ライフサイエンスコーパス: compared with WT

1 Growth of mutants was delayed compared with WT.

2 ant increase in vimentin protein expression in the MKR mice compared with WT.

3 3 or neocortical, pyramidal cells was significantly reduced compared with WT.

4 administration, they showed significantly lower drug intake compared with Wt.

5 exposure were significantly slower in heterozygous KI mice compared with WT and RPE65 heterozygous knockout mice.

6 transcript levels were increased in flc and pep1-1 mutants compared with WT, and this correlated with reduced growth in

7 l as loss of PDE10A enzyme in the striatum of zQ175 mice as compared with WT animals, in agreement with data obtained in

8 uction in D1 and 5-HT2A binding in the hippocampus of zQ175 compared with WT animals.

9 ate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) expressing IL-33Ralpha and IL-13 compared with WT animals.

10 migration/proliferation in vitro in response to FBS or BDNF compared with WT astrocytes.

11 with a deleted gene encoding SPIN showed decreased survival compared with WT bacteria after phagocytosis by neutrophils.

12 DeltaCTL also displays a reduced GTP hydrolysis rate compared with WT, but this altered activity does not account

13 Compared with WT cardiac MSCs and saline, TLR4(-/-) cardiac M

14 tokines from activated cardiac MSCs of TLR4-deficient mice, compared with WT cardiac MSCs.

15 Compared with WT cells, bmMFs lacking either mPGES-1 or EP2 r

16 roinflammatory mediators in ABIN1[D472N] cultured podocytes compared with WT cells.

17 the cerebral cortex of Malat1 KO mice after ischemic stroke compared with WT controls.

18 n the number of CNS-infiltrating proinflammatory leukocytes compared with WT controls.

19 ulin release, in Adipoq(-/-) dams was significantly reduced compared with WT dams.

20 Compared with WT ER, mutants exhibited approximately 10- to 2

21 Thermodynamic analysis indicated that compared with WT filamin, the conformationally fluctuating st

22 NA (miRNA) expression was highly upregulated in IL10KO-FPCs compared with WT-FPCs.

23 Hdc(-/-) HFD mice had increased steatosis compared with WT HFD mice.

24 ant is pathogenic resulting in lower expression levels when compared with Wt hFOXA2.

25 Similarly, compared with WT macrophages, monocytes from 12/15-LOX(-/-) m

26 rmore, heterozygous KI mice exhibited lower A-wave recovery compared with WT mice after photobleaching, suggesting a dela

27 at were fed a high-fat (HF) (45% fat) diet and exercised as compared with WT mice fed a HF diet and exercised.

28 y protected from intestinal inflammation and mucosal damage compared with WT mice in a model of intestinal I/R-induced in

29 Compared with WT mice injected with LPS, Lcn2(-/-) mice injec

30 eady showed, respectively, lower and higher quantal content compared with WT mice, before signs of MN death and before NM

31 nificantly reduced in allergen-challenged miR-155(-/-) mice compared with WT mice.

32 SK proliferation and increased numbers of LSK and GMP cells compared with WT mice.

33 iet (HS), BPs of hAS(+/-) mice were significantly increased compared with WT mice.

34 olds, decreased activation latencies, and larger amplitudes compared with WT mice.

35 xhibited a marked attenuation in granulomatous inflammation compared with WT mice.

36 cerebral artery occlusion was increased in Klkb1(-/-) mice compared with WT mice.

37 load enhanced BM-FPC mobilization and homing in IL10KO mice compared with WT mice.

38 Baseline wakefulness was modestly increased in OE compared with WT mice.

39 nd developed exacerbated fatty liver disease when fed a HFD compared with WT mice.

40 ted exacerbated IRI, comparable with that of CD73(-/-) mice compared with WT mice.

41 ) mice showed decreased multinucleated osteoclast formation compared with WT mice.

42 expression, mitochondrial content, and neovascularization, compared with WT mice.

43 tumor growth and metastasis in NOX1/2 double knockout mice compared with WT mice.

44 nocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and lipopolysaccharide compared with WT mouse macrophages.

45 receptor, also show a significant increase in pSTAT3 levels compared with WT myotubes, indicating that alpha7beta1 can ac

46 Compared with wt-PMI, hearts from Nod1(-/-)-PMI mice had bett

47 Compared with WT PV1, P2(Min) displayed a vastly reduced spec

48 duction in Galphaq binding affinity (10-fold increase in Ki compared with WT RGS2 in a flow cytometry competition binding

49 Compared with WT, the expression of IFN-alpha-stimulated gene

50 tivity, and target gene expression in the E705V-transfected compared with WT-transfected cells.