ライフサイエンスコーパス: cmH2O

1 ion (6 ml) evoked an increase of 9.0 +/- 1.0 cmH2O of intragastric pressure in vivo.

2 had a mean +/- S.E.M. value of 79.6 +/- 5.0 cmH2O.

3 s quantified as the ventilation at CPAP of 0 cmH2O.

4 ues were 5.5 x 10(-7) and 4.0 x 10(-7) cms-1 cmH2O-1 and were not significantly different.

5 relative to both non-tumor-draining LNs (-1 cmH2O) and LNs from naive animals (-1 to 2 cmH2O).

6 nidase, namely to 4.14 +/- 1.06 microl min-1 cmH2O-1 (control, 0.54 +/- 0.24 microl min-1 cmH2O-1).

7 from a control of 0.90 +/- 0.20 microl min-1 cmH2O-1 (mean +/- s.e.m. , n = 6) to 4.52 +/- 0.70 micro

8 uasi-plateau, 0.05 +/- 0.01 microliter min-1 cmH2O-1 (mean +/- s.e.m.), was 1/39th that for Ringer so

9 ost-enzyme, 3.11 +/- 0.45 microliter l min-1 cmH2O-1).

10 cmH2O-1 (control, 0.54 +/- 0.24 microl min-1 cmH2O-1).

11 .e.m. , n = 6) to 4.52 +/- 0.70 microl min-1 cmH2O-1.

12 s (control, 1.34 +/- 0.22 microliter l min-1 cmH2O-1; post-enzyme, 3.11 +/- 0.45 microliter l min-1 c

13 ces in response to hydrostatic pressure of 1 cmH2O (P<0.05).

14 re also significantly increased in TDLNs (+1 cmH2O) relative to both non-tumor-draining LNs (-1 cmH2O

15 tilator settings should include PEEP of 5-10 cmH2O during major abdominal surgery.

16 fferents which responded to distension (< 10 cmH2O) did not show a 5-HT3-mediated response (P = 0.92,

17 histamine was only from 14-15 cmH2O to 10-11 cmH2O.

18 +/- 3 cmH2O with 2.5 % gels and 725 +/- 145 cmH2O with 10 % gels.

19 delta pi with histamine was only from 14-15 cmH2O to 10-11 cmH2O.

20 ased omega delta pi from a baseline of 14-15 cmH2O to one of 6-7 cmH2O whereas the fall of omega delt

21 ally increased during exercise (a 4.5 and 15 cmH2O increase during moderate and heavy exercise, respe

22 as established at expiratory loads > or = 15 cmH2O/liter/s and was dose dependent with increasing loa

23 de that resistive expiratory loads > or = 15 cmH2O/liter/s elicit regional activation of discrete bra

24 nt to an effective osmotic pressure of 13-17 cmH2O at the interface.

25 creasing the inspiratory pressure level by 2 cmH2O every 2 min until hypopnoea (failure to trigger th

26 tatic pressure/volume inflation curve plus 2 cmH2O as a positive end-expiratory pressure setting limi

27 1 cmH2O) and LNs from naive animals (-1 to 2 cmH2O).

28 At 10-20 cmH2O the slope of the quasi-plateau, 0.05 +/- 0.01 micr

29 outflow increased 4.4-fold between 5 and 20 cmH2O.

30 The increased opposition to outflow at 20 cmH2O was equivalent to an effective osmotic pressure of

31 Pj, reaching eight times the HA value by 20 cmH2O (P = 0.0001, ANOVA).

32 and the vessel perfused at a pressure of 20 cmH2O.

33 te of 60L/min, suction pressure of around 20-cmH2O for Diskus((R)) and Ellipta((R)), between 35- and

34 raised in steps every 30-60 min (range 2-24 cmH2O).

