ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparative

1 Here we performed a comparative 16S rRNA gene survey of the rhizosphere of 4

2 raint-breaking adaptations actually manifest comparative advantage over their counterparts.

3 These comparative analyses between lakes in two very different

4 current approaches suggests that systematic comparative analyses could identify best organizational

5 Recent phylogenomic comparative analyses indicated that the nodulation trait

6 Our species-level comparative analyses of morphotype and head size evoluti

7 In this study, we performed genome-wide comparative analyses of mRNAs encoding orthologous prote

8 Comparative analyses of S-locus sequences of these three

9 Comparative analyses of survival and funding statistics

10 throughput and large-scale, quantitative and comparative analyses of various models.

11 and quantifiable ways, enabling high-powered comparative analyses of vocal acoustics.

12 Comparative analyses were performed between the early tr

13 44% and is broadly available for streamlined comparative analyses, interactive exploration, metabolic

14 he warming over a set time horizon, for most comparative analyses, static values provide reasonable b

15 s to account for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative analyses.

16 nt analyses of radish datasets followed by a comparative analysis against the newly established Arabi

17 The comparative analysis between the two genotypes revealed

18 Comparative analysis indicates that our new algorithm ou

19 However, a comparative analysis of alpha7 with its homologs that ca

20 Comparative analysis of biopsies revealed a higher fract

21 e for researchers seeking to map and perform comparative analysis of brain data.

22 Here, we use comparative analysis of chemokine NMR structures, struct

23 illock structures in N-polar GaN, studied by comparative analysis of GaN:Mg films grown by MOCVD on h

24 To begin addressing this gap, we performed a comparative analysis of gene expression variability and

25 Our comparative analysis of known SA complexes with FDA-appr

26 tion, we compiled a dataset for phylogenetic comparative analysis of long-term fruit/seed production

27 Comparative analysis of model bioactive/toxic compounds

28 1 organization between strains, we performed comparative analysis of neuronal populations in A1 of ad

29 Comparative analysis of orthologous genes in grain amara

30 We present a comparative analysis of pelagic microbial communities ac

31 eby providing the first robust multi-species comparative analysis of predator-induced bodily damage i

32 This study presents the most comprehensive comparative analysis of relative abundances of N-glycans

33 The comparative analysis of the dispersal dynamics of the fi

34 ant LD functions, our data set allowed for a comparative analysis of the LD protein composition throu

35 Comparative analysis of the master regulator genes follo

36 pening in European pear, as well as a unique comparative analysis of the two cultivars with very diff

37 From a comparative analysis of various ML algorithms including

38 We also developed a comparative analysis pipeline that minimizes biases attr

39 This comparative analysis presents important lessons to be le

40 Comparative analysis revealed extensive structural rearr

41 Comparative analysis revealed marked differences in prot

42 Our detailed comparative analysis reveals remarkable similarities bet

43 Comparative analysis shows that LCR16a has independently

44 Comparative analysis suggests that partial pressure of c

45 ombining theory, experimental evolution, and comparative analysis to advance scientific understanding

46 Given that the comparative analysis was derived from few randomized pub

47 differentially expressed genes identified by comparative analysis with 24 healthy volunteers.

48 Comparative analysis with methylomes of various tissues

49 To facilitate comparative analysis, both flatmaps are scaled equally,

50 In this comparative analysis, PDT was an effective treatment met

51 By performing a global comparative analysis, we show that Com pili genes are vi

52 transcriptional data, genetic variation and comparative analysis.

53 stor of Juglandaceae using site substitution comparative analysis.

54 to their equivalent QC injection volumes for comparative analysis.

55 Additionally, we evaluate how comparative, anatomical and genomic approaches have info

56 conclude by emphasizing the importance of a comparative and integrative approach to understanding av

57 Comparative and multivariable analyses were performed to

58 nspecific-preference, we conducted the first comparative and noninvasive visual neuroimaging study of

59 Comparative and quantitative proteomic analysis was used

60 it performance and illustrate the need for a comparative approach in neuroscience.

