide.
39                                      Climate change is predicted to result in warmer and drier Neotro
40  rTMS to the right PPC did not significantly change measures of contrast sensitivity, but increased t
41                                     However, changing mental representations is not sufficient by its
42 ersion measurements report on conformational changes occurring on the mus-ms timescale.
43 ferent times of day resulted in differential changes of core clock gene expression, demonstrating an
44                      Due to a memory effect, changes of NH protection during antibody binding are mea
45 catterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression and change-point analyses and Spearman correlation coefficie
46                        We quantified FAC as 'change (POST-PRE) in correlation of force with position'
47                                 However, the changes that occur in the brain as this learning takes p
48 oing rapid declines, driven in large part by changes to land use and climate.
49 ring in a dose-dependent manner, but did not change TSH levels, weight, histology, or expression of m
50         However, it is unclear whether these changes would be accompanied by histological improvement