戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 conjugated estrogen; r = -0.507, P=0.004 for combined therapy).
2  Lactococcus lactis as tolerogenic adjuvant (combined therapy).
3 ation, which were further enhanced following combined therapy.
4  treated at some point with either single or combined therapy.
5 rlie acquired resistance to BRAFi and to the combined therapy.
6 lease of cargoes to achieve multi-functional combined therapy.
7 moral tissue was still intact 24 h after the combined therapy.
8 utcome was to assess the long-term safety of combined therapy.
9 he realistic application of phage-antibiotic combined therapy.
10 im analysis revealed significant benefit for combined therapy.
11 herapy for stable or responding patients was combined therapy.
12 CGT level in tumors subjected to CGT-NP+UTMD combined therapy.
13 otic and autophagy activities induced by the combined therapy.
14 s of contextualization, optimal arousal, and combined therapy.
15 ventricular size and function in response to combined therapy.
16 tion abrogated the therapeutic effect of the combined therapy.
17 ich PAKs mediate resistance to BRAFi and the combined therapy.
18 sify therapy, switch to another drug, or use combined therapy.
19 tial clinical and immunologic effects of the combined therapies.
20 of tamoxifen response and personalisation of combined therapies.
21 , it was less common in the groups receiving combined therapy (34/130 [26%]) than in the group treate
22 ng: tracer-determined glucose disposal rate (combined therapy, 52.4 +/- 2.9 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), vs
23 te grade 3 mucositis was more prevalent with combined therapy, 84% v 43% (P <.001), resulting in a hi
24 lone, as compared with patients who received combined therapy (95 percent confidence interval, 1.10 t
25                  In this context, antifungal combined therapy (ACT) has become an emerging strategy a
26 of renal interstitial fibrosis; therefore, a combined therapy aimed at simultaneously targeting multi
27 alysis of pulmonary metastases revealed that combined therapy also had a more potent antimetastatic e
28                                              Combined therapy also increases tumor destruction over e
29                                              Combined therapy also resulted in improved local control
30                                          The combined therapy also synergistically inhibited the accu
31 2.4 +/- 0.4 (standard error of the mean) for combined therapy and 0.9 +/- 0.2 for RF ablation alone (
32  was 49.0 months among patients treated with combined therapy and 29.3 months among those treated wit
33                        On other measures the combined therapy and its 2 component therapies produced
34 o significant differences were found between combined therapy and ligation in rebleeding (29% vs. 30%
35 cterize pathophysiological changes following combined therapy and to determine whether radioresponse
36 nal patients (69) were treated with the same combined therapy and were analyzed.
37  increases in the immune responses (from the combined therapy) and duration of antibody response that
38 , 1 patient died suddenly while treated with combined therapy, and 1 patient died of unrelated causes
39 nts had resuscitated cardiac arrest while on combined therapy, and 1 patient had repeated, appropriat
40 i67 proliferation index were documented with combined therapy, and EGFR down-regulation was observed
41 jor treatments were no therapy, monotherapy, combined therapy, and potent antiretroviral therapy, res
42 eing treated with methotrexate-sulfasalazine combined therapy, and two of the patients were being tre
43  beta-blocker therapy and continuous pacing, combined therapy appears to provide reasonable, long-ter
44                                              Combined therapy, as compared with liposomal doxorubicin
45                            Additionally, the combined therapy attenuated the formation of plasminogen
46                                         This combined therapy attenuates in vivo expression of SPARC,
47 ow that treatment of C57BL/6 donor mice with combined therapy before the transplant protects the reci
48 many cancers, survival depends on aggressive combined therapies, but treatment comes at a price.
49 replicon particles (HPV16-VRP) and that this combined therapy can eradicate human papillomavirus 16 (
50 t demonstrates that orthodontic-regenerative combined therapy can resolve complex clinical problems a
51                                              Combined therapy caused a predictable fall in hemoglobin
52 noma of the prostate, but outcome using this combined therapy compared with RT alone is not known.
53 duced microvessel counts in the tumors given combined therapy compared with the tumors given either a
54                                 Furthermore, combined therapies consisting of thermal ablation and ad
55 diopathic long-QT syndrome were treated with combined therapy consisting of continuous cardiac pacing
56                                              Combined therapy cost $1633 more (P = .01).
57             Therefore, we determined whether combined therapy could normalize insulin action in the Z
58 oup as a whole; however, in 50% of patients, combined therapy decreased PVRI by 20% more than did iNO
59   Surprisingly, the animals treated with the combined therapy did not perform as well as postnatally-
60  deletion of CD20-bearing cells and that the combined therapy did not significantly impair establishe
61                   Four patients who received combined therapy died as a direct result of the treatmen
62 , 250 microL; total dose, 0.5 mg) alone; (c) combined therapy (doxorubicin injection immediately foll
63                                          The combined therapy efficiently suppressed T-cell prolifera
64 reduced immunosuppression, whereas a FOLFIRI combined therapy enhanced immunosuppression.
