ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparative analysis

1 PGDBs, including Omics Viewers and tools for comparative analysis.

2 cutaneous PFO closure or medical therapy for comparative analysis.

3 le to diverse microorganisms and amenable to comparative analysis.

4 anisms including a number of non-vectors for comparative analysis.

5 hing was used to create 2 matched groups for comparative analysis.

6 e sequenced its genome (AD)2 and performed a comparative analysis.

7 sgenic and null segregants and are ideal for comparative analysis.

8 r in combinations to support integrative and comparative analysis.

9 volutionarily young and thus well suited for comparative analysis.

10 PGDBs, including Omics Viewers and tools for comparative analysis.

11 as become one of the standard techniques for comparative analysis.

12 nted viral genome as an entirety to make the comparative analysis.

13 els, transcriptional data, polymorphisms and comparative analysis.

14 svirus-positive solid lymphomas included for comparative analysis.

15 e inference of affected steps and simplifies comparative analysis.

16 support this prediction using a phylogenetic comparative analysis.

17 a fundamental step in many phylogenetics and comparative analysis.

18 ed infectious P-MLVs have been sequenced for comparative analysis.

19 transcriptional data, genetic variation and comparative analysis.

20 monomicrobial cultures were included in the comparative analysis.

21 metabolite structure database to facilitate comparative analysis across studies.

22 om a whole community metagenomic survey, and comparative analysis against extant Accumulibacter genom

23 Comparative analysis among retroviruses has been critica

24 ndard nomenclature of defined cell types for comparative analysis and biomarker discovery.

25 we then focused on MN-enriched miRNAs via a comparative analysis and found that they may functionall

26 We present CAMSA-a tool for comparative analysis and merging of two or more given sc

27 easily accessible workbench and database for comparative analysis and meta-analysis of all published

28 h its ancillary information, will facilitate comparative analysis, as will the growing availability o

29 A comparative analysis between anatomic corneal features i

30 from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and perform a comparative analysis between Asian and Caucasian patient

31 A comparative analysis between central macular thickness (

32 tial genes in individual datasets as well as comparative analysis between conditions.

33 plement inhibitor, which was identified in a comparative analysis between CSCs and non-CSCs in endome

34 Here we report a comprehensive comparative analysis between ex vivo human Treg and Tcon

35 ets allows us to make, for the first time, a comparative analysis between experimental results and nu

36 Comparative analysis between M. javanica and other mamma

37 ity for data retrieval and analysis, such as comparative analysis between multiple data sets.

38 The comparative analysis between the superficial capillary p

39 Comparative analysis between UM(s), PT(s), and blood/ski

40 within a species, we conducted a genome-wide comparative analysis by characterizing and comparing MIT

41 We performed a comparative analysis controlling for body size and phylo

42 Crisp set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), which uses Boolean algebra

43 The result is that 31 are active and the comparative analysis demonstrated specific activity in p

44 The comparative analysis demonstrated that three transcripti

45 ciently showed that this MSS can achieve the comparative analysis detection limits, accuracy and sens

46 Comparative analysis during 2010-13 revealed a decline i

47 Comparative analysis during infection of HMECs vis-a-vis

48 Here we report the first comparative analysis examining the genomic background of

49 We found support for this hypothesis with a comparative analysis, examining data from across 60 spec

50 quivocal evidence of homology, without which comparative analysis fails.

51 A comparative analysis for different gases reveals the hig

52 a, were compared using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA).

53 Indeed, no comparative analysis has been performed to evaluate thei

54 Secondly, the comparative analysis I have conducted shows that whether

55 Pan-mammalian comparative analysis identified DLX5 as part of the huma

56 important for insect-associated strains, and comparative analysis identified guaA as more important t

57 Comparative analysis identifies other catalysts that con

58 of the nascent peptide chain, we performed a comparative analysis in bacteria, yeast, and mammalian c

59 By comparative analysis in human postmortem brains, we foun

60 Finally, comparative analysis indicates that Class 2 CRISPR-Cas s

61 Furthermore, a comparative analysis indicates that the alkanedithioates

62 Our comparative analysis involving a non-redundant set of 55

63 A comparative analysis involving partitions of the individ

64 thers in a given individual) in intrapatient comparative analysis (IPCA) of nevi may help improve the

65 Intrapatient comparative analysis is of major importance to the effec

66 e a combination of theory and a phylogenetic comparative analysis of 191 pathogenic bacterial species

67 pment of multiple tumours, here we conduct a comparative analysis of 20 syCRCs from 10 patients.

