コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 uence of selection bias on cost estimates in comparative effectiveness research.
2 (IV) methods are increasingly being used in comparative effectiveness research.
3 treatment options creates an urgent need for comparative effectiveness research.
4 key characteristic differentiating PCOR from comparative effectiveness research.
5 ith PS analysis are a robust alternative for comparative effectiveness research.
6 , is a reasonable approach for observational comparative effectiveness research.
10 uality of the body of evidence available for comparative effectiveness research and enhance the abili
11 ding has significant implications for future comparative effectiveness research and potential policy
12 a Warehouses (CDWs) promise to revolutionize Comparative Effectiveness Research and suggest new avenu
13 ral initiative has allocated $1.1 billion to comparative effectiveness research, and many have emphas
14 xts, particularly product safety evaluation, comparative effectiveness research, and measurement of c
15 , resource utilization in clinical practice, comparative effectiveness research, and the evaluation o
16 r identifying evidence gaps and prioritizing comparative effectiveness research by using a combinatio
18 ine the similarities and differences between comparative effectiveness research (CER) and evidence-ba
19 n which the Council described the purpose of comparative effectiveness research (CER) as developing e
22 ve data exist to guide the prioritization of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in pediatric su
23 ing or applying newer methods for evaluating comparative effectiveness research (CER) in rheumatoid a
27 ubjective experience in prospective clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) of oncology tre
30 ill require well-designed cohort studies for comparative effectiveness research (CER) that link detai
35 nvestments in health information technology, comparative effectiveness research, health care quality
40 ablish a nongovernment-affiliated Healthcare Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute that would
45 uggests that using observational studies for comparative effectiveness research may increase rather t
46 of the clinical utility of markers by using comparative effectiveness research methods are urgently
48 ost salient issues encountered in conducting comparative effectiveness research on implantable device
50 PEARL evaluates new technologies, conducts comparative effectiveness research, participates in mult
51 ms, high variation can be used to prioritize comparative effectiveness research, patient-provider edu
52 red Outcomes Research Institute is funding 8 comparative effectiveness research projects to improve p
54 tely quantify procedural risks to facilitate comparative effectiveness research, provider comparisons
55 able information for shared decision making, comparative effectiveness research, quality improvement,
56 se rate among DRCR.net members identified 22 comparative effectiveness research questions as high pri
57 preliminary indications from registry-based comparative effectiveness research should be definitivel
60 ornerstone of the PBRN studies is to conduct comparative effectiveness research studies to disseminat
62 e 2009, the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research submitted a report to
63 in turn are connected to research, including comparative effectiveness research, that tests how the e
64 e their efforts to expand the performance of comparative effectiveness research to establish the valu
65 SCD treatment guidelines are warranted as is comparative effectiveness research to strengthen the und
66 iagnosed in 2005 and suggesting the need for comparative effectiveness research to weigh their costs
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。