ライフサイエンスコーパス: comfort

1 og scale (0-100, with 100 indicating optimal comfort).

2 CGM systems regarding size, weight and wear comfort.

3 te, such as shoe properties and/or perceived comfort.

4 a pulse oximeter probe for increased patient comfort.

5 , accuracy of risk estimates, and decisional comfort.

6 flexibility or need for padding for patient comfort.

7 s thanks to ease of use and improved patient comfort.

8 in the built environment can augment thermal comfort.

9 ring less time and offering superior patient comfort.

10 me measurement, urine sample collection, and comfort.

11 and for buildings and affect outdoor thermal comfort.

12 at provides one's main source of support and comfort.

13 ery and also improved patient compliance and comfort.

14 the alternative of care focused entirely on comfort.

15 restoring functionality, not just providing comfort.

16 en titrating the medications used to provide comfort.

17 f mechanical ventilation and enhance patient comfort.

18 oup 1 similarly chose an overlay to maximize comfort.

19 the Haitian earthquake disaster onboard the COMFORT.

20 d an acrylic stent was delivered for patient comfort.

21 tabolic resources, and for providing patient comfort.

22 a lower recurrence rate and greater patient comfort.

23 urrences inspire awe but remain too rare for comfort.

24 ous lines, axial flow mechanisms and patient comfort.

25 rituality serves as a source of strength and comfort.

26 sensitivity, multi-parameter monitoring and comfort.

27 anspulmonary pressure swings, Pa(CO(2)), and comfort.

28 rment the option of pursuing care focused on comfort.

29 state of health of users and to ensure user comfort.

30 d to evaluate the impact of KM upon brushing comfort.

31 l work and can reduce visual performance and comfort.

32 ented the option of care focused entirely on comfort.

33 aining it unchanged, while improving patient comfort.

34 t radiation loss without sacrificing wearing comfort.

35 am members' interactions, communication, and comfort.

36 vival advantage of ruxolitinib over placebo (COMFORT-1) or best available therapy (COMFORT-2).

37 ikely to offer the option of care focused on comfort (13% vs 13%; 95% CI, -13% to 12%; p = 1.0) but w

38 00 PMF patients receiving ruxolitinib within COMFORT-2 with that of 350 patients of the DIPSS study.

39 acebo (COMFORT-1) or best available therapy (COMFORT-2).

40 do not suffer;" 33% (n=126) chose "Focus on comfort;" 20% (n=75) opted for "Live as long as possible

41 ose who said the patient's physician was not comforting (71% vs. 23%, p = .02).

42 arents fulfill the good parent role and take comfort afterward in having acted as a good parent.

43 n, and the effect of other factors including comfort and bowel preparation on extent of examination.

44 tive ratings of alertness, wellbeing, visual comfort and cognitive performance were regularly collect

45 gonucleotides may result in improved patient comfort and compliance.

46 as extended life, miniaturization to improve comfort and conformability, and functions that integrate

47 acy, ease of use, image quality, and patient comfort and convenience should generally dictate the cho

48 Reported participant experience for comfort and difficulty of examination preparation was be

49 le, it is a prime goal to keep the patients' comfort and dignity as much as possible.

50 interventions for IC aim to increase walking comfort and distance, but there is inconclusive evidence

51 We studied how this impacts patient comfort and duration of hospitalization and other associ

52 annulae are associated with improved patient comfort and dyspnea scores.

53 uld explain part of the benefits in terms of comfort and efficiency.

54 Optimizing patient comfort and ensuring that patients achieve adequate rest

55 ives, and antipsychotics to optimize patient comfort and facilitate mechanical ventilation, adverse e

56 and regular inclusion of measures of patient comfort and family satisfaction with care is needed to i

57 e associated with greatest perceived patient comfort and family satisfaction with care.

58 rrent PET/MR acquisitions range from patient comfort and increased throughput to multiparametric imag

59 framework: identity, inclusion, attachment, comfort and occupation.

