ライフサイエンスコーパス: chloroplast DNA

1 egenerate sites of coding regions from grass chloroplast DNA.

2 ncoding sites in different contexts in grass chloroplast DNA.

3 rticipants in the uniparental inheritance of chloroplast DNA.

4 Variation of chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA (DNA encoding

5 cucumerifolius with reference to diagnostic chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA markers.

6 the number found in previous comparisons of chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal internal transcrib

7 logenetic studies using noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA and rDNA internal transcribed spacer wer

8 these mutants contain near normal levels of chloroplast DNA and RNAs, suggesting that ZmWHY1 is not

9 We used molecular data from chloroplast DNA and simple sequence repeats loci of P. m

10 14 populations of H. annuus ssp. texanus had chloroplast DNA and/or ribosomal DNA markers of H. debil

11 aracterized mitochondrial sequences, 2.4% to chloroplast DNA, and 15% to the seven repetitive DNA mot

12 gly disagreed with those based on allozymes, chloroplast DNA, and morphological traits.

13 tion analysis of a 3.2-kb region of variable chloroplast DNA, and restriction fragment length polymor

14 umber of the single-copy nuclear genes or on chloroplast DNA are found.

15 Other restriction fragments of tobacco chloroplast DNA besides those at the oriA region also ge

16 copy of the inverted repeat (IR) of tobacco chloroplast DNA between positions 130,502 and 131,924 (I

17 Several chloroplast DNA clones from this region were tested for

18 Although both CCMP452 and NIES293 chloroplast DNAs contains 197 genes, multiple nucleotide

19 nvestigated, pointing out that the number of chloroplast DNA copies is too variable for its possible

20 The distribution of chloroplast DNA (cp-DNA) length variants was analyzed wi

21 al DNA molecules to analyze the structure of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) from shoots of ten to 14 day old

22 vated, part of which leads to destruction of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) from the mating type minus (mt-)

23 ce of local base composition on mutations in chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is studied in detail and the res

24 Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is under great photooxidative st

25 In contrast with RNA metabolism, chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) levels declined under P deprivat

26 l transcribed spacer (ITS)) and two types of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers (PCR-RFLP, cpSSR) to stu

27 and organization of a large number of intact chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) molecules from Arabidopsis, toba

28 We sequenced chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of white spruce (Picea glauca),

29 hain reaction experiments involving specific chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) oligonucleotides.

30 al and crossing groups, which also differ in chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) restriction map and nuclear ribo

31 A chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) restriction site analysis of Arg

32 Analyses of nuclear rDNA and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequences indicate that the dome

33 We used patterns of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) variation to investigate the pos

34 n and evolutionary biology are studied using chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

35 analyze the structure of Medicago truncatula chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

36 rophytes by sequencing a c. 350-bp region of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

37 ng 5' end-labeled nascent strands of tobacco chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) as a probe, replication displace

38 Replication of chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) in several plants and in Chlamyd

39 Furthermore, we were unable to detect chloroplast DNA-derived sequences among nuclear genome d

40 Chloroplast DNA differentiation is consistent with gene

41 idopsis chloroplasts and binds to all tested chloroplast DNA fragments without detectable sequence sp

42 Ultimate origin of silversword alliance chloroplast DNA from within the Californian-endemic para

43 existing and new phylogeographic data sets (chloroplast DNA) from 14 woody taxa in Eastern North Ame

44 e-copy genes, rRNA-encoding DNA (rDNA) and a chloroplast DNA gene, was determined and compared to a n

45 Chloroplast DNA haplotype distributions and extensive ba

46 ear allozyme loci and both mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA haplotypes in a natural population of po

47 versus minus mating type gametes followed by chloroplast DNA hypermethylation in zygotes.

48 ted to the chloroplast and co-localized with chloroplast DNA in nucleoids.

