ライフサイエンスコーパス: coevolutionary

1 y partitioned niches, although not simply by coevolutionary adaptation and niche packing as is often

2 Here we show how coevolutionary adaptation of a specific enzyme in the fu

3 h exposure to gammaretrovirus infections and coevolutionary adaptations in the viral envelope.

4 we hypothesize that herbivores may not show coevolutionary adaptations, but instead "chase" hosts ba

5 responsible for the different results among coevolutionary analyses of different proteins.

6 functioning of BdTGD1 in Arabidopsis tgd1-1 Coevolutionary analysis and coimmunoprecipitation assays

7 tomistic and coarse-grained simulations with coevolutionary analysis and network modeling of the resi

8 results extend the potential applications of coevolutionary analysis far beyond cases treatable so fa

9 We present a gene-culture coevolutionary analysis of a small selection of such rul

10 We conclude that coevolutionary analysis of cross-species protein interac

11 We show that sequence-based coevolutionary analysis systematically identifies residu

12 d examples of the application of prokaryotic coevolutionary analysis to the prediction of eukaryotic

13 We addressed this debate with a coevolutionary analysis, by examining genes for CB1, CB2

14 ion between biology and culture was probably coevolutionary and bidirectional: life-history changes a

15 robust convergence to criticality emerges in coevolutionary and coadaptive setups in which individual

16 with the inoculation results, suggests that coevolutionary and competitive processes may be drivers

17 We used coevolutionary and positive-selection analyses to charac

18 Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these r

19 ow into the molecules and organs used in the coevolutionary arms race between predator and potential

20 ntiviral immunity that is likely to entail a coevolutionary arms race with rapidly evolving viruses.

21 nvaders, giving microbes an advantage in the coevolutionary arms race with their invaders.

22 riable resistance to tetrodotoxin (TTX) in a coevolutionary arms race with their toxic prey, newts of

23 e no longer effective, a process dubbed the 'coevolutionary arms race'.

24 symbiont interface are predicted to follow a coevolutionary arms race, as observed for genes governin

25 Here we report the next stage in this coevolutionary arms race, using the Illumina GAIIx platf

26 lence of avian brood parasites can trigger a coevolutionary arms race, which favours rejection of par

27 tors have an advantage against phages in the coevolutionary arms race.

28 Our model suggests that accounting for coevolutionary arms races at the predator-prey detection

29 phenotypic and genetic levels, characterizes coevolutionary arms races between amphibians and their s

30 Coevolutionary arms races between brood parasites and ho

31 Coevolutionary arms races between species can favor exag

32 Extortion strategies do particularly well in coevolutionary arms races between two distinct populatio

33 tions with pathogens are expected to undergo coevolutionary arms races in which plant specificity and

34 arisen in several species of snakes through coevolutionary arms races with toxic amphibian prey, whi

35 Others contend that selection, including coevolutionary arms races, can systematically push organ

36 To understand parasite-host coevolutionary arms races, many studies have examined ho

37 Coevolutionary arms races, where adaptations in one part

38 icted by Ehrlich and Raven's plant-herbivore coevolutionary arms-race hypothesis, and tested whether

39 Thus, the attine symbiosis appears to be a coevolutionary "arms race" between the garden parasite E

40 ain fitness advantage during a host-parasite coevolutionary "arms race."

41 ruses and host RNAi may represent an ancient coevolutionary "arms race." This could lead to strong di

42 Furthermore, there is a fundamental coevolutionary asymmetry between plants and their herbiv

43 ass extinction is the coincidence of a large coevolutionary avalanche in the ecosystem with a severe

44 a purely biotic mechanism as the result of "coevolutionary avalanches".

45 ry ecology model and find the conditions for coevolutionary branching and relevant dimensionless para

46 current approaches, especially culture-gene coevolutionary (CGC) approaches, have neglected them.

47 components of molecular systems involved in coevolutionary change.