60 iterature despite its importance for patient comfort and optimal end-of-life care.

61 ntary alternative options to improve patient comfort and overall outcome.

62 f life-sustaining treatment and the shift to comfort and palliative care.

63 provided the best compromise between patient comfort and quantification accuracy.

64 Adjusted differences in comfort and radiation dose reductions were calculated by

65 compliant than the edges; this may add extra comfort and safety to the structure.

66 e proliferated with the promise of increased comfort and safety.

67 ator exercise score, time to completion, and comfort and satisfaction with robotic surgery simulation

68 ured simply and which has a direct effect on comfort and surgical accuracy.

69 y driven by a desire to facilitate patients' comfort and their tolerance of invasive procedures or ot

70 tilator muscle function/recovery and patient comfort (and sedation needs).

71 materials can be utilized to adjust personal comfort, and be effective in reducing energy consumption

72 the transparency, biocompatibility, patient comfort, and biointegration that is possible with native

73 tidisciplinary team to maximize function and comfort, and decrease fracture incidence.

74 ed into reproducible improvements in patient comfort, and decreased mortality, blood loss and complic

75 y reduces motion artifacts, improves patient comfort, and decreases length of sedation.

76 e informed, more likely to select a focus on comfort, and less likely to desire CPR/intubation compar

77 ccuracy, ease of use, image quality, patient comfort, and other similar factors should predominate in

78 tems by improving outcomes, ensuring patient comfort, and reducing cost.

79 ral contrast may improve efficiency, patient comfort, and safety.

80 ce status, artificial tear use, contact lens comfort, and tear break-up time.

81 However, users who prefer DNR for listening comfort are not likely to jeopardize their ability to de

82 Along with providing protection and comfort at the cost of tactile sensitivity, cushioned fo

83 e advantages of high-flow oxygen therapy are comfort, availability, lower costs, and additional physi

84 We translated the COMFORT behavior scale into Norwegian before conducting

85 Noninferiority of time adequately sedated (COMFORT Behavior Score 11-16) while mechanically ventila

86 ptation of observational measures, using the COMFORT behavioral scale as an example, and demonstrates

87 The COMFORT behavioral scale is developed for assessment of

88 and then used the translated version of the COMFORT behavioral scale to assess pain based on a 3-min

89 his/her thought process while completing the COMFORT behavioral scale.

90 n the original COMFORT scale and the revised COMFORT behavioral scale; and (2) Rater-context problems

91 l bonding behaviors and less to foraging and comfort behaviors.

92 raphy with fecal tagging can improve patient comfort but may result in nondiagnostic examinations fro

93 eatment may reduce costs and improve patient comfort but risk progression of undetected medical probl

94 underwent MRE for suspected CD which was not comforted by study results.

95 hermal climates, intermediate in populations comforted by undemanding temperate climates irrespective

96 more likely to want limited care (92.7%) or comfort care (96.2%) than all care possible (1.9%); 83.2

97 onger to transition to do not resuscitate or comfort care (median, 4 vs 3 d; p = 0.048).

98 ), basic care (hospitalization, no CPR), and comfort care (symptom relief).

99 active lifesaving treatment as compared with comfort care after birth.

100 als-of-care video were more likely to prefer comfort care and avoid CPR, and were more certain of the

101 mpared the proportion of patients preferring comfort care between study arms immediately after the in

102 for more than 48 hours who either adopted a comfort care course or had a planned termination of life

103 ificantly associated with do-not-resuscitate comfort care decisions.

104 Comparing the 31 patients placed on comfort care despite available medical options with an a

105 calate care, or 6) other limitations (e.g., "comfort care only").

106 spect for the family's choice, whether it be comfort care or intervention.

107 ican American patients (1.34%) had the Adult Comfort Care order set placed, whereas 413 of 21,212 Cau

108 rges (n = 29,590), 525 (1.77%) had the Adult Comfort Care order set placed.

