ライフサイエンスコーパス: colectomy

1 rmediate (duodenal polyposis) and worst (pre-colectomy).

2 1 years (pulmonary resection) to 78.2 years (colectomy).

3 f 170,789 patients who were readmitted after colectomy.

4 cific postoperative complication rates after colectomy.

5 with intravenous corticosteroids, underwent colectomy.

6 f stay (LOS), and readmission after elective colectomy.

7 ived adjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of colectomy.

8 motherapy for colon cancer within 90 days of colectomy.

9 long-term immunosuppressant therapy or total colectomy.

10 st varied from 27% for cystectomy to 40% for colectomy.

11 mends full bowel preparation before elective colectomy.

12 ased infectious complications after elective colectomy.

13 years of age or older who underwent elective colectomy.

14 nged ileus and LOS in patients who underwent colectomy.

15 mized trial testing laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

16 o accelerate gastrointestinal recovery after colectomy.

17 bowel resection instead of the advised total colectomy.

18 ohort of patients with UC and the effects of colectomy.

19 icare expenditures for laparoscopic and open colectomy.

20 of stay (LOS) in patients who have undergone colectomy.

21 patients failing medical management require colectomy.

22 healing is associated with decreased risk of colectomy.

23 d less adhesion formation after laparoscopic colectomy.

24 in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial colectomy.

25 f long-term outcomes such as need for future colectomy.

26 th care costs for many operations, including colectomy.

27 percent of clopidogrel-treated patients with colectomy.

28 s according to the need for elective partial colectomy.

29 rged to a nonhome destination after emergent colectomy.

30 ciated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy.

31 t (>/=18 years) patients undergoing elective colectomy.

32 th ulcerative colitis have increased risk of colectomy.

33 ciated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy.

34 associated with a 50% reduction in SSI after colectomy.

35 on and costs up to 1 year following elective colectomy.

36 ; mainly segmental bowel resections and hemi-colectomies.

37 on cancer patients treated with laparoscopic colectomies.

38 ilar frequency in right-sided and left-sided colectomies.

39 access and 573,435 for non-critical access; colectomy, 10,198 for critical access and 577,680 for no

40 day readmission rate for patients undergoing colectomy (12.1% vs 14.1%; P < .001) and hip replacement

41 iated hospitals had fewer readmissions after colectomy (12.6% vs 13.5%, P = .03).

42 Three years after colectomy, 12% did not work at all compared with 7.2% of

43 cular abscess (12.0% vs 9.7%; P < .001), and colectomy (13.5% vs 11.5%; P < .001).

44 t study of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colectomy (189229 patients at 1876 hospitals), coronary

45 286 ileocecal resections (48%), 118 subtotal colectomies (19%), 134 ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (21%

46 The analysis included 31,191 colectomies, 2,670 cystectomies, 1,514 pancreatectomies,

47 f SSIs were 5.4% for appendectomy, 12.1% for colectomy, 2.8% for hysterectomy, and 1.7% for prostatec

48 at a different hospital (AAA repair: 40.5%; colectomy: 25.8%; hip replacement: 32.5%; and pancreatec

49 high complication rates were also higher for colectomy ($2719 per patient), abdominal aortic aneurysm

50 cant but attenuated difference persisted for colectomy ($34,949 vs $30,352; P < 0.001).

51 cant but attenuated difference persisted for colectomy ($34,949 vs $30,352; P < 0.001).

52 erwent subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) underwent total proctocolectomy w

53 lung resection (22.3% MIS), partial or total colectomy (39.1%), enterolysis (19.0% MIS), ileostomy (9

54 Of 25481 patients who underwent colectomy, 4160 were included in the study (laparoscopic

55 Of 25481 patients who underwent colectomy, 4160 were included in the study.

56 st vs highest LOS mode ($26482 vs $29250 for colectomy, $44777 vs $47675 for CABG, and $24553 vs $279

57 ; P < 0.001), and $19,147 more expensive for colectomy ($51,893 vs $32,746; P < 0.001).

