ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparative analyses

1 tations in non-model organisms has precluded comparative analyses.

2 a set of 'reference species' to anchor their comparative analyses.

3 r tests and were therefore excluded from the comparative analyses.

4 iction for the first time using phylogenetic comparative analyses.

5 e with this scale, to allow for combined and comparative analyses.

6 samples underwent histologic processing and comparative analyses.

7 ion factors in a gene or transcript list for comparative analyses.

8 gning chromatographic data for comprehensive comparative analyses.

9 s evolutionary origins cannot be traced with comparative analyses.

10 a comprehensive collection of organisms for comparative analyses.

11 imilar flocculation or deposition methods in comparative analyses.

12 that served as the historical framework for comparative analyses.

13 e option for sequence refinement en route to comparative analyses.

14 rom public mappings and integrated tools for comparative analyses.

15 to indicate statistical significance in the comparative analyses.

16 racy of detection and reliable for real-time comparative analyses.

17 canonical exon junction counts to facilitate comparative analyses.

18 published studies, in particular large-scale comparative analyses.

19 s for vegetation change using correlation or comparative analyses.

20 For our comparative analyses, 621 patients were matched with con

21 re of invertebrate brains, and exemplify how comparative analyses across ecologically divergent speci

22 ENCODE projects, we provide novel group-wise comparative analyses across sex, tissue type, state and

23 ts but are extraordinarily diverse, allowing comparative analyses aimed at identifying specific genot

24 Such comparative analyses also inform dietary reconstruction

25 Further cosegregation, complementation, and comparative analyses among different salt-sensitive muta

26 current tool includes quick yet informative comparative analyses and a first pass visualization of b

27 To facilitate comparative analyses and identification of protein compl

28 Comparative analyses and phylogenetic reconstructions re

29 nconsistent gene assignments that complicate comparative analyses and prevent efficient construction

30 be system described here can be employed for comparative analyses and subsequent structural character

31 tegrated using ontology-based annotation and comparative analyses, and accessed through both visual a

32 e level, several precomputed cross- proteome comparative analyses are available based on SCOP domain

33 Comparative analyses are based on the ratio of the two i

34 These comparative analyses are highly reliable when the intens

35 enomes from single-cell eukaryotes to human, comparative analyses are still relatively few and comput

36 vides a valuable resource for deep mammalian comparative analyses, as well as for monotreme biology a

37 Based on these comparative analyses, assembly of the heterotrimer appea

38 We conducted a sequence-level comparative analyses, at the scale of complete bacterial

39 All comparative analyses between CBSV and UCBSV presented he

40 Comparative analyses between insertion- and non-insertio

41 egion of the genome of B. rapa and conducted comparative analyses between the Brassica sequences and

42 Comparative analyses between tomato and potato at the ge

43 ples exposed to RT for less than 2 hours for comparative analyses between various medical conditions.

44 Such inconsistencies hinder comparative analyses by non-uniformly extending or trunc

45 Comparative analyses can contribute to this effort by le

46 full-length cDNA, or plant homolog from our comparative analyses could be found.

47 Taken together, these parallel comparative analyses demonstrate for the first time the

48 Comparative analyses demonstrate that similar molecular

49 spersed throughout the literature, rendering comparative analyses difficult.

50 Comparative analyses extend this scheme to explain how d

51 Results from our comparative analyses favor a model of divergence post ve

52 Kinannote produces a draft kinome and comparative analyses for a predicted proteome using a si

53 study, we sought to investigate-in parallel comparative analyses-Gag cellular distribution, VLP size

54 iraffe and okapi were sequenced, and through comparative analyses genes and pathways were identified

55 reatly expands the possibility of conducting comparative analyses giving tremendous insight into netw

56 However, comparative analyses have been unable to resolve the roo

57 In this study, parallel comparative analyses have been used to study Gag express

58 ons of intraspecific diversification because comparative analyses have focused on species inhabiting

59 Comparative analyses have identified genomic regions pot

60 While multiple comparative analyses have investigated variation in brai

61 Comparative analyses have revealed that the Fusarium gen

62 human economic structures can be informed by comparative analyses; however, we do not agree with seve

63 In addition, comparative analyses identified three noncoding evolutio

64 Our comparative analyses identify signatures of convergence

65 blish their calibration data, and this makes comparative analyses impossible.

