ライフサイエンスコーパス: coefficient of variation

1 d during sedation interruption (p < 0.05 for coefficient of variation).

2 kably low interindividual variability (32.4% coefficient of variation).

3 and high repeatability as low as 10% in CoV (Coefficient of Variation).

4 rogeneity was assessed by using the regional coefficient of variation.

5 ratch density, namely standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

6 w total expression and with large biological coefficient of variation.

7 ow 10 ng of BSA with less than a 10% average coefficient of variation.

8 Reproducibility was assessed by using the coefficient of variation.

9 e intraclass correlation coefficient and the coefficient of variation.

10 ntraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation.

11 detection efficiency by 35% with an improved coefficient of variation.

12 SBP related to postural change, expressed as coefficient of variation.

13 es, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of variation.

14 Voxelwise RS-ESA yielded similar V(T)s and coefficients of variation.

15 easurements was evaluated by calculating the coefficients of variation.

16 ensitive cTnI (99 th percentile 40 ng/l; 10% coefficient of variation 0.03 mug/l) were measured in a

17 Furthermore, the coefficients of variations (0.9999) were less than 1% at

18 QI discriminates well across trauma centers (coefficient of variation = 0.02, 95% confidence interval

19 educed in baskets compared to single crudes (coefficient of variation = 0.2 for a typical basket when

20 good within-session baseline repeatability (coefficient of variation, 0.8%-5.2%; intraclass correlat

21 est is similar in variability and magnitude (coefficient of variation: 0.08 +/- 0.06 and 284 +/- 147

22 284 +/- 147 mm Hg s/m) to those during FFR (coefficient of variation: 0.08 +/- 0.06 and 302 +/- 315

23 in turnover rates among rats was low (median coefficient of variation: 0.09).

24 uted, on average, 15% to the total TV sales (coefficient of variation: 0.21).

25 (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.986, coefficient of variation = 1.11).

26 7; P<0.001; n = 361), was repeatable (median coefficient of variation, 1.3%), and provided excellent

27 er interobserver variability for RT-ungated (coefficient of variation=1.9% and 2.0% for left and righ

28 ows pronounced population-based variability (coefficient of variation 102.9%).

29 mong surgeons performing the same procedure (coefficient of variation, 118.4% for colorectal, 89.0% f

30 recovery values in the range of 72.3-103.2%, coefficients of variation 12%, and detection limits in t

31 riable among the livers (median and range of coefficient of variations: 135%, 74-217% and 52%, 39-105

32 ences of +/- 0.60 IU/ml for all individuals (coefficient of variation, 14%), and +/- 0.24 IU/ml (coef

33 d, with the PR method giving a lower average coefficient of variation (15.2%, 5.8%, and 19.0% for hal

34 ar stroke volumes, respectively) than gated (coefficient of variation=15.2% and 13.6%; P<0.01).

35 in (range in quality 35-66% [16/46-232/350]; coefficient of variation 18.2).

36 variation <2%), followed by time-domain OCT (coefficient of variation 2%-2.9%), scanning laser polari

37 iation 2%-2.9%), scanning laser polarimetry (coefficient of variation 2.6%-4.5%), and confocal scanni

38 ient of variation, 14%), and +/- 0.24 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 27%) for individuals whose ini

39 sus 3057.7 +/- 330.1 cells/mm(2) (P < .001); coefficient of variation, 27.5 +/- 10.6 versus 37.7 +/-

40 py allowed the precise copper determination (coefficient of variation = 3.1%, n = 10) and enhanced de

41 ocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy rim area (coefficient of variation 4.2%-7.6%).

42 pp during home 6MWTs were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation =4.6%) and correlated with in-c

43 was extremely variable between individuals (coefficients of variation, 41.4% to 73.6%).

44 AUCtau of elvitegravir was 33 814 ng x h/mL (coefficient of variation 58%), and the mean AUClast of t

45 wever, DeltaRnet showed a lower intersubject coefficient of variation (64%) than all of the other tes

46 The imprecision of the LPT was low (coefficient of variation 7.2%).

47 ovascular circulating volumes was good (mean coefficient of variation, 7.6%).