58 ; P < 0.001), and $19,147 more expensive for colectomy ($51,893 vs $32,746; P < 0.001).

59 scores, EQ-5D, or SF-6D scores; frequency of colectomy (55 [41%] of 135 patients in the infliximab gr

60 neurysm repair ($60456 vs $23261; P < .001), colectomy ($56787 vs $22853; P < .001), pulmonary resect

61 The query yielded 741,817 elective colectomies (684,969 open and 56,848 laparoscopic).

62 rate was 9.4% after AAA repair, 13.6% after colectomy, 7.5% after hip replacement, and 16.3% after p

63 l pouch-anal anastomoses (21%), 23 segmental colectomies (8%), and 18 abdominoperineal resections (4%

64 o occur in patients who underwent left-sided colectomy (8.2% vs 5.9%).

65 ciclosporin group; p=0.223); or mean time to colectomy (811 [95% CI 707-912] days in the infliximab g

66 s for appendectomy (3.8% vs 7.0%; P < .001), colectomy (9.3% vs 15.0%; P < .001), hysterectomy (1.8%

67 (4.1%) underwent AAA repair; 29 388 (22.9%), colectomy; 91 168 (71.2%), hip replacement; and 2276 (1.

68 Among elective colectomies, a focus of surgical quality-improvement ini

69 for a subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, o

70 A caseload of 168 colectomies across 3 years was required to achieve a rel

71 owing: colonic perforation, toxic megacolon, colectomy, admission to an intensive care unit for cCDI,

72 Segmental colectomy affords good function, and our data supports t

73 recognized when considering routine elective colectomy after successful nonoperative management of ac

74 lpha (TNFalpha) agents, immunomodulators, or colectomy among those initially treated with intravenous

75 Total annual costs for elective colectomies amounted to >$1.7 billion: 11.3% was due to

76 Of these, 77% underwent colectomy and 23% underwent proctectomy.

77 Total proctocolectomy, or total colectomy and a 1-year interval of proctoscopic surveill

78 clinical trial setting include laparoscopic colectomy and demonstrate a potential association betwee

79 f disease at the time of IRA, indication for colectomy and having received immunomodulative agents be

80 urgical site infection (SSI) after segmental colectomy and is part of the World Health Organization's

81 821 Medicare enrollees underwent an elective colectomy and met inclusion criteria.

82 Similar results were obtained for colectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

83 Patients who underwent segmental colectomy and sustained a period of intraoperative hypot

84 had cancer, 31% IBD; 49% underwent LAR, 27% colectomy, and 14% proctocolectomy.

85 tic resection, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy.

86 ortic aneurysm repair, pancreatic resection, colectomy, and appendectomy.

87 Extensive colitis, a high prevalence of colectomy, and chronic and continuous symptoms of IBD oc

88 eatectomy, pulmonary resection, hepatectomy, colectomy, and cystectomy) between 2010 and 2012 were id

89 pair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

90 pair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip replacement.

91 m, open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, colectomy, and hip replacement.

92 ntation, more emergent admissions at time of colectomy, and lower survival relative to privately insu

93 ents undergoing total hip replacement (THR), colectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

94 7 hospitals undergoing hip and knee surgery, colectomy, and thoracotomy were matched to 2 sets of 204

95 Among patients who underwent colectomies, annual days lost increased from a mean of 4

96 ere selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

97 ere selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric.

98 Minimally invasive colectomies are increasingly popular options for colon r

99 Surgical site infections (SSI) in colectomy are associated with increased morbidity and co

100 poorly understood; indications for elective colectomy are unclear.

101 ticulitis, accounting for death and elective colectomy as competing events.

