1 ariable and dynamic, a lesson gleaned from a
comparative genomic analysis.
2 twelve other related filamentous fungi using
comparative genomic analysis.
3 models for each related organism used in the
comparative genomics analysis.
4 illance metadata and novel data derived from
comparative genomics analysis.
5 based on SLAF-seq and used them to perform a
comparative genomics analysis.
6 Using
comparative genomic analysis,
an orphan nine-gene cluste
7 introduces a new probabilistic framework for
comparative genomic analysis and demonstrates its utilit
8 Comparative genomic analysis and experimental verificati
9 though equivalent DC have been identified by
comparative genomic analysis and functional studies in h
10 A bioinformatics approach combining
comparative genomic analysis and gene expression studies
11 Both
comparative genomic analysis and selective sequencing of
12 102) using a computational protocol based on
comparative genomics analysis and mining experimental da
13 We employed a
comparative genomic analysis approach using the 28 isola
14 Comparative genomic analysis at imprinted domains is eme
15 We here present the results of a
comparative genomic analysis between a bovine mastitis-a
16 genome to 10.4-fold coverage and performed a
comparative genomic analysis between C. albicans and Sac
17 ce genome by a variety of methods, including
comparative genomic analysis between cereal species and
18 Comparative genomic analysis between tambaqui and zebraf
19 We performed
comparative genomics analysis between the woody perennia
20 son of the present/absent gene matrix (i.e.,
comparative genomic analysis [
CGA]) identified a candida
21 cing of multiple related species followed by
comparative genomics analysis constitutes a powerful app
22 Here, we have used locus-wide
comparative genomic analysis coupled with chromatin immu
23 Comparative genomic analysis demonstrated conserved synt
24 The results of this
comparative genomics analysis emphasize the importance o
25 systems has vastly expanded as the result of
comparative genomic analysis,
followed by experimental v
26 These data illustrate the power of
comparative genomic analysis for the study of human dise
27 c diversity of Campylobacter, we conducted a
comparative genomic analysis from a collection of 67 C.
28 rate and specific alignments are crucial for
comparative-genomics analysis,
from inferring phylogeny
29 ustrates the power of using a combination of
comparative genomic analysis,
gene expression studies, a
30 Comparative genomic analysis has found an unprecedented
31 Comparative genomic analysis has led to the discovery of
32 Comparative genomic analysis has revealed limited strain
33 In this study, whole-genome sequencing and
comparative genomic analysis identified a unique Ent tri
34 Our
comparative genomic analysis identified an expansion in
35 Comparative genomic analysis identified genes that were
36 Our
comparative genomic analysis identifies chromosome-level
37 Here
comparative genomic analysis illustrates that UP-1s and
38 A
comparative genomics analysis implicated the enigmatic f
39 Comparative genomic analysis,
including pseudogene and s
40 However,
comparative genomic analysis indicated (i) that certain
41 Comparative genomic analysis indicated that angiosperms
42 Comparative genomic analysis indicated widespread functi
43 The wheat-rice
comparative genomics analysis indicated that gene evolut
44 axis scaffolding proteins CheV and CheW, and
comparative genomic analysis indicates a likely recent e
45 Comparative genomic analysis indicates H24L5A's similari
46 A
comparative genomic analysis indicates that the family o
47 Comparative genomic analysis indicates vertebrate expans
48 Our
comparative genomics analysis indicates that Cen8 was fo
49 Comparative genomic analysis localizes human RAB38 to th
50 Comparative genomic analysis may be undertaken at differ
51 Based on
comparative genomic analysis of >6,000 sequenced bacteri
52 Comparative genomic analysis of 129 and C57BL/6J mouse s
53 Here we perform a
comparative genomic analysis of 271 strains of conjuncti
54 Comparative genomic analysis of 28 S. Newport strains (i
55 Comparative genomic analysis of 47.2 kb of microsatellit
56 A new study reports
comparative genomic analysis of 52 geographically divers
57 Comparative genomic analysis of a serotype 1/2b strain s
58 Comparative genomic analysis of a wild-type strain of th
59 s increases, there is increasing emphasis on
comparative genomic analysis of closely related organism
60 pecifically identify H. haemolyticus Through
comparative genomic analysis of H. haemolyticus and NT H
61 sh HBVs, which allow the first comprehensive
comparative genomic analysis of hepadnaviruses from four
62 Comparative genomic analysis of important signaling path
63 Comparative genomic analysis of mouse genomic Icos seque
64 Comparative genomic analysis of mouse L-R mammary gene e
65 Our results demonstrate that
comparative genomic analysis of multiple closely related
66 Here we report
comparative genomic analysis of nine isogenic iPSC lines
67 A recent
