ライフサイエンスコーパス: chest radiography

1 ose tests; electrocardiography; and portable chest radiography).

2 not provide a microbiological diagnosis (eg, chest radiography).

3 L-2R and ACE levels determined and underwent chest radiography.

4 , particularly the use of pulse oximetry and chest radiography.

5 onary nodules, one of which was calcified at chest radiography.

6 nd rate of false-positive results of routine chest radiography.

7 identify four out of every five earlier than chest radiography.

8 e (50%) of their 24 cancers were detected at chest radiography.

9 polymerase chain reaction to detect HIV, and chest radiography.

10 at baseline, compared with 68 (7% [5-9]) by chest radiography.

11 screen-film posteroanterior (PA) and lateral chest radiography.

12 raphy system as they are used clinically for chest radiography.

13 stic thoracentesis do not need postprocedure chest radiography.

14 raphy compared with conventional screen-film chest radiography.

15 al examination, basic laboratory testing, or chest radiography.

16 ients with positive or equivocal findings at chest radiography.

17 pheid Inc.), tuberculin skin test (TST), and chest radiography.

18 ence of a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography.

19 (1:1) to follow-up with either PET/CT or US/chest radiography.

20 d tomography (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography.

21 course of antibiotics or oral steroids, and chest radiography.

22 he catheter tip determined by postprocedural chest radiography.

23 lacement of yearly follow-up posteroanterior chest radiography.

24 compared with that diagnosed with routine US/chest radiography.

25 c, and with a right lower lobe infiltrate on chest radiography.

26 sonographic air bronchograms undetectable by chest radiography.

27 and exclusion of pneumothorax compared with chest radiography.

28 sis for evaluating clinical image quality in chest radiography.

29 mputed tomography of the chest compared with chest radiography.

30 diagnosed using clinical questionnaires and chest radiography.

31 center during 2007 underwent PA and lateral chest radiography.

32 f the lesions overlooked by human readers at chest radiography.

33 the diagnostic capabilities and influence of chest radiography.

34 y group (26,715 to low-dose CT and 26,724 to chest radiography); 26,309 participants (98.5%) and 26,0

35 (41%), fecal occult blood testing (39%), and chest radiography (36%), were desired.

36 Chest radiography (38%) and abdominal computed tomograph

37 the 69,820 patients, 66,276 (95%) underwent chest radiography, 63,715 (91%) received supplemental ox

38 nd 39 of 40 relapses were identified with US/chest radiography (97.5%; P = .0001 for the equivalence

39 d with the 26,554 participants who underwent chest radiography, according to the quintile of 5-year r

40 Chest radiography alone may be sufficient for initial sc

41 alth and work questionnaire, spirometry, and chest radiography among 464 male California rice farmers

42 galy or signs of congestive heart failure on chest radiography and absence of known valve disease wer

43 However, chest radiography and arterial blood gas sampling seem u

44 CLMs using ultrasound and MRI has increased, chest radiography and computed tomography still play imp

45 The accuracies of chest radiography and CT for the detection of pleural di

46 Chest radiography and CT, respectively, revealed interst

47 Initial radiologic examination included chest radiography and plain abdominal erect radiography.

48 Combined chest radiography and serum ACE levels at the standard c

49 Chest radiography and serum angiotensin-converting enzym

50 Chest radiography and sputum culture drug susceptibility

51 All patients underwent chest radiography and thin-section CT, and images were i

52 chocardiography, metabolic exercise testing, chest radiography, and hemodynamics before intervention

53 ccult-cancer screening (basic blood testing, chest radiography, and screening for breast, cervical, a

54 he efficacy of low-dose computed tomography, chest radiography, and sputum cytologic evaluation for l

55 .8-3.8]) by CT and seven (0.7% [0.3-1.3]) by chest radiography, and stage I malignant disease in 23 (

56 lture colony count, bilateral cavitations on chest radiography, and the number of drugs the initial i

57 On the basis of clinical assessment, chest radiography, and transthoracic echocardiography, a

58 the procedure to catheter utilization after chest radiography approval was 2.4 hours.

59 US and chest radiography are diagnostic tools that enable effec

60 icting 6-y lung cancer incidence in the PLCO chest radiography arm, with sensitivities >79.8% and spe

61 to diagnose pneumonia were determined using chest radiography as a reference standard.

62 cy with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiv

63 ceiving M. vaccae had greater improvement on chest radiography at 6 months (91% vs. 77% for placebo r

64 ine or screening posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography at a university-affiliated primary car

65 underwent several imaging studies-including chest radiography; bone scanning; contrast material-enha

66 nstances of NSCLC evident retrospectively at chest radiography but undetected by a radiologist at a t

67 trictive bronchiolitis had normal results on chest radiography, but about one quarter were found to h

68 ference standard for diagnosing pneumonia is chest radiography, but it is likely that many physicians

69 Systematic but unselective daily routine chest radiography can likely be eliminated without incre

70 Perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography can provide diagnostic accuracy simila

71 ers at a smaller size and earlier stage than chest radiography can.

72 Chest radiography (chest x-ray [CXR] and chest computed

73 Chest radiography combined with sIL-2R at a cutoff of 60

74 icantly improved with selenium-based digital chest radiography compared with conventional screen-film

75 quires various imaging techniques, including chest radiography, computed tomographic scanning, and bo

76 These imaging modalities include chest radiography, computed tomography, lung magnetic re

77 ren between 1 month and 15 years of age with chest radiography-confirmed pneumonia.

78 V-P scintigraphy, chest radiography, conventional and thin-section CT, and

79 management by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus D

80 l computed tomography (CT), as compared with chest radiography, could reduce mortality from lung canc

81 for three specific scenarios: performance of chest radiography (CXR) as the first radiation-associate

82 t or former heavy smokers to receive LDCT or chest radiography (CXR) for three annual screens.

