コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sify unknown samples correctly (100% correct classification).
2 SVM models obtained better results (>92% of classification).
3 econd intervals (steeper dilation = "Longer" classifications).
4 sessment in lymphoma according to the Lugano classification.
5 Relief-F feature selection and random forest classification.
6 identifying clinical biomarkers for disease classification.
7 usters, demonstrating reproducibility of the classification.
8 of proteins have not been annotated for fold classification.
9 ucted at different levels are fused for eMCI classification.
10 s in extraction efficiency and bioinformatic classification.
11 ed on fundus photographs using the Rotterdam Classification.
12 ne expression profile testing and prognostic classification.
13 ommon subtypes and correlated with the basal classification.
14 done using a functional-group transformation classification.
15 of fistulas according to the standard Parks classification.
16 h unsupervised clustering and reference-free classification.
17 nt calling in addition to accurate taxonomic classification.
18 e motor and somatosensory systems and lesion classification.
19 dded to update the World Health Organization classification.
20 sessment in lymphoma according to the Lugano classification.
21 and PET features were the most important for classification.
22 ccurate multi-analyte signatures for patient classification.
23 cits that cuts across traditional, DSM-based classification.
24 (PPA) variants defined by current diagnostic classification.
25 ing ontologies to the outputs of data-driven classification.
26 ot always correspond to the established FXYD classification.
27 As for mutation detection and non-coding RNA classification.
28 reliability of tumor node metastasis system classification.
29 uires an accurate phenotypic description and classification.
30 ered minimally standard for their respective classifications.
31 by the World Health Organization and Panama classifications.
32 gency department visits using updated sepsis classifications.
33 n after considering several latency exposure classifications.
34 r integration of lncRNAs in molecular cancer classifications.
35 r adverse (34%) risk by European LeukemiaNet classification; 50% of patients had underlying myelodysp
36 ess meat and fish intake and improve subject classification according to the amount and type of meat
37 ted coefficients of determination (Q(2)) and classification accuracies ranging from 0.35 to 0.99 and
38 laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) assess the classification accuracy and (3) credibility of these sta
39 a are associated with instability, decreased classification accuracy and high-computational burden.
46 ifferent training sets of CRMs, and employ a classification algorithm to integrate these similarity s
47 e classification models, various statistical classification algorithms are compared, and the k-NN (k
49 l taxonomic unit (OTU) generation, taxonomic classification, alpha- and beta-diversity measures for d
50 phenotypic effects, hemagglutinin (HA) clade classifications, an automated tool for HA subtype number
52 emains intact, as shown through multivariate classification analyses of electroencephalogram (EEG) da
56 s with CD were scored according to the Marsh classification and characterized for leukocyte infiltrat
58 ng a new technology that facilitates variant classification and keeps pace with variant discovery.
59 software that predicts the histopathological classification and post-treatment disease-free survival
60 enome sequences can be used to improve viral classification and provide insight into the viral "tree
61 acknowledges the inherent uncertainty of the classification and provides a natural measure of precisi
62 on that permits accurate automated taxonomic classification and quantitative data about organism ultr
63 apid qualitative susceptible/non-susceptible classification and quantitative MIC measurement in a sin
64 cation and regression tasks, yielding nodule classification and rating performance concordant with th
66 provement by the CNN model over HIST in both classification and regression tasks, yielding nodule cla
67 ve, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were
70 lications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo Classification and scored with the Comprehensive Complic
71 ciated rectosigmoid location, combined Paris classification and surface morphology, and increasing si
73 to compute environmental and genetic disease classifications and corresponding reliability measures.
74 including concepts for drug delivery and new classifications and therapeutic options for various form
75 g Discriminant Analysis, with 95% correct re-classification, and 97% grouping of grape skin and seed
76 dramatic effect on the accuracy of taxonomic classification, and alpha- and beta-diversity estimation
78 aluated by investigators per the 2014 Lugano classification, and patients could proceed to autologous
79 improve both subsystem annotation and k-mer classification, and tags new genomes as having signature
84 ariable models; for example, the Beck et al. classification AUC from 0.59 to 0.75 combining proportio
87 ates all diagnostic categories and optimizes classification by selectively combining a subset of moda
92 ts proposed new or revised species names and classification changes associated with fungi of medical
93 be little advantage from the use of the NOVA classification compared with the current epidemiologic a
94 ding performed 1 month later used predefined classification criteria and involved a third senior radi
96 interdependence of the cell-of-origin (COO) classification, dual expression (DE) of MYC and BCL2 pro
100 te differential network estimation and lower classification error than that achieved by other state-o
102 metric technique" allowing the most accurate classification for each monovarietal extra-VOO was highl
103 ormed by 2 reviewers according to the Lugano classification for staging and response assessment.
