戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sify unknown samples correctly (100% correct classification).
2  SVM models obtained better results (>92% of classification).
3 econd intervals (steeper dilation = "Longer" classifications).
4 sessment in lymphoma according to the Lugano classification.
5 Relief-F feature selection and random forest classification.
6  identifying clinical biomarkers for disease classification.
7 usters, demonstrating reproducibility of the classification.
8 of proteins have not been annotated for fold classification.
9 ucted at different levels are fused for eMCI classification.
10 s in extraction efficiency and bioinformatic classification.
11 ed on fundus photographs using the Rotterdam Classification.
12 ne expression profile testing and prognostic classification.
13 ommon subtypes and correlated with the basal classification.
14 done using a functional-group transformation classification.
15  of fistulas according to the standard Parks classification.
16 h unsupervised clustering and reference-free classification.
17 nt calling in addition to accurate taxonomic classification.
18 e motor and somatosensory systems and lesion classification.
19 dded to update the World Health Organization classification.
20 sessment in lymphoma according to the Lugano classification.
21 and PET features were the most important for classification.
22 ccurate multi-analyte signatures for patient classification.
23 cits that cuts across traditional, DSM-based classification.
24 (PPA) variants defined by current diagnostic classification.
25 ing ontologies to the outputs of data-driven classification.
26 ot always correspond to the established FXYD classification.
27 As for mutation detection and non-coding RNA classification.
28  reliability of tumor node metastasis system classification.
29 uires an accurate phenotypic description and classification.
30 ered minimally standard for their respective classifications.
31  by the World Health Organization and Panama classifications.
32 gency department visits using updated sepsis classifications.
33 n after considering several latency exposure classifications.
34 r integration of lncRNAs in molecular cancer classifications.
35 r adverse (34%) risk by European LeukemiaNet classification; 50% of patients had underlying myelodysp
36 ess meat and fish intake and improve subject classification according to the amount and type of meat
37 ted coefficients of determination (Q(2)) and classification accuracies ranging from 0.35 to 0.99 and
38 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) assess the classification accuracy and (3) credibility of these sta
39 a are associated with instability, decreased classification accuracy and high-computational burden.
40                                          The classification accuracy of the transcranial magnetic sti
41                                        Using classification accuracy to guide platform optimization,
42 inated metastatic from primary melanoma (87% classification accuracy).
43 ormance and provides a marker list with high classification accuracy.
44  a small number of OTUs were assigned unique classifications across programs.
45                                      The new classification addressed to DHRs will enable the collect
46 ifferent training sets of CRMs, and employ a classification algorithm to integrate these similarity s
47 e classification models, various statistical classification algorithms are compared, and the k-NN (k
48 ations of epigenomes, and choosing different classification algorithms provided by our tool.
49 l taxonomic unit (OTU) generation, taxonomic classification, alpha- and beta-diversity measures for d
50 phenotypic effects, hemagglutinin (HA) clade classifications, an automated tool for HA subtype number
51                                              Classification analyses also revealed that oscillatory p
52 emains intact, as shown through multivariate classification analyses of electroencephalogram (EEG) da
53                                        Cross-classification analyses showed that only 8.1% of foods w
54                                              Classification analysis of their brain network identifie
55                                Further, with classification analysis, we predict the behavioural diag
56 s with CD were scored according to the Marsh classification and characterized for leukocyte infiltrat
57                        Although the existing classification and grading approach is of prognostic val
58 ng a new technology that facilitates variant classification and keeps pace with variant discovery.
59 software that predicts the histopathological classification and post-treatment disease-free survival
60 enome sequences can be used to improve viral classification and provide insight into the viral "tree
61 acknowledges the inherent uncertainty of the classification and provides a natural measure of precisi
62 on that permits accurate automated taxonomic classification and quantitative data about organism ultr
63 apid qualitative susceptible/non-susceptible classification and quantitative MIC measurement in a sin
64 cation and regression tasks, yielding nodule classification and rating performance concordant with th
65             We trained Gaussian process (GP) classification and regression models with expression and
66 provement by the CNN model over HIST in both classification and regression tasks, yielding nodule cla
67 ve, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were
68                                              Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and l
69                                     We use a classification and regression tree model to further refi
70 lications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo Classification and scored with the Comprehensive Complic
71 ciated rectosigmoid location, combined Paris classification and surface morphology, and increasing si
72 oped, lead to further advances in diagnostic classification and treatment.