61 By taking a comparative approach that exploits Drosophila neurogenet

62 e applied a phylogenomics-based integrative, comparative approach to test hypotheses about the scope

63 covery, we hope that others also embrace the comparative approach to understanding sensory system evo

64 A map-based comparative approach was employed to identify the underl

65 tease apart possible explanations through a comparative approach, we assessed capuchin and rhesus mo

66 Adopting a comparative approach, we examined the impact of animals'

67 Here, using a phylogenetic comparative approach, we study the evolution of the ther

68 ependent coders using an inductive, constant comparative approach.

69 We anticipate that existing statistical comparative approaches will be more commonly applied to

70 om individual clinical sites using different comparative assays, the overall positive percent agreeme

71 Comparative assessment of higher-order models (HOMs, 9th

72 In comparative benchmarking with Bayesian and non-Bayesian

73 when it is possible to reasonably infer the comparative benefits or risks in settings, in which doin

74 confocal Raman spectroscopic imaging for the comparative bimolecular analysis of fully intact and liv

75 Using comparative biochemical and physiological analyses, we f

76 ximal oxygen uptake in acute hypoxia but the comparative biology literature has many examples of spec

77 le songbirds under Arnold's (Integrative and Comparative Biology, 23, 1983, 347) classic performance-

78 This is a retrospective comparative case series of eyes undergoing vitrectomy wi

79 This is prospective, comparative case series.

80 zellomyces a genetically tractable model for comparative cell biology and understanding the evolution

81 The success of comparative cell biology for determining protein functio

82 ectrophoresis using the ZipChip platform for comparative characterization of the monoclonal antibody

83 Comparative ChIP-seq analysis identifies genomic loci bo

84 We conducted comparative chromosome painting analysis in six differen

85 elopment program typically culminates with a comparative clinical efficacy study.

86 Here, we review the role of comparative clinical studies in biosimilar development,

87 important that clinicians understand how the comparative clinical study differs from a traditional ph

88 This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study conducted at 2 academic medical

89 is a population-based retrospective matched comparative cohort study of adults diagnosed with synchr

90 ies." First, research approaches may provide comparative complementarity when they offer separate rea

91 We have conducted a comparative computational analysis of transcriptomic dat

92 sease simulation model was used to calculate comparative cost-utility of intravitreal bevacizumab (IV

93 of clinical efficacy, and safety, as well as comparative costs and cost-effectiveness.

94 A diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-sectional study was performed, compari

95 A comparative CyTOF analysis of resected-tumor samples fro

96 ys flamarioni provide an invaluable tool for comparative cytogenetics in closely related species.

97 Comparative cytotoxicity assays of 41 MTM(ox) analogues

98 ensively in industrialized settings, but few comparative data are available from humans and closely r

99 Comparative data are limited and describe re-treatment r

100 inely inform patients and clinicians whether comparative data exist on new products.

101 eutical and device manufacturers to generate comparative data in the post-marketing period.

102 In summary, the comparative data obtained demonstrate that MAM by LC-MS

103 rmaceutical and device companies to generate comparative data on drugs and devices and assure timely

104 This study provides comparative data on two biological agents with different

105 er of metagenomics to glean large amounts of comparative data regarding both emerging vectors and the

106 Comparative data visualization tool use by stewards at 8

107 ncluding geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and comparative DeltaC(T) method.

108 However, the field lacks a comparative description of performance parameters across

109 In this comparative descriptive cross-sectional study 45 consecu

110 Based on a comparative discussion with results from other crystalli

111 that many of the contemporary differences in comparative economic development have their roots in the

112 We did a comparative economic study of the costs and cost-effecti

113 hypoglycemia, few studies have examined the comparative effect of basal insulin in the real-world se

114 ribe newer, alternative approaches that have comparative effectiveness and fewer deleterious effects;

115 emia (ALI) remains unclear, and contemporary comparative effectiveness data on endovascular versus su

116 We searched for but found little or no comparative effectiveness evidence about strategies such

117 Comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering drugs for

118 existing data are inconclusive regarding the comparative effectiveness of N95 versus medical masks an

119 The comparative effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist or

120 ese advances in bone biology as context, the comparative effectiveness of these anabolic agents is di

121 ntial for identifying best practices through comparative effectiveness research.

122 lance and facilitate quality improvement and comparative effectiveness research.

