ライフサイエンスコーパス: college

1 irations in engineering in the first year of college.

2 d that it was necessary to continue PA after college.

3 ilarly disadvantaged peers who do not attend college.

4 s of four, stratified by sex, ethnicity, and college.

5 glish speaking, and 380 (53.0%) had attended college.

6 Americans attended relatively more selective colleges.

7 th white people (14.5%), those who completed college (13.0%), and those with health insurance (15.6%)

8 ng mild pathology and the majority of former college (27 [56%]), semiprofessional (5 [56%]), and prof

9 school, 3 of 14 high school (21%), 48 of 53 college (91%), 9 of 14 semiprofessional (64%), 7 of 8 Ca

10 Among those who enrolled in college, affirmed African Americans attended relatively

11 Activity as an Index of Heart Attack Risk in College Alumni", established that more strenuous PA redu

12 .83;1.04,7.71],secondary[AOR:3.45;1.33,9.41],college and above [AOR: 4.86;1.82,12,99] and having eye

13 3, 5.95], secondary [AOR: 4.34; 2.30, 8.22]; college and above [AOR: 9.82; 4.27, 22.60]) and having e

14 l and below, middle school, high school, and college and above], previous cardiovascular events [yes

15 t of educational programs, such as community college and online courses.

16 in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities in 2013-2014.

17 higher education, as well as the pipeline to college, and (b) have been evaluated in at least two stu

18 g problems were less likely to graduate from college as young adults than adolescent survivors withou

19 father worked in retail), and I traveled to college at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, where

20 e samples and 46 saliva samples from 55 male college athletes ages 18-25 years.

21 oronary heart disease in longshoremen and in college athletes at Harvard University and University of

22 y common areas and student rooms on two U.S. college campuses adhering to two different furniture fla

23 5% confidence interval (CI): -0.02, 0.01) or college completion (odds ratio = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.0

24 s from more privileged backgrounds, for whom college completion is associated with benefits to both m

25 In contrast, college completion is associated with higher metabolic s

26 College completion is associated with lower metabolic sy

27 ind uniform lower depression associated with college completion regardless of childhood disadvantage,

28 whether the health benefits associated with college completion vary by level of childhood disadvanta

29 attainment), early adulthood (high-school or college completion), and older adulthood (income, mean a

30 operating characteristic curve of the King's College criteria (early, 0.552 alone, 0.711 with FABP1;

31 4.84; 95% CI, 1.22-19.21; P = .02), having a college degree (vs some college) (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53

32 Approximately 72% of respondents held a college degree or higher.

33 icity other than non-Hispanic white: 16%; no college degree: 35%; household income <$50,000: 26%).

34 dj's = 0.4-0.6, p < 0.01); more likely to be college-educated (ORadj = 15.8 (13-19) versus </=high sc

35 neighborhoods that are densely populated by college-educated adults are more likely to experience ph

36 < .01), being a high school graduate without college education (aMOR 2.6, P < .01), remaining in Ulaa

37 5 (5.3) years, with 3936 (52.2%) reporting a college education or better, 754 (10.0%) reporting black

38 chool education or less-versus undergraduate college education or more-displayed greater odds of pref

39 Predictors of second opinion use included college education vs less education (odds ratio [OR], 1.

40 analysis, predictors of better QOL included college education, marital status, higher household inco

41 students and is rarely implemented early in college education, when it will have the greatest impact

42 insurance and 708 (71.9%) had at least some college education.

43 increased African Americans' probability of college enrollment 7-9 y later.

44 ons improved disadvantaged students' overall college experiences, promoting use of student support se

45 by using the American Association of Medical Colleges faculty roster and linked this list to a compre

46 le populations (including military veterans, college fraternity/sorority members, football fans, mart

47 Across four college freshman dorms (n = 193), we characterized indiv

48 n (0.49%; 95% CI, 0.18% to 0.80%) than among college graduates (0.03%; 95% CI, -0.17% to 0.23%; inter

49 , 51% were men, 92% were white, and 65% were college graduates.

50 Americans in the rural Southeast who attend college have worse physical health than their similarly

51 tient department of Kumudini Women's Medical College Hospital and the babies born to those mothers.

