ライフサイエンスコーパス: comparison

1 om participants without SCT; P<.001 for both comparisons).

2 ean glucose concentration (P > 0.20 for both comparisons).

3 the control group (P<0.001 for between-group comparisons).

4 stay (21 days vs. 33 days) (P<0.001 for both comparisons).

5 than did nonsurgery group 1 (P<0.05 for all comparisons).

6 irst or last, 6.8 vs 10.7; P < .001 for both comparisons).

7 points for ivacaftor alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons).

8 making requires grounding in perspectives of comparison.

9 c enzyme lignin (CEL) was also prepared as a comparison.

10 , however, scarce data on their head-to-head comparison.

11 th false discovery rate control for multiple comparisons.

12 in LD vs MD, LE vs ME, LE vs LD, or ME vs MD comparisons.

13 In comparison, 1-hydroxymidazolam did not depress the corti

14 grains (40%; n = 19,541) or to a usual diet comparison (60%; n = 29,294).

15 ; and (iii) use risk metrics that facilitate comparison among studies and the evaluation of multiple

16 he current deficiency of tools for automated comparison and analysis of multiple assemblies of the sa

17 Group comparison and interrelations between global cognitive a

18 le and expandable nomenclature, allowing for comparison and sharing of typing results among laborator

19 Negative social comparisons and competition may involve the hypothalamic

20 s of the entire TCGA NSCLC cohort, including comparisons and contrasts between different disease subs

21 ncy in data collection will allow meaningful comparisons and provide an evidence base enabling improv

22 pretation should be cautious due to multiple comparisons and small sample size, these results provide

23 ariables, chi-square testing for categorical comparisons, and the generalized estimating equation mod

24 In this work we explored if an atlas-based comparison approach reveals shape differences in the pro

25 Alignment-free sequence comparison approaches have been garnering increasing int

26 The results of the tranexamic acid comparison are reported here.

27 ferred to other research fields where sample comparisons are conducted.

28 urrence score (ODxRS), and post hoc pairwise comparisons assessed ODxRS means by using imaging featur

29 draft genomes of these two species and their comparisons at the functional genomics level to support

30 For comparison, average speed in the A. thaliana hypocotyl e

31 Comparisons based on simulated data showed that pulver i

32 We primarily report the comparison between adolescents and young adults.

33 er our work provides the first transcriptome comparison between cork oak and holm oak outer bark, whi

34 We excluded studies that did not allow comparison between more or less advantaged groups.

35 Comparison between strains demonstrated increased adhesi

36 ile levels were statistically significant on comparison between the healthy and CP groups and between

37 tion of parameters necessary to ensure valid comparisons between different adsorbents.

38 icult, if not impossible, to make meaningful comparisons between different peripheral nerve interface

39 Comparisons between eDNA, community DNA, taxonomy and UK

40 n animal models, but there have been limited comparisons between methods and the accuracy of detectin

41 We demonstrate that direct empirical comparisons between rainfall and streamflow provide a me

42 Based on comparisons between several theoretical and experimental

43 Similar results were seen in the comparisons between the newer biologics (e.g. vedolizuma

44 Two-sided t tests were used for comparisons between treatment groups.

45 For comparison, both the STP and the STOK techniques were us

46 or villages) with a social franchisee to 120 comparison clusters in six districts of Uttar Pradesh, I

47 vely, than members of the general population comparison cohort.

48 Structural comparisons demonstrate that the initiation mechanism in

49 alcohol use of past-year ayahuasca users and comparison drug users; and subjective effects of ayahuas

50 ers; and subjective effects of ayahuasca and comparison drugs.

51 uli elicited a modulation of the N400 in all comparisons except for body-face condition.

52 uPR curves are argued as suitable metric for comparison for imbalanced datasets similar to the one st

53 2 versus 26 (15.3%) of 170 in the historical comparison group (odds ratio: 4.0; 95% confidence interv

54 Outcomes in a historical comparison group were also evaluated.

55 Compared with the matched comparison group, the mean total costs declined by $781.

56 oints per year (p=0.0002) for the 21 patient comparison group.

57 zithromycin or clarithromycin) served as the comparison group.

58 n was 8.5 years (95% CI 7.9-9.0 years); this comparison had P = .088.

