ライフサイエンスコーパス: choice behavior

1 processes, which in turn leads to irrational choice behavior.

2 ferentially engaged in effort and cue-guided choice behavior.

3 oportions matching those that best explained choice behavior.

4 rgets, ensuring that total reward was due to choice behavior.

5 ce of conceptual knowledge and its effect on choice behavior.

6 3 receptor agonist, 7-OH-DPAT, did not alter choice behavior.

7 effort can be used to assess effort-related choice behavior.

8 perience to the contrary, instructions drove choice behavior.

9 hat value, risk, and risk aversion influence choice behavior.

10 e influencing RTs and errors, did not affect choice behavior.

11 ing an overall metric of value used to guide choice behavior.

12 aptic plasticity is able to produce adaptive choice behavior.

13 choice outcome, novelty nevertheless drives choice behavior.

14 he two sets of brain regions predicts actual choice behavior.

15 the evolution of qualitative aspects of its choice behavior.

16 e-exposed rats displayed increased impulsive choice behavior.

17 experience and can exert strong influence on choice behavior.

18 einforcement learning model of the patient's choice behavior.

19 ed individual differences in satiety-related choice behavior.

20 ositive and negative outcomes to guide their choice behavior.

21 ter self-control and improved predictions of choice behavior.

22 ortance of the law of diminishing returns in choice behavior.

23 que to modulate dopamine activity and monkey choice behavior.

24 romedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) predicted choice behavior.

25 not use prospective regret signals to guide choice behavior.

26 volved in Pavlovian processes that influence choice behavior.

27 phasic dopamine release that may drive risky choice behavior.

28 formation and use of prior beliefs to guide choice behavior.

29 avioral mechanism by which MA rigidly biases choice behavior.

30 ous reward, and are predictive of subsequent choice behavior.

31 animals integrate prior knowledge into their choice behavior.

32 ognized as a ubiquitous aspect of real-world choice behavior.

33 significant component of the variability of choice behavior.

34 to motor actions, thereby enabling adaptive choice behavior.

35 question of causal factors underlying human choice behavior.

36 site ways with the baseline stochasticity of choice behavior.

37 ssion-like effects, can alter effort-related choice behavior.

38 racterize our model of individual and social choice behavior.

39 rcuits govern the ability to learn and shift choice behavior.

40 pulations of value are sufficient to mediate choice behavior.

41 ge to future actions is crucial for adaptive choice behavior.

42 e neural mechanisms mediating this important choice behavior.

43 and result in more impulsive social-economic choice behavior.

44 ulsivity, whereas valproate had no effect on choice behavior.

45 ompeting valuation systems in the control of choice behavior.

46 ained monkeys can serve as a model for human choice behavior.

47 the inability of rats to maintain reinforced choice behavior.

48 yses to identify regions involved in biasing choice behavior.

49 renicline on probabilistic reversal learning choice behavior.

50 e of the selection pressures associated with choice behaviors.

51 Strikingly, computational modeling of choice behavior [7] revealed that tolcapone exerted sele

52 issors game, rhesus monkeys can adjust their choice behaviors according to both actual and hypothetic

53 Models of choice behavior account for this bias by weighting decis

54 commissurotomy, were unable to adjust their choice behavior after a change in the outcome (here, a r

55 thyltransferase gene predicts both impulsive choice behavior and activity levels in the dPFC and PPC

56 l substrates of such mechanisms by comparing choice behavior and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD)

57 executive cognitive function could influence choice behavior and brain responses.

58 oblem was assessed by monitoring accuracy of choice behavior and by measuring latency to respond for

59 of purely economic motivations in explaining choice behavior and instead emphasize the importance of

60 Choice behavior and its neural correlates have been inte

61 alue coding critically influences stochastic choice behavior and provide a generalizable quantitative

62 estigate amino acid-specific effects on food-choice behavior and report that folic acid from the micr

63 provides evidence for OFC's role in guiding choice behavior and shows that this is dissociable from

64 key role of orbitofrontal cortex activity in choice behavior and shows that this is dissociable from

65 s were screened for aggressive and impulsive choice behaviors and categorized into Low-Aggression (L-

66 There is no difference in their choice behavior, and both groups depart substantially fr

67 nstrates that the two dominant frameworks of choice behavior are linked through the law of diminishin

68 making, but the effects of normalization on choice behavior are unknown.

69 er, the signaling mechanisms underlying food-choice behaviors are poorly understood.

70 tion and explains both classically described choice behavior as well as behavioral patterns not predi

71 ng how marketing actions can affect consumer choice behavior as well as for how environmental cues ca

72 Characters involved in choice behavior at reproduction appear based on quantita

73 ce that enhanced cognitive control can shift choice behavior away from immediate and risky rewards, w

74 mplicated dopamine as a modulating factor in choice behavior based on effort.

75 e has an impact on monkeys' ability to guide choice behavior based on reward value but does not impac

76 magination can be used to accurately predict choice behavior both between and within individuals.

77 Such choice behavior can be assessed from an optimal foraging

78 We propose that choice behavior can be more accurately accounted for by

79 re can cause enduring increases in impulsive choice behavior, consistent with observations in human s

80 del-based and model-free influences on human choice behavior could be distinguished.