66 osporogenesis was studied using phylogenetic comparative analyses in 83 species dispersed throughout

67 Here, we performed comparative analyses in cultured mouse neurons of all ma

68 eration found in human hunter-gatherers [4], comparative analyses in the genus Pan have been limited

69 The sample for the comparative analyses included 897,232 records and 114,26

70 Biochemical and comparative analyses indicate that AAA+/DNA contacts obs

71 Phylogenetic comparative analyses indicate that for small-bodied mamm

72 Comparative analyses indicate that ORC encircles DNA, us

73 Comparative analyses indicated high wheat-specific inter

74 ng, well-accepted measures are ill-suited to comparative analyses involving different entities (i.e.

75 uitable for use as a reference phylogeny for comparative analyses, is to perform a maximum likelihood

76 for transgenic studies or for multi-species comparative analyses, it is paramount that the CNEs are

77 ylogenetic diversity metrics, performs trait comparative analyses, manipulates phenotypic and phyloge

78 timately allow the more rapid integration of comparative analyses, metabolite identification, and dat

79 Further, comparative analyses of 17 genes involved in CPT biosynt

80 Comparative analyses of 31 fungal genomes (12 generated

81 We conducted phylogenetically informed comparative analyses of 81 taxa of Dalechampia (Euphorbi

82 Comparative analyses of a gene family may reveal importa

83 Comparative analyses of all loci, including beta-tubulin

84 n yeast will provide a foundation for future comparative analyses of animal and plant elements in add

85 Comparative analyses of approximately 400 bacterial geno

86 Comparative analyses of available full-length FIV consis

87 of dedicated online databases to facilitate comparative analyses of Borrelia genomes.

88 Comparative analyses of caffeine NMTs demonstrate that t

89 Comparative analyses of cell wall polysaccharide fractio

90 te this hypothesis we conducted quantitative comparative analyses of choline acetyltransferase-immuno

91 euechinoids, the cidaroids, suggesting that comparative analyses of cidaroid GRN architecture may co

92 OD project, has been incorporated to support comparative analyses of community linkage and physical m

93 Comparative analyses of consensus dominant quasispecies

94 We conducted retrospective, comparative analyses of contamination rates for cultures

95 t affords us a unique opportunity to conduct comparative analyses of core cellular systems between ea

96 ns, D. erecta, and D. virilis) and performed comparative analyses of Crz gene sequences and expressio

97 Comparative analyses of cultured phytoplankton cells gen

98 Together with comparative analyses of data for the free-living nematod

99 r more Linked Experiments - which allows for comparative analyses of data from multiple experiments b

100 Comparative analyses of deforestation therefore lend the

101 ymes like the I-AniI nickase will facilitate comparative analyses of DNA repair and mutagenesis induc

102 a freely available web resource that enables comparative analyses of drug-disposition genes.

103 this holds for all sea urchins necessitates comparative analyses of echinoid taxa that diverged deep

104 previously published method exists to enable comparative analyses of enrichment levels derived from d

105 a comprehensive reliable scaffold for future comparative analyses of evolutionary innovations among i

106 parison with parasitic genomes necessary for comparative analyses of existing and future trypanosomat

107 Here, we consider recent comparative analyses of extant species that are uncoveri

108 Comprehensive comparative analyses of F and AP have not been carried o

109 le-species investigations or nonphylogenetic comparative analyses of few species, despite calls for a

110 We used phylogenetic and comparative analyses of fruit and seed anatomy, biomecha

111 Comparative analyses of genome and transcriptome protein

112 osa isolates and pooled populations and used comparative analyses of genome sequences including phylo

113 of complex genetic disorders can derive from comparative analyses of genome-wide linkage data generat

114 utational systems biology, namely global and comparative analyses of genomes and metabolic networks,

115 Sequencing and comparative analyses of genomes from multiple vertebrate

116 tetrapod genomes, making it a good model for comparative analyses of gnathostome genomes.

117 maps of growth open the way for standardized comparative analyses of growth patterns.

