ライフサイエンスコーパス: competition experiment

1 cantly more reactive than Rawal's diene in a competition experiment.

2 h different levels of TF expression and in a competition experiment.

3 itive advantage to tumor cells in an in vivo competition experiment.

4 uclear cell cultures for a complete pairwise competition experiment.

5 cleophiles was directly investigated through competition experiments.

6 ding specificity was demonstrated by in vivo competition experiments.

7 mpromises the interpretation of conventional competition experiments.

8 n the setting of UTI, particularly in direct competition experiments.

9 probed by peptide membrane array and antigen competition experiments.

10 linear free-energy relationship studies, and competition experiments.

11 [Pt(CH(3))(a(7)-PhobPBu)(dppe)][BPh(4)] from competition experiments.

12 ent ring the site of exclusive reactivity in competition experiments.

13 d FGF.FGFR complex binding to heparin in the competition experiments.

14 relative to a continuous food environment in competition experiments.

15 isothermal titration calorimetry and calcium competition experiments.

16 ess their affinities indirectly via solution competition experiments.

17 wild-type NU14 and showed reduced fitness in competition experiments.

18 brium constants (K) were determined from NMR competition experiments.

19 ands were able to achieve full inhibition in competition experiments.

20 of 5'-dA were determined from time-based and competition experiments.

21 here n = 1-3] have been compared in internal competition experiments.

22 ch antibody binding was abrogated in peptide competition experiments.

23 f these interactions was verified by peptide competition experiments.

24 ABA(B)R1b transcripts, consistent with decoy competition experiments.

25 e surface, both of which were established by competition experiments.

26 nmodified helicase has been characterized in competition experiments.

27 complexed proteins during the titration and competition experiments.

28 f this hypothesis, we theoretically analyzed competition experiments.

29 inding affinities were established by direct competition experiments.

30 ular reaction over the intermolecular one in competition experiments.

31 st interaction of the import process through competition experiments.

32 metabolic switching, and a fitness defect in competition experiments.

33 ecular character of this transfer, including competition experiments.

34 ild-type vacuoles requires PI3P, as shown in competition experiments.

35 investigated through truncation studies and competition experiments.

36 each pair of hydron donors is evaluated from competition experiments.

37 aused nonspecific binding of the drug during competition experiments.

38 as demonstrated by the NMR and fluorescence competition experiments.

39 The first evidence is derived from competition experiments.

40 uity of this last step by means of a set of "competition" experiments.

41 In competition experiments, 2 mM RGD tripeptide reduced the

42 Competition experiments along with DeltaG(re)(double dag

43 irmed their colonization phenotypes by using competition experiments and by determining the dose requ

44 h histone fold interactions as determined by competition experiments and by high density histone pept

45 did not inhibit HCR/A entry into neurons in competition experiments and did not bind SV2, the protei

46 ally, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNase I footprints were perf

47 ormed electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNase I footprints.

48 ormed electrophoretic mobility shift assays, competition experiments and DNaseI footprints, which sug

49 f the new reactions, we have studied various competition experiments and ESI-MS and 3D Mid-IR-ATR spe

50 ent study is highly specific as confirmed by competition experiments and extremely sensitive with det

51 ptor binding site on the RBD as suggested by competition experiments and further supported by site-di

52 ally related substrates is evaluated through competition experiments and kinetic assays using LC-MS t

53 reduced binding affinities were confirmed by competition experiments and led to proportional decrease

54 Moreover, competition experiments and mutational analysis revealed

55 At high Si(OH)(4), competition experiments and nonsaturability indicated up

56 Competition experiments and release of (15) NH3 suggest

57 Competition experiments and surface plasmon resonance an

58 In this study we have used growth competition experiments and TaqMan real-time PCR detecti

59 The CAHB hypothesis was supported by competition experiments and the finding that weak acid a

60 Competition experiments and the role of the acid additiv

61 We use truncation constructs, peptide competition experiments, and chimeric secretin-GLP1 rece

62 ctivity of the donors was investigated using competition experiments, and some but not all were found

63 olid-state thermodynamic measurements, anion competition experiments, and X-ray structural analysis.

