ライフサイエンスコーパス: coexisting condition

1 imited to patients who do not have extensive coexisting conditions.

2 minority groups, and has a higher burden of coexisting conditions.

3 tic evaluation for more than 100 potentially coexisting conditions.

4 idiopathic, whereas others are secondary to coexisting conditions.

5 providers of patients with multiple chronic coexisting conditions.

6 hocytic leukemia (CLL) but not in those with coexisting conditions.

7 e heart failure, and diabetes were prominent coexisting conditions.

8 y improved outcomes in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions.

9 n patients with previously untreated CLL and coexisting conditions.

10 e patients, indications for colonoscopy, and coexisting conditions.

11 rate the impact of multimorbidity related to coexisting conditions.

12 ents, VT was of nonendocardial origin with a coexisting condition also requiring cardiac surgery.

13 rolling for potential confounders, including coexisting conditions and severity of illness.

14 t of quality did not vary by the presence of coexisting conditions and was not related to objective r

15 , timed 6-meter walk, presence of at least 1 coexisting condition, and self-rated health status.

16 (70%) were male, 9 of 26 patients (35%) had coexisting conditions, and 22 (81%) were health care per

17 HF, LVEF is a dynamic factor related to sex, coexisting conditions, and drug therapy.

18 adjustment for demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, and site of infarction (hazard ra

19 nagement of heart failure, the prevalence of coexisting conditions, and socioeconomic factors.

20 spitals after adjustment for age, sex, race, coexisting conditions, and the location of the infarctio

21 , and tobacco use were among the most common coexisting conditions, and their prevalence increased fr

22 hite, were more likely to be male, had fewer coexisting conditions, and were more likely to have unde

23 esources to support HF patients with complex coexisting conditions are needed to decrease hospitaliza

24 any patients with severe aortic stenosis and coexisting conditions are not candidates for surgical re

25 Changes in body weight, coexisting conditions, cardiometabolic risk factors, and

26 ents with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of

27 The presence of coexisting conditions has a substantial effect on the ou

28 controlling for demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, hospital, and surgery type.

29 Endocarditis is an uncommon coexisting condition in bacterial meningitis but is asso

30 ients are critically ill and frequently have coexisting conditions including sepsis and multiple orga

31 The presence of extensive coexisting conditions may attenuate the survival benefit

32 iations between condition type and number of coexisting conditions on receipt of overall good quality

33 We examined the impact of coexisting conditions on the quality of care for hyperte

34 Coexisting conditions or risk factors included current o

35 Four patients (29 percent) had no serious coexisting conditions or risk factors.

36 differences in demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, or infarction site between patien

37 average sicker, having higher rates of most coexisting conditions, outpatient care, and prior hospit

38 zation rates versus differences in patients' coexisting conditions, quality of discharge planning, ph

39 ality did not differ according to age, race, coexisting conditions, self-reported performance status,

40 After adjustment for age, coexisting conditions, severity and causes of heart fail

41 We compared coexisting conditions, severity of illness, and 30-day a

42 VHA patients had more coexisting conditions than Medicare patients.

43 specialty hospitals were less likely to have coexisting conditions than those being treated at genera

44 les were queried to identify the presence of coexisting conditions that confer a high risk of pneumoc

45 versus 29%, P=.02), and less likely to have coexisting conditions that might have predisposed to sud

46 evice to endarterectomy in 334 patients with coexisting conditions that potentially increased the ris

47 Among those without coexisting conditions, the annual incidence of invasive

48 ss the severity of infarction, the number of coexisting conditions, treatments received, and the appr

49 disease without dialysis, the prevalence of coexisting conditions was higher in the PAMV group.

50 than population norms, and the prevalence of coexisting conditions was similar to that among controls

51 The most frequent coexisting conditions were hypertension (60.0%), diabete

52 llitus (DM), a risk factor for, and frequent coexisting condition with, HF continues to increase in t