118 Our comparative analyses of H. somnus 129Pt, H. influenzae R

119 Comparative analyses of Hox gene expression and regulati

120 Comparative analyses of Hubbard's sportive lemur were co

121 Comparative analyses of human erythropoiesis identify de

122 miR2GO is a web-based platform for comparative analyses of human miRNA functions.

123 69), and the method was also verified by the comparative analyses of human urine samples collected fr

124 fication of Hymenoptera and allow for future comparative analyses of Hymenoptera, including their gen

125 Despite its vital role in health, comparative analyses of IIS/TOR have been limited to inv

126 ing noncardiac surgery, and should allow for comparative analyses of in-hospital mortality.

127 ysis of somite-stage embryos, we carried out comparative analyses of key genes and found that the ano

128 However, few worldwide comparative analyses of long-term trends of body-mass in

129 Finally, through comparative analyses of mAb binding and neutralizing cap

130 ave begun to address these questions through comparative analyses of Medicago truncatula and Medicago

131 Here, we review comparative analyses of mineralized dental tissues, with

132 Here, we present comparative analyses of mitochondrial proteomes, cellula

133 analysis and underlying data environment for comparative analyses of multiple gene lists.

134 lude: a wide variety of sequence alignments, comparative analyses of multiple genome assemblies, and

135 Parallel, comparative analyses of multiple thiol oxidoreductases r

136 Comparative analyses of nonhuman primate vocalizations c

137 Through comparative analyses of normal cells from the same patie

138 Comparative analyses of nuclear and organelle genetic ma

139 Comparative analyses of nuclear transcriptome data sugge

140 ve states in room-temperature X-ray data and comparative analyses of other dimeric herpesvirus protea

141 Comparative analyses of other previous screening approac

142 Comparative analyses of parental and infected A20 cells

143 d by these data will require reassessment of comparative analyses of passerine diversification and ad

144 provided the primary framework for numerous comparative analyses of passerine ecological and behavio

145 iants between the Fat and Lean mice and with comparative analyses of polymorphisms across 17 mouse st

146 Comparative analyses of population trends provide strong

147 Phylogenetic comparative analyses of portions of S and medium segment

148 We report here comparative analyses of PR-bearing genomic fragments rec

149 Comparative analyses of pre-tRNA and tRNA binding to the

150 hat have been defined allow for quantitative comparative analyses of protein binding sites for use in

151 CDD also supports comparative analyses of protein families via conserved d

152 For many decades comparative analyses of protein sequences and structures

153 information flows using pairwise phenotypic comparative analyses of protein-protein interactions.

154 nd analysis and visualization tool to enable comparative analyses of ribosome-profiling datasets.

155 fferences in the response to Ca(2+) binding, comparative analyses of sequence and structures, combine

156 Comparative analyses of several natural signal sequences

157 Comparative analyses of simulated data indicate that the

158 Our study highlights that comparative analyses of single-cell and bulk gene expres

159 rphology, and our results are beneficial for comparative analyses of spider respiration.

160 However, comparative analyses of the amounts of BV genomic DNA an

161 Comparative analyses of the cleavage site reveal specifi

162 sex-specific traits in D. melanogaster with comparative analyses of the condition dependence of male

163 Comparative analyses of the control of mammalian microbi

164 these surveys were similar enough to enable comparative analyses of the data across the 7 countries.

165 The comparative analyses of the data require appropriate sta

166 Comparative analyses of the deduced amino acid sequences

167 Comparative analyses of the distributions of various his

168 ms, and lays the phylogenetic groundwork for comparative analyses of the drivers and correlates of su

169 In the absence of comprehensive direct comparative analyses of the evolutionary processes at di

170 Comparative analyses of the flagellar toolkit showed a p

171 Comparative analyses of the genome of Apostasia odorata,

172 By comparative analyses of the genomes of cucumber, melon a

173 However, interspecies comparative analyses of the genomic landscapes demonstra

174 view seeks to address how the functional and comparative analyses of the gut microbiome from 'large'

175 from South Korea and emphasizes the need for comparative analyses of the H5N1 isolates from different