48 Niche-based theories propose that coevolutionary changes among species lead to character d

49 tribution, and the potential consequences of coevolutionary changes in pathogen-host relationships fo

50 e adaptive diversification of colors and the coevolutionary chase at the putative algae-protein bindi

51 ed that sexual conflict can drive an endless coevolutionary chase between the sexes potentially leadi

52 I show that a cyclic coevolutionary chase is possible under a broad range of

53 Female diversification brings coevolutionary chase to the end.

54 showing that the two sexes are locked in a "coevolutionary chase" that could be driven by processes

55 ed covariation networks, indicating frequent coevolutionary/compensatory changes in the context of pr

56 hat the host and pathogen may be locked in a coevolutionary conflict at these loci, where attempts to

57 the need for more holistic research into the coevolutionary consequences when multiple adaptations an

58 In a wider coevolutionary context, our framework also shows that th

59 system to this end because they encompass a coevolutionary continuum of interactions ranging from mu

60 s this question, we introduce here a general coevolutionary coupling analysis strategy and apply it t

61 to differences in the phase of host-parasite coevolutionary cycles, although higher hm2 diversity in

62 7803 and the virus (RIM8) underwent multiple coevolutionary cycles, leading to the rapid diversificat

63 le strategies or runaway selection, and when coevolutionary cycling between high and low levels of ho

64 choosiness and parasite virulence or indeed coevolutionary cycling of both traits.

65 In this paper we combine coevolutionary data and molecular dynamics simulations t

66 Results on simulated coevolutionary data indicate that the BMM method can suc

67 evance of these findings with respect to the coevolutionary dynamic operating between genomic element

68 ssion and selection, and their effect on the coevolutionary dynamics and final states of interacting

69 ere we introduce an approach that integrates coevolutionary dynamics and network structure.

70 We suggest that coevolutionary dynamics are associated with the nature o

71 ereas molecular traits associated with rapid coevolutionary dynamics are more labile at branch tips.

72 arise generically from an instability of the coevolutionary dynamics between genome composition and r

73 esistance provides a window into the ongoing coevolutionary dynamics between plants and herbivores an

74 to competition from the invader, suggesting coevolutionary dynamics between the species.

75 predictably and generally affect qualitative coevolutionary dynamics by both direct and indirect (med

76 city within species, it is not known whether coevolutionary dynamics differ among functionally simila

77 e impact of community complexity on pairwise coevolutionary dynamics is theoretically dependent on th

78 nd theoretical framework for analyzing rapid coevolutionary dynamics of bacteriophage and bacteria in

79 velop a simple mathematical model describing coevolutionary dynamics of male and female traits involv

80 we propose a mathematical model to study the coevolutionary dynamics of phenotypic diversity and cont

81 Our data reveal coevolutionary dynamics of reproductive traits between t

82 tor which in turn allows us to determine the coevolutionary dynamics of the system.

83 to impose powerful and continuing effects on coevolutionary dynamics, if that structure creates selec

84 show how phase transitions emerge from such coevolutionary dynamics, which can be interpreted as pro

85 gene flow across a landscape can shape local coevolutionary dynamics.

86 little about how the environment influences coevolutionary dynamics.

87 Pathogen identity affected coevolutionary dynamics.

88 ing plant and insect molecular genetics with coevolutionary ecology.

89 el of mass extinction which does not rely on coevolutionary effects and in which extinction is caused

90 In this particular system we find that the coevolutionary equilibrium is always stable and that hos

91 enses or "legacy adaptations" that prevented coevolutionary escalation.

92 These are all coevolutionary events and spread out through time during

93 atric human populations identified potential coevolutionary events between host and pathogen.

94 ively, these results reveal the existence of coevolutionary events during persistent HCV infection th

95 showed both arms race escalation and strong coevolutionary fluctuation in toxin concentrations acros

96 al geometry of the network, suggesting a new coevolutionary framework for biological, geomorphologica

97 This review explores a coevolutionary framework for the study and management of

98 onjugation can only be fully understood in a coevolutionary framework.

99 re has been growing interest in the study of coevolutionary games on networks.

100 12S ribosomal DNA and ND2 sequences to infer coevolutionary history for ASLVs and their hosts.

101 hylogenetic analyses indicate that this long coevolutionary history includes a third symbiont lineage

102 ding the diversification of the bees and the coevolutionary history of bees and angiosperms requires

103 two phages was very high, independent of the coevolutionary history of the bacteria.