109 ight in an ICU were discharged with an Adult Comfort Care order set, whereas 54 Black patients (5.11%

110 6,324 (5.53%) were discharged with an Adult Comfort Care order set.

111 er QODD-1 score included use of standardized comfort care orders and occurrence of a family conferenc

112 graphic factors predicted do-not-resuscitate comfort care orders.

113 care-arrest patients with do-not-resuscitate comfort care patients, those with more severe clinical i

114 re compared with those of do-not-resuscitate comfort care patients.

115 rest patients and 91 were do-not-resuscitate comfort care patients.

116 ted care and 97.1% of subjects who requested comfort care received care consistent with their prefere

117 th their respective races, who had an "Adult Comfort Care" order set placed prior to discharge.

118 are (life-prolonging care, limited care, and comfort care) and CPR/intubation plus a 6-minute video d

119 Of the 81 (73%) patients placed on comfort care, 31 (38%) had care withheld or withdrawn de

120 (25%) chose limited care, 63 (51%) selected comfort care, and 2 (2%) were uncertain.

121 , 4.4% preferred basic care, 91.3% preferred comfort care, and 4.4% were uncertain (P < .0001).

122 (22%) selected limited care, 37 (30%) chose comfort care, and 8 (7%) were uncertain (P<0.001).

123 citate patients, 194 were do-not-resuscitate comfort care-arrest patients and 91 were do-not-resuscit

124 al/demographic factors of do-not-resuscitate comfort care-arrest patients were compared with those of

125 Comparing do-not-resuscitate comfort care-arrest patients with do-not-resuscitate com

126 204; P < .001) correlated with transition to comfort care.

127 prolonging care, 51.9% basic care, and 22.2% comfort care.

128 ns for discussion and possible shifts toward comfort-care only therapies, build consensus, and refine

129 dementia (requiring ICU and transitioned to comfort-care), intraabdominal conditions, and alcohol ab

130 hould be developed to increase radiologists' comfort communicating with patients.

131 High-flow oxygen therapy improved comfort, compared with standard oxygen (p = 0.004) and n

132 grounded in spiritual goals, such as peace, comfort, connections, and tributes; they may seek a spir

133 This work provides important and comforting data regarding the safety of phage therapy.

134 ues to offer advantages of increased patient comfort decreased operative times and improved postopera

135 goals, and values; patient care maintaining comfort, dignity, and personhood; and family care with o

136 end on the congruency between bodily action (comfort/discomfort) and target emotion (happiness/anger)

137 in Experiment 1, IPS was measured through a comfort-distance task, before and after eliciting the il

138 m the use of a sodium hyaluronate (SH)-based comfort drop, instilled before the insertion of contact

139 gan donation can be experienced as a form of comfort during bereavement provided family members remai

140 death and say goodbye; and 3) donation as a comfort during bereavement.

141 Women were asked to compare their comfort during CT with that during mammography on a cont

142 pist was replaced with a question on patient comfort during endoscopy.

143 ragm function, respiratory rate, and patient comfort during high-flow oxygen therapy and standard oxy

144 but at the same time increased their social comfort, effects that did not occur for a comparison gro

145 textiles is important since it affects wear comfort, efficiency of treatment and functionality of pr

146 ford comfortable end positions-the end-state comfort (ESC) effect.

147 t properties of fabrics are critical to wear comfort, especially for sportswear and protective clothi

148 iated with individual surgeons (eg, level of comfort, experience, leadership role) and the context (e

149 ive research: performance in quiet settings, comfort, feedback, frequency of battery replacement, pur

150 Use of NHF is associated with better comfort, fewer desaturations and interface displacements

151 more likely to disclose prognosis and offer comfort-focused care.

152 stress-induced eating of calorically dense "comfort foods." Such behavioral reactions likely contrib

153 ten eat calorically dense, highly palatable "comfort" foods during stress for stress relief.

154 e increased diagnostic accuracy and improved comfort for patients with incontinence or voiding dysfun

155 eraction easier while preserving privacy and comfort for the individual researcher.