64 A series of competition experiments are examined where the effects o

65 that when the same solutes that were used in competition experiments are used to probe changes accomp

66 This is further demonstrated by competition experiments as well as by the results of Fuk

67 ic studies were performed, including various competition experiments as well as reactions with isotop

68 In the competition experiment at ERalpha the compounds displaye

69 This diversity has not been evident from competition experiments because of steric interference e

70 A competition experiment between calix[4]arene-bis(benzocr

71 Competition experiments between 8-anilino-1-naphtalene s

72 of transfected CHO cells by performing cross-competition experiments between a set of nine monoclonal

73 Competition experiments between common amine nucleophile

74 Competition experiments between cycloalkenes and allylbe

75 ichness of the set of molecular targets from competition experiments between distinguishable ligands,

76 It was first determined in competition experiments between DNA and RNA that histone

77 pf for intestinal colonization, we performed competition experiments between E. coli O157:H7 and an i

78 First, using data from competition experiments between kin discriminating strai

79 sively screen individuals and then run sperm competition experiments between males that differ specif

80 Competition experiments between primary R5 and X4 HIV is

81 Competition experiments between pUC18 and pUC18 plasmids

82 Competition experiments between S. caprae and MRSA demon

83 Competition experiments between strains expressing eithe

84 Competition experiments between substituted styrenes and

85 Competition experiments between substituted styrenes and

86 We validated these findings through in vivo competition experiments between T6S+ Vibrio cholerae and

87 Competition experiments between these inhibitors and ace

88 Competition experiments between two different terminal a

89 Competition experiments between WT and an DeltansiR4 KO

90 However, in competition experiments between wt and DeltafliC strains

91 In a competition experiment, both unlabeled N- and C-terminal

92 -OFF bacteria showed no fitness advantage in competition experiments carried out in immunodeficient M

93 In ligand competition experiments, cell surface-bound TSG-6-hyalur

94 Binding-competition experiments conducted using native and degly

95 Competition experiments confirm that all of the nonnatur

96 se of the phthalocyanine-bombesin conjugate, competition experiments confirm the involvement of the G

97 Direct competition experiments confirmed that three out of four

98 Competition experiments demonstrate rapid and reversible

99 Competition experiments demonstrate that additions of al

100 Crosslinking and competition experiments demonstrate that ComK- and ComS-

101 Competition experiments demonstrate that I-AniI binds th

102 Competition experiments demonstrate that SH2 domains who

103 A systematic mutational analysis and competition experiments demonstrate that the lateral sit

104 Competition experiments demonstrated no distinct autoant

105 Nevertheless, acceptor competition experiments demonstrated that D520 has a gre

106 Competition experiments demonstrated that E. coli had a

107 Competition experiments demonstrated that free heparin a

108 Furthermore, competition experiments demonstrated that the binding of

109 Competition experiments demonstrated that the C- and N-t

110 Metal competition experiments demonstrated that the transporte

111 Direct binding and competition experiments demonstrated that this selectivi

112 Growth competition experiments demonstrated that viruses incorp

113 Competition experiments demonstrated that, in addition t

114 Here, we show that competition experiments do not eliminate the extracellul

115 Transient fluorescence competition experiments enabled measurement of rates of

116 Moreover, a series of amide competition experiments establish selectivity principles

117 Competition experiments establish the relative rates of

118 A competition experiment established that the reaction inv

119 However, competition experiments have shown that tethering the hy

120 Competition experiments identified a peptide that inhibi

121 ntly, the value of k(1) was estimated from a competition experiment in which the effect of GW0385 on

122 A competition experiment in which the flanking sequences o

123 me system was assessed using mixed infection competition experiments in a mouse model.

