ライフサイエンスコーパス: compared with control

1 ) of 3196 allocated the Lite intervention (prevalence ratio compared with control 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.16; p=0.74), and 49

2 of 3464 assigned the Classic intervention (prevalence ratio compared with control 0.99, 0.85-1.15; p=0.87).

3 to controls, and VWC was slightly higher in warmed (14.5%) compared with control (13.5%) plots during the growing season

4 Compared with control cells, they failed to decidualize in vi

5 d as the relative change in trait value under water-deficit compared with control conditions.

6 by reduced beta-cell apoptosis in db/db-PI3Kgamma(-/-) mice compared with control db/db mice.

7 -8.3 letters; P = 0.002), then recovered with no difference compared with control eyes 12 and 24 months later (P > 0.05 f

8 ease significantly after the tear, but continued to decline compared with control eyes at all end points.

9 Mean FAZ area was greater in diabetic eyes compared with control eyes both in the superficial (0.427 mm(

10 Mean VLD was also lower in diabetic eyes compared with control eyes in both the superficial (17.68 mm(

11 Mean VAD was lower in diabetic eyes compared with control eyes in both the superficial (49.44% vs

12 Compared with control glomeruli, DN, FSGS, IgAN, and MPGN glo

13 1% (95% CI, 2.5-18.9) higher scores on patients' confidence compared with control group participants (P = 0.01).

14 tive emotional response but led to reliably improved memory compared with control images when patients were given a recog

15 tivity indices or other psychological wellbeing scores when compared with control in patients with quiescent disease.

16 arately and combined to promote infant safe sleep practices compared with control interventions.

17 )-vil-Cre mice also had increased visceral hypersensitivity compared with control littermate Sox9(flox/flox) mice.

18 )]i and proinsulin and higher insulin and glucose tolerance compared with control littermates after 10 weeks of a high-fa

19 Compared with control littermates, knockout mice showed impai

20 a 40%-50% decrease in tumor mass at the end of treatment as compared with control mice (P = 0.002; ANOVA on ranks with Du

21 content in pancreata of A2AAR-deficient mice were decreased compared with control mice after consuming an HFD.

22 in parallel with increased mortality after MI in T2DM mice compared with control mice.

23 hways, and spontaneous inflammation at 22-24 months of age, compared with control mice.

24 esulted in more severe inflammation and increased mortality compared with control mice.

25 acute-phase response, and increased hepatocellular damage, compared with control mice.

26 Specifically, compared with control or FSGS glomeruli, IgAN glomeruli exhib

27 ins stimulated significant increase in neutrophil apoptosis compared with control (P <0.001) and significantly increased

28 d by T-wave symmetry and principal component analysis ratio compared with control participants.

29 ced over the contralesional but not the ipsilesional cortex compared with control patients with diabetes.

30 e (QoL) in patients with quiescent herpes simplex keratitis compared with control patients without ocular herpes.

31 When compared with control patients, half maximal relaxation time

32 c pathways was significantly different in KATPHI beta-cells compared with control, providing a mechanism for the observed

33 d median survival with reduced tumor size and proliferation compared with control Pten-mutant mice, the latter of which e

34 Compared with control samples (tomatoes without coating and t

35 these seeds accumulated significantly higher levels of Met compared with control seeds through an as yet unknown mechani

36 tio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37; P = .002) for treating cancer compared with control states.

37 UNCOUP_LD were significantly higher in both patient groups compared with control subjects (P < 0.05).

38 Reaction times were prolonged in SCI participants compared with control subjects and stimulation was provided a

39 PPU subjects when compared with control subjects showed increased activation of

40 cytes from patients with type 2 diabetes had increased Mll1 compared with control subjects without diabetes.

41 esting increased connectivity in young children with T1D as compared with control subjects without diabetes.

42 In unadjusted models, TD/CTD patients, compared with control subjects, had an increased risk of both

43 rebral blood flow and metabolic activity in key brain areas compared with control subjects.

44 as comparable between groups, longitudinal peak was reduced compared with control subjects.

45 eserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared with control subjects.

46 17% higher in the ventral striatum in pathological gamblers compared with control subjects.

47 MPP (P < .001), and a trend toward lower entropy (P = .07) compared with control subjects.

48 05) levels resulted in decreased viability of CD27(-)CD4(+) compared with control transduced cells.

49 ated (MSMP) gene was substantially upregulated in resistant compared with control tumors.

50 Bay 117085 significantly reduces tumor growth in nude mice compared with control untreated mice or either drug alone.