ライフサイエンスコーパス: comment

1 and skin type compatibility (78 of 325 [24%] comments).

2 d on the ODP Web site for 2 weeks for public comment.

3 nt benefit existed, thus precluding specific comment.

4 among all panel members for final review and comment.

5 ndards was posted for 6 weeks of open public comment.

6 e Prevention Web site for 5 weeks for public comment.

7 e Prevention Web site for 5 weeks for public comment.

8 e Prevention Web site for 4 weeks for public comment.

9 views, a technical working group, and public comments.

10 ings of less than 5, and optionally provided comments.

11 ation on a 9-point Likert scale and provided comments.

12 distribution of the respondents' scores, and comments.

13 ell localization and expression, and general comments.

14 n a deadline for the moratorium or solicited comments.

15 ith average axial and planar symmetries, are commented.

16 d activating them by charge transfer is also commented.

17 In free-text comments, 76 respondents (11.5%) expressed skepticism th

18 The current literature is insufficient to comment about the potential harms and benefits of routin

19 aders are provided with the facility to post comments about each paper.

20 Here, we respond to comments about such issues as cognitive architecture and

21 eir cell of origin are reviewed, followed by comments about the ability of these two hypotheses to ac

22 to the field (the adventure), and ends with comments about the current status of the field.

23 ial cultural bridges provoke 2.52 times more comments about their messages from new social media user

24 This comment addresses an error in the calculation of the fun

25 This comment addresses problematic areas in their assumptions

26 in 6 major categories according to consumer comments: affordability, cosmetic elegance, separate rat

27 Kepp argues in his Comment, among other concerns, that the atomic densities

28 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an independent panel prepared a draft report t

29 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an unbiased, independent panel prepared a draf

30 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an unbiased, independent panel prepared a draf

31 open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be contin

32 Debate, comment and even developments are often based more on op

33 A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Worksh

34 ogy and specific application were eventually commented and approved by each center registered in the

35 Hilda Bastian considers post-publication commenting and the cultural changes that are needed to b

36 lowing users to attach personally meaningful comments and hashtags to their uploaded images.

37 gene symbols, Gene Ontology terms, annotator comments and links to National Center for Biotechnology

38 hank the contributors for their enlightening comments and look forward to future developments in the

39 They also produce comments and questions about what their interlocutors mi

40 Diplomates' comments and ratings of the usefulness of the activity i

41 , n = 198), or rmPCR reported with templated comments and real-time audit and feedback of antimicrobi

42 ons, usage statistics, discussions in online comments and social media, social bookmarking, and recom

43 ical and biomedical investigations, numerous comments and suggestions have been reported from the use

44 Their comments and suggestions were carefully considered by th

45 was refined by considering expert and public comments and through application to case studies.

46 wed by product performance (146 of 325 [45%] comments) and skin type compatibility (78 of 325 [24%] c

47 itation to affirm or refute the message, add comments, and submit an automated, prepopulated electron

48 automated run, including analysis logs, user comments, and viewpoint screenshots.

49 ntary; however, the general observations and comments are our own.

50 In addition, comments are provided on mouse studies in cases when hum

51 We show that most of their comments are unfounded and that our observation of a tra

52 This Formal Comment argues that this claim is unfounded.

53 A brief comment as to sedative and opiate withdrawal follows.

54 of continuum theories, will also discuss his comments as relates to the work of other researchers.

55 e page, enhancing available annotation; such comments become immediately searchable via the text sear

56 We comment both on past work in the field and on challenges

57 Here, we comment briefly on the life of this remarkable scientist

58 We further comment briefly on the need for accurate parasite identi

59 without and with competitive inhibition, and commented briefly on A+B-->products.

60 In their comment, Bui et al argue that the approach we described

61 We welcome and appreciate the comment by Braun and Schmidt on our recent correspondenc

62 The Comment by Meunier states that the process we described

63 The comment by Stephen Harvey in this issue of the Biophysic

64 The data reported in the Technical Comments by Fitz et al., Price et al., Tesseur et al., a

65 Two Comments by Hupe and by Langbein and Puppe address our c

66 elines were presented on websites for public comments by members of both the societies.