59 To date, however, no genome-wide comparisons have been performed to provide an unbiased a

60 Some of the most powerful comparisons have been those made to the Drosophila visua

61 iclustering, bicluster expanding, biclusters comparison, heatmap visualization of any identified bicl

62 The same comparisons in men, based on a single food frequency que

63 In a paired comparison including 1213 patients, 73% of the patients

64 A three-way comparison including the published short-read assembly (

65 Basic partitioning theory comparisons indicate that overestimation of vapor pressu

66 Formal model comparison indicated that the model of multiword phrase

67 Pairwise comparisons indicated: (1) the mean melanopsin-mediated

68 Overall, high heterogeneity was observed for comparisons involving xanthine and ischemic precondition

69 Information used for international comparisons is threatened, as is service delivery, espec

70 By comparison, laboratory rats are larger in size and more

71 In comparison, membranes composed of a mixture of rods with

72 FFQ were weaker when ASA24s were used as the comparison method (mean r = 0.43).

73 ger statistically significant in the sibling comparison models or after the exclusion of comorbid att

74 By comparison, MRS2500 behaved as surmountable antagonist r

75 would rise, in Berkeley stores more than in comparison non-Berkeley stores; (3) consumer spending pe

76 ning based on more than 100 compounds, and a comparison of a nontargeted screening based both on the

77 i, for the first time we provide a proteomic comparison of a protein complex across asexual blood, se

78 The comparison of ABA metabolism and signaling in roots of f

79 The RACAT (Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies) trial found triple thera

80 Comparison of adapted populations with those found on le

81 years of follow-up among participants in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment

82 emulsion surfaces and allow for an important comparison of AOT at smaller micellar (curved) and plana

83 The PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Im

84 Comparison of ATP-bound and nucleotide-free states revea

85 developed for probabilistic pairwise global comparison of biological networks, and it has been appli

86 A direct comparison of bulk and surface spectral functions (taken

87 ing energy homeostasis favored detection and comparison of caloric value.

88 employed a curve fitting approach for linear comparison of cell types and introduced a novel spillove

89 The THGr method allows comparison of data obtained at different institutions an

90 Comparison of delta(15)N values between C. virginica she

91 ns of definitions with outcomes to provide a comparison of different definitions.

92 lates for follow-up reactions as well as the comparison of different electrochemical set-ups also enh

93 With the comparison of distributions between workday and non-work

94 atrophy using a validated 4-point scale, and comparison of E2 levels.

95 Comparison of exomic diversity reveals that: (i) both ne

96 euterium isotope exchange is obtained from a comparison of experimental and calculated NMR data.

97 A comparison of experimental and predicted drug release da

98 ane (7TMR) function has been gained from the comparison of experimental data to receptor models.

99 le, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison of FMD and PISA scores among the study groups

100 ed EF underwent cardiac catheterization with comparison of hemodynamic measurements before and after

101 A structural comparison of holo-ScNsrR with an apo-IscR-DNA complex s

102 Comparison of homologous protein models identified highl

103 Comparison of inclusion textures in lapilli from the act

104 s, and the lack of standardization, make the comparison of ion channel models with one another and wi

105 Comparison of linkage disequilibrium patterns between th

106 Analysis of variance was used for comparison of lipid profile, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test

107 Comparison of mass spectra in the two systems reveals si

108 A comparison of NPR Scythian mtDNA linages with other cont

109 nt in individual patients and will allow the comparison of outcome data in future studies.

110 A comparison of oxic to anoxic soils reveal up to ten time

111 able time on the measurement and statistical comparison of patients' ICU LOS.

112 onstrate the utility of the technique in the comparison of placental vessel networks in normal and fe

113 Side-by-side comparison of PORCN and Hedgehog acyltransferase (HHAT),

114 Whole-genome comparison of pretreatment and relapse isolates of M. in

115 Comparison of pRNFL, IRL, mRNFL, mGCL, mIPL, mGCC, mGCL-

116 test assuming unequal variance and Z test of comparison of proportions.

117 mputational method that enables quantitative comparison of protein scavenging rates across cell lines

118 Comparison of reactivities of [(PyTACN)Fe(O)(X)](+) gene

119 A comparison of reactivity indicates that it decreases in

120 ultiplexed quantification of glycans through comparison of reporter ion intensities.