52 Patients admitted to the King's College Hospital HASU between 2011 and 2012 were analyse

53 nd November 2013 at Kumudini Women's Medical College Hospital, a secondary-level hospital in Mirzapur

54 rolled young women attending a university or college in Montreal, Canada, and their male partners, fr

55 A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated.

56 were reported among youth, high school, and college-level football athletes with a mean (SD) of 5.48

57 le University (New Haven, CT, USA), Imperial College London (London, UK), University of Chicago (Chic

58 It is sponsored by University College London (UCL).

59 y history were recruited from the University College London Hospital.

60 British Heart Foundation, and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) Nat

61 al Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals, and Biomedical Research Centre

62 h Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, and the National Health and Medical Rese

63 mole fraction, and isotopic values at King's College London, enabled assessment of the isotopic signa

64 formed in a single academic center, Imperial College London, of adult patients with moderate to sever

65 and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London.

66 lay theory intervention-be effective before college matriculation?

67 (odds ratio=2.66), a major in psychology in college (odds ratio=2.58), and valuing work-life balance

68 emy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Joint Task Force

69 thma and Immunology (AAAAI) and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI), forme

70 fluence of CRM infiltration according to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Royal College

71 Design The College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society

72 rican Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for

73 ASCO and the College of American Pathologists published immunohistoch

74 to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER

75 e 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for hum

76 Using established tools available in a College of American Pathologists-accredited and Clinical

77 d interobserver variance from GTC, following College of American Pathology guidelines.

78 xis services were surveyed through the Royal College of Anaesthetists 6(th) National Audit Project.

79 te a formal evaluation of FALD, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) sponsored a stakeholders mee

80 The joint American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association

81 Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Associat

82 The 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (

83 In the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association G

84 The American College of Cardiology Adult Congenital and Pediatric Car

85 erol management guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (AC

86 The latest guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, re

87 Equations Risk Model (PCERM) of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association.

88 orting effort being launched by the American College of Cardiology and partnering professional organi

89 g AC, a survey was developed by the American College of Cardiology Anticoagulation Work Group.

90 Women in Cardiology section of the American College of Cardiology conducted a voluntary anonymous su

91 approximately 3 months later), the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart

92 ration, American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, European Heart Network

93 nt events and is recommended by the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Associat

94 Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool or American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Associat

95 The American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend 3 months of a

96 with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines.

97 competent in the care of CAHAP, the American College of Cardiology has recently established a Sports

98 The American College of Cardiology In-Training Exam (ACC-ITE) is inco

99 We describe the American College of Cardiology International Cardiovascular Excha

100 the 2013 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology lifestyle guidelines and the 2015

101 only a small number of early-career American College of Cardiology members have benefited as funding

102 outpatients with AF enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Regis

103 ng patients with AF enrolled in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Regis

104 This cross-sectional study used the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Regis

105 CHA2DS2-VASc >/=2) enrolled in the American College of Cardiology PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and

106 In 2016, the American College of Cardiology published the first expert consens

107 The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology support the program.

108 The American College of Cardiology third decennial Professional Life

109 the 2015 Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology titled, "The Academic Medical Cent

110 om the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (STS/A

111 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT)

112 Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT)

113 om the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Regist

114 om the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Regist

115 gistry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Regist

116 rom the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Regist

117 r Disease in Women Committee of the American College of Cardiology, in conjunction with interested pa

118 The American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiog

119 ction Academic Working Group of the American College of Cardiology, with senior leadership support, a

120 Distinguished Science Award of the American College of Cardiology.

121 mated 10-year ASCVD risk (using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Assocation pooled-c

122 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

123 The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

124 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

125 ve Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

126 F recommendations compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

127 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

128 l performance was compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

129 nes were compared with current 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

130 The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

131 The accuracy of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AH

132 We compared the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 200

133 ducted a detailed review of current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and Ame

134 d Framingham risk equation, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association ASCVD P

135 ter at predicting SCD than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiov

136 tor blocker use in patients with an American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I

137 Although the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

138 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

139 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

140 tatin eligibility based on the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

141 for statin eligibility per the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

142 tin therapy was defined by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

143 atin eligibility was determined per American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

144 ubject matter with the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideli

145 a exist regarding the prevalence of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association HF stag

146 Addition of mtDNA-CN to the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled

147 al cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled

148 ide incremental value over the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled

149 .54-0.62, slopes 0.06-1.12) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled

150 uation risk chart, and the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled

151 tivity and specificity for the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recomme

152 determine the accuracy of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association statin

153 the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society atrial fibril

154 the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society atrial fibril

155 e used as is, particularly the 2012 American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines, v

156 We used the AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry

157 The American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians recommendations are intended

158 e American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians, provides evidence-based rec

159 e American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians.