124 In this study, using mixed-infection competition experiments in a mouse respiratory model, in

125 Using competition experiments in a murine model of colonizatio

126 Competition experiments in CH(2)Cl(2) solvent reveal tha

127 Examination of a series of competition experiments in combination with analysis of

128 Using competition experiments in continuous cultures grown in

129 o acid resistance were then compared through competition experiments in ex-germ-free mice that were e

130 Furthermore, competition experiments in mice showed that WT GBS exhib

131 mutant was used with the wild-type strain in competition experiments in mouse models to examine the c

132 Using pooled competition experiments in nutrient-limited chemostats f

133 pecificity was carried out using a series of competition experiments in the liver.

134 NA cleavage for one of the hairpin DNAs, and competition experiments in which the diminution of cleav

135 Competition experiments (in 68% DMSO/phosphate buffered

136 c acid esters was established in a series of competition experiments, in which two thioglucoside and/

137 Competition experiments indicate equivalent selectivity

138 Congruently, competition experiments indicate that EB1 can bind to F-

139 Kinetic competition experiments indicate that further oxidation

140 However, DNA binding competition experiments indicate that human Tdp1 binding

141 Competition experiments indicate that Pdcd4 prevents ca.

142 In addition, competition experiments indicate that the dissociation r

143 Competition experiments indicate that volatile anestheti

144 Competition experiments indicated an overlap of GAG and

145 Surprisingly, competition experiments indicated that individual Plin5

146 Competition experiments indicated that this interaction

147 Competition experiments involving catalytic hydrogenatio

148 ffinity ligands employing a new calorimetric competition experiment is described.

149 Using competition experiments, it was found that ATP and ADP b

150 LFERs, Rehm-Weller estimations of DeltaGET, competition experiments, KIEs, fluorescence data, and DF

151 eling studies, kinetic measurements, kinetic competition experiments, kinetic isotope effects, and hy

152 boron-catalyzed processes are explored using competition experiments, kinetics, and catalyst structur

153 In competition experiments, mature thiolase did not affect

154 ients, flow cytometry of synovial cells, and competition experiments measuring enrichment of CXCR2-ex

155 Competition experiments monitored by ITC and fluorescenc

156 gth of the neutral ligands was determined by competition experiments monitored by NMR spectroscopy.

157 The competition experiment of 10 + 9b over 10 + 31a-c reveal

158 mation of the phenotype was established in a competition experiment of wild-type and a markerless bep

159 Competition experiments of different antibiotics with (3

160 uch results, together with those obtained in competition experiments of FA versus Eu(3+) subset2 and

161 Intramolecular competition experiments of triaryl azides suggested the

162 Homologous (epibatidine) competition experiments on total (surface and intracellu

163 However, in competition experiments, one chimera of each variant pai

164 However, in competition experiments only the high-affinity B cells r

165 requires the validation of the hits through competition experiments or orthogonal biophysical techni

166 Direct competition experiments, pairwise or between all 3 alkan

167 Growth competition experiments performed at 30, 37, and 41 degr

168 Competition experiments performed with beta-hydroxy alde

169 Competition experiments performed with the pC peptide, w

170 However, analyses of binding data (Lyn) and competition experiments (PLCgamma2) suggest that these b

171 [n]uril (CB[n]), where n = 6-8, using 1H NMR competition experiments referenced to absolute binding c

172 Specific binding, as shown by competition experiments, requires the phosphorylation of

173 Both radioligand binding and cellular cross-competition experiments reveal a competitive relationshi

174 Deuterium labeling and competition experiments reveal that the reductive radica

175 Deuterium labeling and competition experiments reveal that the reductive radica

176 Competition experiments reveal that wild-type Ku binds d

177 th parameters showed only minor differences, competition experiments revealed a clear pattern: 7-8 co

178 ro phosphorylation assays and phosphopeptide competition experiments revealed a phosphorylation at Se

179 A series of competition experiments revealed a preference of the rea

180 Competition experiments revealed about 30% inhibition of

181 Surface plasmon resonance solution competition experiments revealed affinity constants of 2

182 Competition experiments revealed isoform-specific differ

183 er, labeling with DCCD as well as Na(+)-DCCD competition experiments revealed only one binding site f

