ライフサイエンスコーパス: chest radiograph

1 aboratory signs and absence of infiltrate on chest radiograph).

2 othoracic ratio >0.55, or pulmonary edema on chest radiograph).

3 sician-diagnosed pneumonia, without use of a chest radiograph.

4 al (n = 26) abnormalities on the most recent chest radiograph.

5 ipsilateral IJ as detected by postprocedure chest radiograph.

6 jugular venous pressure, or cardiomegaly on chest radiograph.

7 e in the infant chest is air trapping on the chest radiograph.

8 chest radiographs first evaluate the infant chest radiograph.

9 ediastinal widening or pleural effusion on a chest radiograph.

10 e for the CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph.

11 e for one CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph.

12 a new, noncalcified pulmonary nodule seen on chest radiograph.

13 y may indicate pathologies not detectable by chest radiograph.

14 se in hematocrit, and diffuse infiltrates on chest radiograph.

15 n or a malposition and, thus, the need for a chest radiograph.

16 heter placement followed by a postprocedural chest radiograph.

17 , or lack of necessity, for a postprocedural chest radiograph.

18 e localization of the aortic valve on supine chest radiograph.

19 consistent with pulmonary oedema on frontal chest radiograph.

20 putum smear result, and extent of disease on chest radiograph.

21 oracic echocardiography is equivalent to the chest radiograph.

22 nsthoracic echocardiography and confirmed by chest radiograph.

23 ss expensive than the routine postprocedural chest radiograph.

24 to simulate the pulmonary anatomy seen on a chest radiograph.

25 uracy for detection of small lung cancers on chest radiographs.

26 s (DCNNs) for detecting tuberculosis (TB) on chest radiographs.

27 lation that would benefit from daily routine chest radiographs.

28 bnormalities systematically reviewed initial chest radiographs.

29 nction test results; electrocardiograms; and chest radiographs.

30 57% (P = 0.006) but not orders for portable chest radiographs.

31 There were no arterial placements found on chest radiographs.

32 available were seen retrospectively on prior chest radiographs.

33 nia was diagnosed by dyspnea and findings on chest radiographs.

34 ard, which consisted of 1007 posteroanterior chest radiographs.

35 ients were symptomatic, and 50% had abnormal chest radiographs.

36 ntly different on 2K and 4K storage phosphor chest radiographs.

37 Both patients had abnormal findings on chest radiographs.

38 ve to the patients' height, weight, sex, and chest radiographs.

39 easurements, pulmonary function testing, and chest radiographs.

40 no standing orders for routine daily morning chest radiographs.

41 Study radiologists independently reviewed chest radiographs.

42 RA) results, normal examinations, and normal chest radiographs.

43 ); 20 patients (87%) presented with abnormal chest radiographs.

44 igrams, 92% of perfusion scintigrams, 79% of chest radiographs, 100% of CT scans, and 100% of thin-se

45 edside during the study period (803 portable chest radiographs, 103 abdominal radiographs, 303 extrem

46 Participants were shown 30 chest radiographs, 14 of which had a pneumothorax, and w

47 Nine readers graded a set of 25 chest radiographs (15 cases of aortic valve disease [AVD

48 ree hundred posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiographs (189 radiographs with negative finding

49 lower lobe were reviewed and correlated with chest radiographs (31 patients).

50 In patients with an abnormal chest radiograph, a combination of 22 VOCs in breath sam

51 Routine chest radiograph after this common procedure is an unnec

52 Chest radiographs also showed intrafissural extension of

53 tment; 3) in the lung, pulmonary fibrosis on chest radiograph and a forced vital capacity of <55% of

54 gin H1N1 influenza, is largely restricted to chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT), which can

55 15.1% of patients, respectively, and initial chest radiograph and electrocardiogram were frequently n

56 (33%) of the patients without infiltrate on chest radiograph and excluded CAP in 56 (29.8%) of the 1

57 racterized by ill-defined infiltrates on the chest radiograph and hypoxia.

