コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ponds to the effect of 6 years aging on this cognitive domain.
2 egree of change from 12 to 72 months for any cognitive domain.
3 gicity did not contribute to variance in any cognitive domain.
4 entia (fvFTD) may reflect impairment in this cognitive domain.
5 veraged to compute composite scores for each cognitive domain.
6 Most participants had at least 1 impaired cognitive domain.
7 working memory, a related but non-numerical cognitive domain.
8 a for cognitive function improvement in each cognitive domain.
9 memory (P = .03), and visuospatial (P = .02) cognitive domains.
10 of cortical networks that influence multiple cognitive domains.
11 s, with consequences for sensory, motor, and cognitive domains.
12 iated with postoperative changes in specific cognitive domains.
13 performance tests in common that assessed 5 cognitive domains.
14 n and to explore specificity with respect to cognitive domains.
15 with decreased executive function and other cognitive domains.
16 could be fruitfully applied to a variety of cognitive domains.
17 reate a measure of global cognition and five cognitive domains.
18 which includes five measures assessing four cognitive domains.
19 ntal factors to influence specific executive cognitive domains.
20 ral brain damage and lower scores in various cognitive domains.
21 guage function but relative sparing of other cognitive domains.
22 as better function in multiple higher-order cognitive domains.
23 of brain regions supporting memory and other cognitive domains.
24 endence of age-related deficits in different cognitive domains.
25 -function relationships within other complex cognitive domains.
26 ional outcomes, including motor, sensory and cognitive domains.
27 egions may relate differentially to distinct cognitive domains.
28 nt formal testing of performance in multiple cognitive domains.
29 ariance in other developmental disorders and cognitive domains.
30 of the variation in performance in specific cognitive domains.
31 duced FA) was negatively correlated with all cognitive domains.
32 an accurately discriminate between different cognitive domains.
33 itive measures representing at least 2 other cognitive domains.
34 and third, to determine the most vulnerable cognitive domains.
35 ilar cognitive trajectories across different cognitive domains.
36 vocal, and few studies have examined several cognitive domains.
37 ates of cognitive decline across a number of cognitive domains.
38 bjects, LLD patients performed poorer in all cognitive domains.
39 on but may have synergistic effects on other cognitive domains.
40 d standardized testing may measure different cognitive domains.
41 chological test battery assessing a range of cognitive domains.
42 s the shared variation in performance across cognitive domains.
43 gical tests measuring performance in several cognitive domains.
44 ments showed progressive decline in multiple cognitive domains.
45 hy ageing has disparate effects on different cognitive domains.
46 lain differential ageing trajectories across cognitive domains.
47 l subregions have specialized roles in other cognitive domains.
48 are also associated with low scores in most cognitive domains.
49 ognition in multiple species and in multiple cognitive domains.
50 ubset completed standard NP assessment for 8 cognitive domains.
51 y unstable response patterns across multiple cognitive domains.
52 acute antidepressant treatment on a range of cognitive domains.
53 respectively) completed 12 tests covering 6 cognitive domains.
54 f atrophy influence decline across different cognitive domains.
55 ate summary measures of global cognition and cognitive domains.
56 n Aphasia Battery-Revised and tests of other cognitive domains.
57 omputerized CogState battery that assessed 5 cognitive domains.
58 e transient cognitive impairment in multiple cognitive domains.
59 etworks widely implicated in supporting many cognitive domains.
60 ogical measure and performance on other MCCB cognitive domains.
61 tion and accelerated decline across multiple cognitive domains.
62 , resulting in more rapid decline in several cognitive domains.
63 ATCV-1 proteins and had decreases in certain cognitive domains.
64 with performance decrements across multiple cognitive domains.
65 D, affecting sensorimotor, as well as higher cognitive, domains.
66 14.6% of children had low ECDI scores in the cognitive domain, 26.2% had low socioemotional scores, a
67 ecline by multiple indicators in two or more cognitive domains, a significantly higher rate than in t
70 better performance in the executive function cognitive domain after 36 months in apolipoprotein E (AP
71 adverse associations of tibia lead in 3 of 7 cognitive domains after adjustment for age, sex, race/et
72 on (P < 0.001), decline in all five specific cognitive domains (all P-values < 0.001), and to fluctua
73 as associated with widespread effects across cognitive domains, although these additional association
74 rment following systemic therapy in selected cognitive domains among some older patients with cancer.