67 Till Barnighausen and colleagues respond to comments by the HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team, noting the

68 Metabolite identities and comments can also be recorded using an interactive table

69 consulted using a Web-based process and all comments carefully considered.

70 The number (percentage) of comments categorized by major themes and subthemes was d

71 The reviewers' comments contributed to creating the final version of th

72 ative to comparison individuals, to negative comments (criticism) referring to themselves.

73 The paper provides introductory comments, describes the basis of human genetic diversity

74 vidence and attendees had the opportunity to comment during open discussions.

75 cussed the body of evidence and participants commented during open discussions.

76 erts discussed the evidence and participants commented during open forums.

77 , and attendees had opportunities to provide comments during open discussion periods.

78 This makes the empirically focused comments especially valuable.

79 Shadlen et al's Comment focuses on extrapolations of our results that we

80 ost cited positive feature (198 of 325 [61%] comments) followed by product performance (146 of 325 [4

81 , cycloaromatization processes are initially commented, followed by reactions directed toward the syn

82 In the present review, a case-and-comment format is used to describe our approach to the m

83 Polypill patients commented frequently on cost-savings, ease, and convenie

84 Systematic qualitative analysis of free-text comments from 316 respondents revealed additional reason

85 study, but patient information and provider comments from chart data were also consulted.

86 acy organizations are more likely to inspire comments from new social media audiences if they create

87 ent and final modifications were informed by comments from stakeholders and the public.

88 of key questions are posed with preliminary comments from the authors, followed by a series of colle

89 The most comment grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=2 [

90 A Formal Comment has challenged the interpretation of a study int

91 Comments he wrote in a memoir-diary during World War I e

92 I comment here on just one of these paths, the analysis of

93 In this Comment, I show that the free energy decomposition from

94 future scenario for the chemical production, commenting in particular the different drivers (economic

95 tions were completed in response to reviewer comments in January 2016.

96 Stakeholder and public comment informed guideline development and modifications

97 Consequently, my comment is not so much a disagreement with P&G but a que

98 A major point we take from the many comments is a prevailing feeling in the research communi

99 from the broad range of partly incompatible comments it has elicited.

100 atures to add mappings between terms, to add comments linked to specific ontology terms and to provid

101 he ability to annotate diagram elements with comments, literature references and links to external da

102 discussions involving staff, suggestion box comments made by friends and relatives and twelve hours

103 In our response, we reply to comments made by the authors regarding the animal model

104 'User Comments' may be added to any gene page, enhancing avail

105 houghtful critique, we argue here that their comment mostly restates our findings with a more complex

106 itivity and specificity of the pathologist's comment of concern for phyllodes tumor on a CNB demonstr

107 rches toward a minority majority, I echo the comments of previous E. E. Just Award recipients on the

108 ot obtaining consensus were revised based on comments of respondents, and then translated and redistr

109 We also comment on 2 alternative approaches for handling competi

110 Finally, we will comment on a number of caveats associated with interpret

111 We revisit and comment on a perspective last presented by Thummel 16 ye

112 In this report, we comment on a thorough multi-platform analysis of common

113 In this perspective, we comment on and review medicinal chemistry efforts aimed

114 However, the General Comment on Article 12 of the CRPD threatens to undermine

115 Here, we comment on assays to describe lateral root phenotypes an

116 We further comment on astrobiological implications of our findings

117 nglish translation of the original paper, we comment on Broca's contribution and its influence on the

118 ate in different stages of atherogenesis and comment on complexities, controversies, and gaps in know

119 Although we do not comment on cost-effectiveness of LDCT screening, we outl

120 We also comment on differences between the magnetic responses an

121 promiscuity arising from off-target effects, comment on drug repurposing, and introduce approaches to

122 Here, we comment on efforts to develop tools and approaches to de

123 of this editorial review is to identify and comment on factors contributing to the current less-than

124 We comment on fundamental questions raised by this new find

125 e the development of yoctowell chemistry and comment on future advances in this technology in light o

126 of cells with polymers and nanoparticles and comment on future advances in this technology in the lig

127 Finally, we comment on future approaches and models to better define

128 he genetic epidemiology of birth defects and comment on future challenges and opportunities.