58 AAS included an upright chest radiograph and upright and supine abdominal radiog

59 essed by independent review of daily digital chest radiographs and arterial blood gases.

60 Chest radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans ob

61 ive pulmonary vascular abnormalities seen on chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in

62 Chest radiographs and computed tomography most commonly

63 Distinctive vascular lesions on chest radiographs and CT scans in Eisenmenger syndrome a

64 seases are included, and pictorial examples (chest radiographs and CT scans) are provided for the maj

65 te analysis showed that extent of disease on chest radiographs and CT scans, cyst size, V-P abnormali

66 stinctive vascular abnormalities observed on chest radiographs and CT scans.

67 fied these radiologist-missed cancers on the chest radiographs and graded them for visibility, locati

68 Chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomograph

69 a structured interview and informed consent, chest radiographs and low-dose CT were done for each par

70 orotic fractures, such as spine fractures on chest radiographs and sagittal multidetector CT reconstr

71 Posteroanterior chest radiographs and spirometry were performed on a gro

72 o the previous Mayo Lung Project, which used chest radiographs and sputum cytology for screening high

73 Simple diagnostic tests, such as chest radiographs and sputum smears, were ordered by cli

74 oracic vertebral body on frontal and lateral chest radiographs and to a line drawn between the anteri

75 t African sites, 206 (74%) had cavitation on chest radiograph, and 60 (22%) had HIV infection.

76 e (70%) of the cases had cavitary lesions on chest radiograph, and 94 (92%) had sputa smear-positive

77 tion of two negative sputum smears, a normal chest radiograph, and a CD4+ cell count of 350 or more p

78 Applicants underwent a chest radiograph, and any with results suggestive of tub

79 ein angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, chest radiograph, and chest computed tomography) togethe

80 he lung for carbon monoxide, pulse oximetry, chest radiograph, and high-resolution thoracic computeri

81 acute heart failure, dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, and increased brain natriuretic peptid

82 eline period, unadjusted arterial blood gas, chest radiograph, and RBC utilization in the interventio

83 ial incentives targeting arterial blood gas, chest radiograph, and RBC utilization.

84 ith 128 fewer arterial blood gases, 73 fewer chest radiographs, and 16 fewer RBCs per 100 patients (p

85 agnosis, an interpretable perfusion scan and chest radiographs, and a Wells' score.

86 p with daily complete blood count, scheduled chest radiographs, and biopsies.

87 Thoracic CT scans, chest radiographs, and clinical data were reviewed for 2

88 Medical records, chest radiographs, and computed tomographic (CT) scans o

89 Intraoperative radioscopy, chest radiographs, and pressure transducer monitoring us

90 laboratory data, electrocardiograms (EKGs), chest radiographs, and pulmonary function tests have bee

91 For each patient, clinical manifestations, chest radiographs, and pulmonary physiology were prospec

92 meters and lung area (LA) were obtained from chest radiographs, and ratios of MB/LA and TR/LA were ca

93 Arterial blood gas testing, chest radiographs, and RBC transfusions provide an impor

94 decrease the avoidable arterial blood gases, chest radiographs, and RBC utilization on utilization of

95 e number of orders for arterial blood gases, chest radiographs, and RBCs per patient.

96 fection; multiple infiltrates or cavities on chest radiograph; and comatose state, intubation, receip

97 Chest radiograph approximated accurate catheter tip posi

98 e (aPR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.60-3.52), and normal chest radiograph (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.63-2.16) and was

99 Routine postprocedure chest radiographs are considered standard practice.

100 isease heterogeneity and lung compression on chest radiographs are highly predictive of a favorable f

101 ight, weight, and measurements from previous chest radiographs are less reliable in predicting a safe

102 Chest radiographs are necessary to ensure correct intern

103 th tachypnea and interstitial infiltrates on chest radiograph at age 2 wk.

