ライフサイエンスコーパス: chimp

1 al transcripts and 5524 chimp ESTs to the 4x chimp draft genome assembly and identified polymorphisms

2 7628 chimpanzee virtual transcripts and 5524 chimp ESTs to the 4x chimp draft genome assembly and ide

3 imp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-human coalescent time of 5 million years before pr

4 Recently, we identified a chimp cDNA, termed CR1b, which represented transcription

5 In general, models that allow chimps to have a larger per-repeat unit slippage rate an

6 We find that human and chimp FOXP2 have similar binding sites that are distinct

7 tch events during the evolution of human and chimp from their common ancestor and hundreds of events

8 he methylation differences between human and chimp have occurred in the germline.

9 rgoing natural selection along the human and chimp lineage by fitting models that include parameters

10 bridisation" between the diverging human and chimp lineages, such observations can be explained more

11 Human and chimp orthologous regions show a striking similarity in

12 Although human and chimp positively selected genes have different molecular

13 We profiled the methylomes of human and chimp sperm as a basis for comparison to methylation pat

14 Comparing methylomes of human and chimp sperm revealed a subset of differentially methylat

15 n compared with the orientation in human and chimp.

16 gions differ significantly between human and chimp.

17 er similarity with the homologous murine and chimp genomic and protein sequences and contained both N

18 nding syntenic regions in the mouse, rat and chimp genomes indicates, as previously suggested, that p

19 at the CTL repertoire overlaps in humans and chimps and that the HLA-A2 and HLA-B7 supertypes extend

20 n synonymous rate in ESX1 between humans and chimps as well as among a total of 15 primate species.

21 analyzing nearly 14,000 genes of humans and chimps.

22 mans (worldwide sample) and four great apes (chimp, bonobo, and gorilla).

23 r that is otherwise highly conserved between chimps and other mammals.

24 g adaptive physiological differences between chimps and humans, human-accelerated genes are significa

25 the proposed cognitive discontinuity between chimps and humans.

26 wn HIV-1 and the infection of chimpanzees by chimp-adapted HIV-1.

27 s of 5 different categories of animals (cat, chimp, gorilla, tiger, fish).

28 Common chimps and bonobos are our closest living relatives but

29 to compare reaction rates among human CPEB3, chimp CPEB3, and HDV ribozymes.

30 etween WDR36 orthologues in mouse, rat, dog, chimp and human.

31 The peptides recognized by each chimp corresponded with the ability of its class I molec

32 teny relationships among 10 amniotes (human, chimp, macaque, rat, mouse, pig, cattle, dog, opossum, a

33 e difference in gene expression among human, chimp, and orangutan, which suggested an accelerated rat

34 complete genomes of mammals (such as human, chimp, horse, and mouse) into their constituent nongenic

35 real TFBS occurrences calculated for human, chimp, mouse, rat, zebrafish and fugu genomes are availa

36 included the analyses of 11 genomes: human, chimp, rhesus, mouse, rat, dog, cat, chicken, guinea pig

37 uilt using the latest releases of the human, chimp, dog, macaque and mouse genomes, so that the resul

38 e is consistent with that based on the human-chimp comparison.

39 red to humans give a better fit to the human-chimp data as well as the human genomic data.

40 he chimpanzee nuclear genome since the human-chimp divergence, which is significantly greater than th

41 fold lower than estimates based on the human-chimp divergence.

42 in our 15 candidate genes predate the human/chimp divergence.

43 onal networks activated in humans but not in chimps by the FoxP2 gene suggest molecular mechanisms un

44 s is substantially smaller in humans than in chimps, despite a generally higher nonsynonymous substit

45 , fruit fly, fugu, chicken, dog, rat, mouse, chimp and human.

46 o substitutions is 3.0 for this 2 million-nt chimp DNA sample compared with human.

47 a key difference in the immune reactivity of chimp and human lymphocytes appears to be related to the

48 ing region of human CR1 and the 3' region of chimp CR1b.

49 that show accelerated evolution in human or chimp, as compared to noncoding regions showing accelera

50 me sequence data from four nonhuman species (chimp, dog, mouse, and rat) with recently available comp

51 were not infectious in a second susceptible chimp, even when from donors with low-level, intermitten

52 Further sequence analysis suggests that chimp, dog and frog nyctalopins are likely to be GPI anc

53 d popularity, a more likely scenario is that chimps and humans were infected by an HIV-1 precursor vi

54 terns, comparisons between the human and the chimp mt protein sequences also revealed a surprisingly

55 nt are present in about equal amounts in the chimp and human sequences.

56 sequence is ancestral or derived, using the chimp genome as the outgroup.

57 From a comparison of our haplogroups to two chimp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-hum

58 e also detected in occasional HBV-uninfected chimps.