73 to compute environmental and genetic disease classifications and corresponding reliability measures.
74 including concepts for drug delivery and new classifications and therapeutic options for various form
75 g Discriminant Analysis, with 95% correct re-classification, and 97% grouping of grape skin and seed
76 dramatic effect on the accuracy of taxonomic classification, and alpha- and beta-diversity estimation
77           Here we developed new terminology, classification, and computer algorithms for automatic de
78 aluated by investigators per the 2014 Lugano classification, and patients could proceed to autologous
79  improve both subsystem annotation and k-mer classification, and tags new genomes as having signature
80 eness of Hetero-RP in diverse clustering and classification applications.
81             Automatic feature extraction and classification are two main tasks in abnormal ECG beat r
82                                    Taxonomic classifications are assigned from the species to the phy
83                   This level of accuracy for classification as well as severity prediction far exceed
84 ariable models; for example, the Beck et al. classification AUC from 0.59 to 0.75 combining proportio
85                                  Orientation classification based on data from V1 thus paralleled the
86 is highlights the unreliability of ethnicity classification based on patient self-reports.
87 ates all diagnostic categories and optimizes classification by selectively combining a subset of moda
88         However, the accuracy of single cell classification by these features remains limited for mos
89                          However, on further classification by time-averaged hematuria, only those pa
90                                  The lineage classifications by the tools generally only differed in
91                                        These classifications can potentially be used for patient stra
92 ts proposed new or revised species names and classification changes associated with fungi of medical
93 be little advantage from the use of the NOVA classification compared with the current epidemiologic a
94 ding performed 1 month later used predefined classification criteria and involved a third senior radi
95                       Moreover, small tissue classification differences (2.23% +/- 0.68%) between gen
96  interdependence of the cell-of-origin (COO) classification, dual expression (DE) of MYC and BCL2 pro
97                                          The classification efficacy of both weighted SC schemes in t
98                                          The classification efficiency for test samples were recorded
99 tructures and measurements than any previous classification effort.
100 te differential network estimation and lower classification error than that achieved by other state-o
101                      Sensitivity of the risk classification for AMI ranged from 87.5% to 100% in indi
102 metric technique" allowing the most accurate classification for each monovarietal extra-VOO was highl
103 ormed by 2 reviewers according to the Lugano classification for staging and response assessment.
104 e ability of the model showed a satisfactory classification for the test samples.
105                   We developed a statistical classification framework that could diagnose CMV status
106                 These data will inform tumor classification, genetic testing, and clinical trial desi
107  analysis, the vast differences in taxonomic classification, genome size, and radioresistance between
108                          In rodents, subtype classification has associated subtypes to function.
109 clinical impact and prognostic value of this classification has been confirmed in numerous studies, a
110                                 Hierarchical classification (HC) stratifies and classifies data from
111         We consider methylation-based tumour classification highly relevant for the future diagnosis
112 e the utilization rate of BI-RADS category 3 classification; however, the overall number of patients
113 ere informative in 542 cases (88%), allowing classification in 10 exclusive primary cytogenetic subgr
114 e outpatient clinic, nasal endoscopy changed classification in only four patients (4.9%).
115 mas were reviewed, according to the 2008 WHO classification, in real time by experts through the Lymp
116 traumatic brain injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases
117                                  Data-driven classification into one of the 10 most common pathologic
118                                   A previous classification into simple, prolonged, and difficult wea
119                                         This classification is a more complete representation of chan
120       These results demonstrate that climate classification is an important factor when comparing hos
121                                  The present classification is compared with those proposed for other
122 appeared to be a reliable marker, allowing a classification matching the genetic diversity of the lin
123 ysis tool, Methylation-based Gene Expression Classification (ME-Class), to explain specific variation
124 microscope was utilized, and a computational classification method was developed to analyze the IR sp
125      An automated unsupervised network-based classification method was developed to simulate the appr
126 al companies yields a dynamic, more accurate classification method.