104 bgroup of men with normal lung parenchyma on chest radiograph at baseline, there was evidence of expo

105 with markers of disease severity, including chest radiograph, beryllium lymphocyte proliferation, an

106 hypothesis that reading perfusion scans with chest radiographs but without ventilation scans, and cat

107 Most lung cancers are initially detected on chest radiographs, but many benign lesions have radiolog

108 dentifying lung cancers previously missed on chest radiographs by radiologists, with histopathologic

109 ut (ie, milliampere seconds) of about 50%, a chest radiograph can be obtained with image quality appr

110 Neither clinical symptoms nor findings on chest radiographs can reliably distinguish children with

111 lysis included 79 185 matched A and B Reader chest radiograph classifications.

112 evaluated 20 16-bit posteroanterior digital chest radiographs compressed with Joint Photographic Exp

113 s involving ionizing radiation that included chest radiograph, computed tomogram scans, radionuclide

114 Chest radiographs, computed tomographic (CT) images, and

115 s (culture positive), probable tuberculosis (chest radiograph consistent), possible tuberculosis (che

116 The mean time between catheter insertion and chest radiograph control (28.3 min) was clearly longer t

117 Similarly, patient care items ("chest radiograph correctly interpreted"; "time to start

118 Pulmonary infiltrates seen on chest radiographs corresponded to intraalveolar edema an

119 Chest radiograph (CXR) findings were classified as showi

120 onal information obtained included whether a chest radiograph (CXR) was obtained and if postextubatio

121 n both microbiologically confirmed cases and chest radiograph (CXR)-positive cases compared to contro

122 Chest radiographs (CXRs) are a valuable diagnostic tool

123 Chest radiographs (CXRs) are frequently used to assess p

124 The appearance of portable chest radiographs (CXRs) may be affected by changes in v

125 Chest radiographs (CXRs) were graded from 0 to 6 (0, no

126 2 matched V/Q defects with regionally normal chest radiograph, (d) 1-3 small segmental perfusion defe

127 ed after a transient ischemic attack, when a chest radiograph demonstrated a right lung mass.

128 Lateral chest radiograph demonstrated lytic destruction of the x

129 Chest radiographs demonstrated mediastinal widening, ade

130 Annual screening with chest radiograph did not reduce lung cancer mortality co

131 Rats were assessed by daily weights, chest radiographs, drug trough levels (high-performance

132 monitoring included daily weight assessment, chest radiographs, drug trough levels measured by high-p

133 who had a large pleural effusion, found on a chest radiograph during the work-up of digital clubbing.

134 ed free of pulmonary symptoms and had normal chest radiographs during the 20-month follow-up period.

135 Twenty abnormal chest radiographs, each with a single nodule, and 20 nor

136 identally on routine imaging studies such as chest radiograph, echocardiography, chest computed tomog

137 Plasma sodium levels, chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, cardiac enzyme leve

138 ormance for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs, even when baseline performance was op

139 nd liver function tests every 3 months and a chest radiograph every 6 months.

140 Teamwork behavior items (e.g., "chest radiograph findings communicated to team" and "tea

141 us (hemodynamics, respiratory variables, and chest radiograph findings).

142 and general radiologists familiar with adult chest radiographs first evaluate the infant chest radiog

143 tuberculin skin test, syphilis serology, and chest radiograph) followed by more complex investigation

144 linically relevant complications detected on chest radiographs following ultrasound-guided right inte

145 linically relevant complications detected on chest radiographs following ultrasound-guided right inte

146 oup were offered annual posteroanterior view chest radiograph for 4 years.

147 ffective, expeditious alternative to routine chest radiograph for position controls of central venous

148 al low-dose CT assessments with three annual chest radiographs for the early detection of lung cancer

149 A chest radiograph helps localise the site and possible co

150 sufficient to recommend routine bone scans, chest radiographs, hematologic blood counts, tumor marke

151 , 1.15 to 5.63; P=0.02), pleural effusion on chest radiograph (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.18 to 5.58; P=0.02

152 and two miners with moderate changes in the chest radiographs (ILO 2/2).