129 It closes with comment on future developments in glycemic care of the c

130 oint, six experts present their opinions and comment on future directions in ageing research.

131 As a comment on Hibbing et al.'s paper, we discuss the evolut

132 We comment on how corona signatures may be linked to effect

133 Finally, we comment on how these cell culture models contributed to

134 nd Human Services recently called for public comment on human subjects research protections.

135 scordant results among recent trials, and to comment on implications for clinical practice.

136 We also comment on implications of the present findings for a no

137 eanderthals is a prime example, which I will comment on in some detail; the issues are much more comp

138 We also comment on information processing in other more physiolo

139 the risk for cardiovascular outcomes, and to comment on its implications for clinical practice.

140 e intestinal space in living animals, and we comment on its implications for timescales of host-micro

141 As a comment on Kurzban et al.'s opportunity cost model, we p

142 w of the recent literature in this field and comment on likely future directions.

143 We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects.

144 assification systems has elicited particular comment on neurodevelopmental disorders, which have seen

145 In a comment on our Article "Evidence of the hydrogen release

146 I comment on Pessoa's (2013) idea that the interaction bet

147 We take this opportunity to further comment on physical activity measurement in epidemiologi

148 We comment on possible origins of the large discrepancy.

149 We comment on potential economic causes and consequences of

150 ardiovascular risk reduction strategies, and comment on present and future considerations for the reg

151 In this perspective, we summarize and comment on recent findings in the field of ribosomopathi

152 This review will comment on recent progress and point out emerging questi

153 Lastly, we comment on recent progress in therapeutic development fo

154 marine omega-3 fatty acids and to review and comment on recent studies reporting on mortality outcome

155 The authors comment on research directions for which there is an enh

156 scuss mechanisms of marker-gene restoration, comment on results obtained using the reporter lines, an

157 garding SSRI-Induced Aggression in Hamsters: Comment on Ricci and Melloni (2012)", presents an interp

158 We take this opportunity to comment on self-selection, exposure measurement, outcome

159 of RFA for the management of such masses and comment on technical considerations for this particular

160 is unusual situation, I have been invited to comment on the 1962 paper.

161 Tong et al. comment on the accuracy of the dating analysis presented

162 Here we comment on the basic metabolic pathways in T cells, foll

163 The prime aim of our work is to report and comment on the bioaccessible concentrations - i.e., the

164 We then comment on the breadth of evidence for the use of proges

165 ed literature within the last 18 months that comment on the causes of nocturia, varying with age.

166 the INSDC, outline data growth patterns and comment on the challenges of increased growth.

167 Here I comment on the conceptual and critical side of their rev

168 Our purpose is to comment on the contributions of the BRINDA to advance gl

169 We also comment on the controversy surrounding the equilibrium g

170 Finally, we comment on the critical limitations that need to be addr

171 In this review we comment on the data available on their antiamyloidogenic

172 Lastly, we comment on the design of future single-molecule experime

173 antages of inverse probability weighting and comment on the desirability of the described parameter.

174 We comment on the differences in other systems where applic

175 ct the expected benefits of Advagraf, and we comment on the fact that a similar lack of bioequivalenc

176 ing functional DNA with redox reporters, and comment on the function-oriented signaling pathways.