160 Provide the 2014 update of the 2007 American College of Critical Care Medicine "Clinical Guidelines f

161 corporeal membrane oxygenation, and American College of Critical Care Medicine guidelines in the newb

162 The American College of Critical Care Medicine provided 2002 and 2007

163 Cancer (MSTF), which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterolo

164 ased study, we extracted data from the Royal College of General Practitioners sentinel primary care n

165 Dutch College of Health Insurance Companies, Schering-Plough,

166 enic variants were classified using American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) consensus guidelines.

167 In addition, review of the American College of Medical Genetics actionable genes identified

168 The American College of Medical Genetics and American College of Path

169 The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Asso

170 In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the

171 classification methodology based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelin

172 On the basis of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, 6 of 28 (21%) ca

173 variants were adjudicated using the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines.

174 y of CNVs was assessed based on the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines.

175 ified according to the contemporary American College of Medical Genetics guidelines.

176 1 dose-escalation study conducted at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, and Tex

177 dical education included the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, residency training at the Universit

178 sease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, from March 201

179 ealth, Focus on Depression, and the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

180 icine and Molecular Imaging and the American College of Nuclear Medicine should choose the membership

181 Care Excellence guidelines and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend tha

182 n Academy of Family Physicians, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

183 Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Data

184 can College of Medical Genetics and American College of Pathologists (ACMG/AMP) variant classificatio

185 ege of American Pathologists (CAP) and Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) on long-term survival of 1

186 t High School in New York City, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science (now University of the S

187 Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Academy of

188 The American College of Physicians (ACP) and the Centers for Disease

189 Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to

190 Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to

191 The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to

192 Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to

193 Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to

194 onent of patient-centered care, the American College of Physicians (ACP) is attentive to all voices,

195 This American College of Physicians (ACP) position paper, initiated an

196 on: This guideline updates the 2008 American College of Physicians (ACP) recommendations on treatment

197 In this position paper, the American College of Physicians (ACP) recommends that physicians a

198 tion and education resources of the American College of Physicians (ACP), including MKSAP (Medical Kn

199 tion and education resources of the American College of Physicians (ACP), including MKSAP (Medical Kn

200 le was reviewed and approved by the American College of Physicians Clinical Guidelines Committee.

201 A 2007 American College of Physicians guideline addressed nonpharmacolog

202 A 2007 American College of Physicians guideline addressed pharmacologic

203 In this position paper, the American College of Physicians maintains that substance use disor

204 This American College of Physicians position paper, initiated and writ

205 ng available treatment options, the American College of Physicians recently issued a guideline titled

206 rts policy recommendations from the American College of Physicians to address the escalating costs of

207 The American College of Physicians' High Value Care Task Force and th

208 The UK Royal College of Psychiatrists offered a policy framework, whi

209 Supported and endorsed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the system has been develope

210 es were calculated according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data S

211 ast minimal residual breast tissue (American College of Radiology categories A-D) and normal conventi

212 The American College of Radiology classification system was used to c

213 Materials and Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanne

214 Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations s

215 In a secondary analysis of American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6668/RTOG 0

216 cancer in the clinical trial by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) and the Gyn

217 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) affili

218 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) E2491

219 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Gro

220 consent, a cohort of women from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Pennsylvania 4006 t

221 patients from multicenter Merck and American College of Radiology Imaging Network trials was performe

222 s is a pooled analysis of ACRIN-PA (American College of Radiology Imaging Network-Pennsylvania) 4005

223 Current American College of Radiology recommendations to discontinue imag

224 Uniform phantom and American College of Radiology-approved phantom results between sc

225 of phantoms, including uniform and American College of Radiology-approved phantoms, PET/CT images, a

226 nt according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20 response) and the change

227 e proportion of patients who had an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response (>/=20% impr

