ライフサイエンスコーパス: colorectal polyp

1 h AAPC, those with small or large numbers of colorectal polyps.

2 eds to thousands of precancerous adenomatous colorectal polyps.

3 urden in AAPC patients that develop very few colorectal polyps.

4 s not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps.

5 sitive association between iron exposure and colorectal polyps.

6 lity of CTC to detect clinically significant colorectal polyps.

7 d these factors in relation to occurrence of colorectal polyps.

8 y provides the greatest rate of detection of colorectal polyps.

9 h indigo carmine dye to diagnosis diminutive colorectal polyps.

10 d genetic disease, which is characterized by colorectal polyps.

11 llows real-time histologic classification of colorectal polyps.

12 used technique for resection of large distal colorectal polyps.

13 aracterized by the widespread development of colorectal polyps.

14 ted with the redundant removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.

15 ice has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal polyps.

16 iation between stress and the development of colorectal polyps.

17 e was no extended effect on cancer deaths or colorectal polyps.

18 IQR 52-61]; 106 [37%] women), with 306 small colorectal polyps.

19 s than has previously been observed in whole colorectal polyps.

20 fication system that can be used to diagnose colorectal polyps.

21 ith similar specificity in classification of colorectal polyps.

22 ective study of 451 consecutively identified colorectal polyps.

23 smoking may substantially reduce the risk of colorectal polyps.

24 to analyze narrow-band images of diminutive colorectal polyps.

25 ged 40-80 y who had undergone removal of all colorectal polyps.

26 mographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps.

27 al-time prediction of histologic features of colorectal polyps.

28 to a significant reduction in the number of colorectal polyps.

29 onventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

30 The sensitivity for detection of colorectal polyps 10 mm or larger, 5.0-9.9 mm, and small

31 colography seems promising for detection of colorectal polyps 5 mm and larger.

32 we evaluated differences in risk factors for colorectal polyps according to histological type, anatom

33 y predict the histology of distal diminutive colorectal polyps according to the ASGE PIVI statement.

34 paraffin-embedded pathological specimens of colorectal polyps, adenocarcinomas, and adjacent normal

35 RNAs can be used to screen for patients with colorectal polyps, adenomas, or both.

36 recently diagnosed adenoma and no remaining colorectal polyps after complete colonoscopy.

37 APC in which affected patients exhibit fewer colorectal polyps and a later age of onset of colorectal

38 ically localise to neoplastic cells in human colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas, and virus infecti

39 ty for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.

40 es in DNMT1 mRNA expression were detected in colorectal polyps and cancers relative to normal colonic

41 ield for endoscopic management of large flat colorectal polyps and early cancer.

42 we determined the status of these markers in colorectal polyps and evaluated associated risk factors.

43 he association of meat intake in relation to colorectal polyps and further investigated the associati

44 diagnostic performance of CTC for detecting colorectal polyps and masses is well established, but it

45 This review updates the information on colorectal polyps and summarizes the recent advances in

46 been gathered about the effects of NSAIDs on colorectal polyps and the development of cancers.

47 ntake is associated with an elevated risk of colorectal polyps, and this association may be synergist

48 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Colorectal polyps are a common cause of gastrointestinal

49 Distal diminutive colorectal polyps are common and accurate endoscopic pre

50 e and in-vivo growth rates of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps are not well established.

51 adenocarcinoma, regardless of whether or not colorectal polyps are present.

52 ribes the histopathology and distribution of colorectal polyps by age and gender in the post-screenin

53 r Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: for diminutive colorectal polyps characterized with high confidence, a

54 lorectal adenomas in a case-control study of colorectal polyps conducted in Minnesota (1991-1994).

55 Volumetric growth assessment of small colorectal polyps could be a useful biomarker for determ

56 liably determine the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps could greatly reduce the cost of colon

57 NGS: A review of recent literature regarding colorectal polyps demonstrates an estimated detected pre

58 , unblinded pilot study, CTC is feasible for colorectal polyp detection > or = 0.5 cm in diameter.

59 raphy (CTC) represents a novel technique for colorectal polyp detection.

60 Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may also reduce colorectal polyp development or recurrence as well as re

61 ification is important for the prevention of colorectal polyps, especially advanced and multiple aden

62 sed in CRC screening, effectively identifies colorectal polyps >/=10 mm and cancers.