104 Thus, differences in the coevolutionary history of wing and body lice can be expl

105 on should focus on its underlying processes: coevolutionary hot and cold spots, selection mosaics and

106 n hypothesis, in that sex is associated with coevolutionary hot spots for virulent parasites.

107 here sexual reproduction is most common, are coevolutionary hot spots, and that deeper habitats are c

108 can produce selection mosaics manifested as coevolutionary "hot spots" and "cold spots".

109 that structure creates selection mosaics and coevolutionary hotspots across landscapes.

110 ow a long-term shifting geographic mosaic of coevolutionary hotspots and coldspots.

111 Consistent with the coevolutionary hypothesis, there is some evidence that d

112 was a key prediction of Ehrlich and Raven's coevolutionary hypothesis, yet has remained largely unte

113 have long provided a spectacular example of coevolutionary integration.

114 Two potential outcomes of a coevolutionary interaction are an escalating arms race a

115 te in generating a geographic mosaic in this coevolutionary interaction on the landscape scale.

116 concerning the space and time dimensions of coevolutionary interactions and their influence on popul

117 Coevolutionary interactions are strong enough to cause c

118 Coevolutionary interactions are thought to have spurred

119 to particular insect orders suggests ancient coevolutionary interactions between baculoviruses and th

120 volutionary dynamics, potentially reflecting coevolutionary interactions between host and symbiont.

121 We examined the coevolutionary interactions between plants (Brassicales)

122 and has the potential to dramatically shape coevolutionary interactions between viruses and their mi

123 However, because coevolutionary interactions can be highly divergent acro

124 sults from localized outcomes of the dynamic coevolutionary interactions of populations with their pa

125 toward linking the selective consequences of coevolutionary interactions to geographic and phylogenet

126 y played by species-specific factors such as coevolutionary interactions with specialized pathogens.

127 A coevolutionary Markov model for codon substitution is al

128 We show that the Coevolutionary-Matrix method can detect greater number o

129 tions, we introduce a novel technique called Coevolutionary-Matrix that captures co-evolution between

130 We have developed a coevolutionary method for the computational design of HI

131 ur quantitative benchmarking showed that all coevolutionary methods clearly benefit from alignments w

132 Here we develop a general coevolutionary model between host mate preference and th

133 ere we explicitly address this issue using a coevolutionary model of cooperation and partner rewiring

134 A coevolutionary model of mutualism finds that HS are unli

135 Here, using an eco-coevolutionary model, we show that predator-prey coevolu

136 omputational task on its own; application of coevolutionary modeling has, in turn, been restricted to

137 Coevolutionary models suggest that herbivores drive dive

138 rical niche development as a result of prior coevolutionary molding of competitive ability determines

139 Domestication is defined as a distinctive coevolutionary, mutualistic relationship between domesti

140 an be considered as the construction of many coevolutionary niches by the network of interactions bet

141 c interactions may be incidental rather than coevolutionary or escalatory in nature.

142 However, coevolutionary oscillations generated by frequency-depen

143 tive abundances are determined by the labile coevolutionary outcomes of interactions with specialized

144 s suggest that sperm and egg proteins may be coevolutionary partners that can alternate between direc

145 Coevolutionary pathways of indirect effects favour ongoi

146 sight into how context dependence can affect coevolutionary patterns even within individual proteins,

147 From the coevolutionary perspective, our work may help explain th

148 dynamics of chemically defended animals and coevolutionary predator-prey and mimic-model relationshi

149 ion for cheating as a source of antagonistic coevolutionary pressure in mutualism and a biological di

150 ntial mutation rates across genes may be the coevolutionary pressure of the various forms of interact

151 ame theory and explore the ways in which the coevolutionary process determines the allocation of bene

152 Our results shed light on the coevolutionary process in simple communities and have pr

153 vidence of the female's participation in the coevolutionary process is critically needed.

154 ially biasing our overall perspective of the coevolutionary process.

155 s model systems for studying such reciprocal coevolutionary processes [2, 3].

