コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 f the missing bricks for the wall, exists in chlamydiae.
2 sglycosylation reactions occur in pathogenic Chlamydiae.
3 tion required live, transcriptionally active chlamydiae.
4 pholipase D (PLD) enzyme family varies among chlamydiae.
5 orate developmental regulation mechanisms in chlamydiae.
6 the site of attachment of surface-associated chlamydiae.
7 nsfer of genes between the rodent-associated Chlamydiae.
8 n of active disease were positive for ocular chlamydiae.
9 e 1 (Th1) response, which effectively clears chlamydiae.
10 nduced artificially with known quantities of chlamydiae.
11 n of the host ERK-cPLA2 signaling pathway by chlamydiae.
12 e of the cycle and in the infectious form of chlamydiae.
13 er infection, even in the presence of viable chlamydiae.
14 ndent on the size of the inoculating dose of chlamydiae.
15 centrations sufficient to kill intracellular chlamydiae.
16 d features related to the complex biology of chlamydiae.
17 t AHNAK is transiently recruited by invading chlamydiae.
18 ing that these genes are conserved among the chlamydiae.
19 osely homologous to those of hsp10s of other chlamydiae.
20 d were also less susceptible to infection by chlamydiae.
21 rescein-1, succinimidyl ester) conjugated to chlamydiae.
22 ectly examined the pH of vesicles containing chlamydiae.
23 t time the presence of PG in a member of the Chlamydiae.
24 ity to survive and are proficient killers of chlamydiae.
25 ce biochemical and physiological analyses of chlamydiae.
26 did not impact development of intracellular chlamydiae.
27 ired for optimal growth of the intracellular chlamydiae.
28 f multivesicular bodies to the intracellular chlamydiae.
29 ensis is a novel organism closely related to chlamydiae.
34 e shed approximately 3 logs fewer infectious chlamydiae and are protected from genital tract inflamma
35 is and C. pneumoniae MOMP exposure on intact chlamydiae and immunogenic properties might be because t
38 dual deletion mutants were used to transform chlamydiae and the transformants were characterized phen
39 molecular and cellular interactions between chlamydiae and their host and large-scale prospective im
40 ry infection, shed high levels of infectious chlamydiae, and did not resolve the infection until 3 to
41 d spondyloarthritis continue to suggest that chlamydiae, and perhaps other pathogens function in the
42 karyotic cells that were similar to those of chlamydiae, and the microspheres were competitively inhi
52 nlike other intracellular bacteria, however, chlamydiae are metabolically inactive extracellularly an
71 dritic cells (DC) pulsed ex vivo with killed chlamydiae as a novel approach to vaccination against ch
72 The enhanced production of this antigen by chlamydiae as a result of iron limitation is of particul
73 type III secretion systems of environmental chlamydiae at macromolecular resolution and find support
74 accompanied by dispersal of the chromatin as chlamydiae become transcriptionally active, although the
78 nvestigated in the preferred target cells of chlamydiae, cervical epithelial cells, nor in vaginally
79 , as follows: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, Chloroflexi, Euryarchaeota, Firmicutes, Fuso
82 rowth and late differentiation, suggest that chlamydiae contained in small non-fusogenic inclusions w
84 ports an evolutionary relationship among the chlamydiae, cyanobacteria, and plants and strengthens th
86 or purify peptidoglycan (PG) from pathogenic Chlamydiae despite genetic and biochemical evidence and
93 is a safe niche for chlamydial replication, chlamydiae exploit a number of host cell processes, incl
96 titively inhibited the infectivity of viable chlamydiae for epithelial cells, indicating that the MOM
100 tion, although very effective in eradicating chlamydiae from genital tissue and preventing upper geni
101 found that Th2-MoPn was unable to eradicate chlamydiae from the genital tract (GT) when it was trans
102 te that the immune system is unable to clear chlamydiae from the gut, so they can remain indefinitely
103 and late T3S inactivation upon detachment of chlamydiae from the inclusion membrane are crucial for c
104 ly NOS2(-/-) mice shed low numbers of viable chlamydiae from the lower genital tract after immunosupp
105 f the treatments affected shedding of viable chlamydiae from the lower urogenital tract, but the admi
106 posed to Desferal: (i) inclusions containing chlamydiae greatly delayed in maturation, (ii) substanti
108 achomatis, to which a protein in extracts of chlamydiae harvested at 23 h after infection binds.
113 g dyes, here we show that some environmental chlamydiae have cell wall sacculi consisting of a novel
115 in chlamydia-infected cells, suggesting that chlamydiae have evolved specific mechanisms for modifyin
116 s and recent advances that have revealed how chlamydiae have maintained conserved aspects of T3S whil
118 The data presented here demonstrate that chlamydiae have the ability to convert a regulatory mole
122 r set of host proteins as did endocytosis of chlamydiae; however, unlike viable chlamydial organisms,
128 cular genetic analyses regarding the role of chlamydiae in induction of inflammatory arthritis have i
129 ors of peptidoglycan synthesis or culture of chlamydiae in medium lacking tryptophan leads to the for
130 he presence or absence of antibodies against chlamydiae in only 78 and 4.9% of sheep and bovine sera,
132 delayed the appearance of the peak level of chlamydiae in the animal and decreased the pathological
133 ingly, we detected greater numbers of viable chlamydiae in the oviducts at lower inoculating doses, a
135 primary peritoneal neutrophils (PPNs) killed chlamydiae in vitro in an antibody-dependent manner.