65                                          The combined therapy enhanced these independent effects of e
66                                              Combined therapy facilitated T:B cooperativity and enabl
67 d dose (480 mg/m(2)), five patients received combined therapy first and carboplatin alone second, and
68                            After receiving a combined therapy for 24 weeks, 43.66% patients showed an
69 yostatin-1 and rituximab could be a valuable combined therapy for B cell malignancies.
70 ssion and provide an insight for designing a combined therapy for cancer treatment.
71 gest that Bryo-1 plus IL-2 may be a valuable combined therapy for cancer treatment.
72 eaths from non-small-cell lung cancer in the combined therapy group (62 vs 31 deaths; 0.09%vs 0.05%;
73 ity (BCVA) improved from 0.73 to 0.53 in the combined therapy group (P < .001) and from 0.79 to 0.72
74 istically significant after 21 months in the combined therapy group and 15 months in the monotherapy
75 mothermia (p < 0.01) (although >40mmHg); the combined therapy group required more fluid boluses (p <
76 h the control group was only achieved in the combined therapy group.
77 the radiotherapy group and 77 percent in the combined-therapy group (P<0.001).
78 te of overall survival was 55 percent in the combined-therapy group and 34 percent in the hyperfracti
79  years were 67 percent among patients in the combined-therapy group and 40 percent among patients in
80   The median survival was 72.2 months in the combined-therapy group and 59.3 months in the monotherap
81 e occurred in 113 participants (3.6%) in the combined-therapy group and in 157 (5.0%) in the dual-pla
82 l (P=0.008) were significantly higher in the combined-therapy group at four years.
83 ciliter (0.87 mmol per liter) greater in the combined-therapy group than in the dual-placebo group, a
84 akness and dizziness were more common in the combined-therapy group than in the dual-placebo group, b
85 onal control was significantly higher in the combined-therapy group than in the group given radiother
86 ree survival was significantly longer in the combined-therapy group than in the radiotherapy group (h
87                                       In the combined-therapy group there were higher frequencies of
88                                 Those in the combined-therapy group who frequently recorded their foo
89 eiving radiotherapy plus short-term ADT (the combined-therapy group), as compared with 57% among pati
90 l and regional control was 82 percent in the combined-therapy group, as compared with 72 percent in t
91 ation for groups 1, 2, and 3 but not for the combined-therapy group.
92 uency of diarrhea and hepatic effects in the combined-therapy group.
93 or the second intracavitary procedure in the combined-therapy group.
94 ate of reversible hematologic effects in the combined-therapy group.
95 acute toxic effects also were greater in the combined therapy groups.
96 ere generally similar in the monotherapy and combined therapy groups.
97 ized freeze-dried bone (DFDB) grafting (BG), combined therapy (GTR + BG) and a DFDB-glycoprotein spon
98          However, for non-contained defects, combined therapy (GTR + BG) demonstrated clinically sign
99                         96 women assigned to combined therapy had non-small-cell lung cancer compared
100                                       Use of combined therapy has been proposed, using a bone graft i
101                                 The value of combined therapy has not been clearly established.
102                                              Combined therapy, however, demonstrated both favorable e
103                            Resistance to the combined therapy, however, is mediated by mechanisms ind
104 rt demonstrates orthodontic and regenerative combined therapy in a 49-year-old male whose right maxil
105 s to summarize our long-term experience with combined therapy in patients with long-QT syndrome.
106   These studies indicate a possible role for combined therapy in the treatment of GLD.
107  possibility that both agents can be used as combined therapy in the treatment of ischemic heart dise
108 and decreased during both lisinopril and the combined therapy in which it was not different from base
109                                          The combined therapy increased perfusion, motor function, an
110                                              Combined therapy increases the survival of patients who
111    In comparison with individual treatments, combined therapy (iNO + dipyridamole) did not augment pu
112                      These data suggest that combined therapy is a promising strategy for prevention
113 utic responses are T-cell-dependent, because combined therapy is not efficacious in severe combined i
114 t of the widespread clinical impression that combined therapy is superior to psychotherapy alone for
115 al role played by PRP, BPBM, and GTR in this combined therapy is unclear and needs to be elucidated.
116                Further study of this form of combined therapy is warranted.
117                      In experiment 2, use of combined therapy led to increased coagulation in all tis
118                                              Combined therapy lengthens the time required for treatme
119           At one year, subjects who received combined therapy lost a mean (+/-SD) of 12.1+/-9.8 kg, w
120 ng on a decision maker's willingness to pay, combined therapy may be cost-effective, particularly for
121 effective only as long as they are used, and combined therapy may be more effective than monotherapy.