68 Comparative analysis of 21 rhodophyte ptDNAs, including

69 A comparative analysis of 430 isolates representing seven

70 gitudinal natural history data were used for comparative analysis of 6MWT performance at baseline and

71 We present a species-wide comparative analysis of 90 genomes of Propionibacterium

72 We present a comparative analysis of a high quality finished genome a

73 d next-generation whole-exome sequencing and comparative analysis of a proband with omodysplasia, her

74 A comparative analysis of a series of DFT models of [NiFe]

75 A comparative analysis of a series of poly-p-phenylene ((R

76 exing of subsamples, permitting standardized comparative analysis of adjacent sections in 3-D and of

77 eporting biases in FAERS, and illustrate how comparative analysis of ADRs can reveal underlying mecha

78 Here we report a comparative analysis of antioxidant potential of whey an

79 ve made, for the first time, an attempt at a comparative analysis of APE1/Ref-1 inhibitors that targe

80 Comparative analysis of AS patterns in B. distachyon, ri

81 s a novel model for interactive browsing and comparative analysis of bacterial genomes online.

82 Here we perform a comparative analysis of bacterial growth and gene deleti

83 Here, we report findings from comparative analysis of base composition at the whole-ge

84 milarities in gene regulation, a large-scale comparative analysis of basic principles of transcriptio

85 functional modules can be identified through comparative analysis of biological networks.

86 nal annotation, disease gene prioritization, comparative analysis of biological systems and predictio

87 In the largest comparative analysis of bivalirudin versus UFH for non-S

88 oligosanthes makes it an ideal C3 plant for comparative analysis of C4 evolution in the panicoid gra

89 Comparative analysis of cancer cell expression data high

90 ng a lack of mobile LHCII in chaos Thus, the comparative analysis of ch1-2 and chaos mutants provides

91 rent classification algorithms, as well as a comparative analysis of classification performance achie

92 Comparative analysis of cocaine induced locomotor activi

93 uence reconstruction in combination with the comparative analysis of contemporary and resurrected enz

94 This paper makes comparative analysis of crop yield, soil organic matter

95 We performed a direct comparative analysis of current molecular diagnostics wi

96 psis as a host plant species, we conducted a comparative analysis of cytokinin genes in response to t

97 We have carried out a comparative analysis of data collected in three experime

98 rmed bacterial infections were included in a comparative analysis of demographics and clinical featur

99 Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes a

100 Here we report on the genome-wide, comparative analysis of differentially localizing RNAs i

101 Comparative analysis of DIMs with the PM showed an enric

102 Our study verifies that the comparative analysis of distantly related herpesviruses,

103 Comparative analysis of DNA methylation revealed that th

104 Furthermore, comparative analysis of domains revealed the diversity o

105 Comparative analysis of drift time versus mass-to-charge

106 ative merits of each technique with a pooled comparative analysis of efficacy and complications.

107 This work shows how structure-first comparative analysis of entire genomes of a pathogenic R

108 formed on the electrode, as determined by a comparative analysis of experimental cathodic blips and

109 Furthermore, by comparative analysis of expression and promoter methylat

110 eference materials of different types and by comparative analysis of fish samples using the accepted

111 In this paper, we provide a comparative analysis of five popular and four novel modu

112 We have conducted a comparative analysis of functional footprints (that is,

113 ull-length HSV-1 and HSV-2 sequences enabled comparative analysis of gene diversity of glycoproteins

114 Comparative analysis of genes in the Arabidopsis thalian

115 Here we address this issue by a comparative analysis of genital cortex.

116 Here we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of genomes and proteomes from all c

117 Through comparative analysis of genomes and transcriptomes of sc

118 Furthermore, comparative analysis of genomes from 1,167 bacterial spe

119 gement system that supports multidimensional comparative analysis of genomic data.