107 analysis, the vast differences in taxonomic classification, genome size, and radioresistance between
109 clinical impact and prognostic value of this classification has been confirmed in numerous studies, a
112 e the utilization rate of BI-RADS category 3 classification; however, the overall number of patients
113 ere informative in 542 cases (88%), allowing classification in 10 exclusive primary cytogenetic subgr
115 mas were reviewed, according to the 2008 WHO classification, in real time by experts through the Lymp
116 traumatic brain injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases
122 appeared to be a reliable marker, allowing a classification matching the genetic diversity of the lin
123 ysis tool, Methylation-based Gene Expression Classification (ME-Class), to explain specific variation
124 microscope was utilized, and a computational classification method was developed to analyze the IR sp
125 An automated unsupervised network-based classification method was developed to simulate the appr
128 This information, coupled with different classification methods (Partial Least Square Discriminat
129 ator outperforms two established multi-class classification methods on simulations and real data, eve
131 a need for a more refined, molecularly based classification model for glioblastoma (GBM) in the temoz
132 ort #1, n = 70), we constructed a supervised classification model involving the most predictive featu
133 s from classical Bayesian methods in which a classification model is assumed and prior distributions
137 work focuses on supervised generative binary classification models, specifically linear discriminant
139 ectosigmoid location, 0-Is or 0-IIa+Is Paris classification, non-granular surface morphology, and inc
142 entation of a HC approach for "omics-driven" classification of 15 bacterial species at various taxono
143 blind samples, obtaining an accuracy in oil classification of 70%, taking the official established m
144 rticular, this dual approach allowed correct classification of 82% EVOO samples, while separate IRMS
146 comes (KDIGO) criteria for the diagnosis and classification of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients
148 riables contributing to characterization and classification of analyzed samples regarding the fruit o
149 e diagnosis away from the traditional binary classification of apparently infected versus uninfected
150 mmarize the results of 2 consensus meetings (Classification of Atrophy Meeting [CAM]) on conventional
154 -SNE)-based visualization (viSNE); automatic classification of cellular expression by nonlinear stoch
156 content heavily impacts the transcriptional classification of colorectal cancer (CRC), with clinical
157 he overall methodology may find uses for the classification of data from other biological networking
161 useful biomarkers that can provide critical classification of disease for accurate diagnosis and to
162 riteria that used a combination of change in classification of disease severity based on alveolar bon
163 th primary aldosteronism using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Revision codes,
164 dwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to classify diag
165 alth conditions defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision chapter of the
166 determined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision codes.
167 fective psychoses (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,
168 cal (defined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,
169 tient visits and defined using International Classification of Diseases codes for bipolar disorder an
173 [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes
174 es mellitus diagnosis by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and cli
175 Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision head region s
176 ry occlusion was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
177 ons diagnosed with giardiasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
178 re identified by the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
179 s were identified by secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
180 iagnoses of ASDs identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Mod
181 ncluded 40011 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coded diagno
182 we identified 156 743 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of
183 ation as a binary outcome, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revision, diagnosis a
185 with a admission diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 584.xx (acute kidney i
186 AND Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-CM codes 35.05
187 assay promises to be a powerful tool for the classification of effectors as well as for the functiona
188 tiveness and efficiency of our method in the classification of enhancers against random sequences, ex
191 s systematically, we provide a comprehensive classification of families based on their scaling proper
193 fully automated opportunity to customize the classification of genome-wide nucleotide variant data mo
194 d next-generation sequencing have led to the classification of HCCs based on molecular features and a
195 s) in ECs and use them as biomarkers for the classification of histological subtypes and the predicti
198 an reveal hidden principles of the system by classification of individual components, analyzing their
200 s were as a result of inconsistencies in the classification of land-use categories during the study p
202 c mechanisms involved in lymphoma impact the classification of lymphoma and have significant implicat
203 ect to the degree of methylation, functional classification of methylated transcripts, and position b