comparative genomic analysis of O. oeni PSU-1 with other
68 Comparative genomic analysis of p53-targets in mouse and
69 Here, through a
comparative genomic analysis of replication origins and
70 We have conducted a
comparative genomic analysis of several olfactory recept
71 show for the first time that it also enables
comparative genomic analysis of strain variation in a pa
72 Here we conducted a
comparative genomic analysis of TCSTs in 53 genomes of 1
73 Comparative genomic analysis of the accessory genome of
74 Here, we present a
comparative genomic analysis of the cis-regulatory map o
75 Comparative genomic analysis of the human LMOD1 and LMOD
76 We carried out a large-scale
comparative genomic analysis of the MCP signaling and ad
77 Here,
comparative genomic analysis of the MIPs was performed t
78 A recent
comparative genomic analysis of the mouse clade B cluste
79 Comparative genomic analysis of these strains and M. lep
80 It is anticipated that
comparative genomic analysis of this strain with other n
81 Comparative genomic analysis of two Bifidobacterium anim
82 Comparative genomic analysis of upstream sequences shows
83 The integrated data has been used in
comparative genomic analysis of x-ray induced cell death
84 Here we performed a systematic
comparative genomics analysis of human disease-causing m
85 The
comparative genomics analysis of strain ZYK(T) implies t
86 etic maps, physical mapping, gene isolation,
comparative genomics, analysis of quantitative trait loc
87 plications of Bambus: support for finishing,
comparative genomics, analysis of the haplotype structur
88 A systematic
comparative-genomic analysis of promiscuous domains in e
89 Comparative genomic analysis offers a powerful approach
90 Through
comparative genomic analysis,
one Red mutant PA1r was fo
91 Comparative genomic analysis predicts that intron 0 is p
92 t with specific, long-term host association,
comparative genomic analysis revealed a deep divergence
93 Comparative genomic analysis revealed differences among
94 examination of trans-splicing patterns, our
comparative genomic analysis revealed diverse molecular
95 Comparative genomic analysis revealed multiple Runx2 (Ru
96 Furthermore,
comparative genomic analysis revealed putative Rrn5p, Rr
97 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that enterobacteri
98 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that evolutionary
99 Comparative genomic analysis revealed that in the four r
100 Comparative genomic analysis reveals an exceptionally la
101 Comparative genomic analysis reveals that all serovars e
102 However,
comparative genomic analysis reveals that these species
103 Comparative genomics analysis reveals that the nerfin-1
104 Comparative genomic analysis show that all sequenced alp
105 Comparative genomic analysis showed differences in sever
106 Comparative genomic analysis showed that two NOG1 copies
107 as testosteroni, and Sphingopyxis alaskensis
Comparative genomic analysis shows that, in Enterobacter
108 Comparative genomic analysis strongly indicates that gen
109 Our preliminary
comparative genomic analysis suggests that Hp0267 repres
110 A
comparative genomic analysis suggests that the reduction
111 Comparative genomic analysis suggests that this region c
112 This
comparative genomics analysis suggests a high degree of
113 Comparative genomics analysis suggests the presence of a
114 Here we show by
comparative genomic analysis that this fundamental cellu
115 In this
comparative genomic analysis,
the sequences of the 9 gly
116 ur study provides a large-scale family level
comparative genomic analysis to address genomic changes
117 In this study, we apply
comparative genomic analysis to characterize the DosR re
118 In addition to the coding regions, we used
comparative genomic analysis to identify conserved nonco
119 To explore this, we performed
comparative genomic analysis to identify vertebrate orth
120 In this study we used a
comparative genomic analysis to predict two additional g
121 nthetic enzyme-coding genes, and facilitates
comparative genomic analysis to study the evolutionary c
122 We used
comparative genomics analysis to identify a cluster of o
123 Our
comparative genomic analysis uncovers that the majority
124 Comparative genomics analysis unravels lineage-specific
125 omic underpinnings of CHKi hypersensitivity,
comparative genomic analysis was performed between hyper
126 Therefore,
comparative genomic analysis was performed to prioritize
127 Comparative genomics analysis was carried out among zoys
128 In this study, a
comparative genomics analysis was performed to identify
129 Using
comparative genomic analysis we identified the molecular
130 Through
comparative genomic analysis,
we identified the ortholog
131 Comparative genomic analysis with a focus on methylotrop
132 A
comparative genomic analysis with Drosophila melanogaste
133 Comparative genomic analysis with Human Microbiome Proje
134 Comparative genomic analysis with the type strain DSMZ10
135 By combining the results of
comparative genomic analysis with those of genetic studi