ライフサイエンスコーパス: child abuse

1 ur understanding of this devastating form of child abuse.

2 r work has been cut out for us in preventing child abuse.

3 treatment is one of the most common forms of child abuse.

4 counted for 63% of the perpetrators of fatal child abuse.

5 eved to underestimate the incidence of fatal child abuse.

6 infant homicides are considered to be fatal child abuse.

7 erosions, or trauma, including the trauma of child abuse.

8 the skeletal survey performed for suspected child abuse.

9 iner's office for the evaluation of possible child abuse.

10 ect the evaluation of children for suspected child abuse.

11 e anterior cingulate cortex as a function of child abuse.

12 ychiatric conditions and lifetime history of child abuse.

13 n the care of children who may be at risk of child abuse.

14 ce of any professional involved in assessing child abuse.

15 or protective alleles who have a history of child abuse.

16 was observed in individuals with history of child abuse.

17 f the 259 homicides, 220 (84.9%) were due to child abuse, 22 (8.5%) were not related to abuse, and th

18 tology (mean [SD], PTSD Symptom Scale for no child abuse, 8.03 [10.48] vs > or =2 types of abuse, 20.

19 ttractive choice for evaluation of suspected child abuse, an application in which high sensitivity is

20 cian's role in the criminal investigation of child abuse and as a witness for court proceedings.

21 fetime diagnosis of mental disorders on both child abuse and child neglect.

22 r the search terms of child abuse, sexual or child abuse and either physical examination; genitalia;

23 The body of knowledge about child abuse and its mimics continues to expand.

24 study involving court-substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect and a matched comparison group w

25 International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool-Child

26 Evidence of the long-term sequelae of child abuse and neglect continues to accumulate, but wit

27 The National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File

28 Victims of substantiated child abuse and neglect from 1967 to 1971 in a Midwester

29 d infancy were identified as perpetrators of child abuse and neglect in 0.29 vs 0.54 verified reports

30 As knowledge about child abuse and neglect increases worldwide, so does the

31 tive analysis of the Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect interview and questionnaire data

32 accumulated unequivocally demonstrating that child abuse and neglect is associated with a marked incr

33 itional research on interventions to prevent child abuse and neglect is needed.

34 Several widely held beliefs about child abuse and neglect may be incorrect.

35 , public health policies designed to prevent child abuse and neglect might be enhanced by an increase

36 inese translation DESCRIPTION: Update of the child abuse and neglect portion of the 2004 U.S.

37 Verified reports of child abuse and neglect were abstracted from state recor

38 Child abuse and neglect were associated with an increase

39 subsequent pregnancies, the use of welfare, child abuse and neglect, and criminal behavior on the pa

40 Whereas prevention is the key to ending child abuse and neglect, diagnosis and treatment continu

41 Recent work exploring the risk factors for child abuse and neglect, long-term consequences of child

42 ood insufficiency, lack of health insurance, child abuse and neglect, overweight and obesity, firearm

43 Interpersonal violence, which includes child abuse and neglect, youth violence, intimate partne

44 ness of interventions to reduce incidence of child abuse and neglect.

45 lity, problems due to use of substances, and child abuse and neglect.

46 oral interventions and counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect.

47 modest effects in the primary prevention of child abuse and neglect; however, the prevention of recu

48 Level of child abuse and non-child abuse trauma each separately p

49 Child abuse and trauma alter the endogenous stress respo

50 s; the most prominent are domestic violence, child abuse, and elder abuse.

51 suicide, with or without a history of severe child abuse, and of psychiatrically healthy control subj

52 ociated with histories of attempted suicide, child abuse, and recent sexual dysfunction.

53 incurred in war and civil unrest, trauma of child abuse, and the experience of being bullied in chil

54 ressed suicide completers with no history of child abuse, and they were strongly correlated with myel

55 Physicians caring for the victims of child abuse are frequently asked to render an opinion re

56 f the FKBP5 gene interacted with severity of child abuse as a predictor of adult PTSD symptoms.

57 (N=27) or without (N=25) a history of severe child abuse, as well as from psychiatrically healthy con

58 medicine and lesions are misdiagnosed, with child abuse being a common misdiagnosis.

59 hips between psychopathology, substance use, child abuse, bullying, internet use, and youth suicidal

60 The incidence of child abuse continues to decline in the United States, a

61 A review of the literature on child abuse continues to emphasize the importance of car

62 The evidence base for many forms of child abuse continues to grow.

63 ture is the challenge which the diagnosis of child abuse creates for clinicians.

64 an outpatient examination should consider a child abuse evaluation in the absence of other known ocu

65 noted between deployment-related trauma and child abuse exposure among Regular Forces personnel.