48 el for 96% of measures) and reproducibility (coefficient of variation 8.56%) in real-time (30s) over

49 y, hsa-miR-1271-5p and hsa-miR-182-5p showed coefficients of variation above 100% indicating a strong

50 nterassay relative error and <15% interassay coefficient of variation across a range from 7.03 to 450

51 milar physiological responses and expression coefficients of variation across experiments masked high

52 The intersubject coefficients of variation after PBMC (43%) and IMC (42%)

53 The within-subject coefficient of variation among perfusion analysis soluti

54 assessed by using intraclass correlation and coefficient of variation analysis.

55 d measures ANOVAs were performed on the: (a) coefficient of variation and (b) absolute and relative p

56 We observed that both the coefficient of variation and autocorrelation increased b

57 Coefficient of variation and failure rate analysis sugge

58 release indices: paired-pulse ratio, inverse coefficient of variation and frequency of miniature even

59 ysis determined the relationship between the coefficient of variation and frequency power.

60 ata with superimposed noise provided smaller coefficient of variation and higher contrast-to-noise ra

61 ge and 9 anatomic sectors by calculating the coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coef

62 cRn in tissue matrices, typically within 20% coefficient of variation and relative error.

63 ed on calibrator samples to characterize the coefficient of variation and signal-over-background inte

64 lined in this counterpoint, I propose to use coefficient of variation and the mean absolute glucose c

65 Within-examination coefficients of variation and Bland-Altman analyses were

66 (under the constraint of a certain rate and coefficient of variation) and exemplify its ability to a

67 ptable accuracy (92%-100%), precision (2%-6% coefficient of variation), and linearity (mean correlati

68 iability was depicted as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and deviation from age-predict

69 ison of endothelial cell density, cell size, coefficient of variation, and hexagonality in rejection

70 earson correlation, Cohen kappa measurement, coefficient of variation, and SD.

71 s were evaluated by using extremal quotient, coefficient of variation, and systematic component of va

72 y: SD, average successive variability (ASV), coefficient of variation, and variation independent of m

73 e limit of detection, limit of quantitation, coefficients of variation, and recovery rates.

74 Coefficient of variation at 6 months was not associated

75 cal replicates (90% of quantified sites with coefficient of variation below 11%).

76 pple juices with acceptable reproducibility (coefficients of variation below 25%) and recoveries (ran

77 g Glx (Glu+Gln), tNAA (NAA+NAAG), mI all had coefficient of variations between 9-25%.

78 accuracy of the quantification and observed coefficients of variation between replicates of the same

79 y during sedation interruption (p < 0.05 for coefficient of variation), compared to patients with hig

80 Bland-Altman analysis of agreement and coefficient of variation comparisons were undertaken.

81 ity and reproducibility were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlatio

82 cient was used to assess correlation between coefficient of variation (CoV) and the year the study st

83 Mean scan-rescan coefficient of variation (COV) for the left ION was 4.3%

84 The coefficient of variation (COV) of each feature across di

85 The coefficient of variation (COV) of SPN emissions of parti

86 ween-individual variability was evaluated by coefficient of variation (COV).

87 tched control individuals (mean differences [coefficient of variation (COV)]: 0.98 mm2 [9.2%]; P = .0

88 ntraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (COV) and test-retest repeatab

89 Coefficients of variation (CoV) for DTI parameters were

90 n glycolysis [TLG]) and textural parameters (coefficient of variation [COV], skewness, and kurtosis)

91 pact of system variables on precision (using coefficient of variation, COV), including acquisition wa

92 traclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (COVs).

93 s, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation, critical percentage difference

94 , 0.10 mug/mL; cystatin C, 0.003 mug/mL) and coefficients of variation (CRP, 2.4-7.0%; cystatin C, 3.

95 The coefficient of variation (CV%) is 0.3%.

96 The intra- and inter-run precision (coefficient of variation (CV%)) was within 11.5% and 10.

97 d and robust solvent (61.1% of features with coefficient of variation (CV) < 20%) while enabling a br

98 As assessment load increased, MAS%MVC (coefficient of variation (CV) = 8.1-12.1%; standard erro

99 es (10 muL) were detected with less than 10% coefficient of variation (CV) across a range from nearly

100 age and anatomic quadrant by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation

101 The intra- and intervisit coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation

102 tion (Sw), intrasubject precision (1.96xSw), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation

103 Instead, the coefficient of variation (CV) associated with the transm

104 ellent retention time repeatability with <1% coefficient of variation (CV) for 96% of analyzed peaks.