184 Moreover, cell-free assays and competition experiments revealed preferential binding of

185 (1) H NMR competition experiments revealed that CB[7]6 is among th

186 Competition experiments revealed that pTRS1 preferential

187 Competition experiments revealed that SCF(betaTrCP) form

188 Competition experiments revealed that the 11th armadillo

189 The results of competition experiments revealed that the relative rate

190 Analysis of complex binding using competition experiments revealed that the three adjacent

191 Competition experiments revealed that these two sites ar

192 Promoter competition experiments revealed that, in addition to LS

193 This enabled competition experiments revealing that the motor program

194 A series of competition experiments shed further light on the mechan

195 Our laboratory competition experiments show that bicA + sbtA genotypes

196 Competition experiments show that CBM28 modules do not c

197 Competition experiments show that insertion occurs more

198 Moreover, toxin competition experiments show that KCBhyb midguts lacking

199 Competition experiments show that other amino acids and

200 Competition experiments show that Tat and Rev can effect

201 Competition experiments show that Tb(3+) binds to the sa

202 Competition experiments show that the COX3 5'UTL and aI5

203 Competition experiments showed a markedly lower competit

204 ere selected against in all populations, our competition experiments showed that antibiotics signific

205 Additionally, competition experiments showed that EcTEBP recognizes an

206 Genetic and in vivo competition experiments showed that sequence conversion

207 Competition experiments showed that STAT6 and C/EBPbeta

208 Competition experiments showed that substitution at the

209 Fitness profiles and growth competition experiments showed that the E138K/M184I muta

210 Competition experiments (solvent swaps) provide insights

211 In tissue competition experiments, subtype C isolates could compet

212 Competition experiments suggest that HOPS bound to the H

213 tions from the Michaelis-Menten model in DNA competition experiments suggested an interaction with DN

214 Ionic-competition experiments suggested that the nature of nfG

215 HDAC6 mRNA in intact cells and in vitro, and competition experiments suggested that the proteins occu

216 Competition experiments supported that finding and showe

217 do this, we designed a novel intramolecular competition experiment that allowed us to measure the in

218 Competition experiments that employed monovalent ligands

219 g, tryptophan fluorescence measurements, and competition experiments that Syk activation by CLEC-2 is

220 This conclusion was based on competition experiments that were assumed to be able to

221 In C(4) organic carbon-inorganic carbon competition experiments, the (12)C-labeled C(4) products

222 In competition experiments, the DTACs blocked estradiol-sti

223 In intermolecular competition experiments, the influence of carbon-based g

224 Consistent with the results from the LuxP competition experiments, the LsrB-deficient strain deple

225 In competition experiments, the parent strain efficiently o

226 From competition experiments, the rate constant for H atom ab

227 Through peptide competition experiments, the region between Cys(165) and

228 Through competition experiments, the relative rate constants of

229 In competition experiments, thrombomodulin inhibited fibrin

230 In ethylene +1-pentene competition experiments, Ti-C0-Cr(SNS) yields 5.5% n-pro

231 We also used competition experiments to determine approximate rate co

232 ibe pre-steady-state kinetic and nucleophile competition experiments to examine RF contributions to t

233 Here, we use SSB-Ct peptide variants in competition experiments to examine the roles of individu

234 use a stochastic model, with data from viral competition experiments, to analyze the effect of fitnes

235 wild-type sequences and were unaltered in a competition experiment using I and III isomer substrates

236 Competition experiments using a copper chelator revealed

237 In competition experiments using equal inocula of a norB or

238 In contrast, competition experiments using gel shift assays suggest t

239 Competition experiments using increasing amounts of (R)-

240 Competition experiments using increasing ethanol concent

241 Competition experiments using isotopic substitution reve

242 tures of the amine reactants are employed in competition experiments using polar solvents, such as DM