121 indirect-to-direct bandgap transition, and a comparison of results in monolayer and bulk allows the a

122 are being treated with alternative programs, comparison of results will require general agreement on

123 ompletion of study treatment; SVR12) and the comparison of safety in the ITG and DTG.

124 Comparison of SAXS curves at high and low salt concentra

125 Comparison of specific rotation data enables assignment

126 Comparison of SPOP-mutant and ERG-fusion organoid models

127 tial confounding effects that arise from the comparison of structures in a crystal as opposed to a me

128 Direct comparison of survival estimates between national regist

129 ta provide a novel framework of analysis and comparison of synaptic transmission alterations in neuro

130 Comparison of teeth and implants via general linear mode

131 r more in the number of headache days in the comparison of the 28-day baseline period with the last 2

132 ited, Frecruited) were computed based on the comparison of the aerated volumes at successive time poi

133 In a comparison of the baseline period with the EOS calculato

134 Furthermore, comparison of the Bmh1:Nth1 complex structure with those

135 A comparison of the distribution of the pathogenic mutatio

136 The comparison of the inflammatory response, cytokine profil

137 Comparison of the intermediate conformational families o

138 A comparison of the mean changes (delta) in the markers be

139 orozoite stages, along with a transcriptomic comparison of the mRNAs that are affected in these stage

140 y with the natural isolate was proved by the comparison of the NMR and circular dichroism spectra and

141 Based on the comparison of the observed transient spectra with the on

142 Comparison of the reactivity of 2 with that of a more el

143 We provide the first comparison of the skill of coupled ecological-niche-popu

144 rison of the total number of HRMS signals, a comparison of the targeted screening based on more than

145 used to perform these evaluations, such as a comparison of the total number of HRMS signals, a compar

146 Our study permits a comparison of the two approaches, and the data support t

147 The comparison of the two oligomerization maps highlights se

148 The comparison of the two ternary crystal structures, AmbP3-

149 centralized database that allows effortless comparison of the user-entered list of gene symbols with

150 Sequence comparison of the VP7 gene of G9 strains identified diff

151 The performed comparison of the whole transcriptome profile in isolate

152 Comparison of these results with those from other classe

153 On the basis of comparison of this MDFF model with an earlier-derived cr

154 A comparison of this structure with inactive- and active-s

155 lipids intensity, which allowed a meaningful comparison of tissue lipids in control and cisplatin-tre

156 he phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial was a head-to-head comparison of two proteasome inhibitors in patients with

157 nd treatment technologies, the framework for comparison of water and wastewater impacts of various bu

158 Comparisons of cells from wild-type vs. AE3(-/-) mice sh

159 Use of standardized panels enables direct comparisons of data from different trials and study site

160 Direct comparisons of erosion during pulsed heat loading betwee

161 The TER is fully supported by the pairwise comparisons of MERs using 106 manually segmented ground-

162 Quantitative comparisons of the binding preferences of 400 peptides a

163 Comparisons of their magnetic, crystallographic, and com

164 Network comparison or differential network analysis has become a

165 and the effects also depend strongly on the comparison or replacement macronutrient.

166 even when few individuals are available for comparison or when genomes are sequenced to low coverage

167 based on modeled data, indirect or nonactive comparisons, or nonvalidated evidence.

168 nt domains for the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome questions.

169 ed 34-71 years) and an age-matched sample of comparison participants (N=18) were administered measure

170 from 2002 for baseline and appropriate later comparison periods to calculate incidence rate ratios (I

171 We argue that (1) analogical comparison processes are central to human cognition; and

172 ulation abilities of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models to the arid ba

173 These comparisons provide a framework for future researchers t

174 For comparison purposes, three commercial black garlic sampl

175 The all-classes comparison (R(2) = 0.86 and Q(2) = 0.83) indicated that

176 eoretical analysis of the expected number of comparisons required for the proposed Lexicographic sear

177 The comparison results with two popular RNA comparison tools

178 Ecological comparisons revealed substantial increases in HPV vaccin

179 The comparisons showed a satisfactory agreement for (148)Gd

180 to 70% of demonstration sites and to 11% of comparison sites.

181 Prospective group comparison studies on representative cohorts are require

182 In genome-wide rate comparison studies, there is a big challenge for effecti

183 reduction was 90% (9%-99%) using data from 5 comparison studies.

