コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 escens isolates related to bronchoscopy at a community hospital.
2 >70% by a randomized, controlled trial in a community hospital.
3 als were academically affiliated and 1 was a community hospital.
4 nts with EVD placed substantial demands on a community hospital.
5 partment at an academic medical center and a community hospital.
6 ber 31, 2010, at the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Community Hospital.
7 terventions to improve patient outcomes in a community hospital.
8 ssion staff, nursing, and surgery staff at a community hospital.
9 oss remaining inpatient non-ICU wards of the community hospital.
10 hat their family members remain at the local community hospital.
11 rgical intensive care unit in a medium-sized community hospital.
12 lantation or destination therapy trials at a community hospital.
13 Cohort 3: five tertiary and four community hospitals.
14 s done in 47 European university centres and community hospitals.
15 adiotherapy (45 Gy) in multiple academic and community hospitals.
16 -volume, non-National Cancer Institute), and Community Hospitals.
17 tertiary referral center) and two affiliated community hospitals.
18 ics are becoming common in both teaching and community hospitals.
19 g patients into clinical trials in rural and community hospitals.
20 d emergency departments at tertiary-care and community hospitals.
21 n of emergency radiology services in private community hospitals.
22 Cohort 1: five tertiary and six community hospitals.
23 when fibrinolytic therapy is administered at community hospitals.
24 than among junior residents and residents at community hospitals.
25 he setting was a stratified sample of all US community hospitals.
26 psychiatric hospital care now takes place in community hospitals.
27 logy attending physicians write them in most community hospitals.
28 One large academic referral hospital and two community hospitals.
29 , an all-payer, 20% probability sample of US community hospitals.
30 om March 2010 to June 2011 at 5 academic and community hospitals.
31 and appropriate susceptibility estimates for community hospitals.
32 urance, and to be admitted to small, general community hospitals.
33 ary angiography vary considerably among U.S. community hospitals.
34 tion myocardial infarction from 31 rural and community hospitals.
35 ites, 28% were academic centers and 64% were community hospitals.
36 for LS, this practice is not well-adopted by community hospitals.
37 ival and delirium-free and coma-free days in community hospitals.
38 npatient Sample database, a 20% sample of US community hospitals.
41 pective payment system was 10% lower than at community hospitals (18% vs 28%) across all cancers, and
42 History A 78-year-old woman presented to a community hospital after an unwitnessed fall at her nurs
43 demic center after receiving care in a local community hospital and 2) control patients who presented
44 s and 76 failures in 42 process steps at the community hospital and academic medical center, respecti
45 arge C. parapsilosis outbreak occurring in a community hospital and conducted a case-control study to
46 nal leaders, healthcare professionals at the community hospital and its referral hospital, as well as
47 of pertussis cases among neonates born at a community hospital and recommended oral erythromycin for
48 2%, compared with 81% and 69% at high-volume community hospitals and 77% and 63% at low-volume hospit
49 multi-institutional clinical study involving community hospitals and academic medical centers to more
50 is designed to represent a 20% sample of US community hospitals and currently includes information o
51 rgical volume and SSI risk have included few community hospitals and have reported conflicting result
52 Consortium in Michigan, which included small community hospitals and large academic medical centers.
53 of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in community hospitals and the complexity of the cases trea
56 riety of pharmacies (an academic hospital, a community hospital, and an independent Pharmacy Compound
57 filiated sites, including a cancer center, a community hospital, and outpatient imaging centers, as w
58 ntly high outliers, 52.3% were comprehensive community hospitals, and 17.8% were academic/research ho
59 icantly low outliers, 47% were comprehensive community hospitals, and 43.9% were academic/research ho
61 ial-vein thrombosis from 27 sites (academic, community hospitals, and specialist practices) in German
62 transmission between and within the general community, hospitals, and funerals, calibrated to incide
64 cens and possible infection of patients at a community hospital as a result of the inadequate disinfe
65 roscopic gastric bypass can be achieved in a community hospital-based program with moderate case volu
67 resents a single institutional series from a community hospital-based training program with a minimal
68 ffiliated academic hospital or an associated community hospital between December 1, 1995, to April 15
72 ty-one patients (71%) presented initially to community hospitals (CHs) and 130 (29%) presented to the
74 cted American College of Surgeons-accredited Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Programs (COMPs)
77 not reflect the experiences of women seen at community hospital EDs, which treat the majority of ED p
78 of antibiogram reporting practices included community hospitals enrolled in the Duke Infection Contr
83 ts was comparable at Specialized Centers and Community Hospitals for all cancers except esophageal an
84 ized clinical care pathways, particularly in community hospitals, for the management of these critica
86 study of surgical procedures performed at 18 community hospitals from January 1, 2004 to December 31,
87 s leaders and influential individuals in the community, hospital, grassroots foundation, and governme
88 s in which 331 different surgeons across 102 community hospitals had operated between midnight and 7