243 In addition, competition experiments using strains with different cir

244 Here we performed competition experiments using synthesized oligopeptides

245 Competition experiments using Zn2+ were used to determin

246 In competition experiments, VEGF165 competed PlGF-2 binding

247 A pairwise competition experiment was performed with peripheral blo

248 A series of relative rate and competition experiments was performed, and the degree of

249 From the competition experiments we deduce that SPP releases a su

250 In a series of competition experiments we showed that a peptide corresp

251 ta-analysis, a series of field surveys and a competition experiment, we aimed to determine the causes

252 Using an in vitro sperm competition experiment, we demonstrate that female ovari

253 Using in vitro competition experiments, we assayed the fitness of eleve

254 ed on NMR assignments and bicinchoninic acid competition experiments, we demonstrate that Cu interact

255 In a range of single-molecule DNA competition experiments, we found that the resistance of

256 In competition experiments, we identify sigma(W) as a key f

257 a series of in vitro sperm manipulation and competition experiments, we show that rapid changes in s

258 Through competition experiments, we show that the most active sy

259 Competition experiments were carried out in both solvent

260 Competition experiments were performed between mutants t

261 To assess which GLUT, hexose competition experiments were performed.

262 In the competition experiments where only the natural bacterial

263 barrier potentially participate, as well as competition experiments where the potential contribution

264 ce of hundreds of mutations in a single bulk competition experiment, which can give a direct readout

265 fects were further explored with a series of competition experiments, which confirmed that binding to

266 mate of complexity from a 100 x100 matrix of competition experiments, which is clearly feasible in hi

267 In a competition experiment with the shorter "periacene" pery

268 In standardized competition experiments with [(3)H]adenosine, P2 transpo

269 Competition experiments with a substrate (pNPP) and iodo

270 ns specifically bound to the UGT1A1-XRE, and competition experiments with Ah receptor and Arnt antibo

271 ) protein affinities have been obtained from competition experiments with bathocuproine disulfonate o

272 The validation of the assay was achieved by competition experiments with both peptide and nonpeptide

273 Competition experiments with both PTS1 and PTS2 proteins

274 Competition experiments with different RNA homopolymers

275 Surface plasmon resonance and competition experiments with duplex DNA and other G-quad

276 or the CREB site in the promoter region, and competition experiments with excess unlabeled or mutated

277 Coimmunoprecipitation and competition experiments with Gbetagamma scavengers sugge

278 rmed chrysophaentin A binds to FtsZ, and NMR competition experiments with GTPgammaS showed chrysophae

279 In this study, we used competition experiments with known CD46 ligands, CD46-sp

280 gen stalks of MBL and L-ficolin, as shown by competition experiments with MASP-3.

281 from direct transport measurements and from competition experiments with MeAIB as a transport substr

282 Furthermore, competition experiments with mice showed that wild-type

283 Competition experiments with mixtures of two olefins ind

284 Competition experiments with other free fatty acids and

285 Both survival and competition experiments with outbred CD1 mice demonstrat

286 obe reactions were carried out, specifically competition experiments with p-substituted styrenes, ste

287 nt DC from bone marrow precursors ex vivo in competition experiments with physiological levels of E2.

288 Competition experiments with previously characterized an

289 Competition experiments with ssRNA revealed that p33 bin

290 Competition experiments with synthetic peptides and site

291 Competition experiments with TAT-fused WASP peptides sug

292 Competition experiments with the cognate ligand, FSH, in

293 rate constants kappaobs) were collected from competition experiments with the faster reactions of 2 i

294 Competition experiments with the H2OCbl(+)-coordinating

295 d species (Brassicaceae), soil analyses, and competition experiments with their phylogeny to reconstr

296 n-RNA association constants were obtained in competition experiments with untagged RNA.

297 Competition experiments with various alcohols and electr

298 Competition experiments with water-soluble isoprenyl mon

299 tants exhibited decreased fitness in vivo in competition experiments with wild-type bacteria.

300 idly eliminated 1-7 days post-inoculation in competition experiments with WT.