ライフサイエンスコーパス: colorectal surgery

1 5 min (combined with 500 mg metronidazole in colorectal surgery).

2 (1.6% for orthopedic surgeries to 11.3% for colorectal surgeries).

3 ecisions for elderly patients considered for colorectal surgery.

4 ation in all patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery.

5 the most devastating complications following colorectal surgery.

6 accelerate the return of gut function after colorectal surgery.

7 assess technical performance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

8 e, to our knowledge, of pure transanal NOTES colorectal surgery.

9 urgical tool with increasing applications in colorectal surgery.

10 predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery.

11 hensive training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

12 ques and to further define best practices in colorectal surgery.

13 nfectious complications on days 1 to 5 after colorectal surgery.

14 d early discharge of selected patients after colorectal surgery.

15 onic liver disease (CLD) patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

16 ed with significant morbidity and cost after colorectal surgery.

17 are files during the first 2 years following colorectal surgery.

18 e among the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery.

19 h cefotetan, in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

20 her quality of care or Medicare payments for colorectal surgery.

21 n patients who have a rising CEA level after colorectal surgery.

22 troponin elevations and outcomes after major colorectal surgery.

23 ine-alcohol for elective, clean-contaminated colorectal surgery.

24 liable marker of anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery.

25 potential reduction of mortality after major colorectal surgery.

26 to be early and reliable markers of AL after colorectal surgery.

27 ins a major source of morbidity and costs in colorectal surgery.

28 of intra-abdominal infection after elective colorectal surgery.

29 tional criteria of discharge protocols after colorectal surgery.

30 ensure a safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

31 ent and life-threatening complications after colorectal surgery.

32 site infection (SSI) prevention in elective colorectal surgery.

33 nin in the occurrence of IAIs after elective colorectal surgery.

34 5 ensure safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

35 ded as part of ERAS pathways in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

36 t common and troublesome complications after colorectal surgery.

37 ak is still the most dreaded complication in colorectal surgery.

38 with morbidity and mortality after liver and colorectal surgery.

39 reliable, and valid for assessing quality in colorectal surgery.

40 d with a substantial reduction in SSIs after colorectal surgery.

41 teroid-treated IBD patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.

42 n exists in hospital readmission rates after colorectal surgery.

43 anisms for quality assurance of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

44 performed an economic evaluation of ERP for colorectal surgery.

45 on postoperative day (POD) 1 after elective colorectal surgery.

46 mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.11-1.94) after colorectal surgery.

47 conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

48 ay for a new era in pure transanal NOTES for colorectal surgery.

49 o safely increase the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

50 among open abdominal procedures, especially colorectal surgeries.

51 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, 2 external data sets were examined.

52 remains the most dreaded complication after colorectal surgery and causes high morbidity and mortali

53 city of data on the effects of smoking after colorectal surgery and in particular for malignant compa

54 development of the use of neuromodulation in colorectal surgery and much of the literature has been i

55 higher than that of perioperative DVT after colorectal surgery and preoperative screening LEVD shoul

56 regarding the optimal timing of CTP in major colorectal surgery and the incidence of OP-DVT remains u

57 that the effect could be more pronounced in colorectal surgery, and in clean-contaminated/contaminat

58 sex, type of colorectal surgery, years since colorectal surgery, and stage were significantly associa

59 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery appears to be a safe and reasonable o

60 Surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery are associated with increased morbidi

61 ERPs for colorectal surgery are clinically effective, but their c

62 icosteroid-treated patients undergoing major colorectal surgery are commonly prescribed HDS to preven

63 Postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery are frequent and associated with rele

64 Patients were identified who underwent colorectal surgery at 182 hospitals participating in the

65 undergoing open or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery at 39 U.S. sites to undergo either th

66 y of 13,082 patients undergoing bariatric or colorectal surgery at 47 hospitals in Washington State f

67 ive study of 49 patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between July

68 Patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals are signific

69 nts included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery between January 1, 2006, and December

70 for patients undergoing pancreas, liver, or colorectal surgery between January 1, 2010, and August 3

71 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, between July 2008 and July 2012, wer

72 d Recovery After Surgery started mainly with colorectal surgery but has been shown to improve outcome

73 te infection in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery but may be associated with an increas

74 bolism (VTE) is an important complication of colorectal surgery, but its incidence is unclear in the

75 eeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), colorectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal h

76 zed clinical trials to improve outcome after colorectal surgery compared to traditional care.

77 ecovery Program (ERP) impacts recovery after colorectal surgery, compared with usual care.