66 However, the relationship between child abuse exposure and suicide-related outcomes in mil

67 cent evidence indicates a high prevalence of child abuse exposure in modern US veterans, which may ex

68 ay be more likely to enter the military, and child abuse exposure may increase the likelihood of suic

69 Any child abuse exposure was higher in the Regular Forces (4

70 ssociations among deployment-related trauma, child abuse exposure, and suicide-related outcomes in mi

71 Child abuse exposure, including physical abuse, sexual a

72 All types of child abuse exposures were associated with increased odd

73 There is a great need in the child abuse field for more formal, rigorous assessment o

74 Child abuse has devastating and long-lasting consequence

75 Because different types of child abuse have equivalent, broad, and universal effect

76 Individuals with a child abuse history may be more likely to enter the mili

77 The rate of child abuse homicide increased from 1.5 per 100000 perso

78 found that significant underascertainment of child abuse homicides in vital records systems persists

79 The results suggest that child abuse, in part through epigenetic reprogramming of

80 ent issues, including sexual abuse, physical child abuse, inflicted head trauma, and child abuse prev

81 ection of CMLs, a characteristic fracture in child abuse, initial radiographic evaluation remains nec

82 Severe child abuse is a prevalent risk for early adult CVD that

83 Finally, results showed that child abuse is associated in the Kappa intron with a sel

84 The evidence base for many forms of child abuse is growing.

85 Although child abuse is widespread and has been associated with c

86 istressing but nonabusive events, memory for child abuse itself, and autobiographical memory.

87 Child abuse may manifest as skin injuries, skeletal trau

88 Prevention efforts targeting child abuse may reduce suicide-related outcomes.

89 Children with perpetrator-admitted child abuse, metabolic bone disease, birth trauma, or in

90 improve the recognition of and management of child abuse need to be sustained.

91 erse early life experiences (aELEs), such as child abuse, neglect, or trauma, increase lifetime vulne

92 Early life stress (ELS) in the form of child abuse/neglect is associated with an increased risk

93 morphisms appeared to moderate the effect of child abuse on the risk for adult depressive symptoms.

94 ion in the childhood abuse (69%) vs. the non-child abuse-only group (34%).

95 e any difference in improving recognition of child abuse or in preventing recurrent maltreatment.

96 , social isolation or withdrawal (33 [25%]), child abuse or neglect (20 [15%]), excessive drinking (3

97 es have been made in diagnosing and treating child abuse, our work has been cut out for us in prevent

98 ciation between cerebrospinal fluid IL-8 and child abuse (p = .07) and mortality (p = .01).

99 ion and reporting of pediatric fractures for child abuse, particularly in toddlers with accidental in

100 rimand by the General Medical Council of two child abuse pediatricians, which was felt by many to be

101 been validated this year by the creation of Child Abuse Pediatrics as a board certified specialty in

102 community's commitment to the recognition of child abuse pediatrics as a formal subspecialty.

103 RECENT FINDINGS: The field of child abuse pediatrics continues to engender controversy

104 Child abuse pediatrics is a well-established and credibl

105 The field of child abuse pediatrics is still young, with the first bo

106 An appreciation of the scope of Child Abuse Pediatrics requires an understanding of phys

107 e to improve and expand our understanding of child abuse pediatrics.

108 rted personal experience with partner abuse, child abuse, physical abuse, and sexual abuse.

109 report will highlight recent efforts toward child abuse prevention, focusing on home visiting progra

110 ical child abuse, inflicted head trauma, and child abuse prevention.

111 environmental factors are contributory, with child abuse providing significant risk liability.

112 Finally, child abuse recently became an accredited subspecialty o

113 Child abuse remains a relatively frequent cause of ortho

114 Child abuse remains a significant problem in the United

115 or the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Child Abuse Screening Tool-Child Institutional.

116 Victims of child abuse (sexual and physical) and neglect are at inc

117 ounter perplexing forensic issues related to child abuse, sexual assault, or unexpected childhood dea

118 e and were indexed under the search terms of child abuse, sexual or child abuse and either physical e

119 However, it is clear that specialists in child abuse should also play a role in order for diagnos

120 ings challenge widely held beliefs about how child abuse should be recognized and treated-a responsib

121 Suspected cases of child abuse should be well documented and reported to th

122 A history of child abuse specifically associated in the anterior insu

123 Controversy around the diagnosis of child abuse still continues, with current debate focused

124 he overall detection of fractures related to child abuse than did baseline skeletal survey.

125 ive head trauma (AHT) is a dangerous form of child abuse that can be difficult to diagnose in young c

126 080; minimum P = .0004) with the severity of child abuse to predict level of adult PTSD symptoms afte

127 icant genetic interactions with level of non-child abuse trauma as predictor of adult PTSD symptoms,

128 Level of child abuse and non-child abuse trauma each separately predicted level of ad

129 ion severity scores, age, sex, levels of non-child abuse trauma exposure, and genetic ancestry.

130 ymptom outcome or interact with level of non-child abuse trauma to predict PTSD symptom severity, 4 S

131 ant levels of childhood abuse as well as non-child abuse trauma using a verbally presented survey com

132 ypes of abuse, 20.93 [14.32]; and for no non-child abuse trauma, 3.58 [6.27] vs > or =4 types, 16.74

133 e evaluation of a child suspected of being a child abuse victim.

134 for these hypotheses comes from research on child abuse victims' memory and suggestibility regarding

135 A history of child abuse was associated with cell type-specific chang

136 s, but little is known about associations of child abuse with adult mortality.

137 We examined associations of child abuse with CVD events among 66 798 women in the Nu

138 ounted for much of the association of severe child abuse with CVD.