153 of the aortic valve location on plain supine chest radiograph images, which can be used to evaluate i

154 etermine the aortic valve location on supine chest radiograph images.

155 Symptoms and chest radiographs improved, and amounts of macrophage in

156 position of catheter was then controlled by chest radiograph in all cases.

157 st that most influence the appearance of the chest radiograph in infants with cough and fever.

158 as associated with alveolar consolidation on chest radiograph in nonconfirmed cases, and with high (>

159 on could be easily monitored on plain supine chest radiograph in the ICU.

160 Initial chest radiographs in children with a mild and self-limit

161 g pattern images were extracted from digital chest radiographs in healthy individuals.

162 The chest radiographs in the control, LFM, and HMR 279 monot

163 diograph consistent), possible tuberculosis (chest radiograph inconsistent), or not tuberculosis (imp

164 All patients had dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, increased brain natriuretic peptide (B

165 Conclusion Chest radiograph interpretation skill increased with exp

166 Purpose To investigate the development of chest radiograph interpretation skill through medical tr

167 key aspects such as antibiotic pretreatment, chest radiograph interpretation, utility of induced sput

168 All chest radiographs interpreted as positive were reviewed

169 Location of an intrathoracic lesion on chest radiograph is facilitated by application of 'silho

170 Chest radiograph is key in establishing parenchymal lung

171 Another objective was to point out that chest radiograph is not sufficient to depict the evoluti

172 The chest radiograph is usually the first screening study pe

173 The detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs is limited by anatomic noise.

174 more, primary diagnosis with posteroanterior chest radiographs is not likely to be affected by the qu

175 ity of screening for lung cancer with modern chest radiographs is unknown.

176 e use of CBCs, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, computed tomograph

177 blood counts, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, pelvic ultrasounds

178 The absence of a new infiltrate on a plain chest radiograph lowers the likelihood of VAP (summary L

179 1), anemia (LR range, 2.2-3.3), and abnormal chest radiograph (LR range, 2.5-3.8).

180 iagnosis of hemoptysis may be established by chest radiograph, many pathologies may be missed.

181 nit, early CT scan findings complementary to chest radiograph markedly affect both diagnosis and clin

182 Beyond basic screening chest radiographs, modern cross-sectional imaging with c

183 nnual computed tomography (CT, n = 9,357) or chest radiograph (n = 9,357) screening and monitored for

184 Chest radiographs (n = 10) and computed tomographic (CT)

185 Chest radiographs (n = 17) and computed tomographic (CT)

186 empirical evidence, the decision to order a chest radiograph needs to rely on expert opinion in seek

187 1.03-1.27] per cycle threshold [CT]), and a chest radiograph not suggestive of active tuberculosis (

188 recent previous tuberculosis, high CT, and a chest radiograph not suggestive of active tuberculosis.

189 cteristic approach and a standardized set of chest radiographs, observer accuracy and variability are

190 A chest radiograph obtained at the outside hospital prompt

191 A chest radiograph obtained at the time of physical examin

192 sarcoidosis after evaluation of an abnormal chest radiograph obtained during work-up of a recently d

193 from 1995 to 2006 at two institutions, each chest radiograph obtained prior to tumor discovery was e

194 Multiple sequential chest radiographs obtained between 1955 and 2004 in 84 w

195 firmed S-OIV infection and available initial chest radiographs obtained between April 2009 and Octobe

196 Lateral chest radiographs obtained in 229 children (mean age, 3.

197 am was applied to 34 posteroanterior digital chest radiographs obtained in 34 patients (21 men, 13 wo

198 The preoperative chest radiographs obtained in 57 patients who had underg

199 -cm lung regions were extracted from digital chest radiographs obtained in healthy subjects.

200 s independently reviewed frontal and lateral chest radiographs obtained in young patients 24 hours af

201 Fifty-six chest radiographs of 34 primary lung cancers and 22 beni

202 Standard and DES chest radiographs of 50 patients with 55 confirmed prima

203 eaders reinterpreted the perfusion scans and chest radiographs of eligible patients.