78 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of colorectal surgery continues to move forward as technica

79 nitrogenous nutrition in patients undergoing colorectal surgery depends on the patient's preoperative

80 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery designed the Lapco TT curriculum to i

81 Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery, experience after esophagectomy has b

82 3 and September 2014, 504 patients underwent colorectal surgery, for malignant colorectal diseases, i

83 This association was isolated to nonelective colorectal surgery, for which the leak rate was 12.3% in

84 atients over the age of 45, undergoing major colorectal surgery from March 2015 to January 2016, were

85 To determine the role of NSAIDs in colorectal surgery, future evaluations should consider s

86 ic gastroenterology, urology, urogynecology, colorectal surgery, geriatrics, neurology, nursing, and

87 Warming patients during colorectal surgery has been shown to reduce infection ra

88 he use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery has demonstrated superiority over con

89 OABP for elective colorectal surgery has fallen out of favor.

90 New developments in colorectal surgery have been driven primarily by technic

91 , matching, and data reporting existed, with colorectal surgery having the best matching of male and

92 of postoperative ileus in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery; however, data are equivocal regardin

93 results like expert surgeons in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if supervised by an experienced train

94 a-abdominal infections (IAIs) after elective colorectal surgery impact significantly the short- and l

95 Colorectal surgery in CLD patients is associated with si

96 Colorectal surgery in elderly patients is associated wit

97 ive hyperglycemia is frequent after elective colorectal surgery in nondiabetic patients.

98 abscess) through 90 days after bariatric and colorectal surgery involving anastomoses.

99 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a complex procedure, often being s

100 Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is a severe complication associated w

101 istration as an element of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery is associated with faster return of b

102 LRD, rather than CF, on POD1 after colorectal surgery is associated with less nausea, faste

103 BACKGROUND/Postoperative ileus (POI) after colorectal surgery is associated with prolonged hospital

104 Colorectal surgery is associated with the highest SSI ra

105 Hospital readmission after colorectal surgery is common, with reported 30-day readm

106 GC dosing among patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery is highly variable even within a sing

107 scopic surgery using the rectum as access in colorectal surgery is intuitively better suited than oth

108 ve use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is limited in the United States.

109 We considered patients who had colorectal surgery lasting at least 1 hour at the Clevel

110 The incidence of IH in colorectal surgery may be as high as 40%.

111 s associated with laparoscopic conversion in colorectal surgery may be institution dependent.

112 Elevated troponin concentrations after colorectal surgery may facilitate identifying patients a

113 gynecology, pain medicine, gastroenterology, colorectal surgery, neurology, physiotherapy, and psycho

114 Transanal NOTES for colorectal surgery overcomes all of these issues; howeve

115 gical-site infection in patients who undergo colorectal surgery; paradoxically, it appears to result

116 We identified 28,751 colorectal surgery patients at 170 hospitals participati

117 This randomized trial involved 99 colorectal surgery patients in an established ERP (media

118 The subset analysis of colorectal surgery patients increased the probabilities

119 111 elective colorectal surgery patients were randomized to CF (n = 5

120 f a benefit to hyperoxia in reducing SSIs in colorectal surgery patients; however, the magnitude of b

121 clinically important predictor of SSI after colorectal surgery, probably because the outcomes are ov

122 system temperature data for adult abdominal colorectal surgery procedures at a large tertiary center

123 ffective in the setting of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery protocols, and should therefore be co

124 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery RCTs have all employed quality assura

125 Seventeen patients undergoing colorectal surgery received intravenous infusion of gluc

126 Although active warming during colorectal surgery reduces SSIs, there is limited eviden

127 ex vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in improved technical knowled

128 However, for colorectal surgery, serious morbidity was lower at HSHs

129 teroid-treated IBD patients undergoing major colorectal surgery should be treated with low doses of s

130 In colorectal surgery specifically, small studies have show

131 appeared to be useful in minimally invasive colorectal surgery, splenectomy for splenomegaly, living

132 In an ERP for colorectal surgery, staff-directed facilitation of early

133 ery patients and 71%, 75%, and 80% among the colorectal surgery subset.

134 performance measure for patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the effects of intraoperative hypoth

135 ents undergoing elective, clean contaminated colorectal surgery, the use of IPA failed to meet criter

136 ate a risk prediction score for laparoscopic colorectal surgery training cases.

137 to facilitate case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training was developed and validated.

138 training/interest; n = 68) or the Society of Colorectal Surgery (training; n = 61) during the study p

139 tailors key teaching skills for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: training structure, skills deconstru

140 Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery underwent preoperative lower extremit

141 fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent colorectal surgery using administrative claims data.

142 dictive models of laparoscopic conversion in colorectal surgery using the Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MCR

143 luate female sexuality/quality of life after colorectal surgery using validated instruments.

144 Pain management after colorectal surgery varies widely and predicts significan

145 coring systems of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were developed and published based up

146 general health of female patients undergoing colorectal surgery were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 a

147 Patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal surgery were excluded.

148 undergoing major elective enhanced recovery colorectal surgery were identified from a prospectively-

149 Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were identified from the National Sur

150 consecutive patients who underwent oncologic colorectal surgery were included in a prospective digita

151 Two hundred patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to routine int

152 nts (median age 52, 45% male), 55% underwent colorectal surgery, whereas 45% had noncolorectal GI sur

153 patient data to identify patients undergoing colorectal surgery who survived to discharge.

154 Consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis were included.

155 sk of complications after all types of major colorectal surgery, with the greatest risk apparent for

156 In multivariate analysis, sex, type of colorectal surgery, years since colorectal surgery, and