49 By contrast, only about 20 kb (16%) of chloroplast DNA, including a single intact plastid-deriv

50 polymorphisms than for paternally inherited chloroplast DNA, indicating that wind-dispersed pollen i

51 SceI, and showed experimentally that tobacco chloroplast DNAs insert into nuclear genomes through dou

52 y, this protein was able to compact purified chloroplast DNA into a nucleoid-like structure in a prot

53 erted repeat, whereas NIES293 (West Pacific) chloroplast DNA is 159,370 bp in size and has an inverte

54 H. akashiwo strain CCMP452 (West Atlantic) chloroplast DNA is 160,149 bp in size with a 21,822-bp i

55 As chloroplast DNA is not transmitted by pollen in plants s

56 hylogenies of the tribe based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers, representing the most in-depth

57 observed mating type-specific differences in chloroplast DNA methylation levels in plus versus minus

58 The genus Pistacia was shown to have a low chloroplast DNA mutation rate: 0.05-0.16 times that expe

59 on of Arabidopsis nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA (ncDNA, mtDNA, cpDNA) was assayed by mea

60 gy-mediated linking of disparate segments of chloroplast DNA occurs frequently during healing of indu

61 sequence variation from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 239 individuals of Juniperus microspe

62 The technique has been used to sequence chloroplast DNA of two Heterosigma akashiwo strains.

63 In contrast, no chloroplast DNA or ribosomal DNA markers of H. debilis s

64 A chloroplast DNA phylogeny indicates that thorn-like pric

65 eveals that both strains contain an isomeric chloroplast DNA population resulting from an inversion o

66 s, the mitochondrial genome, a multifragment chloroplast DNA probe, and bacteriophage lambda.

67 analysis of the Pistacia cpDNA with tobacco chloroplast DNA probes) provided a new set of variables

68 ates chloroplast isolation, does not require chloroplast DNA purification, and reduces sequencing pro

69 Two noncoding chloroplast DNA regions were sequenced for samples colle

70 Two mechanisms for chloroplast DNA replication have been revealed through t

71 the w2 gene is responsible for virtually all chloroplast DNA replication in maize.

72 in all the necessary elements for support of chloroplast DNA replication in vitro.

73 In vivo chloroplast DNA replication intermediates were examined

74 ns of limited dNTP supply, the inhibition of chloroplast DNA replication may be the primary factor in

75 or with the same plasmid carrying a putative chloroplast DNA replication origin (oriA).

76 ddition of the 68 kDa protein to an in vitro chloroplast DNA replication system resulted in complete

77 lso support the reliability of this in vitro chloroplast DNA replication system.

78 Chloroplast DNA restriction-site comparisons were made a

79 Restriction site markers in the chloroplast DNA reveal several clear cases of localized

80 material from La Reunion and Mauritius using chloroplast DNA RFLP markers and random amplified polymo

81 d thus a detailed functional analysis of any chloroplast DNA sequence should be possible.

82 Chloroplast DNA sequences and microsatellites are useful

83 Double Y patterns were observed when a chloroplast DNA template containing both ori s (pKN9) wa

84 is and the many separate losses of infA from chloroplast DNA, the gene has probably been transferred

85 Transcriptionally active chloroplast DNA together with tightly bound protein fact

86 to detect any stable nuclear integration of chloroplast DNA under normal growth conditions or under

87 ethod for detecting protein-binding sites on chloroplast DNA, using modifications to the nuclear ChIP

88 hese data agree with our previous studies of chloroplast DNA variation in suggesting that this polypl

89 A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA variation in the purple saxifrage (Saxif

90 The geographical distribution of chloroplast DNA variation in the species supports the hy

91 An intrapopulation polymorphism in chloroplast DNA was used to examine relative spatial and

92 subset of these proteins and the majority of chloroplast DNA were recovered in the supernatant after

93 Chloroplast DNA, which is typically unmethylated, was en

94 lling about 84 kb and covering two thirds of chloroplast DNA, with the intact nuclear copies of 26 di