120 Comparative analysis of genomic distribution and transcr

121 Comparative analysis of GlcB structures in complex with

122 We test this prediction in a comparative analysis of helper investment in 36 cooperat

123 A comparative analysis of hybridization specificity of oli

124 We perform comparative analysis of hydrogen jump mechanisms observe

125 This comparative analysis of immunity to infection and cancer

126 Comparative analysis of immunogenicity of human embryoni

127 ht to understand this process better through comparative analysis of inducible and constitutive inact

128 es the effect of lattice properties from the comparative analysis of interfacial fracture properties

129 al biopsies for NGS, which should enable the comparative analysis of larger 'progressor' versus 'non-

130 This study provides the first head-to-head comparative analysis of leading antigens using two diffe

131 A comparative analysis of lentiviral (HIV-1) and gammaretr

132 A comparative analysis of ligand binding pockets in chemok

133 Comparative analysis of ligand-dependent alternating acc

134 cumulation in HIV-1 polymerase (Pol) through comparative analysis of linked HIV-1/HLA class I genotyp

135 However, the comparative analysis of LTL in the survivors and their d

136 Through molecular modeling and comparative analysis of machines assembled with protein-

137 By comparative analysis of mammalian cell lines, we found t

138 omic and metabolic) evolution, thus enabling comparative analysis of metabolic conditions.

139 Chemotaxonomy and the comparative analysis of metabolic features of fungi have

140 function that BioPAXViz provides is a visual comparative analysis of metabolic pathway topologies acr

141 bined quantitative proteomics, cross-species comparative analysis of metabolic pathways, and localiza

142 A comparative analysis of methanol extracts from fruit and

143 Comparative analysis of methylomes and hydroxymethylomes

144 Comparative analysis of microarray data from females aft

145 Here, comparative analysis of microRNA (miRNA) expression prof

146 A comparative analysis of microRNAs expressed in normal an

147 Comparative analysis of miRNA expression in MCF7 versus

148 zed in depth for the last three decades, the comparative analysis of molecular and pathological prope

149 This manuscript represents the first in vivo comparative analysis of monocyte-derived macrophages (MD

150 terrogated activated signaling pathways in a comparative analysis of mouse and human leukemias expres

151 rder to establish a robust workflow enabling comparative analysis of multiple cross-linked samples si

152 This hypothesis is supported by comparative analysis of multiple gene families, includin

153 dful of cases, which typically have involved comparative analysis of mutant proteins in the context o

154 We carried out a multicountry comparative analysis of natural resource management prog

155 ther, these lines of investigation provide a comparative analysis of NEF function in yeast that impli

156 A comparative analysis of neonatal and adult responses to

157 Comparative analysis of NTPase and helicase activities o

158 A comparative analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic fraction

159 Here we report results from a phylogenetic comparative analysis of over 1000 species of squamate re

160 Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient

161 Comparative analysis of overall risk-adjusted inpatient

162 Comparative analysis of P. lambertiana and P. taeda L. r

163 In this study we performed comprehensive comparative analysis of P450s in 13 newly explored oomyc

164 slow softening behaviour of Kanzi apples, a comparative analysis of pectin biochemistry and tissue f

165 Therefore, comparative analysis of phenotypically defined subpopula

166 tSEED a unique environment for cross-kingdom comparative analysis of plant and bacterial genomes.

167 The results provide the basis for comparative analysis of polyphenolic compounds in yellow

168 and it provides tools for visualization and comparative analysis of precursor and product genomes.

169 Comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes showed that

170 thematical modeling of genome evolution with comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes to estimate

171 6:0 in relation to cell life, we performed a comparative analysis of properties among C16:0 SM, C24:0

172 6:0 in relation to cell life, we performed a comparative analysis of properties among C16:0 sphingomy

173 ctural information in order to assist in the comparative analysis of protein evolution and in the opt

174 Comparative analysis of protein-protein interaction (PPI

175 re, we used an in vitro leaf disc system for comparative analysis of proteins extracted from control

176 Together with the comparative analysis of proteome and gene expression dat

177 The comparative analysis of publically available transcripto

178 in other plants, we conducted a large-scale comparative analysis of root hair development genes from