184 ection from 19 matched tetrads of unaffected comparison subjects and subjects with SZ, bipolar disord

185 generalized anxiety disorder and 32 healthy comparison subjects group-matched on IQ, gender, and age

186 In this retrospective comparison, the accelerated approach was equally as effe

187 While this is an imperfect comparison, the data suggest that the separation of the

188 In comparison, the NO2(-) spiked cultures with COD:N = 4:1

189 By comparison, the zinc binding region of the P73G mutant,

190 Daily intake estimation comparisons through diet diary analyses and duplicate di

191 erall survival and has better specificity in comparison to conventional imaging.

192 In comparison to CT, NT, for example, generated lower leach

193 Using extensive in silico analyses and comparison to cytometry immunophenotyping, we show that

194 ht the opportunities this approach brings in comparison to frameworks that coerce trophic interaction

195 d in response to elevated [CO2] (E-[CO2]) by comparison to free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and chamber

196 cium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Coronary

197 igin cannot be understood by a morphological comparison to gymnosperms, their closest relatives, whic

198 titial space were observed for metastases in comparison to HCCs (P < 0.05).

199 The hydrolytic stability of SIFSIX-2-Cu-i in comparison to its structural counterparts is attributed

200 heart disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy, in comparison to nonfailing hearts.

201 ersistence of the constructed mussel beds in comparison to nonorganized beds.

202 es that encode limited number of proteins in comparison to other biological entities.

203 nd that GRAPE pathway scores perform well in comparison to other methods.

204 At the 6-month follow-up, mean CDVA in comparison to preoperative levels improved significantly

205 Comparison to previous studies indicates the importance

206 In comparison to related bidentate phenylurea dihomooxacali

207 which attributes to its higher Voc and ff in comparison to RSQ1.

208 In comparison to spoligotyping of acid-fast-positive MGIT c

209 que, to predict 6 cardiovascular outcomes in comparison to standard cardiovascular risk scores.

210 ders of magnitude [from 10microM to 50nM] in comparison to ta-C thin film electrodes and (ii) the coa

211 t MS with perfluoro coated Si-GLAD SALDI, by comparison to tabulated data.

212 rmance after the perturbation was removed in comparison to the control participants.

213 esium in the obtained ice cream was lower in comparison to the control samples.

214 er compound coverage, and high-throughput in comparison to the LC-MS based approach.

215 for the 64,498 XCMS determined features, in comparison to the less spectrally complex sample that ha

216 ong durability, with superior performance in comparison to the pure iron oxy-hydroxide (FeOOH) cataly

217 In comparison to the unmodified trimer, structural differen

218 ion coefficient of 1.59 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s, in comparison to the value of 2.38 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s using a

219 ical changes in several of these lineages in comparison to their relatives with larger genomes.

220 from affected individuals were decreased in comparison to those in control cells.

221 (based on a false discovery rate < 0.1), in comparison to zero of 18,055 autosomal and PAR genes (Fi

222 Comparisons to existing BLM calibrations show good agree

223 ents who were asymptomatic; P < .001 for all comparisons to patients with CMV pneumonia).

224 Comparisons to severe asthma multicenter studies and ava

225 The comparison results with two popular RNA comparison tools, RNApdist and RNAdistance, showcased th

226 nome assemblies and an embedded VISTA genome comparison viewer.

227 Immunological comparison was carried out using Western blot.

228 25 and its reaction partners, and a detailed comparison was made with the previously described arylim

229 This comparison was then followed by Free Water Imaging analy

230 Pairwise assay comparisons were also performed using 245 clinical sampl

231 Comparisons were made with conventionally washed minces

232 In comparison, when DENV and WNV were produced in insect ce

233 an efficient and precise measure for network comparison, which is based on quantifying differences am

234 a benchmark with which to make quantitative comparisons, while presenting a suspension suitable for

235 (4 papers, change in management in 51%); and comparison with (111)In-octreotide (2 papers, sensitivit

236 ng 4500 patients randomly assigned to CTA in comparison with 4602 patients randomly assigned to funct

237 Comparison with a 7.8 A resolution cryo-electron microsc

238 cod (n=80) from those of haddock (n=90), in comparison with a FT-NIR benchtop spectrometer.

239 In comparison with AD subjects without psychosis, AD+P subj

240 n a higher attachment of particles on oil in comparison with adsorption, as commonly assumed.