102 is episodes for patients undergoing elective colectomy at 1 of 49 participating hospitals (2010-2013)

103 be recommended due to limited response (70% colectomy at 3 years) and high rate of serious adverse e

104 tients surviving to discharge after emergent colectomy at 3012 hospitals, 46.7% were discharged to a

105 ng gastrectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and colectomy at a 2000-bed urban medical center in Taipei,

106 Medicare enrollees undergoing an elective colectomy at a large tertiary care hospital between Janu

107 nt pancreaticoduodenectomy, hepatectomy, and colectomy at a single academic institution between Septe

108 the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative-Colectomy Best Practices Project.

109 2005 (n = 19,714) and patients who underwent colectomies between 1998 and 2002 (n = 807).

110 edicare beneficiaries who underwent emergent colectomy between 2008 and 2010.

111 eneficiaries undergoing laparoscopic or open colectomy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012

112 Furthermore, we found that colectomy can be performed with excellent survival in se

113 ty score analysis was used to match elective colectomy cases based on primary exposure variable-full

114 The study population consisted of all colectomy cases in the American College of Surgeons Nati

115 A case-control cohort of colectomy cases was analyzed comparing patients in the s

116 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy cohort from 2011 to 2012 was performed to exam

117 orse and more costly outcomes after elective colectomy compared with patients with CC but better than

118 Optimization of surgical outcomes after colectomy continues to be actively studied, but most stu

119 Patients undergoing colectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hyste

120 urgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted colectomy data initiated in 2012 capture information on

121 Two patients undergoing total colectomy developed a metachronous rectal cancer (18.2%)

122 Rates of colectomy did not differ significantly between patients

123 onal inpatient database was reviewed for all colectomy discharges from 2010 to 2011.

124 A total of 81,622 colectomy discharges were evaluated: 44% emergent and 56

125 opulation levels in the group that underwent colectomy during several years of follow-up.

126 nts undergoing hip surgery, cholecystectomy, colectomy, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, an

127 prior standard for proceeding with elective colectomy following 2 episodes of diverticulitis is no l

128 was used to study emergently performed open colectomies for a primary diagnosis of C difficile colit

129 5-2007 (after COST) was queried for elective colectomies for both benign and malignant disease.

130 ive care unit admission after positive test, colectomy for C. difficile infection, or death within 30

131 bdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 69207), colectomy for cancer (n = 107647), pulmonary resection (

132 The outcomes after colectomy for cancer are comparable in right-sided and l

133 cations on the use of adjuvant therapy after colectomy for cancer.

134 the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of colectomy for CDAD after solid organ transplantation.

135 ed from normal mucosa of patients undergoing colectomy for colon cancer or inflamed colonic tissues f

136 e the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal diseases in obese patients comp

137 From 1987 to 2009, 50 patients underwent a colectomy for Crohn's colitis-associated dysplasia.

138 sex, and race-adjusted rates of laparoscopic colectomy for each HRR.

139 Some patients can require colectomy for medically refractory disease or to treat c

140 variation in the utilization of laparoscopic colectomy for Medicare patients with colon cancer, sugge

141 hic variation in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy for patients with colon cancer.

142 iding evidence for the practice of deferring colectomy for patients without persistent symptoms or mu

143 Conversely, colectomy for severe acute colitis was associated with d

144 However, IRA could be discussed after colectomy for severe acute colitis, or in patients naive

145 pouch-anal anastomosis is recommended after colectomy for UC, IRA is still performed.

146 f ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) failure after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC).

147 n, $105259 [IQR, $87335-$126541]), and total colectomy for ulcerative colitis (WIQR, $24497; median,

148 ne hundred eight patients underwent subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis during the study period

149 e used to identify adults with UC undergoing colectomy from 1996-2007.

150 Patients who underwent nonemergent colectomy from 2012 to 2013 were identified from the The

151 lt patients who underwent elective segmental colectomy from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 200

152 who underwent elective laparoscopic or open colectomy from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 201

153 nt reoperation compared with the right-sided colectomy group (56% vs 30%).