136 last several years, four different phages of chlamydiae, in addition to a phage associated with Chlam
137 eterinarians, that in virtually all hosts of chlamydiae, including mammals and birds, chlamydiae resi
138 Our findings reveal a mechanism by which chlamydiae induce localized cytoskeletal changes by the
140 Cytotoxin gene transcripts were detected in chlamydiae-infected cells, and a protein with the expect
142 l differentiation of the replicating form of chlamydiae into the infectious form until sufficient rou
143 vitro is defined as viable but noncultivable chlamydiae involving morphologically enlarged, aberrant,
145 ta suggest that the inflammatory response to chlamydiae is initiated and sustained by actively infect
147 ht on how the construction of a cell wall in chlamydiae is taking shape and why the wall is being bui
149 t during reductive evolution, the pathogenic chlamydiae lost individual nucleotide transporters, in c
150 properties of Npt1Ct and its conservation in chlamydiae make it a potential target for the developmen
151 ed, a clearer picture of the extent to which Chlamydiae manipulate mammalian cellular processes is be
152 nown about the molecular mechanisms by which Chlamydiae manipulate the mammalian host because they ar
153 s, suggesting that ligation of TLR4 by whole chlamydiae may down-modulate signaling by other TLRs.
155 condary chlamydial lung infection eliminated chlamydiae more effectively and generated a lung cytokin
156 hlamydophila genomes shows that, as in other chlamydiae, most of the genome diversity is restricted t
159 multivesicular bodies and the intracellular chlamydiae, neutralization with small interfering RNAs a
163 an-intermediate' organisms that includes the Chlamydiae, Orientia tsutsugamushi, Wolbachia and Anapla
164 Furthermore, because GrgA is present only in chlamydiae, our findings highlight how nonconserved regi
165 developmental stages of three environmental chlamydiae: Parachlamydia acanthamoebae, Protochlamydia
166 logy varies dramatically among the different chlamydiae, particularly within the species Chlamydia ps
167 no compelling evidence from gene trees that Chlamydiae played any role in establishing the primary p
168 the C. trachomatis genome has revealed that chlamydiae possess genes that may encode a type III secr
170 Because of the dearth of genetic tools for chlamydiae, previous studies examining secreted proteins
173 abbreviated genital infection with virulent chlamydiae promotes anamnestic antibody and T cell respo
174 -d-erythro-sphingos ine as a vital stain for chlamydiae proved to be a sensitive method for identifyi
175 le approaches to the genetic manipulation of chlamydiae raises the possibility of explosive progress
177 ificant increase (P < 0.05) in the amount of chlamydiae recovered from the vaginas of mice that had r
185 mance liquid chromatography, suggesting that chlamydiae require a minimum concentration of each amino
186 of chlamydiae, including mammals and birds, chlamydiae reside in the gastrointestinal tract for long
189 paratus provides support for the notion that chlamydiae secrete proteins via a type III mechanism.
190 results show that DC efficiently phagocytose chlamydiae, secrete IL-12 p40, and present chlamydial an
192 osis of ruminant infections with abortigenic chlamydiae, since they are more sensitive than the CFT,
195 sulfuromonadales, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, Spirochaeta, and Chloroflexi and two archaea
196 ct immunofluorescence of cells infected with chlamydiae stained with an antibody to the trans-Golgi n
198 an and the absence of an FtsZ homolog within chlamydiae suggest an unusual mechanism for the division
199 not further compromise host defense against chlamydiae, suggesting that compensatory mechanisms are
200 he difficulty of growing large quantities of chlamydiae suitable for biochemical fractionation, littl
201 and plants and strengthens the argument that chlamydiae synthesize a cell wall despite the inability
204 Proteins present in the outer membrane of chlamydiae that are involved in mucosal epithelial cell
205 hyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis to generate chlamydiae that contained less then one mutation per gen
207 cells are artificially infected with certain chlamydiae that have not been adapted to the host specie
208 Thus, among women with similar exposure to chlamydiae, the serologic response to Hsp10 exhibited a
209 C. burnetii resemble that of Rickettsiae and Chlamydiae, their genome architectures differ considerab
210 are located in a single locus; however, for chlamydiae these genes are scattered throughout the geno
213 nts of the vaginal microbial flora, allowing chlamydiae to escape IFN-gamma-mediated eradication and
214 o provide a pathogenic mechanism that allows chlamydiae to establish themselves in a site that is not
217 dary inclusions via IncA-laden fibers allows chlamydiae to generate an expanded intracellular niche i
218 l ancestry, but we detect no strong case for Chlamydiae to host transfer under the best-fitting model
223 obviate the need for transport induction by chlamydiae under conditions favoring the growth of infec
225 Interestingly, one of the strategies that chlamydiae use for these purposes is the induction of li
227 From within this protective environment, chlamydiae usurp numerous functions of the host cell to
228 lex developmental cycle, it is possible that chlamydiae utilize a different complement of proteins to
231 aces of an ancient link to parasites such as Chlamydiae were found in the genomes of C. paradoxa and
234 aken onto the lamellipodial surface: 1) some chlamydiae were moved in a random fashion on the cell su
236 ed into the culture medium, whereas 2) other chlamydiae were translocated across the lamellipodium in
238 relationship between planctomycetes and the chlamydiae, which has previously been postulated on the
243 understanding of antimicrobial resistance in chlamydiae would benefit from the development of standar
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。