ライフサイエンスコーパス: compared with control

1 , 0.027) mug; Control: 0.015 (0.013, 0.018) mug, P = 0.001] compared with Control.

2 lative risk of new caries experience in the DR-BNI group as compared with control.

3 reductions in WNT1 expressions in RAD6B knockout M14 cells compared with control.

4 requency domain BRS indices were reduced in type 2 diabetes compared with control 2 and were positively associated with t

5 e mice had a significantly smaller percentage of tumor TEMs compared with control and HIF-2alpha (fl/fl) /LysMcre mice.

6 ed immunosorbent assay, and COX2 messenger RNA and protein, compared with control biopsies.

7 fferentiated HepaRG harbored mtDNA levels of 0.9% and 17.9% compared with control cells, respectively.

8 Compared with control cells, the B-to-A permeability of mIBG

9 iral progeny are reduced in vimentin-deficient fibroblasts, compared with control cells.

10 om an affected individual showed reduced expression of GDF6 compared with control cells.

11 s (sub-colonies), foundation of new nests or survival, when compared with control colonies.

12 yndrome (PCOS) have been shown to be less insulin sensitive compared with control (CON) women, independent of BMI.

13 Compared with control dams, Angptl4 mRNA levels were signific

14 Compared with control, flow-controlled ventilation elevated P

15 glomerular tissue of patients with diabetic kidney disease compared with control glomerular tissue.

16 ly intact participants the PSS score was higher in the aMCI compared with control group but neither the RLCQ scores nor s

17 43] compared with 3.77 [0.62], P = 0.0006, Cohen's D: 0.69) compared with control group mothers.

18 ifference in OS in favor of patients randomized to eribulin compared with control in patients with bone, lymph node, and

19 Almonds, compared with control, increased endothelium-dependent vasodi

20 mutations (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) in individuals with anemia compared with control individuals, other mutations were enric

21 = 6.56; P = 0.0003) genes was observed in late AMD patients compared with control individuals.

22 had increased expression of genes that define PMC identity compared with control liver tissues.

23 d in the interfollicular space of iMCD lymph nodes (N = 26) compared with control lymph nodes by immunohistochemistry (IH

24 e of exogenous transforming growth factor-beta2 (TGFbeta2), compared with control matrices (VehMs), glucocorticoid-induce

25 s increased during nighttime following the almond treatment compared with control (mean difference 337 ms2; 95% CI: 12, 6

26 pancreas by inflammatory cells, and plasma amylase activity compared with control mice given cerulein injections.

27 Compared with control mice, Pkd1 knockout mice exhibited redu

28 strated that RSV infection led to increased HA accumulation compared with control mice, which also coincided with decreas

29 eased, but fatty acid synthesis transcripts were increased, compared with control mice.

30 anipulation produced significantly fewer IgE Abs to peanuts compared with control mice.

31 volumes, and MRI findings in asymptomatic neonates with SDH compared with control neonates.

32 Compared with control participants, both paracentral and peri

33 Compared with control participants, the participants with liv

34 eased ratio of reduced/oxidized redox in db/db mouse retina compared with control retinas.

35 Compared with control, SO downregulated ACACA, INSIG1, and DG

36 mmetry in measures of hand motor resting-state connectivity compared with control subjects (P < .05).

37 d 4) increased fasting and arginine-induced glucagon levels compared with control subjects without diabetes.

38 s with PJI contains elevated amounts of D-lactate and IL-10 compared with control subjects, and bacterial lactate increas

39 At baseline, compared with control subjects, CHR individuals had high glut

40 At baseline, compared with control subjects, CHR subjects (independent of

41 GLS decreases with ICI myocarditis and, compared with control subjects, was lower among cases present

42 (WM), density, and GM/WM density ratio of BD patients were compared with control subjects.

43 e comparison of each patient response status and time point compared with control subjects.

44 between MWF samples and lung tissue samples of case workers compared with control subjects.

45 tients and a trendwise reduction in unmedicated patients as compared with control subjects.

46 genes with differential RNA expression in patients with PAH compared with control subjects.

47 third subtype did not have changes in methylation pattern, compared with control tissue, but had a gene expression patte

48 use mortality was significantly lower in the DCB group when compared with control treatment (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.

49 rials, blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a low

50 Blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a red