177 We comment on the implications for regime shifts due to inc

178 public health implications of this work, and comment on the importance and feasibility of utilising t

179 of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on the initial drafts and approved the final ver

180 We comment on the latest insights from comparative research

181 their judgements, health visitors tended to comment on the mother's behaviours or the relationship b

182 Finally, we comment on the need for improved communication and colla

183 In their Comment on the our recent Report, Nakamura et al argue t

184 llow an analytical solution, and finally, to comment on the output of the model in light of the SSA r

185 rvature for lipid droplet sequestration, and comment on the possibility of cross talk between lipopha

186 We comment on the possible contribution of the DFG-in to DF

187 molecular dynamics simulations allows us to comment on the possible factors resulting in better perf

188 erlying these effects of HDAC inhibition and comment on the potential for some HDAC inhibitors to pro

189 al features required for dual inhibition and comment on the potential of this approach in anticancer

190 We comment on the proposition "that lower temperatures and

191 We comment on the reaction of laypeople and scientists to t

192 In this paper, we comment on the response of these industries to the life

193 nt development of vaccines is needed, and we comment on the role that an independent, expert group su

194 We further comment on the sensitivity, selectivity, and practicabil

195 re, function, and development literature and comment on the similarities and differences between the

196 s evolution from "bench to bedside." We also comment on the task faced by electrophysiologists and HF

197 clarify the term differentiation of selves, comment on the two-step nature of our model, offer theor

198 touch on cross-talk among these systems and comment on the utility of animal models in charting the

199 h speculations on further developments and a comment on the value of attempting to apply models and t

200 terature and create a concise evaluation and comment on the ways to provide financially efficient cat

201 In making these points we comment on their discussion of the literature on experti

202 tometry data, outline their differences, and comment on their strengths and limitations.

203 We comment on these breakthroughs and their potential appli

204 test work being performed in these areas and comment on trends in the field.

205 We comment on ways in which Lake et al. advance our underst

206 We also comment on whether this is a coincidence or there can be

207 orial in The FASEB Journal, Robert W. Krauss commented on a recent report of the Presidential Advisor

208 Although age was commented on in many articles, it was never the primary

209 elop better drugs suitable for patients, and commented on the future perspectives of targeting Hv1 in

210 In this review, we have commented on the implications of this novel MPS classifi

211 Sherman et al. commented on the precedence of enantiodivergence, listin

212 rking in a variety of scientific disciplines commented on the theoretical model of CLimate, Aggressio

213 profiles are sometimes observed, but rarely commented on, or are attributed to noisy data.

214 lth policy changes in the provision of care, commenting on a study by James Lopez Bernal and colleagu

215 g guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences and deficiencies of eviden

216 g guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences, thus providing a concise

217 d disubstituted diazo compounds are covered, commenting on the complex regiochemistry of the reaction

218 highlight their advantages and shortcomings, commenting on the outlook for development of novel volta

219 After comments on background issues relating to the patient an

220 The article ends with some general comments on conducting research and the rewards that can

221 Comments on current and future challenges are also provi

222 This article comments on my trajectory first from Havana as a medical

223 Goncharov and Struzhkin present comments on our observation of metallic hydrogen.

224 Liu et al present negative comments on our observation of the Wigner-Huntington tra

225 In our response, we review and address the comments on our target article made in the 25 commentari

226 It comments on present limitations in glucose monitoring, o

227 discussion of mechanisms and efficiency, and comments on prospects for future nuclear reprogramming r

228 This review comments on recent developments in N,O-ligated late tran

229 cts during biological responses in vivo, and comments on some of the similarities and differences in

230 This review summarizes and comments on the clinical effectiveness, practicality, co

231 discusses the meaning of this discovery and comments on the exciting future implications of these fi

232 ng markers developed over the last year, and comments on the high standards placed on these markers w

233 Additionally, it comments on the research strategies available to pursue

234 From the 174 selected reviewers, 94 sent comments on the second draft, which steering committee m

235 k functions for HIV-infected individuals and comments on the usefulness of extending the Framingham r

236 This study summarizes recent findings and comments on their clinical relevance.

237 ystem will be summarised, together with some comments on their influence, and some personal reminisce

238 We include comments on what insights modeling can provide that comp

239 were rated from good to excellent; positive comments outnumbered negative ones by a ratio of 5:1.

240 ndations with strong agreement from the open comment participants.

