ライフサイエンスコーパス: coercion

1 studies describe mechanisms underlying host coercion.

2 ducation and training, service provision and coercion.

3 t some "cooperative" behaviors may rely upon coercion.

4 female EPC and men's partner-directed sexual coercion.

5 liminated intrasexual combat and intersexual coercion.

6 ake this choice freely and in the absence of coercion.

7 consent of the child, unrealistic hope, and coercion.

8 anced exchanges because of the potential for coercion.

9 were all strongly correlated with perceived coercion.

10 unted for 43.3% of the variance in perceived coercion.

11 rson's brain is functioning normally without coercion.

12 as persuasion, do not induce perceptions of coercion.

13 eport experiencing attempted rape and sexual coercion (18% vs 4%, P=.02 and .04, respectively).

14 Interestingly, coercion also reduced the neural processing of the outco

15 CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement) study is an individual level, r

16 ill to act altruistically, the potential for coercion and exploitation of donors, increased risk to p

17 of early marriage, human trafficking, sexual coercion and forced first sex, and males as victims have

18 Nevertheless, we show that coercion and iterated, multilevel selection on both spec

19 nervosa reported higher levels of perceived coercion and pressure and a lower sense of procedural ju

20 d IPV for new mothers, and reduced pregnancy coercion and unsafe relationships for women in family-pl

21 ially monogamous birds, suggesting that male coercion and/or female willingness to cheat the partner

22 However, three key factors (kinship, coercion, and constraint) typically combine to limit the

23 ee that consent should be voluntary, free of coercion, and fully informed, there is no consensus on w

24 hat all exchanges increase the potential for coercion, and we currently reject the proposal of altrui

25 relate our findings to questions of consent, coercion, and/or compliance, and the controversial issue

26 study to present genetic evidence of sexual coercion as an adaptive strategy in a social mammal.

27 military, and an analogous case of economic coercion by China in a dispute with Japan.

28 tment, psychological frailties, distress, or coercion do not exhaust the causal pathways to deadly ma

29 ationship with the prescriber, experience of coercion during admission, and low insight predicted a n

30 acy, lacking self-confidence, avoiding donor coercion, emotional vulnerability, respecting cultural,

31 informed decision-making, safeguard against coercion, ensure psychological safety, justifiable risk,

32 ere mental health problems, personal crises, coercion, fear of an approaching enemy, or hidden self-d

33 crease the potential for undue influence and coercion for potential donors and transplant candidates.

34 cipation in violence increases when there is coercion from leaders in complex societies leading to gr

35 e ability to obtain informed consent without coercion have been raised.

36 for all three main predictions of the sexual coercion hypothesis [7]: male aggression (1) is greatest

37 reproductive success, supporting the sexual coercion hypothesis.

38 ; shorter psychiatric stays; lower perceived coercion; improved therapeutic relationships; and improv

39 the existence of comparable forms of sexual coercion in animals [4, 5], in which repeated male aggre

40 t admission decisions, induce perceptions of coercion in persons with mental illness.

41 ggression toward females functions as sexual coercion in wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus).

42 Coercion increased the perceived interval between action

43 about patient decision-making abilities and coercion into care, a less developed quality measurement

44 r options, is making these decisions free of coercion, is optimally prepared for surgery and that the

45 instruction to harm, suggesting that social coercion may alter mechanisms of voluntary agency, and h

46 Coercion may thus extend well beyond the systems in whic

47 ion to problems of the commons is in "mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon," and hence in how groups

48 test competition between males and in sexual coercion of females, thus increasing the potential for f

49 icially generated (rather than extracted) by coercion of human primed embryonic stem cells by modifyi

50 selfish behaviour ("self-promotion") and (2) coercion of other genotypes to act cooperatively.

51 Perceptions of coercion, of pressure by others toward hospitalization,

52 lves an outcome in which the family, without coercion or manipulation, comes to accept that the appro

53 elationships while eliminating or minimising coercion or restriction".

54 dures, coders determined whether or not nine coercion-related behaviors occurred around the time of a

55 patients' scores on the MacArthur Perceived Coercion Scale.

56 rmine what predicts patients' perceptions of coercion surrounding admission to a psychiatric hospital

57 ents under 18 (N=35) reported more perceived coercion than did adult patients (N=104), and a trend wa

58 experiencing rape, attempted rape, or sexual coercion than those who were not forced to cook (55% vs

59 lved tactics such as partner-directed sexual coercion that reduce the risk of cuckoldry.

60 educed costs allow preemptive or compensated coercion to be an instantaneously self-interested behavi

61 However, perceptions of coercion were stable from admission to follow-up, and pa

62 s that these are successful outcomes of male coercion, where females have conceded to superfluous mat