176 Comparative analyses of the human and chimpanzee genomes

177 Comparative analyses of the human microbiome have identi

178 Comparative analyses of the human microbiome have reveal

179 Taken together, comparative analyses of the influenza-host protein inter

180 Comparative analyses of the interaction and of the abili

181 Comparative analyses of the interactomes identified comm

182 ired for nucleosomal destabilization, and by comparative analyses of the intercalator and salt induce

183 Comparative analyses of the intergenic DNA sequence acro

184 Functional connectivity was inferred from comparative analyses of the internuclear and intranuclea

185 In this study, comparative analyses of the LOS structures and correspon

186 Comparative analyses of the LPS from the wild-type and w

187 Comparative analyses of the MD structures of ETS-GGAA an

188 Comparative analyses of the molecular processes that und

189 Comparative analyses of the mouse, rat, human, dog, cow,

190 elopment and following injury, which enables comparative analyses of the regenerative (neonatal) vers

191 Comparative analyses of the sequences showed, as expecte

192 ts to any metabolic reaction or pathway; and comparative analyses of the transport capabilities of di

193 Comparative analyses of the wild-type 7169 strain and th

194 In psychiatry, comparative analyses of therapeutic options and the aggr

195 en identified that can be used for effective comparative analyses of these proteins.

196 The individual and combined comparative analyses of these three genome sequences, co

197 Phenotypic comparative analyses of this double mutant, together wit

198 m a basis for future intra- and interspecies comparative analyses of this ecologically important phen

199 Here, we perform comparative analyses of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa str

200 Integrative comparative analyses of transcript and metabolite levels

201 Comparative analyses of transcription profiles in NSPCs

202 In particular, several genome-wide comparative analyses of transcriptional circuits across

203 Comparative analyses of transcriptional profiles from hu

204 Comparative analyses of transcripts expression based on

205 Comparative analyses of transfection efficiency and cell

206 Comparative analyses of V. cholerae mutants suggest that

207 Quantitative comparative analyses of various features of the brain, s

208 human influenza virus NP and illustrates how comparative analyses of viral lineages from different ho

209 actin incorporation into HIV-1, we performed comparative analyses of virus-like particles (VLPs) obta

210 Comparative analyses of wild-type (WT) and symbiotic mut

211 lation and its molecular basis, we performed comparative analyses of WSC components and the expressio

212 Here we perform phylogenetic comparative analyses on 106 unique host-bacterial symbio

213 se two closely related species, we performed comparative analyses on 14 new S. gordonii and 5 S. sang

214 Based on phylogenetic comparative analyses on 3,005 bird species, we demonstra

215 Comparative analyses on experimentally validated dataset

216 Finally, we performed comparative analyses on the pathological changes in the

217 Comparative analyses point to accelerated pollen tube gr

218 uerin vaccine demonstrated the importance of comparative analyses, potential difficulties in generali

219 Comparative analyses proved that the nanoCT can depict t

220 Large-scale comparative analyses provide an alternative and suggest

221 Comparative analyses provide data on the conservation an

222 Comparative analyses reveal a high level of diversity be

223 tif has unusual direct-repeat structure, and comparative analyses reveal sequence and structural simi

224 Comparative analyses reveal that each decoding factor ex

225 Comparative analyses revealed (1) up to 3-fold higher ex

226 These comparative analyses revealed substantial variation in n

227 Comparative analyses revealed that dipterans follow simi

228 Whole genome comparative analyses revealed that the L.monocytogenes g

229 Subsequent phylogenetically controlled comparative analyses revealed that vibrato-like F0 modul

230 Comparative analyses revealed that WRKY33 possesses dual

231 Structural and comparative analyses revealed the putative binding sites

232 Comparative analyses revealed unique large-scale genomic

233 Comparative analyses show a fascinating picture of conse

234 Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and

235 Comparative analyses show that temperature-dependent con

236 Comparative analyses show that the turkey vulture has ol

237 The comparative analyses show that the two data files yield

238 Comparative analyses showed that Asian colobines have an

239 Comparative analyses showed that genes targeted by conse

240 ights the importance of including fossils in comparative analyses, showing that freshwaters have play