75 t predictors were in the motor, imaging, and cognitive domains: an increase of one SD in total motor
76 hould attempt to use multiple tests for each cognitive domain and feature populations from ethnocultu
77 critically reviewed and tabulated by study, cognitive domain and follow-up period, with particular e
79 ing 19 neuropsychological tests from which 5 cognitive domain and global summary scores were derived,
86 seemingly disparate findings across multiple cognitive domains and could provide a unified account of
88 hearing loss to impaired performance across cognitive domains and increased risk for dementia diagno
90 tients with type 2 diabetes mellitus but the cognitive domains and patient groups most affected have
91 tistical approach is applicable across other cognitive domains and provides a key to understanding ti
92 ser portions of covariance between the other cognitive domains and schizophrenia were also found to b
93 tween men and women and how it varies across cognitive domains and subjective dimensions has not been
94 episodic and working memory but not in other cognitive domains), and it was elevated in those who dev
95 le HbA1c measurement at baseline, 1 test per cognitive domain, and potential geographic confounding o
96 rformed between 18F-AV-1451 binding and each cognitive domain, and we used the Biological Parametric
98 ever, efficacy varies across populations and cognitive domains, and little is known about the efficac
99 T is efficacious on global cognition, select cognitive domains, and psychosocial functioning in peopl
102 ease and magnetic resonance variables, which cognitive domains are most vulnerable, the influence of
103 regions predicting individual differences in cognitive domains are predominantly located in regions o
104 z scores were calculated and clustered into cognitive domains as follows: episodic and working memor
105 gimens may have nonspecific effects on other cognitive domains as well as certain patient reported ou
106 s of BD is unclear, but many of the affected cognitive domains, as well as neuroanatomical abnormalit
107 in largely unknown for a variety of critical cognitive domains, as, for example, risky decision makin
108 r of genomic copies at the 16p11.2 locus and cognitive domains assessed in 62 deletion carriers, 44 d
109 association between LDL-C variability and 4 cognitive domains at month 30 in 4428 participants of PR
111 al tests were categorized according to eight cognitive domains: attention, executive functioning, inf
112 s clinical remission outcomes, on a range of cognitive domains: attention, response inhibition, execu
113 he PFC specifically produces deficits in the cognitive domain, but does not give rise to PFC-dependen
114 itative differences are apparent across many cognitive domains, but are especially obvious in episodi
115 nces contributed substantially to all of the cognitive domains, but intelligence and working memory w
116 ted for overall cognitive function and eight cognitive domains by calculating standardized mean diffe
117 ent studies indicate that impairments in two cognitive domains characterize the cognitive abnormaliti
118 ody pathology to dementia, global cognition, cognitive domains, cognitive decline and fluctuations in
119 n or performance in any of the five assessed cognitive domains, compared with the non-hallucinators.
123 a for amnestic MCI: 87 had memory plus other cognitive domain deficits and 21 had pure memory deficit
124 ely impaired patients with memory plus other cognitive domain deficits, rather than those with pure a
125 atial navigation and long-term memory, major cognitive domains dependent on hippocampal function, hav
126 cored lower than the healthy controls on all cognitive domains (eg, intelligence quotient [IQ], 76 [s
127 estimate -0.10 [SE 0.04], p=0.0096) and four cognitive domains (episodic memory -0.10 [0.04], p=0.017
129 g performance, as two potentially vulnerable cognitive domains essential in everyday life functioning
130 included measures of global cognition and 2 cognitive domains (executive functioning and memory), as
131 y fractional anisotropy (FA) and three broad cognitive domains (fluid intelligence, processing speed,
132 functions but relative preservation of other cognitive domains for at least the first two years of di
133 nt change in cognitive performance for eight cognitive domains from baseline to 12- and 72-month foll
134 ression model with a latent process for each cognitive domain: global cognition (Mini Mental State Ex
136 trong association with impairment in several cognitive domains highlights the clinical relevance of w
138 decline after 36 months in the visuospatial cognitive domain in APOE varepsilon4 allele non-carriers
139 ese limitations, we assessed a wide range of cognitive domains in a large sample (N=100) of 14- to 16
141 of interest (ROIs), is associated with these cognitive domains in normal adults and adults with mild
142 extent of impairment in social and nonsocial cognitive domains in patients with bipolar disorder comp
143 te matter injury to dysfunction in different cognitive domains in patients with multiple sclerosis ha
144 a, 10 tests were selected to represent seven cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Bat
145 t that a weakened link between emotional and cognitive domains in the psychopathic brain may combine
146 ementia; lower and more rapid decline in all cognitive domains including episodic memory and fluctuat
147 y childhood onset of dysfunction in multiple cognitive domains including socio-emotional function, sp
149 formance in a wide variety of linguistic and cognitive domains, including morphological agreements su
150 ubsequent decrease in performance in several cognitive domains, including ones involving recognition
151 a reduction of one SD in Stroop word score (cognitive domain) increased risk by 2.32 times (1.88-2.8
152 he findings into the major categories of the cognitive domains investigated, considering sample chara