179 Nod-independent symbiotic processes, and for comparative analysis of stem nodulation.

180 MusaPIP2;6 was firstly identified based on comparative analysis of stressed and non-stressed banana

181 Comparative analysis of success and complication rates b

182 A comparative analysis of TcdB proteins from NAP1/RT027 an

183 A public sybil database for easy comparative analysis of the 90 genomes was established.

184 A comparative analysis of the Ad4 E3-19K/HLA-A2 structure

185 A comparative analysis of the AOX isoenzymes AOX1A, AOX1C,

186 e six reported total syntheses, as well as a comparative analysis of the approaches utilized in their

187 In particular, we provide a comparative analysis of the available ligand families, a

188 We performed a comparative analysis of the capacity of purified monocyt

189 applying REMD simulations we have performed comparative analysis of the conformational ensembles of

190 We report a comparative analysis of the connections among 5-HT2CR ed

191 A comparative analysis of the data reveals a similar inter

192 Comparative analysis of the data sets led to the followi

193 The comparative analysis of the data within and across data

194 Comparative analysis of the effect of heteroatom in 1-he

195 ues surrounding this biology, we undertook a comparative analysis of the effects of neutralizing mAbs

196 earum was toxin dependent, as determined via comparative analysis of the effects of wild-type fungus

197 gain insight into this issue, we undertook a comparative analysis of the eight major human sHsps on t

198 We performed a comparative analysis of the elastic modulus derived from

199 Comparative analysis of the endogenous gamma1 locus and

200 emispheric transfer in birds, but also for a comparative analysis of the evolution of commissural sys

201 eatures have been investigated by means of a comparative analysis of the frequency generation perform

202 Comparative analysis of the genetic diversity of eightee

203 is uniquely positioned to contribute through comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Ebola st

204 PU catabolic pathway were revealed, based on comparative analysis of the genomes of three IPU-mineral

205 ovides an interactive framework for a visual comparative analysis of the given assemblies.

206 The method is based on comparative analysis of the given sample and a reference

207 Our study is a comparative analysis of the host innate immune response

208 We have performed a comparative analysis of the human and Drosophila Pols ga

209 A comparative analysis of the hydrolysis of two model poly

210 In this review we provide a comparative analysis of the internalization routes for t

211 A comparative analysis of the key features of the propagat

212 A comparative analysis of the kinetic parameters of MtSK o

213 We performed a comparative analysis of the laminar and subcellular expr

214 The Cf and Cf,exp values are used in a comparative analysis of the mass changes (deltaDeltam) f

215 l RNAPs and thus provides a unique model for comparative analysis of the mechanism, regulation and ev

216 Using the SIV model of AIDS, we performed a comparative analysis of the molecular and cellular chara

217 A comparative analysis of the molecular phenotypes of CA-M

218 en vascular plants, permitting a genome-wide comparative analysis of the molecular programs used by a

219 Comparative analysis of the nicotine distribution was de

220 Comparative analysis of the overall enzymatic signatures

221 Here we have performed a systematic and comparative analysis of the p63 target gene network with

222 Finally, we performed comparative analysis of the presence of G4 motifs in the

223 Comparative analysis of the prognostic power of gene exp

224 In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of the proteome and O-GlcNAcome of

225 Comparative analysis of the proteome and transcriptome r

226 A comparative analysis of the proteome profiles of raw and

227 Comparative analysis of the reaction products in the age

228 oss the UK to provide the first phylogenetic comparative analysis of the relative roles of plasticity

229 A comparative analysis of the responses to Ag preparations

230 Comparative analysis of the results of the tools showed

231 Comparative analysis of the shared structural fold with

232 tail derivatives was synthesized, enabling a comparative analysis of the single-tail versus dual-tail

233 not associated with Pd Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the subcellular targeting of the

234 Comparative analysis of the upper girdle scan in 181 of

235 Herein we report a comparative analysis of the UV and visible light respons

236 This article provides a comparative analysis of the various methods of genome se

237 We also performed comparative analysis of the whale shark mitogenome to th

238 pplied a three-step process, starting with a comparative analysis of the X-ray crystallographic struc