105 3 blood trough levels available to calculate coefficient of variation (CV) from month 4 to 12, (2) gr

106 ry were satisfactory (73.97-119.38%), with a coefficient of variation (CV) less than 20%.

107 acrolimus variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) measured between 1 month p

108 n (SD) of 0.14 log10 copies/ml or less and a coefficient of variation (CV) of </=6.1% for each level

109 depletion, is high, with a process replicate coefficient of variation (CV) of <12%.

110 ise were less reliable: exercising PCr had a coefficient of variation (CV) of 27% during exercise, co

111 in-flow at a droplet rate of few hertz and a coefficient of variation (CV) of up to 2% over 10000 eve

112 lthy individuals) the median interlaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.6%, with 85% of meta

113 all peptides was 71.5 amol/muL (nM), and the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the l

114 sing within-subject standard deviation (SW), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlatio

115 The EC density, coefficient of variation (CV), and percent hexagonal cel

116 cision was similar across all assay designs (coefficient of variation (CV), CVintra: 8-14%; CVinter:

117 by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient

118 eparation for one of the peptides was </=13% coefficient of variation (CV).

119 evaluated by using the extremal quotient and coefficient of variation (CV).

120 apatient variability of AUC0-24 expressed as coefficient of variation (CV).

121 Variability was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV).

122 apatient variability of AUC0-24 expressed as coefficient of variation (CV).

123 ariation at each school was quantified using coefficient of variation (CV).

124 everity diagnosis related groups measured as coefficient of variation (CV); and care costs and compos

125 In this study, we compared coefficient of variation (CV, the ratio of the standard

126 Overall, we find a drop size coefficient of variation (CV; i.e., polydispersity) of a

127 Using intra-individual coefficients of variation (CV%), patients were classifie

128 Most of these proteins showed very low coefficients of variation (CV<5%) whether they were quan

129 s and quantitation limits were achieved, and coefficients of variation (CV) for repeatability and rep

130 ratio (SOR), resulting in distributions with coefficients of variation (CV) of 0.1-0.9 and 0.5, respe

131 old (CT) values for B. pertussis samples had coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from 10% to 28%.

132 Within and between batches coefficients of variation (CV) were 2.5% and 3.2% respec

133 ed PBF, CT-derived PBV, and their associated coefficients of variation (CV) were closely correlated o

134 Regional PBV and PBV coefficients of variation (CV), a measure of spatial blo

135 u for elvitegravir was 23 840 ng x h per mL (coefficient of variation [CV] 25.5%), and the mean AUCla

136 tient variability was observed on clearance (coefficient of variation [CV], 40%) and bioavailability

137 and showed intra-assay heterogeneity (E1L3N coefficient of variation [CV], 6.75%-75.24%; SP142 CV, 1

138 enhancement fraction (baseline intrapatient coefficient of variation [CV]=8.6%), volume transfer con

139 y lower when expressed on a leaf mass basis (coefficient of variation, CV = 36%) than when expressed

140 April body mass showed no long-term trend (coefficient of variation, CV = 8.8%) and was higher foll

141 through consistency in adjusted R(2) (i.e., coefficient of variation, CV) and in regression coeffici

142 The assay precision (percent coefficient of variation, % CV) was measured at three di

143 of the effect itself through a between-study coefficient of variation (CVB).

144 the highest observed intermediate precision coefficient of variation CVR was 11% in starchy material

145 rall precision expressed as root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CVRMS) improved with increasin

146 The within and between-batch coefficient of variations (CVs) of present biosensor wer

147 ranging from 93% to 105%, and precision with coefficients of variation (CVs) < 15%.