156 d emotional holding (creating time-space and comfort giving).

157 an affect both ocular function and aesthetic comfort.Histologic characterization of dermoids has been

158 tertiary care medical center aboard the USNS COMFORT hospital ship.

159 .e., olfactory investigation, contact time), comfort (i.e., grooming), and locomotion (i.e., contact

160 COMFORT-I (Controlled Myelofibrosis Study With Oral JAK

161 155 ruxolitinib-treated patients in phase 3 COMFORT-I study, suggest that continued therapy with rux

162 tus, in 2 phase III studies against placebo (COMFORT-I) and best available therapy (COMFORT-II).

163 ted Kinase (JAK) Inhibitor Treatment-II (the COMFORT-II Trial), comparing ruxolitinib with the best a

164 cebo (COMFORT-I) and best available therapy (COMFORT-II).

165 linical outcomes in 166 patients included in COMFORT-II.

166 s of high-performance SDRC for human thermal comfort in buildings.

167 duce energy consumption and enhance occupant comfort in buildings.

168 Comfort in initiating a conversation about transplantati

169 tificial tear use, and improved contact lens comfort in patients with dry eye.

170 entifies positive aspirations, which provide comfort in the face of death.

171 s have allowed improved safety, function and comfort in treating children with osteogenesis imperfect

172 ss score (EDS) visual analogue scale, Ocular Comfort Index (OCI), and Work Productivity and Activity

173 ratory analyses; and ii) overall assessment (comfort, invasiveness, pain, sedation requirement, etc.)

174 Patient comfort is not assured by common practices for terminal

175 how we decide when our self-interest (e.g., comfort) is pitted against the collective interest (e.g.

176 n reduce energy consumption and improve user comfort, is still rare.

177 The mean comfort level (1 = not at all comfortable/strongly disag

178 guided regional anesthesia has increased the comfort level for many anesthesiologists performing bloc

179 istory as well as the skill, experience, and comfort level of the individual surgeon.

180 Perceived comfort level with PPE recommendations was significantly

181 Perceived comfort level with PPE standards was significantly assoc

182 Participants' comfort level with the video was also measured.

183 When comfort levels in caring for CCS were described (ie, 1 =

184 rch on human-wind interaction has focused on comfort levels in urban settings or knock-down threshold

185 Patients' comfort levels were high for both treatments.

186 Care preferences, comfort levels with caring for CCSs (7-point Likert scal

187 Almost all respondents reported comfort making recommendations (92%) and viewed them as

188 multivariable models, code status change to comfort measures after sICH diagnosis was the sole facto

189 percentage of patients were transitioned to comfort measures despite available treatment, yet few pr

190 Patients were grouped by treatment modality: comfort measures only (CMO), nonoperative treatment, or

191 vs. 4/17 [24%]; p = .215), or initiation of comfort measures only (within-subject comparison: 16/32

192 ent's family, as early as possible after the comfort measures only discussion has been initiated.

193 POLST order for medical interventions ("comfort measures only" vs "limited additional interventi

194 ; 41% women), 401 (22%) had POLST orders for comfort measures only, 761 (42%) had orders for limited

195 ly during surgery; if they were admitted for comfort measures; or for a history of immunodeficiency.

196 ing process, and therapeutic goals (improved comfort, ocular surface protection, or resolution of ker

197 f vaginal lubricants to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activities.

198 In addition to improving the comfort of the inhabitants and mitigating the growing en

199 onitoring of vulnerable populations from the comfort of their homes.

200 sures: Prosthesis symmetry, skin tone match, comfort of wear, and appearance.

201 ion for breast tomosynthesis, increasing the comfort of women undergoing the examination.

202 Value included intentional comforting of families as they honored the lives and leg

203 uring times of crisis, humans often seek the comforts of home.