204 Supine anterior-posterior chest radiographs of patients with an aortic valve prost

205 ible active tuberculosis (most with abnormal chest radiographs, only 18% symptomatic).

206 atography/mass spectrometry, blood analyses, chest radiographs, open lung biopsies, as well as tissue

207 berculosis therapy, 13 (45%) had an abnormal chest radiograph or a positive sputum smear.

208 equired obstructive spirometry, emphysema on chest radiograph or computed tomography, or physician di

209 ual clinical practice-eg, 50 (73%) ordered a chest radiograph or sputum test during the vignette comp

210 Any follow-up chest radiographs or computed tomographic images that ha

211 anifested as lobar or segmental opacities on chest radiographs or CT scans.

212 using capacity, and interstitial markings on chest radiographs or high-resolution computed tomography

213 ntubation, presence of primary lung disease, chest radiograph, or illness severity.

214 es were diagnosed by radionuclide bone scan, chest radiograph, or other body imaging, which was perfo

215 antimicrobial use (P = 0.032), and number of chest radiographs (P = 0.005), when controlling for pote

216 onent tests (P < 0.001) and 16% for portable chest radiographs (P = 0.03).

217 nia, age under 1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predicted therapy failu

218 e obtained for all intubated patients, 1.026 chest radiographs per patient day were performed.

219 the intervention, the ratio dropped to 0.653 chest radiographs per patient day, a decrease of 36.4%.

220 ased variability in ordering practice, fewer chest radiographs per patient, and an accompanying cost

221 evaluation (ie, tuberculin skin test and/or chest radiograph) per prevalent case diagnosed; number o

222 Sixty-six percent (547/833) of those with chest radiographs performed had infiltrates and 31% (340

223 Of 451 patients with chest radiographs performed, 195 (43%) had pneumonia (sp

224 , 76%; 95% CI, 62%-90%), and cardiomegaly on chest radiograph (pooled sensitivity, 89%; 95% CI, 73%-1

225 Vietnamese immigrants with abnormal chest radiographs provided up to three sputum specimens,

226 sitively with extent of lung infiltration on chest radiographs (r = 0.483; p < 0.05).

227 nd presence of pulmonary hypertension on the chest radiograph, reduced lung volume, and abnormal gas

228 has become a standard of care, postinsertion chest radiograph remains the gold standard to confirm ce

229 "edema" or "bilateral + infiltrates" on the chest radiograph report, a tidal volume of >8 mL/kg pred

230 a (validated by review of medical records or chest radiograph reports).

231 nderstanding of the appearance of the infant chest radiograph requires an understanding of the anatom

232 re visible on 12 (50%) and seven (29%) of 24 chest radiographs, respectively.

233 Conversely, a completely normal chest radiograph result or the absence of pain of sudden

234 The plain chest radiograph results are usually abnormal (sensitivi

235 Chest radiograph revealed a parenchymal infiltrate in 18

236 Although a chest radiograph revealed patchy bilateral alveolar dens

237 Chest radiographs revealed lymphadenopathy, pulmonary no

238 Chest radiograph ruled out pneumothorax in 137 of 137 pa

239 iomegaly, interstitial or pulmonary edema on chest radiograph, S(3) heart sound, tachycardia) plus le

240 The chest radiograph score was 12.7 for the 3 HAPE-susceptib

241 nd clinical condition (respiratory function, chest radiograph score, or Shwachman clinical score).

242 readers reviewed each worker's longitudinal chest radiograph series in reverse chronologic order and

243 The chest radiograph showed mediastinal air extending into t

244 dol, the woman became short of breath, and a chest radiograph showed severe pulmonary oedema.

245 The first chest radiograph showed significantly fewer abnormalitie

246 Fifteen chest radiographs showed major abnormalities.

247 Chest radiographs showed mild pulmonary edema with a sma

248 Chest radiographs showed pulmonary edema with a normal h

249 Chest radiographs showed pulmonary infiltrates in all pa

250 r antibodies, and double-stranded DNA, and a chest radiograph showing pleural fluid.