148 nalyzed by using between- and within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) and analysis of variance

149 with repeated-measures analysis of variance; coefficients of variation (CVs) and variance components

150 fat, lung, and IT) were assessed by means of coefficients of variation (CVs) calculated across the 3

151 The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) for five replicate deter

152 zed with a Gaussian distribution with either coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.2 or with CVs calcu

153 Coefficients of variation (CVs) of lipid mean concentrat

154 Coefficients of variation (CVs) were computed to examine

155 macokinetics varied widely between subjects (coefficients of variation [CVs] 33.8% and 40.2% for clop

156 nd real-time PCR revealed greater precision (coefficients of variation decreased 37-86%) and improved

157 By incorporating coefficient of variation estimates into a theoretical mo

158 ontrol conditions exhibited distributions of coefficient of variation, failure rate and release proba

159 The coefficient of variation for 5 day, triplicate determina

160 Coefficient of variation for CD34 cells was 2.9% and 4.8

161 tested for correlations with a standardized coefficient of variation for each rate.

162 sitivity and specificity and a less than 15% coefficient of variation for intra-assay, interassay, an

163 oreover, the elder mother cells showed lower coefficient of variation for Pdr5p levels compared to th

164 The coefficient of variation for peaks detected in replicate

165 The coefficient of variation for quantitative BPU measuremen

166 ble in terms of fidelity and accuracy with a coefficient of variation for repeatability and reproduci

167 that estimate changes in mean yield and the coefficient of variation for seasonal yields across a br

168 At the lesion level, the coefficient of variation for SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVtot

169 r phantomless BMD measurements, and the mean coefficient of variation for the general calibration fac

170 on cohort demonstrated the lowest intravisit coefficient of variation for the global RNFL thickness.

171 The mean blood glucose coefficient of variation for the glucagon-like peptide-1

172 le recoveries ranged from 95 to 105% and the coefficient of variation for the intermediate precision

173 t all bias values were < +/-0.25 mm, and the coefficients of variation for 5 replicates were <11%.

174 Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation for assessing repeatability.

175 The average coefficients of variation for each organ for each patien

176 The range in the coefficients of variation for lymph-node harvest (0.07-0

177 ouse validation ranged from 89% to 109%, and coefficients of variation for repeatability ranged from

178 ability was better after surgery, with lower coefficients of variation for scans performed after surg

179 The coefficients of variation for the organs across all scan

180 (LOD) of 1E-4 ng/mL (i.e. 1 pg/mL) at 7% CV (coefficient of variation) for cTnT in HS was demonstrate

181 The reproducibility (coefficient of variation) for the Patlak model was 16% f

182 he addition of internal standard reduced the coefficient of variation from 30.8% to 9.5% for D4 and f

183 oduced through traditional methods (13% mean coefficient of variation from SAMBED versus 16% from man

184 a decline from west to east, the increase in coefficient of variation from west to east confirmed gre

185 Recoveries and coefficients of variation from fortified samples were wi

186 Coefficient of variation greater than 30% (hazards ratio

187 variation (64%) than all of the other tests (coefficient of variation, >/=99%).

188 The coefficient of variation in 2016 is expected to be 20.3%

189 ance in PC inputs also accounts for the high coefficient of variation in CN spike trains, while the b

190 eters were assessed by measuring the SUV and coefficient of variation in different regions (aorta, li

191 rregularity by calculating the square of the coefficient of variation in interspike intervals (CV(2))

192 variation in GPP propagated through to a 27% coefficient of variation in net biome productivity (NBP)

193 nsity or basal nuclear area, comparable with coefficient of variation in nuclear area and collagen de

194 parameters of nuclear area, nuclear density, coefficient of variation in nuclear area in the basal ep

195 ntrations ranging from 419 mug/mL (geometric coefficient of variation in percentage [CV%] 26.2) to 48

196 lly in both how tau scales with N and in the coefficient of variation in time until extinction.

197 Coefficients of variation in k3 estimates varied from 15

198 The coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coeffic

199 a on MRI, a quantitative ROI-based analysis (coefficient of variation) is also proposed.

200 recoveries ranged from 93.7% to 108.2% with coefficient of variations less than 16.3%.

201 ture were entropy (P = .007; reproducibility coefficient of variation < 1%), the neck-shaft angle (NS

202 brain, with good identifiability (percentage coefficient of variation < 5%).