204 The COMFORT offered sophisticated medical care to a geograph

205 nderstanding, working knowledge, or level of comfort on the following 10 topics: negotiation and conf

206 reduce motion sickness and improve passenger comfort on tilting trains.

207 cantly less likely to receive ICU admission (comfort only: 123/401 [31%] vs 406/656 [62%], aRR, 0.53

208 ore likely to receive POLST-discordant care (comfort only: 29/64 [45%] vs 92/337 [27%], aRR, 1.52 [95

209 T-discordant care than those without cancer (comfort only: 41/181 [23%] vs 80/220 [36%], aRR, 0.60 [9

210 ients with full-treatment POLSTs, those with comfort-only and limited-interventions orders were signi

211 Across patients with comfort-only and limited-interventions POLSTs, 38% (95%

212 ed to 14% (95% CI, 11%-17%) of patients with comfort-only orders and to 20% (95% CI, 17%-23%) of pati

213 Patients with dementia and comfort-only orders were significantly less likely to re

214 ed in 31% (95% CI, 26%-35%) of patients with comfort-only orders, 46% (95% CI, 42%-49%) with limited-

215 ry treatments, but do not suffer;" "Focus on comfort;" or "Unsure." Patients also completed a validat

216 ate) and preference for life-prolonging over comfort-oriented care (adjusted OR, 1.493; 95% CI, 1.091

217 of behavior, susceptibility, and health and comfort outcomes can be collected from additional monito

218 , without affecting Pa(CO(2)) (P = 0.80) and comfort (P = 0.50).

219 These findings could be used to comfort parents at diagnosis and in expert testimony pro

220 ere rescue neuroleptic use, delirium recall, comfort (perceived by caregivers and nurses), communicat

221 During this time, comfort procuring condoms and ability to convince sexual

222 Excellent safety, tolerability, and comfort profile supports this new CsA formulation as hav

223 The COMFORT program has demonstrated the positive effect of

224 e perceptual distortion of text and maximize comfort (PRVS group).

225 as a thermal absorber for buildings' thermal comfort purpose.

226 range of 0.97-1.41 and indications of wider comfort ranges and higher minimum mortality temperatures

227 ned rank procedure, the null hypothesis that comfort ratings were symmetric about a score of 5.5 (equ

228 ral efficiency, which could increase patient comfort, reduce operator occupational injuries, and enha

229 d of patients with a preference to "Focus on comfort" reported that a life on dialysis would not be w

230 For thermal comfort research, globe thermometers have become the de

231 asurements over the past 30 years of thermal comfort research.

232 We assessed comfort, safety and quality of endoscopy under moderate

233 idence that intentional rounding ensures the comfort, safety or dignity of patients or increases the

234 Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) was utilized to quantify QOL (pain,

235 ed, and (c) differences between the original COMFORT scale and the revised COMFORT behavioral scale;

236 er, and quality of life (SF-36 and Carolinas Comfort Scale) were assessed preoperatively and 1 year p

237 t solutions examined for a transient thermal-comfort scenario.

238 ring system in North America (22%), with the COMFORT score more prevalent in all other countries (39%

239 A Carolinas Comfort Score was self-reported at 1-, 6-, 12-months and

240 algorithm-based sedation protocol based on a comfort score.

241 iteration at sites of discomfort and overall comfort score.

242 % CI, -14.15 to -4.69; P < .01) and physical comfort scores (beta = -17.29; 95% CI, -23.32 to -11.25;

243 Ethical and legal knowledge and comfort scores improved significantly among trainees who

244 scopy group]), colonoscopy quality measures, comfort scores, and sedation were similar between groups

245 e analysis of 13 studies on tolerability and comfort suggested that high-flow nasal cannulae are asso

246 ent for stylish designs without sacrifice of comfort, suggesting great potential in smart textiles or

247 pression generally leads to higher listening comfort than fast compression, (c) the benefit from fast

248 vide CMS, and the transplant community, with comfort that the proposed CMS metric using CDC inpatient

249 It may comfort the apprehensive reader to learn that there is n

250 ported confidence, outcome expectancies, and comfort to address social versus technical aspects of ca

251 This work should provide comfort to child-tx mothers and their physicians that th

252 data while providing necessary function and comfort to females engaging in physical activity.