123 able platform for efficient surveillance and comparative effectiveness research; results from demonst

124 randomization (MR) study to disentangle the comparative effects of lipids and apolipoproteins on isc

125 prior exposure to TNF-alpha antagonists, (2) comparative efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy

126 ere UC are complex, with limited guidance on comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments,

127 based on a systematic evidence review on the comparative efficacy and safety of nonpharmacologic and

128 erate to severe UC included: (1) overall and comparative efficacy of different medications for induct

129 ulcerative colitis included: (5) overall and comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for

130 mbination therapy with immunomodulators, (3) comparative efficacy of top-down (upfront use of biologi

131 The comparative efficiency of the synthesized samples was in

132 elasmobranchs (Tostivint et al., General and Comparative Endocrinology, 2019, 279, 139-147).

133 We conducted a comparative evaluation between this KI-LAMP1-APEX method

134 Comparative evaluation of proximal and distal TE cell po

135 ell-type proportions from DNA methylation, a comparative evaluation of the performance of these metho

136 CSMD was benchmarked in a comparative evaluation with other classic tools on previ

137 Comparative evidence generation is even sparser for medi

138 om free-ranging primates, our study provides comparative evidence to strengthen the existing body of

139 We conducted a phylogenetic comparative experiment with 74 grass species, conceptual

140 The results of comparative experiments with the TCN, LSTM, and EEMD-LST

141 I highlight recent chimpanzee-human comparative findings that should help refine such analys

142 ying construct of anti-smoking/vaping norms (Comparative Fit Index = 0.958, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.95

143 n square error of approximation = 0.02-0.05; comparative fit index/Tucker-Lewis index = 0.97-1.00/0.9

144 ples from multiple tissues were studied in a comparative framework, individuals and tissues were conf

145 ric and stress results in the context of the comparative framework, we conclude that in the hominin c

146 ination of how plasticity evolves in a large comparative framework.

147 Previously published comparative functional genomic data sets from primates u

148 Further, comparative gene expression analysis revealed several ge

149 Comparative Gene Ontology proteome analysis revealed tha

150 Comparative genetic mapping also suggests that, at least

151 However recent comparative genome analyses suggest that fungi followed

152 assembly of the M. polymorpha genome, making comparative genome structure analysis and classical gene

153 Here, we used a comparative genome-wide microscopy-based functional scre

154 Comparative genomic analyses indicate that RiTBi may be

155 ith high-resolution mycobiota sequencing and comparative genomic analyses of fecal and blood specimen

156 Here, we have performed comparative genomic analyses to identify the conserved s

157 Through comparative genomic analysis and ribosome profiling we h

158 Our study highlights the power of comparative genomic analysis for identifying species and

159 Through comparative genomic analysis of 12 Thermoplasmata metage

160 Comparative genomic analysis of this group, which we nam

161 Our cross-species comparative genomic analysis provides unique insights in

162 We here apply comparative genomic approaches to generate the first gen

163 Genome-wide analysis methods, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and whole-genome

164 Comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation se

165 istry (22 different antibodies), array-based comparative genomic hybridization and targeted next gene

166 Array comparative genomic hybridization showed a 22q11.23 dupl

167 into origins of distinct plant groups using comparative genomic techniques is now feasible.

168 TIGER uses a comparative genomic, ping-pong BLAST approach, based on

169 Moreover, comparative genomics analysis reveals that a greater num

170 Using large-scale comparative genomics and advanced orthology evaluation t

171 Its resources are of great importance for comparative genomics and evo-devo approaches.

172 Future comparative genomics and functional studies in closely r

173 Comparative genomics and phylogenetic analyses within th

174 Using comparative genomics and surface plasmon resonance, we i

175 re-organization efforts are supported by the comparative genomics here, although several changes are

176 Comparative genomics of Vellore isolates was performed t

177 a are often applied to large-scale bacterial comparative genomics projects but the reconstruction of