203 ysis, 2,377 proteins were quantified, with a coefficient of variation </=25% among technical and biol

204 ess was best for Fourier-domain OCT (overall coefficient of variation <2%), followed by time-domain O

205 sfactory linearity (r(2)>0.9969), precision (coefficient of variation <2%), recoveries (70-100%), lim

206 shown to be highly reproducible (drift time coefficients of variation < 1.0% and isotopic pattern ro

207 .0 fmol/mug of total lysate protein and with coefficients of variation < 15%.

208 Acceptable precision with coefficients of variation <20% and accuracies of 100% +/

209 covery clenbuterol rates are 82.8-92.4% with coefficients of variation <9.4%.

210 trated acceptable precision, defined as <20% coefficient of variation (<25% at LLOQ).

211 We show acceptable run-to-run variation (coefficient of variation, <0.15), image analysis results

212 sed by using Bland-Altman and within-subject coefficient of variation measures.

213 Image quality was assessed via the coefficient of variation measuring nonuniformity of the

214 ction limit was equal to 17.5 mug L(-1), the coefficient of variation (n = 8; 100 mug L(-1)) was 2.7%

215 A coefficient of variation (n=8; 5mgL(-1)) of a 2.1% and a

216 In the validation study, mean intra-assay coefficients of variation (n=162) were 15%, 13% and 10%

217 Coefficients of variation (n=8) were estimated at 0.4% a

218 00; mean tidal volume = 6 mL/kg), with a 30% coefficient of variation (normal distribution).

219 below 1000 bacteria per mL, with an average coefficient of variation of 10% achieved with the develo

220 ction at ppb concentration level and average coefficient of variation of 10% were achieved with the d

221 patient level variance was 0.042 kPa, with a coefficient of variation of 10.7%.

222 retained its linearity up to 225 muM with a coefficient of variation of 11% for 10 measurements of 1

223 Reliability was demonstrated by an average coefficient of variation of 14% between all of the micro

224 n 85-115%, as well as within and between-day coefficient of variation of 2 and 14%, respectively.

225 erfusion pressure were reproducible within a coefficient of variation of 2%.

226 The reproducibility study yielded a coefficient of variation of 2.2% and intraclass correlat

227 rred within +/-20 g CO2e MJ(-1) of the mean (coefficient of variation of 20-45%), with economic model

228 with a recovery rate of 44.6 +/- 9.1% and a coefficient of variation of 20.4%.

229 ession repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of variation of 4.5%.

230 n of the assay was evaluated, resulting in a coefficient of variation of 5-7%.

231 rovided precise measurements with an average coefficient of variation of 6.1%.

232 mean recovery was found to be 97.12% with a coefficient of variation of 6.42% (n=5); consequently, t

233 ls mL(-1) of Salmonella was obtained, with a coefficient of variation of about 2.4%.

234 to protocol, tumor SUV has a within-subject coefficient of variation of approximately 10%.

235 e at any point along the PK profile within a coefficient of variation of approximately 5%.

236 Precision testing demonstrated a coefficient of variation of below 5% within a run and 14

237 The coefficient of variation of blood glucose ranged from 7.

238 have lower endothelial cell density, higher coefficient of variation of cell area, and lower percent

239 in measuring endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation of cell size (CV), and central

240 itral-to-mitral EPSP amplitude, increase the coefficient of variation of EPSPs, and increase paired-p

241 The coefficient of variation of fold-changes between pairs o

242 25-25 split in revenues reduces the expected coefficient of variation of gross revenues between 24% a

243 mely, gamma distribution shape factors and a coefficient of variation of inter-spike interval - we sh

244 s, such as opening and closing times and the coefficient of variation of inter-spike intervals, and o

245 found for other neuronal activity measures (coefficient of variation of interspike interval, skewnes

246 ed increase in paired-pulse ratio and in the coefficient of variation of IPSPs, consistent with decre

247 configurations each had an individual median coefficient of variation of less than 10%.