127        Here we critically evaluate three MOA classification methodologies using an aquatic toxicity d
128     This information, coupled with different classification methods (Partial Least Square Discriminat
129 ator outperforms two established multi-class classification methods on simulations and real data, eve
130 th standard and state-of-the-art multi-label classification methods.
131 a need for a more refined, molecularly based classification model for glioblastoma (GBM) in the temoz
132 ort #1, n = 70), we constructed a supervised classification model involving the most predictive featu
133 s from classical Bayesian methods in which a classification model is assumed and prior distributions
134                   This research tested furan classification models in fried matrices based on the pat
135                                              Classification models were constructed to identify weigh
136                                       Hybrid classification models were developed that could predict
137 work focuses on supervised generative binary classification models, specifically linear discriminant
138                       To construct cell type classification models, various statistical classificatio
139 ectosigmoid location, 0-Is or 0-IIa+Is Paris classification, non-granular surface morphology, and inc
140              Regardless of fuel, the current classification of "fresh" tailpipe emissions as nonhygro
141 urement of two milk mixtures yielded correct classification of >94%.
142 entation of a HC approach for "omics-driven" classification of 15 bacterial species at various taxono
143  blind samples, obtaining an accuracy in oil classification of 70%, taking the official established m
144 rticular, this dual approach allowed correct classification of 82% EVOO samples, while separate IRMS
145  outperforms existing methods with regard to classification of active compounds for cancers.
146 comes (KDIGO) criteria for the diagnosis and classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients
147 rofiling platforms into the routine clinical classification of adult brain tumors.
148 riables contributing to characterization and classification of analyzed samples regarding the fruit o
149 e diagnosis away from the traditional binary classification of apparently infected versus uninfected
150 mmarize the results of 2 consensus meetings (Classification of Atrophy Meeting [CAM]) on conventional
151          This review describes the molecular classification of breast cancer and the use of predictiv
152 used for the intraoperative or postoperative classification of bulk tissue samples.
153          Our results support measurement and classification of CBE techniques and provide the foundat
154 -SNE)-based visualization (viSNE); automatic classification of cellular expression by nonlinear stoch
155 sions classified as grade I or II by the WHO classification of CNS tumors.
156  content heavily impacts the transcriptional classification of colorectal cancer (CRC), with clinical
157 he overall methodology may find uses for the classification of data from other biological networking
158                                  Multi-label classification of data remains to be a challenging probl
159      We developed an electrophysiology-based classification of dentate granule cells and mossy cells
160            These findings do not support the classification of DIF-negative patients, meeting the cli
161  useful biomarkers that can provide critical classification of disease for accurate diagnosis and to
162 riteria that used a combination of change in classification of disease severity based on alveolar bon
163 th primary aldosteronism using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Revision codes,
164 dwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to classify diag
165 alth conditions defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision chapter of the
166 determined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision codes.
167 fective psychoses (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,
168 cal (defined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,
169 tient visits and defined using International Classification of Diseases codes for bipolar disorder an
170  color Doppler in FHS and from International Classification of Diseases codes in Sweden.
171 ish version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases version 8, 9, or 10.
172 cular conditions identified by International Classification of Diseases, billing codes.
173  [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes
174 es mellitus diagnosis by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and cli
175  Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision head region s
176 ry occlusion was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
177 ons diagnosed with giardiasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
178 re identified by the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
179 s were identified by secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
180 iagnoses of ASDs identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
181 ncluded 40011 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coded diagno
182  we identified 156 743 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of
183 ation as a binary outcome, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revision, diagnosis a
184 ention" in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (ICD-10).
185  with a admission diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 584.xx (acute kidney i
186  AND Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05
187 assay promises to be a powerful tool for the classification of effectors as well as for the functiona
188 tiveness and efficiency of our method in the classification of enhancers against random sequences, ex
189  identification of related animal models and classification of entire assay descriptions.