228 of 318 patients with TA fulfilling American College of Rheumatology and Ishikawa criteria was analyz

229 a 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12 and

230 improvement at week 16 according to American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) in the intentio

231 Patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptomatic knee os

232 ned at least 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR-20) at we

233 portion of patients who attained an American College of Rheumatology response of at least 50% (ACR50)

234 vascular procedures sampled for the American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement

235 trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Pro

236 of daily living recommended by the American College of Surgeons (bathing, transferring, dressing, sh

237 registry database sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society, on

238 To do so, the American College of Surgeons and the National Institutes of Healt

239 ality improvement initiative of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the America

240 e National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons for "urgently needed" research, the

241 The Royal College of Surgeons have proposed using outcomes from ne

242 A retrospective analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database from 1998 t

243 l patients were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program

244 o 2013 were identified from the The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program

245 2005, to December 31, 2013, in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement

246 This retrospective review used the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement

247 When controlling for standard American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement

248 ment databases (Veterans Affairs or American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

249 m 2013 to 2015 were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

250 Data from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

251 retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

252 isted of all colectomy cases in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

253 latform for patient outcomes is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

254 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

255 2764 children (6%) in the 2012-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

256 tients between 2005 and 2013 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

257 included in the Colectomy-Targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

258 ght to evaluate the accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvemen

259 Methods The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031A trial

260 The results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 (ACOSOG Z0011)

261 e National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons Summit on Surgical Disparities Resea

262 n 2014, using the pancreas-targeted American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Progra

263 Using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improveme

264 We used American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improveme

265 rwent pancreatic resection from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improveme

266 e and Joint Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Endoscopy, Archives of Surgery, and

267 has led organizations, such as the American College of Surgeons, to revisit this challenge.

268 model was validated using the 2013 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvemen

269 Confirmatory analyses from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvemen

270 From American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvemen

271 ed to the intensive care unit of an American College of Surgeons-verified level I trauma center betwe

272 from March 2014 to March 2015 at an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center.

273 4% of illiterate women vs 100% of those with college or higher education), antenatal care (17% vs 69%

274 ican, P < .001; paternal education less than college (OR, 1.4, P = .05); and 6MP nonadherence (OR, 9.

275 Women with some college (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.65-6.84; P = .001) or a bac

276 ; P = .02), having a college degree (vs some college) (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53-2.49; P < .001), and no

277 ing a high school education or less (vs some college) (OR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.22-19.21; P = .02), having

278 coccal (MenB) vaccine, was used to control a college outbreak.

279 Laboratory, and 33rd President of St. John's College, Oxford.

280 es from disadvantaged backgrounds, finishing college pays substantial dividends for mental health but

281 and concussion history was observed; former college players with more than three concussions had low

282 cs and science standardized test scores on a college preparatory examination (ACT) for adolescents by

283 Latino Americans' probability of entering a college readiness track rather than a remedial one near

284 gative stereotypes had long-term benefits on college-relevant outcomes.

285 Shifting large numbers of college science, technology, engineering, and mathematic

286 scales and disease staging using the King's college staging system.

287 t (i.e., STEM career interest, the number of college STEM courses, and students' attitudes toward STE

288 scale-free network, an empirical Venezuelan college student network, and an empirical Montreal wirel

289 Cardiovascular evaluation and care of college student-athletes is gaining increasing attention

290 al volume in an independent sample of 430 EA college students (fwe-P=0.008).

291 regular sleep and light exposure patterns in college students are associated with delayed circadian r

292 we conducted a cross-sectional study of 1870 college students from Shanghai, China.

293 Ninety percent of first-year college students from three institutions were randomly a

294 nia, as well as the follow-up of the Harvard College students to evaluate PA both in and after colleg

295 microarray dataset from a study of American college students with AIM.

296 ge students to evaluate PA both in and after college that was detailed in the article "Physical Activ

297 nded, inoculating women for the first 2 y of college-the window of greatest attrition from science, t

298 eriences and retention in engineering during college transition, assessing its impact for 1 y while m

299 school [AOR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.72-4.90], and College/University [AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.28-3.87].

300 Weight, adjusted for sex, ethnicity, and college, was not significantly different between the gro