248 esolution FTICR-MS, both in terms of m/z and coefficient of variation of peak intensities among biolo

249 We evaluated the coefficient of variation of PEF (CVpef) and the scaling

250 ird, load-induced unbinding yields a reduced coefficient of variation of the bond lifetimes, which im

251 eurons display highly irregular spike times (coefficient of variation of the interspike intervals >1)

252 It is based on the coefficient of variation of the measured expression rati

253 Respiratory rate variability index, coefficient of variation of tidal volume and apnoea-hypo

254 , respiratory rate variability index and the coefficient of variation of tidal volume.

255 Inter- and intra-assay precision had coefficients of variation of </=17 and </=10%, respectiv

256 SUVmean and SUVmax resulted in coefficients of variation of 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively

257 etention time drifts of less than 0.73 s and coefficients of variation of intensity of less than 18%

258 H broadened the action potentials, increased coefficients of variation of the interspike interval, an

259 increased the half-width and produced larger coefficients of variation of the interspike interval, su

260 The coefficients of variation of the intra-assay reproducibi

261 The coefficients of variation of the model FC averaged 0.03

262 The coefficients of variation of the novel method did not ex

263 Between-subject coefficients of variation of V(T) ranged between 12% and

264 , accurate (</= 15% RE) and precise (</= 15% coefficient of variation) over a linear concentration ra

265 detection was below 0.03mug/ml and the assay coefficient of variation ranged from 0.3 to 9%.

266 The coefficient of variation ranged from 0.33% to 0.93%.

267 od showed good repeatability; the calculated coefficients of variation ranged from 2% to 13%.

268 arameters ranged from 0.74 to 0.92, and mean coefficients of variation ranged from 3.03% to 7.45%.

269 e distribution volume ratio (1 + BPND), with coefficients of variation ranging from 20% in the striat

270 t fitting metric for variability signals was coefficient of variation (rather than SD or variance), b

271 as indexed by the variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR).

272 e and 1.7% and 3.3% within and between batch coefficients of variation respectively.

273 gases, airway pressure, tidal volume and its coefficient of variation, respiratory rate, neural timin

274 The coefficient of variation showed a nonlinear increase, pr

275 al (ss = 0.026, P < .01) and temporal sector coefficient of variation (ss = 0.099, P < .01).

276 We calculated a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for e

277 The coefficient of variation then, for the number of molecul

278 ulated by using the root mean square average coefficient of variation to evaluate the robustness of t

279 The intra-assay and interassay coefficient of variation values for the Lyra assay were

280 The coefficient of variation values indicated good repeatabi

281 Intrabatch coefficients of variation varied between 3.9% and 9.6%.

282 e lot CT variability measured as the average coefficient of variation was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.2% to 3.2%)

283 ADC measurement was repeatable: mean coefficient of variation was 3.8% in healthy volunteers

284 arbitrary units (au), and the within-subject coefficient of variation was 4.9%.

285 The mean coefficient of variation was less than 20%.

286 n data point-level precision, expressed as a coefficient of variation, was 1.4% (interquartile range,

287 nce, 95% limits of agreement, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), and repeatability coeffi

288 t statistically significant increases in the coefficient of variation were observed for multiple anat

289 orrelation coefficients were 0.996-0.998 and coefficients of variation were 1.5%-3.6%.

290 Within batch and between batch coefficients of variation were 3.2% and 3.35% respective

291 The within-day (between-day) coefficients of variation were 7.7% (17%) and 5.4% (6.1%

292 008 ng mL(-1) and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were below 6%.

293 ents were greater than or equal to 0.994 and coefficients of variation were less than or equal to 7.3

294 CAP (0.95 vs 0.65, respectively; P = .0015); coefficients of variation were similar (19% vs 11%, P =

295 pe (P = .032), estimated by using the median coefficient of variation, were significantly higher in a

296 years, increasing interannual precipitation coefficient of variation while maintaining a precipitati

297 hare expression characteristics--a change in coefficient of variation with no change in paired-pulse

298 Scanner variability was +/-18.4% (coefficient of variation) with same-vendor follow-up.

299 The best metric for encoding variability is coefficient of variation, with heterogeneity in this enc

300 ation coefficients (ICCs) and within-subject coefficient of variation (WSCV).