190  control region (left V1) yielded successful classification of facial identity.
191 s systematically, we provide a comprehensive classification of families based on their scaling proper
192                                     The NOVA classification of foods proposes 4 categories: unprocess
193 fully automated opportunity to customize the classification of genome-wide nucleotide variant data mo
194 d next-generation sequencing have led to the classification of HCCs based on molecular features and a
195 s) in ECs and use them as biomarkers for the classification of histological subtypes and the predicti
196           We investigated whether functional classification of HNF1A rare coding variants can inform
197  as powerful diagnostic methods for accurate classification of hydatidiform moles.
198 an reveal hidden principles of the system by classification of individual components, analyzing their
199 nt a framework for the automated large-scale classification of ion channel models.
200 s were as a result of inconsistencies in the classification of land-use categories during the study p
201           The 2016 World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms recently acknowledg
202 c mechanisms involved in lymphoma impact the classification of lymphoma and have significant implicat
203 ect to the degree of methylation, functional classification of methylated transcripts, and position b
204                                          The classification of miscible and immiscible systems of bin
205 ivity in initiating carbapenemase tests, and classification of most carbapenemases.
206  had an area under the curve of 0.82 for the classification of OA and control samples.
207 ts of olive oil, enhancing its potential for classification of olive oil samples according to their q
208 uantification models was proven and the best classification of olive oils according to the altitude o
209  taxonomies are ubiquitous, ranging from the classification of organisms to the file system on a comp
210 rders, how paradigm shifts in the phenotypic classification of patients would empower the search for
211 s ranging from whole-genome phylogeny to the classification of protein families, identification of ho
212 e first comprehensive machine learning based classification of protein kinase active/inactive conform
213 rth group IV to V, and 37 were International Classification of Retinoblastoma group C to E.
214                                              Classification of RMP subpopulations based on CD11b/CD11
215  and then classified according to Vertucci's classification of root canals.
216 for determining the safranal content and the classification of saffron for commercial purposes.
217                    We attempted geographical classification of saffron using UV-visible spectroscopy,
218 thod was the only approach successful in the classification of samples, and thus prioritization, when
219  approach leads to accurate and reproducible classification of sensitive and resistant cell line-drug
220          The simplified binary labelling and classification of sexual behaviour in dementia as approp
221                          Here we demonstrate classification of skin lesions using a single CNN, train
222                                    Automated classification of skin lesions using images is a challen
223  found that pupil hazard rates predicted the classification of sub-second intervals (steeper dilation
224 re registered according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications, and Comprehens
225                                      Focused classification of the 14 subunits in each oligomer revea
226                  Sequence alignments enabled classification of the evasins into two subfamilies: C8 e
227  work opens a venue for the expansion of the classification of topological phases of matter.
228                 The 2016 revision of the WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid
229 t (TAR) RNA, we achieved nucleotide-specific classification of two independent secondary structure mo
230 el of concordance between chest radiographic classifications of A and B Readers in a national surveil
231  to mining these data largely rely on binary classifications of disease vs. control, and are not able
232                                              Classifications of the complexity of ERCP have been pres
233 ugh leave-one-out cross validation and cross-classification on independent datasets, we show that thi
234 ks enables taxonomists to revise and propose classifications on an objective basis, changing ranks of
235 ive aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classification (PADUA) scoring systems and other tumor b
236 ility index with a cut-off of 1.05 gave good classification performance for Parkinson's disease tremo
237 ue is available that has proven to have good classification performance, and the diagnostic gold stan
238 LD response, and allowed for increased shape-classification performance, when it matched rather than
239                     Even when using the same classification pipeline, the specific OTU-generation str
240 ettings in QIIME, MOTHUR and a pplacer-based classification pipeline, using a novel software package:
241 members of the fungal community, and greater classification power is realized by generating consensus
242                            Regardless of the classification, predictive value for development of peri
243 automated detection was applied to a 2-class classification problem in which the task was to distingu
244 ariables (eg, age, comorbidities, ASA, wound classification), procedure type (eg, laparoscopic vs ope
245 ed by spectral analysis and supported by the classification provided by the PCA analysis.