122                                              Combined therapy may improve outcome relative to monothe
123  injected liposomal doxorubicin (n = 26), or combined therapy (n = 30) and were compared with control
124 solated bileaflet chordal cutting versus the combined therapy (n=7 each).
125 therapy plus antidepressant pharmacotherapy (combined therapy; n = 352).
126                                   Therefore, combined therapies of anti-CD154 antibodies plus donor-s
127 tudy, we present seven patients for whom the combined therapies of PP/IVIG were successful in reversi
128 pes or pulsed-HIFU exposure in addition to a combined therapy of (90)Y-B3 and taxol to enhance the sy
129                                              Combined therapy of alphabeta-TCR-CsA for 7 days resulte
130 s stages of prostate cancer cells and that a combined therapy of antiandrogens and anti-PI3K/Akt inhi
131 e increased to 5.98 (95% CI, 0.72-216.0) for combined therapy of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvas
132                                            A combined therapy of avasimibe plus an anti-PD-1 antibody
133 est that MiPs should be further explored for combined therapy of cardiac and skeletal muscles.
134                                  Clinically, combined therapy of cisplatin (CDDP) and metformin is an
135                                              Combined therapy of cisplatin and ATP11B-targeted siRNA
136 rpose of this study was to determine whether combined therapy of glutaraldehyde-polymerized bovine he
137                                          The combined therapy of NB-UV-B and afamelanotide appears to
138                             Women who used a combined therapy of oestrogen with cyclic progestagen (e
139                 Postmenopausal women who use combined therapy of oestrogen with cyclic progestagen on
140  mm +/- 0.9 (P: <.001) was observed with the combined therapy of PEI followed by RF.
141 icroL of ethanol infused over 1 minute); (c) combined therapy of PEI immediately followed by RF ablat
142  immediately followed by RF ablation; or (d) combined therapy of RF ablation immediately followed by
143                                    Moreover, combined therapy of RSpo1 and keratinocyte growth factor
144 BMP7 and LfcinB as individual treatments and combined therapy on bovine nucleus pulposus (NP) cells b
145 n are added to statin therapy, the effect of combined therapy on LDL cholesterol levels is additive.
146                                The effect of combined therapy on PAI-1 [5.6 (2.3, 8.8) ng/mL] was sig
147 dothelium, leading to synergistic effects of combined therapy on tissue perfusion.
148 d for selecting patients for more aggressive combined therapies or enrollment into trials targeting E
149  of lifestyle-modification counseling (i.e., combined therapy); or sibutramine plus brief lifestyle-m
150 s was 5 degrees C lower for tumors receiving combined therapy (P < 0.01).
151 he first antimicrobial used or lowest MIC of combined therapy (P = 0.006).
152 change in PAI-1 during ramipril (P=0.011) or combined therapy (P=0.006) but not during estrogens (P=0
153           In cells that are resistant to the combined therapy, PAKs regulate JNK and beta-catenin pho
154        In the succeeding nonrandomized part, combined therapy produced a 5-year overall survival of 1
155    Model-predicted cellular responses to the combined therapy provide good agreement with experimenta
156                                     A FOLFOX combined therapy reduced immunosuppression, whereas a FO
157                                              Combined therapy required significantly more sessions to
158               Moreover, the CD4(+)/SOCS1-KIR combined therapy resulted in decreased leukocytic organ
159         In the subcutaneous tumor model, the combined therapy resulted in improved survival.
160                                              Combined therapy resulted in significantly longer period
161                                              Combined therapy results in modest 12-month improvement
162 five patients received carboplatin first and combined therapy second.
163                                          The combined therapy significantly improved antitumor activi
164                                              Combined therapy significantly increased overall surviva
165                                         This combined therapy significantly prolonged the life span o
166 but the response to iNO was not augmented by combined therapy (SOD + iNO).
167                     As a consequence of this combined therapy, strains resistant only to rifampin wer
168                   Finally, a triple-response combined therapy strategy is achieved by PEGylated BP na
169                                Moreover, our combined therapy synergistically attenuates tumor growth
170 rotection during ALI opens possibilities for combined therapies targeted to this protein set.
171                                              Combined therapies targeting aberrant properties of LSC
172                                              Combined therapies targeting common and subtype-specific
173  neuroprotective activities, suggesting that combined therapies targeting distinct Ass42 epitopes can
174                                              Combined therapies targeting glucose metabolism and poly
175 nhibitors, by targeted ER degradation, or by combined therapy targeting both ER and growth factor sig
176 ic blood pressure was 6.2 mm Hg greater with combined therapy than with dual placebo.