154 space SSIs, more patients in the left-sided colectomy group underwent reoperation compared with the

155 the rectum/pouch, duodenal polyposis and pre-colectomy groups, respectively.

156 Attempted laparoscopic transverse colectomy had the highest rate of conversion (20.8%), fo

157 Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to have significant short- and

158 ed diverticulitis, the incidence of elective colectomy has increased dramatically in the last 2 decad

159 t greater odds of dying within 30 days after colectomy, heart valve repair/replacement, or abdominal

160 ulcerative colitis were at increased risk of colectomy (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.83) compared to nev

161 n codes were obtained on patients undergoing colectomy, hysterectomy, and knee and hip replacement pr

162 inistrative data correctly identified UC and colectomy in 85.9% of cases.

163 grafting, hip replacement, back surgery, or colectomy in IDS-affiliated hospitals compared with thos

164 evidence supporting the use of laparoscopic colectomy in patients with cancer has led to dramatic in

165 ons of UC or the drugs used to treat it) and colectomy in patients with moderate to severe UC compare

166 an intriguing suggested alternative to total colectomy in severe, complicated cases.

167 attempted LCR had better outcomes than open colectomy in the immediate perioperative period.

168 ern and current rate of laparoscopic partial colectomy in the United States and analyze various facto

169 to estimate the rate of laparoscopic partial colectomy in the United States for the years 1996, 2000,

170 associated with decreased risk of SSI after colectomy, including SCIP-2-compliant prophylactic antib

171 ine based on 3 or more episodes for elective colectomy increased concurrently with a benchmarking and

172 Emergency/urgent colectomy increased from 7.1 to 10.2 per 100,000 (P < 0.

173 Elective colectomy increased from 7.9 to 17.2 per 100,000 people

174 stoperative ileus after laparoscopic partial colectomy is associated with specific preoperative and p

175 high risk of IRA failure, particularly when colectomy is performed for refractory disease.

176 Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and effective in the treatment of many

177 marked increase in the rate of laparoscopic colectomy is seen in recent years.

178 sed hospital quality for patients undergoing colectomy, lower extremity bypass, or all surgical proce

179 nee replacements) or nontargeted procedures (colectomy, lung resection, abdominal aortic aneurysm rep

180 ancreatectomy, partial or total gastrectomy, colectomy, lung resection, and cystectomy for cancer fro

181 09 Medicare data on beneficiaries undergoing colectomy, lung resection, or coronary artery bypass gra

182 stent with a National Quality Forum-endorsed colectomy measure.

183 Minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) is an increasingly common surgical proce

184 0%) to conventional (multiport) laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) (overall conversion rate, 6.9%).

185 c colectomy (SILC) to multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) when performed by experienced laparoscop

186 tients undergoing appendectomy (n = 97,780), colectomy (n = 118,407), hysterectomy (n = 26,639), or r

187 1,422), pulmonary resection (n = 93,056), or colectomy (n = 277,619) from 2009 to 2012.

188 1,422), pulmonary resection (n = 93,056), or colectomy (n = 277,619) from 2009 to 2012.

189 al ulcer, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and colectomy, n = 70,719).

190 r safe adaptation of this approach from open colectomy (OC) is occurring among surgeons.

191 inversely associated with readmission after colectomy (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93) but

192 ere used to assess the impact of the side of colectomy on operative outcome measures, adjusting for c

193 007 and December 2010 who underwent elective colectomy operations.

194 ned to improve processes of care surrounding colectomy operations.

195 ients with advanced UC treated with elective colectomy or medical therapy.

196 nd most common reason overall (10.3%), after colectomy or proctectomy (18.1%), ventral hernia repair

197 fection (SSI) overall (19.5%) and also after colectomy or proctectomy (25.8%), ventral hernia repair

198 esentative operations: bariatric procedures, colectomy or proctectomy, hysterectomy, total hip or kne

199 [37.6%]; P = .02) but not among those in the colectomy or proctocolectomy cohorts.