246 ation was evaluated and ranked using several classification quality metrics.
247 ity measures were used to determine possible classification rates for differential treatment outcomes
248                       Results showed correct classification rates for genuine and false samples over
249 vity scores for these three regions, overall classification rates of 72%-78% for remission and 75%-89
250 se hits for each query sequence, and further classification reliabilities are evaluated by bootstrap
251                                         This classification restricts patients presenting with clinic
252                        The best new expanded classification rule was platelet count >110 x 10(9) cell
253 leukemia (ALL), a uniform CSF and risk group classification schema was incorporated into Children's O
254  was used to create a novel miRNA-based risk classification scheme (AMLmiR36).
255                Here, we report a morphologic classification scheme for definitive PVN from the Banff
256      We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, espe
257 ce, we select features that best benefit the classification scheme in the kernel space.
258                  This novel stability-guided classification scheme is delivered in two flavours: duri
259 s a byproduct, we develop an order-parameter classification scheme that predicts supertransitions bet
260 play an important role in making data driven classifications searchable and query-able, but fulfillin
261 igmatic, suggesting a need to define disease classification subtypes that inform disease progression
262  sources not consistently captured by common classifications such as "humic-like" fluorescence.
263                                            A classification system and criteria for OCT-defined atrop
264  discussions at 3 meetings over 12 months, a classification system based on OCT was proposed for atro
265 ded according to the OCT-based International Classification System developed by the International Vit
266 s were graded according to the International Classification System for age-related maculopathy and st
267                                            A classification system has been described as predictive o
268 s between 2012 and 2014 and used a validated classification system to map services to seven subspecia
269 ature regarding FCDs, addressing the current classification system, histopathology, molecular genetic
270 ntity in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, is readily recognized as a partic
271 iopsy and classified according to the Vienna Classification system.
272 raded according to the modified Airlie House classification system.
273 mmon utilization of inadequate or inaccurate classification systems among healthcare providers.
274                            Ultimately, these classification systems should be unified into an all-enc
275 uggest that widely used harmonised commodity classification systems should evolve to address these ga
276 dardized the terminology around chronic GVHD classification systems to ensure that a common language
277 ant anal sphincter anatomy, imaging methods, classification systems, and treatment objectives.
278 st text-based formats that contain taxonomic classifications, taxon names, taxon identifiers, or sequ
279 igh accuracy and is effective as a new image classification technique.
280 e used fMRI in combination with multivariate classification techniques to determine which brain regio
281 orrelation (CaMCCo), for fusion and cascaded classification that incorporates all diagnostic categori
282 al for using the outputs of data-driven cell classification to structure ontologies and integrate the
283 ndings support the use of the SOFA and qSOFA classifications to identify patients with infection who
284 r prediction, orthology and multigene family classification, transcriptome analyses, phylogenetic ana
285                                              Classification tree analysis was performed to identify h
286 ven clinical images with two critical binary classification use cases: keratinocyte carcinomas versus
287  motility disorders was based on the Chicago Classification validated for SWS (CCv3) and with STM (CC
288 cal baseline variables could not achieve any classification (validation AUC: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.64
289     Future research needs to employ sex as a classification variable, as sex differences can generall
290                           Performance of the classification was evaluated and ranked using several cl
291                                  Results COO classification was successful in 414 of 452 samples.
292                            Type 5 Vertucci's classification was the most frequently observed canal co
293 riodontitis at age 31 years according to six classifications was used as the gold standard to compute
294 ate the robustness of these proposed subtype classifications, we evaluated 12 public datasets, togeth
295  for one class in a GLM or that receive high classification weights in MVPA tend to exhibit high nois
296  according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification were eligible for ASCT in first remission
297 rding to the METAVIR scoring system or Brunt classification when appropriate.
298 ed to standardize nomenclature and taxonomic classification, while incorporating new allele submissio
299 earning algorithms achieve blind single cell classification with up to 95% accuracy.
300 ere analyzed with the Lymph2Cx assay for COO classification, with immunohistochemistry for MYC and BC

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top