239 Examination of this structure and comparative analysis of the yeast ribosomal assembly pat

240 sphatases are of significant interest, yet a comparative analysis of their activities against diverse

241 d from these data, we show that the proposed comparative analysis of their associated networks identi

242 basis and a domain-level alignment tool for comparative analysis of trans-AT polyketide synthase ass

243 A comparative analysis of transcriptional and chromatin fe

244 Comparative analysis of transcriptomes revealed conserve

245 Cross platform comparative analysis of transcriptomic data elucidated t

246 A retrospective comparative analysis of treatment regimen for P. falcipa

247 Comparative analysis of tRNA gene families in sequenced

248 We then use tDRmapper to perform a comparative analysis of tRNA-derived RNA profiles across

249 different calling strategies by performing a comparative analysis of variant calling methods on exoni

250 A comparative analysis of wild-type and Map3k8(-/-) mice w

251 demonstrated by small-angle x-ray scattering comparative analysis of wild-type and mutant forms, the

252 We perform a comparative analysis of X chromosome polymorphism in 10

253 We tested these predictions with a comparative analysis on the outcomes of 719 studies acro

254 Our implementation allows comparative analysis over combined data without revealin

255 Comparative analysis revealed an activated AKT-mTOR path

256 Comparative analysis revealed major differences in funct

257 This comparative analysis revealed multiple strong associatio

258 A comparative analysis revealed that a majority of these m

259 Comparative analysis revealed that P. saccamoebae shares

260 Comparative analysis reveals numerous deuterostome-speci

261 The resulting comparative analysis reveals promising opportunities and

262 Comparative analysis reveals that high rates of gene dup

263 Our comparative analysis reveals that the hypothalamus in ma

264 Comparative analysis reveals that the screened ISGs targ

265 The study of PPI networks, such as comparative analysis, shall benefit the understanding of

266 Comparative analysis showed that few of these novel gene

267 Comparative analysis showed that nine of the 10 analyzed

268 Comparative analysis showed that the new algorithm had i

269 Lastly, comparative analysis shows that antigen processing gene

270 A gene-wise comparative analysis shows that deep learning achieves l

271 A comparative analysis shows that existing approaches can

272 Comparative analysis shows that in contrast to the type

273 Our comparative analysis shows that MINTmap exhibits superio

274 ess to large volumes of genome sequences for comparative analysis, some generated by the plethora of

275 In a comparative analysis, the HR was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.00-1.6

276 With comparative analysis to a reference-transcriptome-guided

277 ions, which highlights difficulties in using comparative analysis to detect parasite-mediated sexual

278 We validated PaCeQuant by extensive comparative analysis to manual segmentation and existing

279 oad range of T6SS gene cluster detection and comparative analysis tools are readily accessible via Se

280 In this study, we performed a comparative analysis using 69 fully sequenced genomes be

281 We also performed a comparative analysis using a nanoACQUITY UltraPerformanc

282 sion over existing NES prediction tools upon comparative analysis using experimentally identified NES

283 Comparative analysis was done for predictive accuracy of

284 A comparative analysis was performed after the implementat

285 Through this comparative analysis we calculated scaling relations qua

286 For comparative analysis, we demonstrate that the intra-expe

287 From this comparative analysis, we have identified a group of pred

288 A comparative analysis with 15 immune diseases showed that

289 After comparative analysis with edgeR, a total of 2,060 differ

290 For the CBDB1-mediated dechlorination, comparative analysis with Hirshfeld charges shows that t

291 Comparative analysis with maps containing the tenacious

292 r of animal and plant datasets and present a comparative analysis with miRCat, miRDeep2, miRPlant and

293 Specifically, we performed a subtractive comparative analysis with non-RNB genomes, employed rele

294 with the use of NHANES data and performed a comparative analysis with past IBW equations.

295 Of these, 94 are potential FMRP targets, by comparative analysis with previously proposed FMRP targe

296 Comparative analysis with rice and Brachypodium distachy

297 In a comparative analysis with the highly virulent lineage I

298 Comparative analysis with wild-type cells expressing mul

299 mprehensive software is needed to facilitate comparative-analysis with user-friendly features that ar

300 ersity in genes encoding VESA (ves1) through comparative analysis within and between three Babesia sp