156 Thus, gaining a better understanding of the coevolutionary processes between interacting species is

157 d by the Red Queen theory, which states that coevolutionary processes favor rapid rates of evolution,

158 ction, and intramolecular and intermolecular coevolutionary processes with OXT were also detected.

159 rred to as the "old friends") were tasked by coevolutionary processes with training the human immune

160 rasite species-specific predictions for many coevolutionary processes, they also illustrate the compl

161 ns in host-symbiont systems raise intriguing coevolutionary questions and may influence the effective

162 graecum sesquipedale, Darwin proposed that a coevolutionary 'race' had driven the directional increas

163 ur findings support the existence of a novel coevolutionary relation between carnivores and their par

164 analysis provides a novel perspective on the coevolutionary relationship between HLA class I molecula

165 Here we establish a previously unknown coevolutionary relationship in 94 amniote species betwee

166 In order to reduce the complexity of coevolutionary relationships and identify the primary co

167 ng to their diversification, we investigated coevolutionary relationships between amoA, a conserved m

168 ary novelty; however, the development of new coevolutionary relationships may act to integrate exotic

169 However, the potential for coevolutionary rescue of competing populations is likely

170 rved confluence of dynamics correlations and coevolutionary residue couplings with global networking

171 poration of dynamic residue correlations and coevolutionary residue dependencies in the construction

172 an adaptation in one sex selects an opposing coevolutionary response from the other.

173 sion, other genes may evolve imprinting as a coevolutionary response to match the expression pattern

174 tions among species force us to consider the coevolutionary responses of species to environmental cha

175 tness and evolvability will emerge in common coevolutionary scenarios.

176 ogen specialization are both consistent with coevolutionary selection and functionally relevant in sp

177 s, demonstrating that the local structure of coevolutionary selection can remain stable across multip

178 Here we confirm that current coevolutionary selection in interspecific interactions c

179 stinctive features of humans are products of coevolutionary selection.

180 g before or after the origin of the putative coevolutionary selective pressure must be attributed to

181 oth coarse-grained and atomistic models with coevolutionary sequence analysis to shed light on this p

182 Here we investigate a possible coevolutionary sequence triggered by mate desertion in t

183 y of signal characters are consistent with a coevolutionary sexual selection mechanism, but the absen

184 nteracting proteins have, on average, higher coevolutionary signal compared with the regions outside

185 istics are calculated to determine whether a coevolutionary signal exists in the mapping.

186 site contacts yield a significantly greater coevolutionary signal than interdomain non-contacts, an

187 As in previous studies, a strong overall coevolutionary signal was detected, and coevolution with

188 for biologically relevant interactions, the coevolutionary signal was strongest in the transmembrane

189 emaining domain sequence still contains some coevolutionary signal.

190 n the other hand, is distinguished by strong coevolutionary signals (with the SBD) exhibited by a ser

191 The second coevolutionary signature is acquisition, referring to th

192 ties of the residue interaction networks and coevolutionary signatures may be linked with specificity

193 Here, we identify three coevolutionary signatures that characterize holobiont ge

194 fense as an antiparasite adaptation, and its coevolutionary significance remains poorly understood [1

195 As coevolutionary specialization increases and spatial scal

196 ic to Cuba, suggesting both lack of pairwise coevolutionary specificity in ant/cultivar interactions

197 results suggest that a fine-tuned one-to-one coevolutionary state between a flower species and a poll

198 We here describe a fine-tuned coevolutionary state of a flower-visiting bee that colle

199 populations retain a genetic record of past coevolutionary states.

200 lity expanded later to all 20 AAs based on a coevolutionary strategy of the genetic code and on a phy

201 Coevolutionary theories and developmental systems theori

202 Recent coevolutionary theory has indicated that the geographic

203 Coevolutionary theory predicts that the distribution of

204 Coevolutionary theory proposes that the diversity of che

205 y evaluate various predictions based on this coevolutionary theory.

206 ariation in parasitism and may influence the coevolutionary trajectories and population dynamics of b

207 ophilic desert Drosophila reflects divergent coevolutionary trajectories between the sexes.

208 ns of laboratory mouse XP-MLV ERVs and their coevolutionary trajectory with their XPR1 receptor, we s