253 arrest, varying from increased attention to comfort to less clinician attentiveness.

254 s are known to spontaneously provide contact comfort to recent victims of aggression, a behavior know

255 acilitate plaque control, to improve patient comfort, to prevent future recession, and in conjunction

256 Filtration properties and comfort vary widely across mask types.

257 icantly higher likelihood of a high level of comfort (visual analog scale >90; odds ratio, 7.6; 95% c

258 th low air movement of 0.26 +/- 0.18 m.s(-1) Comfort was achieved with a coincident mean radiant temp

259 Wearing comfort was assessed at the end of each procedure on a v

260 Comfort was assessed in all 256 measurements.

261 m light for both chronotypes, whereas visual comfort was best in the self-selected lighting.

262 Comfort was higher in F2 than F8 in regard to anxiety (8

263 Comfort was rated by the patients, whereas safety and qu

264 A majority felt that "establishing trust and comfort" was best accomplished in person, and the vast m

265 Users reported satisfactory comfort wearing the device without significant impairmen

266 l blood gases, respiratory rate, and patient comfort were also assessed.

267 Levels of comfort were higher in clinicians who had practiced skil

268 es, and nursing staff, internists aboard the COMFORT were integral to supporting the mission of the h

269 Arterial blood gases, dyspnea, and comfort were recorded.

270 of intubation and assessment of delirium and comfort were secondary outcomes.

271 improvement in internal medicine residents' comfort with and knowledge of CLD, and increased career

272 ver, the majority also displayed substantial comfort with both PCPs and NPs in the same domains.

273 Day-to-day tasks are rarely the same, and comfort with change and the unknown is essential.

274 Ethical and legal knowledge and comfort with communication (before and after the worksho

275 or improving ethical and legal knowledge and comfort with communication among critical care medicine

276 s were symmetric about a score of 5.5 (equal comfort with CT and mammography) was tested.

277 tive of this study was to explore survivors' comfort with different clinician types or with a telepho

278 rity was associated with decreased clinician comfort with early mobilization.

279 e therapeutical techniques that provide more comfort with improved efficacy.

280 This may represent increasing clinician comfort with irradiating a new breast reconstruction and

281 In LI individuals, LM and digestive comfort with lactose-containing milks was improved with

282 nowledge of the units and provider or family comfort with leaving the ICU remain.

283 which evaluated self-perceived knowledge and comfort with managing CLD.

284 f life-saving skills and may promote rescuer comfort with newly acquired cardiopulmonary resuscitatio

285 We constructed a scaled measure of comfort with secondary use of deidentified medical infor

286 g changed clinical management, the surgeon's comfort with the clinical management plan, and post-test

287 the candidate and improving potential donor comfort with the evaluation process.

288 26) of surgical cases, and increased surgeon comfort with the patient management plan in 95% (94 of 9

289 ive procedures and reported higher levels of comfort with the practice of providing options to parent

290 Comfort with the use of deidentified information from me

291 higher score indicating more knowledge) and comfort with video.

292 e examination times, thus increasing patient comfort without a relevant decrease in diagnostic compet

293 he radioisotope solution can improve patient comfort, without compromising SLN identification.

294 the scale and complexity of data exceeds the comfort zone of local data stores on scientific workstat

295 nteractions and maintenance of a particular "comfort zone" or distance from other people ("personal s

296 a Poisson rate, r, when the load leaves the comfort zone.

297 d episodes contributing to feeling 'out of a comfort zone.' Emotional upset, self-blame and feelings

298 n considering cases at the boundary of their comfort zones, participants described a variety of facto

299 hat were inside or outside of their personal comfort zones.

300 es on risk in the context of their personal "Comfort Zones." Semistructured, 60-minute interviews wer