ライフサイエンスコーパス: competitor

1 or survival in the presence of the perceived competitor.

2 oe, on their side or not, or a cooperator or competitor.

3 anslocation) reversed the fate of its losing competitor.

4 hen challenged with a matrix-targeted copper competitor.

5 deaths unrelated to disease or treatment as competitors.

6 at predation reduced the influence of strong competitors.

7 d by extracorporeal infusion of PBUT binding competitors.

8 surprisingly good, easily beating all of the competitors.

9 ns of susceptible genes than do the existent competitors.

10 adaptive social defence against predators or competitors.

11 e ions was demonstrated using common ions as competitors.

12 ibronectin and vitronectin, respectively, as competitors.

13 ty certainty in the face of more promiscuous competitors.

14 tal signals to give it an advantage over its competitors.

15 mpact of warming on competition with current competitors.

16 of colicin production with the need to repel competitors.

17 ial food (proto-farming) and defense against competitors.

18 ratus of Gram-negative bacteria used to kill competitors.

19 eveloped allelopathic strategies to suppress competitors.

20 h both peptide and nonpeptide OTR ligands as competitors.

21 in the nervous system of prey, predators, or competitors.

22 for common resources from less well-adapted competitors.

23 ctional similarity between current and novel competitors.

24 ories suppressed cortical patterns unique to competitors.

25 to kill eukaryotic predators or prokaryotic competitors.

26 sensitive cells can often outgrow their T6S+ competitors.

27 ere not detected in individuals growing with competitors.

28 ographical areas produces lower densities of competitors.

29 r than its more specialized state-of-the-art competitors.

30 seen experimentally for both DNA and protein competitors.

31 ical crises nor with the advent of potential competitors.

32 by the phenotypes, and so the genotypes, of competitors.

33 radiation in the upper leaves, thus shading competitors.

34 duce antimicrobials to inhibit the growth of competitors.

35 indirectly by altering selection imposed by competitors.

36 initiate dramatic stem elongation to overtop competitors.

37 N deficits that suppress the growth of their competitors.

38 ent are commonly depicted as self-interested competitors.

39 but also a means of deflecting enemies onto competitors.

40 ys that feed back to benefit themselves over competitors.

41 etition through contact-dependent killing of competitors.

42 ighter control of type I error rate than its competitors.

43 and facilitate long-term persistence of poor competitors.

44 election of correct tRNAs among many similar competitors.

45 even in the presence of excess metal cation competitors.

46 en their niches, in response to having fewer competitors.

47 their niche breadths even in the face of few competitors.

48 the correct word among semantically related competitors.

49 with neighboring prokaryotic and eukaryotic competitors.

50 coexist sympatrically with high densities of competitors.

51 to identify comparatively more DEGs than its competitors.

52 ulse and in response to the presence of some competitors.

53 mediate and long-term risk posed by dominant competitors.

54 rk examines the coexistence of just pairs of competitors.

55 energy landscape and geometric nature of the competitors.

56 al activities against the potential saprobic competitors.

57 cess to fluid flow and redirect resources to competitors.

58 quality: 1) visual exposure to predators and competitors, 2) density of predation refuges and 3) subs

59 The release of compounds that inhibit competitors, a process known as allelopathy, may play a

60 nts, taxa from barer environments are poorer competitors, a tradeoff that may contribute to soil ende

61 The extent known-competitor adsorbates decrease target-adsorbate removal

62 ith the removal of nutrient limitation (poor competitors) also increased following removal of consume

63 dent, varying with medium, plasmid status of competitor and levels of environmental mercury.

64 nd 59 mainland lizard species, and estimated competitor and predator richness at the localities where

65 hes than mainland species, how it relates to competitor and predator richness, and the nature of the

66 Dietary niche breadth was unrelated to competitor and predator richness, on both islands and th

67 st their growth to the size of their closest competitor and raise the possibility that similar plasti

68 creasing the gain of neural responses to the competitor and reducing the gain of neural responses to

69 Plants sense the foliar shade of competitors and alter their developmental programs throu

70 he results show that the removal of demersal competitors and benthos by trawling can change the diets

71 plant commensal bacterium to antagonize its competitors and broadly implicates NAD(P)(+)-hydrolyzing

72 times overshadow the importance of deterring competitors and claiming territory.

73 I have also been fortunate with regard to competitors and collaborators, particularly because, whe

74 with indiscrete anecdotes about your former competitors and collaborators.

75 irectly via influxes of predators, prey, and competitors and indirectly by vectoring nutrients, energ

76 tween benefit gained by inhibiting sensitive competitors and loss due to an increased contribution to

77 ned by the combination of visitation by both competitors and potential mates.

78 a highly vocal species and can be both food competitors and potential predators of many other cetace

79 feeding efficiency and gain protection from competitors and predation.

80 conditions that may be deleterious to their competitors and predators.

81 ilding was promoted by the rise of substrate competitors and predators.

82 ply their impressive heat tolerance to avoid competitors and predators.