63 e levels to the endoscopic interpretation of colorectal polyp histology allows sufficient accuracy fo

64 ation system for the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyp histology and established its predictiv

65 lowed real-time in vivo prediction of distal colorectal polyp histology and is accurate enough to lea

66 sts made real-time predictions of diminutive colorectal polyp histology and surveillance interval pre

67 , the system allowed endoscopic diagnoses of colorectal polyp histology.

68 y, PA), with narrow-band imaging, to predict colorectal polyp histology.

69 educed both true-positive and false-positive colorectal polyp identification.

70 Seven hundred fifty-six (57.7%) colorectal polyps identified at optical colonoscopy in 4

71 nterology fellows) using 118 high-definition colorectal polyp images of known histology; and (4) vali

72 and cigarette smoking in relation to risk of colorectal polyps in a Nashville, Tennessee, colonoscopy

73 med to measure the prevalence of significant colorectal polyps in average-risk individuals and to det

74 , black and Hispanic) are at higher risk for colorectal polyps in childhood.

75 Although colorectal polyps in children are generally benign and e

76 hibitor, significantly reduced the number of colorectal polyps in children with familial adenomatous

77 , a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on colorectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous

78 ology and is accurate enough to leave distal colorectal polyps in place without resection or to resec

79 en poultry consumption and the prevalence of colorectal polyps in this study.

80 Accurate optical diagnosis of small (<10 mm) colorectal polyps in vivo, without formal histopathology

81 study of the association between subsets of colorectal polyps, including adenomas and serrated polyp

82 The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain.

83 Detection of colorectal polyps is the cornerstone of the Bowel Cancer

84 N-CAD to identify neoplastic or hyperplastic colorectal polyps less than 5 mm.

85 BACKGROUND & AIMS: Almost all colorectal polyps </= 5 mm are benign, yet current pract

86 were compared with 2,751 controls without a colorectal polyp, matched on age and follow-up time.

87 s of shared and type-specific etiologies for colorectal polyps may provide insights into colorectal c

88 However, because striking variations in colorectal polyp numbers occur among patients carrying i

89 are being applied for the treatment of large colorectal polyps, obviating the need for surgery in mos

90 Accurate optical analysis of colorectal polyps (optical biopsy) could prevent unneces

91 KGROUND & AIMS: Accurate optical analysis of colorectal polyps (optical biopsy) could prevent unneces

92 ated with high red meat intake was found for colorectal polyps or adenomas in subjects with a high HC

93 ts referred for EMR of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps or laterally spreading lesions (>/=20

94 who underwent EMR for large sessile or flat colorectal polyps or laterally spreading lesions, we ass

95 28.0 percent reduction in the mean number of colorectal polyps (P=0.003 for the comparison with place

96 The ability to determine colorectal polyp pathology by endoscopy could reduce the

97 ith recently diagnosed adenomas and no known colorectal polyps remaining after complete colonoscopy.

98 rn in 14 (82%) of 17 and seven (78%) of nine colorectal polyps, respectively, and 12 (80%) of 15 and

99 gated the association of n-3 PUFA intakes on colorectal polyp risk.

100 clarify the association of HCA exposure with colorectal polyp risk.

101 ch case and control, we identified the first colorectal polyp(s) that underwent a biopsy or were exci

102 1306 polyp-free controls from the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study.

103 provides morphological detail of diminutive colorectal polyps that correlates well with polyp histol

104 ents had a total of 49 histologically proved colorectal polyps that were 5 mm and larger.

105 Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated

106 rst systematic comparison of risk factors by colorectal polyp type in a large colonoscopy-based case-

107 irtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps using histopathology as a gold standar

108 en colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs and colorectal polyps varies by polyp type.

109 Real time histology of 121 diminutive distal colorectal polyps was evaluated using high-definition en

110 stinguishing adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps were 93% and 95% respectively.

111 Eight of 49 colorectal polyps were depicted only on images obtained

112 orrelated with a lesser or greater number of colorectal polyps were detectable within approximately t

113 significant differences in the detection of colorectal polyps were found between the three technique

114 Large colorectal polyps were identified at CT colonography in

115 We aimed to test whether the association of colorectal polyps with intake of calcium, magnesium, or

116 n has gained great acceptance to manage flat colorectal polyps with the two major complications being

117 reased the detection of small and diminutive colorectal polyps with unknown clinical impact.

118 al dominant inheritance of multiple types of colorectal polyp, with colorectal carcinoma occurring in

119 high confidence for 75% of consecutive small colorectal polyps, with 89% accuracy, 98% sensitivity, a