241 A series of comparative analyses shows that the overall genomic stru

242 An example of the power of E.coli comparative analyses such as those available through col

243 e levels in standard and low salt media, and comparative analyses suggest that DacA-1 is V. cholerae'

244 Comparative analyses suggest that intramitochondrial rec

245 Furthermore, comparative analyses suggest that many Gammaproteobacter

246 he DNA is disordered within the Lrp crystal, comparative analyses suggest that the observed differenc

247 Comparative analyses suggested that levels of leptin, in

248 In comparative analyses, T cells sensitized with AAPCs expr

249 Phylogenetic comparative analyses test for relationships between soci

250 to the feasibility of detailed cross-species comparative analyses that may allow strong testing of hy

251 Researchers are also making plans to use comparative analyses that will help to turn the data int

252 lant genome sequence data will enable larger comparative analyses that will identify functionally imp

253 both label-free proteomics and metabolomics comparative analyses, the software can be operated in se

254 ork that integrates taxonomic and functional comparative analyses to accurately quantify taxon-level

255 is repeatability and allowing 'through time' comparative analyses to be performed.

256 ate species, we performed novel multispecies comparative analyses to detect highly conserved sequence

257 We ran our algorithm on several large comparative analyses to evaluate its effectiveness; one

258 rganisms, trace their evolution, and perform comparative analyses to find structural features that ca

259 l performance for these compounds and expand comparative analyses to include physicochemical properti

260 s question, we used psychoacoustic tests and comparative analyses to investigate whether this distinc

261 ed and continually updated, thereby enabling comparative analyses to reveal the basis for differences

262 l genome sequences has enabled us to perform comparative analyses to shed light on the distribution o

263 We used comparative analyses to show that infanticide primarily

264 Here we use phylogenetic comparative analyses to test whether ASR is related to t

265 cation of peptides and proteins extends from comparative analyses to the determination of actual amou

266 earch and teaching communities in support of comparative analyses toward understanding the chromatin

267 In comparative analyses, uptake kinetics of the K(+) channe

268 Comparative analyses using SNPs equivalently identified

269 Comparative analyses using the opossum genome have alrea

270 However, comparative analyses using these types of events as pred

271 Here, based on whole-genome comparative analyses, we comprehensively investigated pr

272 For comparative analyses, we derived one-to-one paired cohor

273 demonstrate the utility of this gene set for comparative analyses, we further analysed the expression

274 For this study, comparative analyses were conducted on lichen-associated

275 Comparative analyses were done with the deletions and th

276 d phylogenetic information was extracted and comparative analyses were performed for various subsets

277 In parallel, comparative analyses were performed on monolayer tumor c

278 Further comparative analyses were performed to determine site-sp

279 Comparative analyses were undertaken to determine the sy

280 Comparative analyses were used to test for significant d

281 ing the composition of the microbiome and on comparative analyses, whereas significantly less effort

282 d to provide analysis tools particularly for comparative analyses, which are required to provide impr

283 Comparative analyses with 40 other sheep breeds showed t

284 ing an integrated online system that enables comparative analyses with a comprehensive set of commonl

285 Comparative analyses with a data set of anther-specific

286 or and a domesticated variety of cassava and comparative analyses with a partial inbred line.

287 Comparative analyses with a phylogenetically divergent p

288 caste populations of South India and perform comparative analyses with caste populations from the nei

289 Through comparative analyses with four plant genome sequence dat

290 Comparative analyses with fresh camu-camu berries indica

291 Through comparative analyses with human and rhesus macaque, we c

292 Comparative analyses with nonboronated proteasome inhibi

293 ations in potential cancer drivers for cross-comparative analyses with ongoing sequencing efforts in

294 invadopodia in PC3 cells, we performed a few comparative analyses with osteoclasts, which utilize pod

295 These structural comparisons, as well as comparative analyses with other IMP and XMP binding prot

296 ive-pacer viper, Deinagkistrodon acutus, and comparative analyses with other representative snake and

297 Comparative analyses with previously available finished

298 Direct comparative analyses with regression coefficient were ca

299 These resources allow for detailed comparative analyses within and across populations as we

300 riables potentially reduces effect sizes for comparative analyses, yet test statistics require more o