200 of these recommendations on use of elective colectomy or rates of emergency surgery remains undeterm

201 Patients were categorized into subtotal colectomy or segmental groups.

202 Among these, 950 (38.4%) underwent subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) unde

203 Procedural Terminology codes for a subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctoco

204 i-TNF agent use among patients who underwent colectomy or total proctocolectomy and experienced no si

205 lished in adults for severe CDI resulting in colectomy or transfer to ICU have not been shown to corr

206 o [OR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.48-0.58]; P < .001), colectomy (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.55-0.61]; P < .001), hyst

207 d severe CDI (intensive care unit admission, colectomy, or death attributable to CDI within 30 days o

208 ed as CDAD associated with graft loss, total colectomy, or death.

209 -7.7%) and compared with 5.9% 3 years before colectomy (P < .001).

210 r postdischarge care use ($4011 vs $5083 for colectomy, P < .001; $6015 vs $6355 for CABG, P = .14; a

211 < .001) or readmissions ($2606 vs $2887 for colectomy, P = .16; $3175 vs $3064 for CABG, P = .67; an

212 onary artery bypass surgery, oesophagectomy, colectomy, pancreatectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hern

213 length of stay than laparoscopic left-sided colectomy patients (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78)

214 The study population included 14,745 colectomy patients in 169 hospitals.

215 Laparoscopic right-sided colectomy patients were more likely to have a prolonged

216 ta from a multicenter trial of 320 segmental colectomy patients.

217 ed the role of complications in FTR rates in colectomy patients.

218 -rescue (FTR) after anastomotic leak (AL) in colectomy patients.

219 Of the 244129 colectomies performed during the study period, 126284 (5

220 This is the largest series of colectomies performed for C difficile colitis in the lit

221 The percentage of elective colectomies performed laparoscopically has increased ove

222 Emergent colectomy performed for C difficile colitis is associate

223 A colectomy perioperative care bundle in Michigan is assoc

224 cement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or colectomy procedures between 2005 and 2007.

225 Patients undergoing colectomy procedures in 2011 were identified by Current

226 ords (2005-2008) for all patients undergoing colectomy procedures in the American College of Surgeons

227 ux-en-Y gastric bypass), colorectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal hernia surgery (parae

228 the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Colectomy Project.

229 The elective colectomy rate for diverticulitis more than doubled, wit

230 Administration of MBP/OABP before elective colectomy reduces the incidence of SSI.

231 dures (ie, ventral incisional hernia repair, colectomy, reflux surgery, bariatric surgery, and hyster

232 gement of the retained rectum after subtotal colectomy remains an important issue even in the era of

233 mpact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy remains an important subject.

234 Bowel preparation before elective colectomy remains controversial.

235 actor for wound infection after laparoscopic colectomy remains unclear.

236 tients (n = 345 surgeons) undergoing partial colectomy reported a risk-adjusted complication rate of

237 It is unclear whether colectomy restores the ability of patients with ulcerati

238 Laparoscopic colectomy results in a significant reduction in health c

239 Elective colectomy seemed to be associated with improved survival

240 Decisions to proceed with colectomy should be made based on consideration of the r

241 Further research on SSI after colectomy should incorporate right vs left side as a pot

242 was to compare single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) to multiport laparoscopic colectomy (ML

243 ial benefits of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC).

244 These 7 procedures included partial colectomy, small-bowel resection, cholecystectomy, opera

245 nt a total proctocolectomy (TPC) or subtotal colectomy (STC) had multifocal dysplasia.