251 5%) workers were judged to have opacities on chest radiographs (small opacities, profusion >= 1/0, an

252 of anticentromere antibodies, hypertension, chest radiograph suggestive of pulmonary fibrosis, and l

253 Lobar infiltrates on chest radiographs suggestive of bacterial pneumonia were

254 ding and overlying a subtle lung nodule on a chest radiograph that are created by the projection of a

255 ARDS diagnosis relies on oxygenation and the chest radiograph that might be directly influenced by th

256 Fifty-three chest radiographs that depicted 31 primary lung cancers

257 or primary interpretation, full-size digital chest radiographs that have been JPEG compressed to 10:1

258 ositions and not to require a postprocedural chest radiograph, there were nine unexpected malposition

259 on of the peripheral vein and postprocedural chest radiograph to assess catheter tip position.

260 We obtained posteroanterior chest radiographs to identify the prevalence of pleural

261 An infiltrate on chest radiograph was considered the reference standard f

262 In 61 cases, neither was predicted (no chest radiograph was needed).

263 Chest radiograph was suggestive of a posterior mediastin

264 ases of tuberculosis (i.e., cases in which a chest radiograph was suggestive of active tuberculosis b

265 nactive tuberculosis (i.e., cases in which a chest radiograph was suggestive of tuberculosis that was

266 Neovascularity on chest radiographs was more common in Eisenmenger syndrom

267 A standardized set of 60 chest radiographs was presented to 162 study participant

268 The frequency of normal chest radiographs was significantly higher in group 1 (n

269 ts with both a positive smear and a cavitary chest radiograph were more likely to have TB infection o

270 Chest radiographs were abnormal in 11 (52%) episodes; fi

271 Eleven (48%) of 23 cancers for which prior chest radiographs were available were seen retrospective

272 Migrants whose chest radiographs were compatible with active tuberculos

273 andardized procedure notes and postprocedure chest radiographs were extracted and individually review

274 Chest radiographs were independently assessed by two obs

275 Chest radiographs were interpreted according to the Inte

276 Chest radiographs were made with low-kilovoltage, calciu

277 Chest radiographs were obtained approximately 28 days po

278 a 29-month control phase when routine daily chest radiographs were obtained for all intubated patien

279 Posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs were obtained in the emergency departm

280 After catheter insertion, chest radiographs were obtained to assess for mechanical

281 At this time, chest radiographs were obtained.

282 Independent reviews of chest radiographs were performed by radiologists.

283 lity was calculated, and echocardiograms and chest radiographs were performed on all study patients.

284 The chest radiographs were read as "normal/near normal," "ab

285 The medical records and daily chest radiographs were reviewed by a pediatric radiologi

286 Chest radiographs were reviewed independently by study r

287 itoring, arterial gas analysis, and portable chest radiographs were reviewed to identify the timing o

288 Chest radiographs were reviewed, and information on pleu

289 st computed tomographic (CT) scans, and four chest radiographs were reviewed.

290 Chest radiographs were unchanged from baseline in 10 (48

291 Chest radiographs were unchanged from precollapse findin

292 Follow-up chest radiographs were used to detect filter migration,

293 graphy and lung ultrasound is noninferior to chest radiograph when used to accurately assess central

294 h samples from 108 patients with an abnormal chest radiograph who were scheduled for bronchoscopy.

295 es were obtained in 120 patients with normal chest radiographs who also underwent angiographic PA pre

296 luid-density posterior mediastinal lesion on chest radiograph with destruction of the vertebral body

297 Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which compared chest radiograph with spiral computed tomographic (CT) s

298 ly manifest as a pulmonary nodule or mass on chest radiographs, with more nodules seen on CT scans.

299 urrent illness such as cough and an abnormal chest radiograph without antecedent tuberculosis or pneu

300 ning Trial, which compared CT screening with chest radiograph, yielded a mortality advantage of 20% t