241 In comparison with AtHY5, which does not cause any change i

242 show differential DNA hydroxymethylation in comparison with both control and nonaddicted rats.

243 Comparison with concentrations obtained using closed ves

244 criptional changes in HCV-infected livers in comparison with control, uninfected livers and HCC, allo

245 ocesses that exhibited multiple swellings in comparison with control.

246 r showed excellent analytical performance in comparison with current HER2 biosensors.

247 e chemical shift reference data suitable for comparison with data of denatured proteins, we repeated

248 In comparison with DCT measurements, these data suggest tha

249 ted by site-directed mutagenesis allows full comparison with dicot CADs and elucidates the potential

250 A comparison with dynamic light scattering measurements in

251 malously low density of the Martian crust in comparison with expectations.

252 book gills, muscles, and fine setae permits comparison with extant horseshoe crabs.

253 prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with full multiparametric contrast material-e

254 UA), early RA, and established RA cohorts in comparison with healthy donors.

255 Comparison with literature values of mobility demonstrat

256 ense-related genes was characterized through comparison with MeJA signalling in model plants.

257 ymptoms, and report worse quality of life in comparison with men.

258 r growth in immunodeficient mice in vivo, in comparison with NIL alone.

259 mice after discontinuation of treatment, in comparison with NIL alone.

260 dase components p47 (phox) and p40 (phox) in comparison with non-CF MDMs.

261 observed in human failing heart biopsies in comparison with nonfailing controls.

262 sence of MDSCs in their peripheral blood, in comparison with normal controls.

263 Comparison with orthologous regions from rice, sorghum,

264 In comparison with other human calpains, CAPN14 has a uniqu

265 In comparison with other neurological diagnoses, subarachno

266 A comparison with other peripheral membrane proteins eluci

267 noliposomal omega3 PUFAs enriched samples in comparison with other samples.

268 significantly reduced heart rate recovery in comparison with patients with higher RV ejection fractio

269 artan did not significantly improve RV EF in comparison with placebo (+0.51%; 95% confidence interval

270 ular degree II furcation defect treatment in comparison with PRF and access therapy alone.

271 heric measurements to provide an independent comparison with reported emissions.

272 rmation in 47% of the sensitized children in comparison with results obtained by standard diagnostic

273 of the infinite 1D material for siloxane, in comparison with silane and alkane, and show that the lar

274 In comparison with SIMA, BIMA grafting was associated with

275 By comparison with strain maps of the developing skeleton,

276 al cardiovascular risk were nearly 2-fold in comparison with subjects who remained below CAC5y=400.

277 educed in the cross-disease meta-analysis in comparison with the analysis of GCA and TAK separately.

278 A detailed comparison with the anisotropic network model (an elasti

279 l excretions showed higher AgNPs contents in comparison with the AuNPs.

280 generate the opposite stereoconfiguration in comparison with the Catharanthus homologue CrISY.

281 d by the direct method presented here and in comparison with the established C18 extraction approach.

282 minorities-its overall impact was modest in comparison with the gaps present before the law's implem

283 stable carbon isotope ratio was evaluated in comparison with the method chosen in the past for these

284 creased As levels significantly (48-227%) in comparison with the original concentration in the rice (

285 Binding mode of the active compounds in comparison with the reference agent was studied using mo

286 Comparison with the transcriptome of L3 PCs from the sam

287 y an extract of Calotropis procera leaves in comparison with those obtained by chymosin.

288 increased 20-fold [0.04192 (mug/mL)(-1)] in comparison with undiluted PBS.

289 Strikingly, comparison with vertebrates indicates that the vertebrat

290 In comparison with women with at least 2 pregnancies, all o

291 Individual model evaluation and multimodel comparisons with data have largely focused on individual

292 Comparisons with deep-sea data from the same region sugg

293 Comparisons with existing titration results from experim

294 Comparisons with nonhuman apes point to our early-emergi

295 The results, achieved through simulations, comparisons with other methods, analyses of TCGA and ICG

296 cle, along with genomic analysis and genomic comparisons with previously known viruses.

297 we test the homology of these organs through comparisons with the architecture of rhizophore vascular

298 standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) to make comparisons with the general population.

299 Finally, we present comparisons with the real-time tsunami MOST (Method of S

300 s objectively, since traditional statistical comparisons without multi-testing correction can generat