35 The increase at 25 cmH2O is only partially accounted for by stretching of t

36 surements showed that in samples taken at 25 cmH2O the conductance of the synovial lining had increas

37 synovial lining hydraulic conductance at 25 cmH2O when taken in conjunction with stretching of the s

38 ) and from joints perfused with saline to 25 cmH2O, and analysing them quantitatively for collagen, c

39 ced by similar amounts after perfusion to 25 cmH2O, namely to 62.8-70.4% of control.

40 proximately 4 microl x min(-1) from 10 to 25 cmH2O.

41 ension in colonic luminal gels of 45.3 +/- 3 cmH2O with 2.5 % gels and 725 +/- 145 cmH2O with 10 % ge

42 sured in six vessels over the range of 15-30 cmH2O before and 10 min after the vessel wall ruptured a

43 of a moderate resistive expiratory load (30 cmH2O/liter/s), using functional magnetic resonance imag

44 then remeasured and found to be 69.9 +/- 8.4 cmH2O, which was not significantly different from its in

45 HFPOs (30 Hz and +/-2 to +/-4 cmH2O) were applied via a piston pump during eupnoea, in

46 reased in increments of 5 cmH2O from 0 to 40 cmH2O.

47 us((R)) and Ellipta((R)), between 35- and 45-cmH2O for Turbuhaler ((R)), and about 60-cmH2O for Twist

48 versus WT (18.76 +/- 2.34 vs. 11.04 +/- 1.47 cmH2O; P < 0.01), which dropped to 2.61 +/- 0.72 cmH2O (

49 uences of increased transmural pressure (1-5 cmH2O) and imposed flow (1-5 cm H2O transaxial pressure

50 ich had a mean +/- S.E.M. Pb of 84.2 +/- 6.5 cmH2O, microvascular pressure was lowered immediately af

51 Application of PEEP >5 cmH2O was associated with a significant lower odds of re

52 al day: 0.91 (0.84 - 0.98)], whereas PEEP >5 cmH2O was not significantly associated with reduced odds

53 association between application of PEEP >/=5 cmH2O and a decreased risk of postoperative respiratory

54 piratory complications compared with PEEP <5 cmH2O.

55 sure, which was increased in increments of 5 cmH2O from 0 to 40 cmH2O.

56 WT pressure (3.41 +/- 0.43 vs. 6.86 +/- 0.56 cmH2O; P < 0.01), which dramatically increased to 9.92 +

57 ised either as a ramp or in a series of 13.6 cmH2O steps.

58 45-cmH2O for Turbuhaler ((R)), and about 60-cmH2O for Twisthaler((R)) were needed.

59 6 Hz vs. 7.46), and higher ALX (median, 2.65 cmH2O/l vs. 1.24) compared to non-obese subjects.

60 owed a significantly lower X5 (median, -0.68 cmH2O/l/s vs. -0.35), higher Fres (median, 9.76 Hz vs. 7

61 by gastric distension, reaching 17.0 +/- 1.7 cmH2O, suggesting mediation by neural pathways.

62 from a baseline of 14-15 cmH2O to one of 6-7 cmH2O whereas the fall of omega delta pi with histamine

63 nce fluid filtration) over the range of 5-70 cmH2O.

64 O; P < 0.01), which dropped to 2.61 +/- 0.72 cmH2O (P < 0.001) after PLN collapse.

65 hich dramatically increased to 9.92 +/- 1.79 cmH2O in collapsed PLN.

66 The GG reflex response to pulses of -8 cmH2O choanal pressure applied via nose mask during earl

67 the infusate's osmotic pressure was only 0.9 cmH2O, this implied concentration polarization to 15-18

68 e of negative pressure (range, -4.0 to -14.9 cmH2O) sufficient to close the airway were preserved fol

69 essure is raised to pathological values (> 9 cmH2O) by saline, the hydraulic conductance of the synov

70 e of baseline, and epiglottic pressure is in cmH2O.

71 during sleep (2.27+/-0.4 vs. 0.58+/-0.1 a.u. cmH2O(-1)).

72 +/-0.3 vs. 1.79+/-0.3 arbitrary units (a.u.) cmH2O(-1)).