83 unction tests, Doppler echocardiography, and chest radiography (CXR).

84 vealed that the elimination of daily routine chest radiography did not affect either hospital or ICU

85 er with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001;

86 accuracy of bedside ultrasound compared with chest radiography for confirmation of central venous cat

87 sensitivity of the method was compared with chest radiography for detecting radiation-induced change

88 sion Tomosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determin

89 , dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and man

90 the cost effectiveness of routine miniature chest radiography for screening for tuberculosis on admi

91 ening, with the use of either low-dose CT or chest radiography, for 3 years.

92 ups: those with pericardial calcification on chest radiography (group I) and those without (group II)

93 Model validation in the chest radiography groups of the PLCO and the National Lu

94 CT examination and 4% with a false-positive chest radiography had a resulting invasive procedure.

95 Routine chest radiography has low diagnostic yield in asymptomat

96 Chest radiography (images not shown) revealed bronchiect

97 owed that tuberculosis screening by (mobile) chest radiography improved screening coverage and tuberc

98 were compared at posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography in 52 adult male patients.

99 Universal chest radiography in a large pre-employment TB screening

100 mined the effect of abandoning daily routine chest radiography in adults in intensive care units (ICU

101 inical assessment, tuberculin skin test, and chest radiography in all eligible children irrespective

102 gher for tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fo

103 aphic variables and to compare sonograhy and chest radiography in detecting early stages of NEC in su

104 Chest radiography in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF)

105 w-dose helical computed tomography (CT) with chest radiography in the screening of older current and

106 ma patients older than 14 years who received chest radiography in this prospective, observational, di

107 This result shows that systematic use of chest radiography is a useful tool for active TB screeni

108 Chest radiography is considered the gold standard for pn

109 Screening for tuberculosis with miniature chest radiography is cost effective even under a wide ra

110 normalities or asymmetrical lung sounds, and chest radiography is usually not indicated.

111 tients with cough lasting 3 weeks or longer, chest radiography may be warranted in the absence of oth

112 not noted nor controlled for during portable chest radiography, may substantially alter the interpret

113 Computed tomography (CT) and chest radiography models were used.

114 ghest numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal C

115 ratio of < or = 150 torr (< or = 20 kPa) and chest radiography on admission to the cardiovascular ICU

116 Of the 249 patients who underwent chest radiography on admission, 100 (40%) had findings c

117 e of the hemithorax occupied by effusion, on chest radiography on day 7 as compared with day 1.

118 two study sites compared times for two-view chest radiography only, and those at the other two study

119 re diagnosis, of 6897 patients who had had a chest radiography, only 2296 (33%) also had spirometry.

120 e primary outcome was pneumonia diagnosed by chest radiography or by the presence of 3 respiratory in

121 Two randomized trials of screening with chest radiography or low-dose CT are currently under way

122 ow significant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone.

123 tection when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis.

124 Chest radiography or Xpert RIF/MTB, delivered through ma

125 al staging approach including bone scanning, chest radiography, or dedicated CT and abdominopelvic so

126 Of the 17 children who had chest radiography performed, 12 (70.6%) had abnormal fin

127 conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and to

128 omography (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imag

129 ronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cell components, chest radiography, pulmonary function test results, and

130 Symptomatic employees had chest radiography, pulmonary function tests, high-resolu

131 se computed tomography (CT) as compared with chest radiography reduced lung-cancer mortality.

132 al computed tomography (CT) rather than with chest radiography reduced mortality from lung cancer.

133 3.4% for low-dose CT and 73.5% and 91.3% for chest radiography, respectively.

134 Chest radiography reveals diffuse bilateral infiltrates,

135 rs were observed with CT screening than with chest radiography screening.

136 examination, routine laboratory testing, and chest radiography seems to be appropriate for detecting

137 Miniature chest radiography should be strongly considered as an im

138 suspected influenza and lung infiltrates on chest radiography should receive early and aggressive tr

139 matic mediastinal masses depicted at routine chest radiography should undergo contrast-enhanced CT.

140 Initial chest radiography showed an enlarged heart with bilatera

141 US/chest radiography showed significantly higher specificit

142 Illness severity as measured by chest radiography, sputum smears, and symptoms had littl

143 isease using clinical criteria that included chest radiography staging, need for treatment, lung func

144 ure on screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortal

145 images acquired with the flat-panel digital chest radiography system as compared with those acquired

146 ior radiographs were obtained with a digital chest radiography system.

147 Compared with chest radiography, there was also a trend favoring reduc

148 erior mediastinal masses depicted at routine chest radiography underwent ultrasonography (US), unenha

149 as associated with alveolar consolidation at chest radiography, very severe pneumonia, oxygen saturat

150 ere male, and the prevalence of pneumonia by chest radiography was 18.0%.

151 y subgroup in which performing daily routine chest radiography was beneficial.

152 ening for active tuberculosis with miniature chest radiography was estimated to be $9,600 per case id

153 Chest radiography was estimated to have a sensitivity of

154 The rates for chest radiography were 9% (CI, 8% to 11%) and 15% (CI, 1

155 tentially resectable NSCLC lesions missed at chest radiography were characterized by predominantly pe

156 Complications of ECMO seen at chest radiography were recorded.

157 ronary artery aneurysms and calcification on chest radiography were unusual features in this group of

158 erformed lung ultrasonography, and evaluated chest radiography when available.

159 ing with DCNNs can accurately classify TB at chest radiography with an AUC of 0.99.

160 Random assignment to low-dose CT or chest radiography with baseline and 1 repeated annual sc

161 Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more

162 Chest radiography would also identify substantially more

163 56%-72%) specificity alone but combined with chest radiography yielded 92% sensitivity and 58% specif