178 A major goal of comparative genomics research is modeling changes in DNA

179 Comparative genomics reveals an unexpected diversity in

180 Here, we use large isolate collections and comparative genomics techniques, linked to phenotype stu

181 The Miscanthus genome expands the power of comparative genomics to understand traits of importance

182 We also explore what comparative genomics, both structural and responsive, ha

183 By combining whole-exome sequencing and comparative global proteomic investigations, we found a

184 DG tests present a better prognosis than the comparative group, probably due to a lower systemic fung

185 Yet, their comparative health and economic impacts have not been qu

186 Arteries), ISCHEMIA (International Study Of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical And Invasi

187 This comparative hydrologic test analysis method provides a n

188 ested for presence of NiV antibodies using a comparative indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay b

189 Comparative informatics between human and mouse data set

190 highlighting discoveries enabled by parallel comparative investigations in cereal crops and related g

191 Comparative kinetic studies of a series of new ruthenium

192 amination, and dilated funduscopy as well as comparative measurements between Goldmann applanation to

193 npoints target metabolites using large-scale comparative metabolomics analysis across a database of 1

194 Using comparative metabolomics, we show that a pathway mediati

195 Fluorescent SmartProbes offer a comparative method to Gram stain for delineating gram-po

196 Using phylogenetic comparative methods and evolutionary modelling approache

197 Phylogenetic comparative methods are powerful but presently under-uti

198 in wild bird populations using phylogenetic comparative methods.

199 es to humans and, as such, provide a crucial comparative model for investigating primate brain evolut

200 lbino visual system is highlighted as an apt comparative model for understanding RGC decussation, as

201 We suggest that Acomys may be a useful comparative model to study adaptive responses to SCI.

202 erging multiple template structures into one comparative model, the best possible template for every

203 f modelling tool could help capture relevant comparative molecular data to address the evolutionary d

204 Dengue endemicity varies but comparative, multi-country data are extremely limited.

205 rofile of known coloboma genes, along with a comparative murine analysis.

206 Comparative (network) analysis showed high interconnecti

207 ird, ZEBrA provides important substrates for comparative neuroanatomy and molecular brain evolution s

208 Maps 4.0 (BM4, rat) (Swanson, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 2018, 526, 935-943), and the firs

209 To create comparative NLR resources, we conducted resistance gene

210 Using comparative NMR analyses of a key regulatory domain, PfD

211 es, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and comparative observational studies published from 2007 th

212 ed trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2008 th

213 y the antennograms offered insights into the comparative olfactory physiology of the two fly species.

214 Comparative performance benchmarks from true screening c

215 The comparative performance between fluciclovine and gallium

216 pre-telehealth, post-telehealth, and a 2019 comparative period were retrospectively reviewed and com

217 This study brings a comparative perspective to the biochemical study of NDMM

218 ional and longitudinal PET-only studies, and comparative PET and autopsy studies are included.

219 d) and then clinical evaluation, including a comparative pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study that

220 ting groups, must have completed the 52-week comparative phase with an ATLAS-2M screening plasma HIV-

221 Here, we perform comparative phylogenetic analyses on Australian rodents

222 lant mating events, population structure and comparative phylogenetic analyses, to examine evidence f

223 individuals with ataxia (n = 102) and from a comparative population (Parkinson's disease or healthy p

224 This study highlights the value of comparative population genomic analyses for gauging the

225 Our comparative preclinical platform recapitulates melanoma

226 There are limited data on the comparative prevalence of neurocognitive impairment (NCI

227 tion approach that is useful for large-scale comparative protein function studies.

228 Comparative proteomic analysis of EVs from young and age

229 Comparative randomized long-term studies are needed.

230 The comparative rebinding studies with AuNP-MIP and non-impr

231 n serve as a valuable model for the study of comparative reproductive biology.

232 The results contribute to comparative research suggesting that modern human abilit

233 nistrative database cohort studies reporting comparative risk of long-term mortality or incident obes

234 By performing interspecies comparative RNA sequencing analyses and functional assay

235 This work presents an extensive comparative sample of 30 extant primate species that was

236 From comparative sequence analysis, 216 SNPs and 30 InDels we

237 Comparative single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirme

238 f the NICE approach is demonstrated via this comparative state-of-the-art review, providing examples

239 Comparative structural analysis demonstrates how metazoa

240 Comparative structural analysis indicates that nucleotid

241 Our comparative structural and biochemical study of H6 and m

242 Comparative structural and genomic analyses suggest that

243 rticle size and structural uniformity enable comparative studies across compositionally different MMN

244 a synthetic approach can facilitate broader comparative studies across the wide range of species wit

245 increasing the diversity of genomes used in comparative studies can reveal more shared and lineage-s

246 No comparative studies have been published.

247 However, recent theoretical and comparative studies have challenged this view.

248 We performed comparative studies in a puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN)

249 nal research and supporting the inclusion of comparative studies in drug development.