81 This pattern of choice behavior could be explained by a causal role for

82 We explored whether this kind of choice behavior could be seen in other primates.

83 uggested that tasks measuring effort-related choice behavior could be used as animal models of the mo

84 We show that choice behavior depended on a baseline (ie, value-indepe

85 trials and reinforcer intake, but effects on choice behavior did not depend on these motivational cha

86 ve payoffs and primary rewards, the animal's choice behavior during this task was nearly optimal.

87 Human choice behaviors during social interactions often deviat

88 Economic choice behavior entails the computation and comparison o

89 Human choice behavior exhibits many paradoxical and challengin

90 Here, we combined computational modeling of choice behavior, experimentally induced inflammation, an

91 udy the neurophysiological signals governing choice behavior fall under one of two major theoretical

92 a key prediction of this hypothesis, we fit choice behavior from a dynamic foraging task with reinfo

93 Choice behaviors, from hard-wired to experience-dependen

94 This inflection in risky choice behavior has been attributed to a neurobiological

95 ision making reliably predicts intertemporal choice behavior have not been identified.

96 lude that previous exposure to cocaine makes choice behavior hypersensitive to differences in the tim

97 also the case in rodents, we examined rat's choice behavior in a binary choice task in which variabl

98 hat treatment with dopaminergic drugs alters choice behavior in a manner consistent with the theory.

99 nhibition of the BLA has opposite effects on choice behavior in a rat model of risky decision making,

100 d duration resulted in normal alterations in choice behavior in AcbC-lesioned rats.

101 However, context-dependent choice behavior in both animals and humans violates this

102 by supporting striatal plasticity in shaping choice behavior in humans.

103 s one of the clearest examples of irrational choice behavior in humans.

104 igate this function, we studied instrumental choice behavior in mice lacking GPR88, a striatum-enrich

105 To do so, we quantified Now/Later choice behavior in naturally cycling adult females (n =

106 Mathematical models that describe choice behavior in specific contexts have provided impor

107 t fixed but collapse over time, facilitating choice behavior in the presence of low-quality evidence.

108 Computational modeling of choice behavior in the reversal phase indicated that [(1

109 The animals' choice behavior in this task followed the molar matching

110 enter, the activity of which predicates this choice behavior in zebrafish.

111 The new research has focussed on choice behaviors in the context of habitat and resource

112 s indicate that the influence of dopamine on choice behavior involves a specific modulation of the at

113 The ability to use prior knowledge to adapt choice behavior is critical for flexible decision making

114 ggesting that information relevant for risky choice behavior is encoded in coarse global patterns of

115 ence of monetary loss on decision making and choice behavior is extensively studied.

116 This neural pattern, as well as subjects' choice behavior, is consistent with a teaching signal fo

117 ight/half-dark visual image evokes an innate choice behavior, light avoidance.

118 However, age differences in choice behavior may be reduced if older adults can recru

119 that emotional associations have on survival choice behaviors may lead to better treatments for menta

120 Findings indicate that choice behaviors mediated by cocaine conditioning are re

121 han gradually adjusting their time-dependent choice behavior, mice abruptly adopted temporal decision

122 those of cocaine as evidenced by a change in choice behaviors motivated by drug reward.

123 After OFC lesions, animals' choice behavior no longer reflected the history of preci

124 Human choice behavior often reflects a competition between inf

125 also makes testable predictions about human choice behavior on a simple decision-making task.

126 video games for measures of brain activity, choice behavior, or cognitive performance.SIGNIFICANCE S

127 A model of choice behavior revealed that the rate of sensory eviden

128 It is believed that choice behavior reveals the underlying value of goods.

129 estigate the molecular and cellular basis of choice behavior, reward and associative learning.

130 matching"-a consistent example of suboptimal choice behavior seen in humans-occurs in an optimal Baye

131 Computational models of choice behavior showed that citalopram increased harm av

132 Human choice behavior takes account of internal decision costs

133 ovement initiation produced a robust bias in choice behavior, this bias was substantially diminished

134 tions to explain valuation and choice, or on choice behavior to derive value functions.

135 retrieved during episodic sampling can cause choice behavior to deviate sharply from the predictions

136 mpete with those of cocaine for control over choice behavior using a place conditioning task.

137 The modulation of choice behavior using microstimulation was best modeled

138 ngle, unified decision process that mediates choice behavior via a common neural currency for outcome

139 nd suggest how reward can influence adaptive choice behavior via prefrontal dopamine.

140 We found that choice behavior was better described by a learning model

141 design allowed us to test whether subjects' choice behavior was guided by policy-based methods, whic

142 The animal's choice behavior was relatively close to the optimal stra

143 plore the neural basis of such intertemporal choice behavior, we devised a novel two-alternative choi

144 s causally related to specific components of choice behavior, we employed selective optogenetic stimu

145 in D. melanogaster and mediate critical host-choice behavior, were deleted or pseudogenized in the ge

146 Notably, OFC inactivation did not affect choice behavior when it was guided by innate taste avers

147 The AcbC-lesioned rats produced appropriate choice behavior when the reward magnitude was equal.

148 Our results show that context-dependent choice behavior, which is commonly perceived as an irrat

149 ble to produce a bidirectional modulation of choice behavior, while drugs that act on D3 receptors we

150 tance and polarization-dependent female mate choice behavior with no polarization-dependent courtship

151 rative data indicate that context influences choice behavior, with the strongest effect seen in marmo

152 Reversal of choice behavior within each block is driven by a combina