241 There was an open comment period followed by a public hearing in early Jan

242 Similar to the open comment period offered earlier this year for the validat

243 passed the RAND process and, after the open comment period, the ACPC council approved 18 metrics.

244 linary stakeholders was followed by a public comment period.

245 ine (ACh) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) Comment: Please use the greek letter for gamma reduces t

246 This comment proposes that Bullot & Reber's (B&R's) emphasis

247 The online Supporting Information provides commented R code for all our analyses.

248 e time of publication, along with reviewers' comments ranging from "It is really just a show and tell

249 s based on our taxonomy and motivated by the comments received by our domain experts.

250 Comments received by the US Food and Drug Administration

251 rmPCR reported with templated comments reduced treatment of contaminants and use of br

252 t group differences with respect to negative comments referring to others or neutral or positive comm

253 s referring to others or neutral or positive comments referring to self or others.

254 o given the opportunity to provide free-text comments regarding their views.

255 The General Comment requires urgent consideration with the full part

256 rol, n = 207), rmPCR reported with templated comments (rmPCR, n = 198), or rmPCR reported with templa

257 Higher levels of interactivity (eg, posting comments) seem to enhance the appeal and usability of av

258 n a written plan, and following a reviewer's comments, some material was moved to supplementary files

259 conditioning sessions, all of these subjects commented spontaneously that they were walking faster an

260 Arimbasseri et al., in their Comment, suggest that to terminate transcription in vivo

261 This comment suggests that Pothos & Busmeyer (P&B) do not pro

262 This comment supplements and clarifies issues raised by J. C.

263 Natarajan et al. and Chen and Savidge comment that comparing the electric field in ketosteroid

264 I comment that mutualism takes us only so far, and I apply

265 e description of the Ham test for PNH, Dacie commented that "the essential basis of the disease is st

266 the Westmead Hospital in Sydney, Australia, commented that a major challenge for the future is impro

267 nicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation

268 f you had asked me before then, I might have commented that parasites were rather disgusting.

269 u are ugly), and neutral (eg, You are human) comments that could be either about the self or about so

270 Goff comments that faulting is important for creation of abys

271 Eight Technical Comments that represent the main concerns, as well as a

272 Wang comments that the diffraction data for the structure of

273 spondents wrote in the section for their own comments that they would like a clear description of the

274 In this Formal Comment, the authors challenge the claims of a recent th

275 7 to 9 (critically important), and analyzed comments thematically.

276 nts believed that they should be able to add comments to a doctor's note.

277 This editorial will provide introductory comments to a series of six miniperspectives that focus

278 saccades land, after providing some critical comments to the "hic-et-nunc" hypothesis.

279 steps, originally discussed as postings and comments to two blogs, led to the outcome described here

280 This review will summarize and comment upon recent developments in the evolution and im

281 ssion, as shown in Moreno-Risueno et al. and commented upon in Traas and Vernoux, and we propose mech

282 r relatives participated by making anonymous comments via a suggestion box available to all friends a

283 In their comment, Vinken and Vogels [1] take issue with our claim

284 We appreciate the depth and breadth of comments we received.

285 In this introductory comment, we briefly describe some of these new databases

286 In this comment, we cover some potential obstacles to implementi

287 In this Comment, we discuss the criticisms leveled in detail, an

288 In our comment, we elucidate complementary aspects of the two t

289 Illustrative consumer comments were also collected.

290 Case descriptions and general comments were classified by the nature of ITC lapses and

291 A total of 328 case descriptions and general comments were obtained and classified.

292 Three hundred twenty-two comments were reviewed by the Steering Group and used as

293 reviewers will receive written responses to comments when appropriate.

294 reviewers will receive written responses to comments, when appropriate.

295 nts submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and reviewers will receive wr

296 nts submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and reviewers will receive wr

297 encourage working while sick, and free-text comments written in response to open-ended questions.

298 vance: This iterative process of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for ski

299 This iterative process of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for ski

300 In their Comment, Zeitler et al. do not challenge our results or