177 te of response was significantly higher with combined therapy than with placebo (79.2 percent vs. 54.
178 dentify new therapeutic targets, and lead to combined therapies that are effective against highly het
179 lenge current trial design paradigm that for combined therapy to be successful individual agents shou
180     The unprecedented capacity of this novel combined therapy to eliminate amyloid deposits should be
181 ing the framework for clinical evaluation of combined therapy to improve patient outcome in MM.
182 s to lie in a multidimensional approach with combined therapy to manage both cancer cachexia and asth
183  preclinical data supporting the use of this combined therapy to overcome the limitations of standard
184 ify LDLR as a promising metabolic target for combined therapy, to limit PDAC progression and disease
185 t different sites and may help us to develop combined therapies using anti-AR and anti-VEGF-C compoun
186                                              Combined therapy using both sorafenib and MEAN enhanced
187        Our findings reveal the potential for combined therapy using optimized doses of Physcion and D
188  85% of patients (39 of 46) in group A given combined therapy versus 11% (5 of 46) receiving lamivudi
189 rred in 31% of patients (14 of 45) receiving combined therapy versus 6% (3 of 48) receiving lamivudin
190             No advantages were observed with combined therapy versus benznidazole monotherapy.
191 (10% had life-threatening toxic effects with combined therapy vs 2% in the RT only group).
192  years of follow-up the overall survival for combined therapy was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI],
193    The 6-month maintenance response rate for combined therapy was 57.1% for the PDSS (P=.04 vs CBT al
194                     In the randomized study, combined therapy was compared with RT only (n = 62): 64
195 A and SAMe treatment prevented this fall and combined therapy was more effective on preserving GSH le
196                                              Combined therapy was more likely to produce clinically s
197                                         This combined therapy was not lymphocyte depleting and did no
198                                      Whereas combined therapy was not significantly more effective th
199                                       Twelve combined therapies were conducted in the 11 patients.
200 dge, and argue that significant progress for combined therapies will require a better understanding o
201 roaches as well as their potential to obtain combined therapies with desired drug release profiles.
202 b, adalimumab, certolizumab, vedolizumab, or combined therapies with placebo or an active agent for i
203 2139 once per week for 15 weeks, followed by combined therapy with 250 mg intravenous REP 2139 and 18
204                                Additionally, combined therapy with a FAK inhibitor and the antiangiog
205                                              Combined therapy with abciximab and ticlopidine has a pr
206 14 trial, a dose-ranging angiographic study, combined therapy with abciximab plus reduced-dose tPA en
207 ffectively improve the treatment efficacy of combined therapy with ADT and vaccination.
208 ment of HER-positive breast cancer, although combined therapy with anthracycline-based regimens has b
209                                              Combined therapy with antibiotics and antirejection medi
210                          We demonstrate that combined therapy with antigen-induced CD4 derived DN Tre
211 nscheduled DNA synthesis that was reduced by combined therapy with antireceptor antibody specific to
212                  Additionally, the impact of combined therapy with aspirin and other COX inhibitors i
213                                 Importantly, combined therapy with bortezomib plus cisplatin induced
214                                              Combined therapy with both Src and PI3K/PKB inhibitors m
215                                     Although combined therapy with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoi
216                Initial results indicate that combined therapy with etanercept plus methotrexate may b
217                     Here we demonstrate that combined therapy with human GM-CSF and low-dose IL-2 is
218 tained with the combination, suggesting that combined therapy with IGF-1 and OP-1 may be an effective
219 vidence in this study strongly suggests that combined therapy with inhibitors of YAP (such as vertepo
220 o treatment demonstrates a possible role for combined therapy with iNO and PGI2 in infants with sever
221 c intermediates, we assessed the efficacy of combined therapy with lovastatin and cholesterol.
222  PTEN/PI3K pathway that would be amenable to combined therapy with MAPK pathway inhibitors for the tr
223                   These results suggest that combined therapy with NSAIDs and antioxidants might be u
224 l was conducted to determine the efficacy of combined therapy with olanzapine and either valproate or
225              Therefore, we evaluated whether combined therapy with paclitaxel and LY294002 would resu
226  patients with C4d positive AHR who received combined therapy with PPH and polyclonal rabbit antithym
227 ctivator (rtPA) makes it a candidate for the combined therapy with rtPA for the acute treatment of is
228 imus (3 mg/kg per day for 14 days); group 4, combined therapy with sirolimus and mCTLA-4Ig.
229                                              Combined therapy with these two agents very effectively
230                                              Combined therapy with thrombospondin-1 type I repeats (3
231                                              Combined therapy with warfarin and aspirin has been show
232 e compared the 3180 participants assigned to combined therapy (with rosuvastatin and the two antihype
233                                              Combined therapy yielded significantly greater lengths o

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top