207 ts of olive oil, enhancing its potential for classification of olive oil samples according to their q
208 uantification models was proven and the best classification of olive oils according to the altitude o
209 taxonomies are ubiquitous, ranging from the classification of organisms to the file system on a comp
210 rders, how paradigm shifts in the phenotypic classification of patients would empower the search for
211 s ranging from whole-genome phylogeny to the classification of protein families, identification of ho
212 e first comprehensive machine learning based classification of protein kinase active/inactive conform
218 thod was the only approach successful in the classification of samples, and thus prioritization, when
219 approach leads to accurate and reproducible classification of sensitive and resistant cell line-drug
223 found that pupil hazard rates predicted the classification of sub-second intervals (steeper dilation
224 re registered according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications, and Comprehens
229 t (TAR) RNA, we achieved nucleotide-specific classification of two independent secondary structure mo
230 el of concordance between chest radiographic classifications of A and B Readers in a national surveil
231 to mining these data largely rely on binary classifications of disease vs. control, and are not able
233 ugh leave-one-out cross validation and cross-classification on independent datasets, we show that thi
234 ks enables taxonomists to revise and propose classifications on an objective basis, changing ranks of
235 ive aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classification (PADUA) scoring systems and other tumor b
236 ility index with a cut-off of 1.05 gave good classification performance for Parkinson's disease tremo
237 ue is available that has proven to have good classification performance, and the diagnostic gold stan
238 LD response, and allowed for increased shape-classification performance, when it matched rather than
240 ettings in QIIME, MOTHUR and a pplacer-based classification pipeline, using a novel software package:
241 members of the fungal community, and greater classification power is realized by generating consensus
243 automated detection was applied to a 2-class classification problem in which the task was to distingu
244 ariables (eg, age, comorbidities, ASA, wound classification), procedure type (eg, laparoscopic vs ope
247 ity measures were used to determine possible classification rates for differential treatment outcomes
249 vity scores for these three regions, overall classification rates of 72%-78% for remission and 75%-89
250 se hits for each query sequence, and further classification reliabilities are evaluated by bootstrap
253 leukemia (ALL), a uniform CSF and risk group classification schema was incorporated into Children's O
256 We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, espe
259 s a byproduct, we develop an order-parameter classification scheme that predicts supertransitions bet
260 play an important role in making data driven classifications searchable and query-able, but fulfillin
261 igmatic, suggesting a need to define disease classification subtypes that inform disease progression
264 discussions at 3 meetings over 12 months, a classification system based on OCT was proposed for atro
265 ded according to the OCT-based International Classification System developed by the International Vit
266 s were graded according to the International Classification System for age-related maculopathy and st
268 s between 2012 and 2014 and used a validated classification system to map services to seven subspecia
269 ature regarding FCDs, addressing the current classification system, histopathology, molecular genetic
270 ntity in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, is readily recognized as a partic
275 uggest that widely used harmonised commodity classification systems should evolve to address these ga
276 dardized the terminology around chronic GVHD classification systems to ensure that a common language
278 st text-based formats that contain taxonomic classifications, taxon names, taxon identifiers, or sequ
280 e used fMRI in combination with multivariate classification techniques to determine which brain regio
281 orrelation (CaMCCo), for fusion and cascaded classification that incorporates all diagnostic categori
282 al for using the outputs of data-driven cell classification to structure ontologies and integrate the
283 ndings support the use of the SOFA and qSOFA classifications to identify patients with infection who
284 r prediction, orthology and multigene family classification, transcriptome analyses, phylogenetic ana
286 ven clinical images with two critical binary classification use cases: keratinocyte carcinomas versus
287 motility disorders was based on the Chicago Classification validated for SWS (CCv3) and with STM (CC
288 cal baseline variables could not achieve any classification (validation AUC: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.64
289 Future research needs to employ sex as a classification variable, as sex differences can generall
293 riodontitis at age 31 years according to six classifications was used as the gold standard to compute
294 ate the robustness of these proposed subtype classifications, we evaluated 12 public datasets, togeth
295 for one class in a GLM or that receive high classification weights in MVPA tend to exhibit high nois
296 according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification were eligible for ASCT in first remission
298 ed to standardize nomenclature and taxonomic classification, while incorporating new allele submissio
300 ere analyzed with the Lymph2Cx assay for COO classification, with immunohistochemistry for MYC and BC
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。