89 e if low-risk patients undergoing surgery at Community Hospitals have perioperative mortality rates c
90 bundle was successfully implemented in seven community hospital ICUs using an interprofessional team
91 d data set of 206 SLN+ patients treated at a community hospital in another city was used to validate
95 at 20 weeks or later in 59 tertiary care and community hospitals in 5 catchment areas defined by stat
98 r risk factors conducted at 103 academic and community hospitals in Europe, Australia, and North and
99 mized, multicenter trial at 362 academic and community hospitals in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, I
101 te or intensive care units of university and community hospitals in Germany, and it included 380 adul
104 uary 12, 2015) conducted at 197 academic and community hospitals in North America, Europe, South Amer
105 omized, multicenter trial at 97 academic and community hospitals in North and South America (enrollme
106 ffectiveness trial at 7 university-based and community hospitals in or near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
107 we selected adult, non-specialty, acute-care community hospitals in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan,
108 y of the two tertiary, seven regional, or 17 community hospitals in the province of Nova Scotia, Cana
109 ted from more than 1500 academic centers and community hospitals in the United States and Puerto Rico
110 sentative sample of patients discharged from community hospitals in the United States, from January 1
111 uld largely return to GS, (4) broader use of community hospitals in these efforts, (5) publicize loan
113 pitals (two urban teaching hospitals and one community hospital) in the Detroit metropolitan area ove
115 gnosis metastatic melanoma were treated at a community hospital inpatient oncology unit affiliated wi
121 = 3,865; 65%), were located in nonteaching, community hospitals (n = 4,245; 71%), and were in hospit
123 tions performed in teaching hospitals versus community hospitals or between high-volume hospitals (>
124 m the general internal medicine floor in our community hospital over a 7-week period, and patients co
127 A volunteer sample of 790 US academic and community hospitals participated from 2003 through 2007.
128 tutions (one academic medical center and two community hospitals) participated in a series of surgica
129 nuary 2005 and December 2010 at academic and community hospitals participating in the American Colleg
130 than those treated at high-volume centers or community hospitals, particularly in the setting of adva
131 noassays in near-patient settings, including community hospitals, physicians' offices, and small clin
133 an centers (7 academic medical centers and 2 community hospitals) provided 2570 fresh lymph nodes mea
135 dmitted voluntarily, being hospitalized in a community hospital rather than a public hospital, and be
136 before this hospitalization, admission to a community hospital rather than a public hospital, having
137 among nurses and physicians in a nonteaching community hospital resulted in a significant, sustained
139 esistance (AMR) rates when compared to small community hospitals (SCHs) as they provide care to patie
140 Much of US healthcare takes place in small community hospitals (SCHs); 70% of all US hospitals have
142 ve care unit physician staffing model in the community hospital setting improves quality measures and
145 real-time PCR (RT-PCR) can be performed in a community hospital setting to identify Coccidioides spec
146 d enhanced recovery program is feasible in a community hospital setting, and it is associated with de
151 it real-time data from stroke care-certified community hospitals (spokes) to a tertiary center (hub).
152 with IABP had a significantly higher rate of community hospital survival (93% vs. 37%, p = 0.0002), a
154 ntervention (PCI) to patients who present to community hospitals that have no interventional capabili
155 e effectiveness of stewardship techniques in community hospitals, the ARLG has also developed strateg
159 2014, a Texas hospital became the first U.S. community hospital to care for a patient with EVD; 2 nur
163 nsfer for revascularization facilitated when community hospitals use both thrombolysis and IABP to tr
165 ected bacteremia at York Hospital (a 500-bed community hospital) was inoculated into at least a Pedia
166 ple (NIS), a representative sample of all US community hospitals, was used to analyze inpatient admis
167 our study of >4000 patients representing two community hospitals, we did not find a reduction in mort
169 itals (an inner-city hospital and a suburban community hospital) were 7 and 12% for methicillin-resis
170 reviewed the charts of 335 patients from two community hospitals who presented with acute MI and had
172 med in 54 consecutive patients admitted to a community hospital with new-onset chest pain, after acut
174 12 academic hospitals; 73,580 patients in 12 community hospitals with residents; and 77,194 patients
175 increasing number of VLBW infants treated in community hospitals with unknown impact on the developme
178 ctive PCI and primary PCI were achieved at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery compar
179 elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at a community hospital without onsite cardiac surgery to tho
180 priate in patients with suspected AMI at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery, following e
181 I can be performed safely and effectively in community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery when
182 ith acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at two community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery.
183 surgical back-up; 2) transfer patients from community hospitals without primary PCI capability to ho
184 8- and 120-hour readmission than patients in community hospitals without residents (1.51 [95% confide
186 ocedure: 1) perform primary PCI in qualified community hospitals without surgical back-up; 2) transfe
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。