250 s general characteristics, emphasizes recent comparative studies in mice, and describes the diverse f

251 Some comparative studies link this to a larger frontal cortex

252 Comparative studies of a crystal of the hTDO-CO-Trp comp

253 rogrammes and, if widely adopted, will allow comparative studies of different approaches for PrEP ser

254 is sampled, measured, and expressed, and how comparative studies of viral diversity can be leveraged

255 However, evidence from large comparative studies on important safety outcomes, such a

256 Comparative studies on physicochemical properties of the

257 In this work, we present comparative studies related to the fabrication of self-a

258 Experimental and comparative studies reveal efficient replication of meth

259 Recent comparative studies show that cooperative breeding is po

260 d highly reproducible measurements, and most comparative studies showed little difference in the aver

261 In n = 10 comparative studies with data available, TNT was found t

262 Here I consider recent comparative studies, including genetic analyses of plant

263 advanced-stage CRC.Keywords: Abdomen/GI, CT, Comparative Studies, Large BowelSupplemental material is

264 This prospective comparative study aimed to determine whether there are p

265 ators in the literature, yet a comprehensive comparative study is lacking.

266 In this first large comparative study of 3 highly effective MS disease-modif

267 these issues by performing first-of-its-kind comparative study of a representative collection of diso

268 In a large-scale, long-term, prospective comparative study of cataract surgery in eyes with uncom

269 the size-resolved PER is conducted through a comparative study of chamber and flow tunnel measurement

270 We performed a retrospective comparative study of patients with advanced non-small ce

271 during inflammation and aging, no systematic comparative study of potential direct sirtuin cysteine o

272 is end, we have conducted an interlaboratory comparative study of the 1D PROFILE and 2D methyl method

273 We report a comparative study of the electron-induced reaction of pe

274 We have carried out a comparative study of the lateral motion of ganglioside G

275 The comparative study was performed in order to assess the m

276 This was a comparative study with serum obtained from 12 healthy vo

277 In this comparative study, species sensitivity and face sensitiv

278 In this comparative study, the trophodynamics of 104 micropollut

279 Classification Accuracy (CA) are chosen for comparative study.

280 However, the comparative systemic safety profile of common anti-VEGF

281 V Sprague-Dawley rat challenge model enables comparative testing of vaccine platforms and antigens an

282 ion of RNA, hindering the standardization of comparative tests in the modeling of RNA structure.

283 Comparative thematic approach with meta-ethnographic fea

284 The metabolic profiles of these comparative time-points indicated a metabolic shift from

285 principle, this manuscript investigates the comparative toxicodynamics of zearalenone, its metabolit

286 In this study, a comparative transcriptome analysis has been performed at

287 haracterize this interaction, we conducted a comparative transcriptome analysis of mouse PVEC vs. adu

288 o our knowledge, this is the first report of comparative transcriptome analysis under drought stress

289 g in wild type C57BL/6 mice was validated by comparative transcriptome analysis with retinal endothel

290 A holistic overview was obtained by a comparative transcriptome profile analysis, which reveal

291 In this study, we provided a comprehensive comparative transcriptomic analysis of gene regulation i

292 An integrative comparative transcriptomic approach on six sugar beet va

293 hydroxylamine (NH(2)OH) as intermediate, and comparative transcriptomics analysis revealed an alterna

294 Comparative transcriptomics between differentiating huma

295 Comparative transcriptomics between low- and high-acylsu

296 process of glycolate metabolism, performing comparative transcriptomics of autotrophic growth under

297 participants were randomized in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2, and

298 In recently published and ongoing randomized comparative trials evaluating treatments for COVID-19, t

299 In this work, for the first time, the comparative use of P-, As-, and Sb-based ligands in phos

300 Our results offer a comparative view of the functional organization of organ