246 relevant to long-term treatment of elective colectomy, stratified differences in risk-adjusted incre

247 In the 4875 colectomies studied, a laparoscopic approach was used in

248 Patients undergoing colectomy surgery (n = 4331) were studied.

249 ational Surgical Quality Improvement Program Colectomy Targeted Participant Use Data File for 2012 an

250 Patients from the 2012 Colectomy-Targeted American College of Surgeons National

251 December 31, 2013, who were included in the Colectomy-Targeted American College of Surgeons National

252 ndectomy, ventral hernia repair, and partial colectomy), the proportion of Zwisch ratings (n = 357) i

253 patients who underwent laparoscopic and open colectomy, the key drivers were a reduction in costs fro

254 For emergency colectomies, there was a wide variation in compliance wi

255 ve confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still a controversy after rectal sur

256 With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demo

257 With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demo

258 t majority of surgeons do not perform enough colectomies to generate a reliable surgeon-specific comp

259 for acute kidney injury undergoing elective colectomy to a minimum urine output target of 0.2 mL/kg/

260 ends do not support the practice of elective colectomy to prevent emergency surgery.

261 ost studies group right-sided and left-sided colectomies together.

262 went abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, total hip arthroplasty, and pancreatectomy.

263 Yet adjusted rates of laparoscopic colectomy utilization varied from 0% to 66.8% across 306

264 ndergoing 4 surgical procedures (2008-2009): colectomy, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneur

265 rd methods, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (vs open) had lower total Medicare expenditure

266 cteristics, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy (vs open) still had lower Medicare expenditure

267 e of the growth rate of laparoscopic partial colectomies was noted after 2004, with a significant inc

268 The rate of laparoscopic colectomy was 2.2% (878/38,264) for 1996, 2.7% (1175/42,

269 ictive value of LGD on biopsy for HGD in the colectomy was 36%.

270 scopic surveillance after surgery, nor total colectomy was associated with a significant reduction in

271 Elective colectomy was associated with improved survival compared

272 Combined MBP plus OABP before elective colectomy was associated with reduced SSI, which ultimat

273 The case-control for colectomy was confirmatory: increased 30-day mortality i

274 Robot-assisted colectomy was equivalent in most clinical outcomes to LC

275 h immunosuppressant (IS) and anti-TNF before colectomy was independently associated with IRA failure

276 Overall, 226,585 partial colectomies were identified.

277 The risks of hospitalization and colectomy were compared between groups using unadjusted

278 al comorbidity (P = 0.01), but not segmental colectomy, were associated with reduced SFS.

279 tis, there was no difference in the need for colectomy when comparing current smokers to never smoker

280 OS and in-hospital mortality of laparoscopic colectomy, which suggests that the choice of hospital af

281 participants performed a laparoscopic right colectomy, which was video recorded and assessed using 2

282 Six patients with CCDC underwent colectomy with 83% patient survival and 20% graft loss.

283 AL is a common complication after colectomy with a relatively high FTR rate.

284 xamined all patients who underwent segmental colectomy with anastomosis from 2008 through 2010 partic

285 49 segmental, 59 subtotal) underwent primary colectomy with anastomosis.

286 old woman who developed delirium first after colectomy with complications and again after routine sur

287 litis, but some patients undergoing subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy are satisfied with an ileos

288 ncer were randomized to laparoscopic or open colectomy with fast track or standard care.

289 ic operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation.

290 ic operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation.

291 We aimed to determine whether immediate colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastamosis (IPAA) after

292 In contrast, early colectomy with IPAA accrued a discounted lifetime cost o

293 der the appropriate clinical settings, early colectomy with IPAA after diagnosis of severe UC reduces

294 er colectomy with IPAA was necessary for the colectomy with IPAA strategy to be cost-ineffective.

295 l 100 years of age or death, comparing early colectomy with IPAA strategy to the standard medical the

296 erapy was 20.78, while QALY-gained for early colectomy with IPAA was 20.72.

297 A low utility value of less than 0.7 after colectomy with IPAA was necessary for the colectomy with

298 Quality-of-life after colectomy with IPAA was the most sensitive variable impa

299 ts had no registered work loss 3 years after colectomy, work loss was not restored to presurgery or g

300 Adoption of OABP before elective colectomy would reduce SSI without effecting LOS.