153 We conclude that performance in the social-cognitive domain is equally impaired in male and female
154 nal compensation is well documented in other cognitive domains, it is presently unclear whether it ca
155 owing to different methods to assess SDB or cognitive domains, making it difficult to draw conclusio
157 asures as well as measures of mood, specific cognitive domains (memory, attention, and language), mot
161 ssociated with lower performance in specific cognitive domains, most notably perceptual speed, separa
165 ovided measures of accuracy and speed on the cognitive domains of abstraction and mental flexibility;
166 B score (R=0.52, P=0.033), as did individual cognitive domains of attention/vigilance, verbal learnin
167 is common but may not preferentially impact cognitive domains of episodic memory, attention, working
168 and examined each biomarker's relation with cognitive domains of episodic memory, executive function
169 tients had significantly lower scores in the cognitive domains of nonverbal intelligence, nonverbal m
170 ns jointly influencing schizophrenia and the cognitive domains of reaction time and verbal-numerical
173 mins had no significant effect on individual cognitive domains or global cognitive function or on cog
174 ngle supramodal mechanism common to multiple cognitive domains or modality-specific mechanisms idiosy
175 hought to be involved in processing in these cognitive domains, or involve possible compensatory proc
178 ded correlations with measures from multiple cognitive domains, particularly declarative and working
179 odules predominantly coactivated by specific cognitive domains (perception, action, and emotion, resp
184 n unadjusted analyses, lower scores on all 3 cognitive domains predicted poorer medication adherence
192 Regarding relative impairment across the two cognitive domains, results revealed a significant group-
194 ciations among salivary cortisol metrics and cognitive domain scores in an urban adult population.
196 notype was found to be associated with worse cognitive domain scores, with evidence of associations i
197 d the longitudinal relationships between key cognitive domains, selected a priori based on their asso
198 0.23) (11 studies, n=858) nor each of eight cognitive domains (SMDs=-0.03 to 0.11) (n=367-940) in th
199 od to promote skill learning across multiple cognitive domains, spanning executive functions, working
200 r CMBs was associated with impairment in all cognitive domains such as attention, language, visuospat
202 is model and its application to other social cognitive domains such as Theory of Mind are discussed.
204 ognitive function was impaired in 4 of the 6 cognitive domains tested (median global T-scores: 50.8 v
205 andard deviations better (p = 0.006) on this cognitive domain than those exceeding all risk factor gu
206 eported greater cognitive dysfunction in all cognitive domains than both norms and the comparison can
208 gration is reorganized due to expertise in a cognitive domain that largely involves audiovisual integ
210 emonstrated that repeated losses in the same cognitive domain, that is, successive changes from bette
212 ggested that rTPJ is implicated in divergent cognitive domains, the demonstration of an involvement i
213 eeping with findings in other behavioral and cognitive domains, the response to an increase in presum
214 e administration and treatment confirmation, cognitive domains to be tested and which mazes should be
215 > .05), but the contribution of the specific cognitive domains to coding task performance differed si
216 mittee evaluated more than 90 tests in seven cognitive domains to identify the 36 most promising meas
217 ation of information processing in different cognitive domains to reach the capacity-limited consciou
218 er treatment (mean duration: 2.3 y) in the 4 cognitive-domain trials (1340 individuals); Mini-Mental
219 ed homocysteine concentrations by 28% in the cognitive-domain trials but had no significant effects o
220 The present study sought to characterise cognitive domains underlying a large test battery and fo
221 Changes in global cognition and specific cognitive domains up to 1 year post-TAVR were evaluated.
223 impairment in memory and at least one other cognitive domain was associated with greatest risk for p
226 ognitive monitoring can operate on different cognitive domains, we ignore whether it involves a singl
227 , but those with impairment in more than one cognitive domain were more likely to progress or remain
229 udy of dementia-free individuals, only a few cognitive domains were associated with established LOAD
232 verse associations between tHcy and multiple cognitive domains were observed for individuals aged 60
233 variables from clinical, psychophysical, and cognitive domains were related to change in symptoms usi
235 arison subjects on both social and nonsocial cognitive domains, whereas both groups differed from sch
236 s associated with lower function in multiple cognitive domains, whereas HS without TDP-43 did not hav
237 hildhood social class was significant in all cognitive domains, whereas within-pair estimates were at
238 identified performance deficits in all three cognitive domains, which were associated with regionally
239 was associated with lower performance in all cognitive domains, while higher estimated verbal intelli
240 in the LTI(+) vs the LTI(-) group in 6 of 7 cognitive domains with statistical significance reached
241 ger associated with performance in the other cognitive domains with the exception of visual learning.
242 thin brain regions known to subserve these 2 cognitive domains, with Met allele carriers having small
243 d mice allows for the assessment of multiple cognitive domains within the same testing environment.
244 Met allele carriers vs Val homozygotes) on 5 cognitive domain z scores and magnetic resonance imaging
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。