83 m, however, contending that promiscuous male competitors and the risk of cuckoldry limit the scope fo

84 mall molecules targeting Plk1 are mainly ATP-competitors and, therefore, are known to elicit side eff

85 reduced the strength of selection imposed by competitors and, therefore, relaxed selection on plant t

86 olyze lignocellulose and repel eventual food competitors and/or cheaters.

87 community structure and examined the role of competitors and/or consumers in mediating these patterns

88 cts to reduce the fitness inequality between competitors and/or strengthen negative frequency depende

89 erent types of perturbations affecting their competitors (and hence their tendency to cross talk) can

90 ts in the presence of soluble cyclicRGD as a competitor, and cytochalasin D as inhibitor of cell spre

91 ability increases the dominance of superior competitors, and intraspecific niche variation reduces s

92 Through encounters with predators, competitors, and noxious stimuli, animals have evolved d

93 istinguishing of own species from predators, competitors, and prey.

94 tides and proteins to communicate, to poison competitors, and to manipulate host cells.

95 tin or advertisements for Zyrtec (McNeil), a competitor antihistamine.

96 sistence of large communities of interacting competitors are lacking.

97 from defending a key resource from microbial competitors are likely to evolve behaviours to control o

98 latedness is homogeneous and encounters with competitors are rare.

99 t communities when niche differences between competitors are small and variation in the direct effect

100 tion by 2OG cosubstrate or primary substrate competitors as well as compounds that bind across both c

101 terplay between density and frequency of the competitors as well as on the concentration of resources

102 nteractions between K. brevis and two diatom competitors, Asterionellopsis glacialis and Thalassiosir

103 nt isoform of the protein is replaced by the competitor at each binding location enables the calculat

104 Furthermore, Ciona appeared to be a weaker competitor at the adult stage.

105 d RO6924963 were identified as high-affinity competitors at the (3)H-T808 binding site on native tau

106 ion systems to interact with host organisms, competitor bacteria, and the environment.

107 l, export antibacterial proteins, and target competitor bacteria.

108 For small and medium competitors, behavioral performance was consonant with a

109 tem cells usually outcompete less successful competitors both in the gonads of the genotype partner f

110 del-based strategies when faced with similar competitors but can switch to a "stochastic" mode when c

111 ce facultative responses to cues produced by competitors by (i) increasing their own antibiotic produ

112 into the periplasm of neighboring bacterial competitors by a Type VI secretion apparatus, eventually

113 in many enzymes such as ribonuclease H, its competitor Ca(2+) may also bind to the enzyme but inhibi

114 Loss of a dominant competitor can open ecological opportunities.

115 brane protein stoichiometry, the presence of competitors can alter tagged-protein density and artifac

116 ecological opportunity (here, the removal of competitors) can trigger the immediate expression of lat

117 n the one hand, simple models of interacting competitors cannot produce the stable persistence of ver

118 aked eye" detection of Pb(2+) ion over other competitor cations such as Hg(2+) and Cd(2+).

119 Phage infection kills competitor cells and bits of their DNA are occasionally

120 trol bone marrow cells, along with wild-type competitor cells.

121 (+) BM cells had an advantage over wild-type competitor cells.

122 function primarily as a means of eliminating competitor cells.

123 sociation can occur in biologically relevant competitor concentration ranges and does not necessarily

124 S-transferase, and via the determination of competitor concentration.

125 uptake was blocked in the presence of excess competitor, confirming that the specificity of tumor acc

126 nces, including biological interactions with competitors, consumers or pathogens, on local population

127 multiple physiological pathways in sensitive competitors, demonstrating that chemical cues in the pla

128 between climate (seasonal precipitation) and competitor densities result in steep differentials in su

129 Sharing was observed even when competitor density was low and individuals could have ea

130 In this crowdsourcing competition, competitors developed algorithms for the prediction of d

131 pprovals, new off-label indications, and new competitors did not influence the annual cost change rat

132 Preincubation with competitor DNA and DNase treatment both reduce Gzm nucle

133 lication origin; however, in the presence of competitor DNA and limiting ORC concentrations, replicat

134 tein-target association in systems involving competitor DNA and the intersegment transfer mechanism.

135 issociation rate of a DNA-protein complex on competitor DNA concentration does not necessarily mean d

136 This dependence on competitor DNA concentration is not seen at 180 mM salt.

137 fluorescence-labeled DNA in the presence of competitor DNA duplexes, including Egr-1 decoys.

138 ed reporter, which will bind to a capture or competitor DNA strand, permanently separating it from th

139 e dependence of kapp on the concentration of competitor DNA, we determined the second-order rate cons

140 reptavidin, were resistant to challenge with competitor DNA.

141 eases the feasibility of restoring degraded (competitor-dominated) systems, particularly if combined

142 tion state of individual target memories and competitors during retrieval.

143 We field parameterised models of competitor dynamics with pairs of 18 California annual p

144 typically used as a substrate to study such competitor dynamics, network structure can instead be in

145 nding to the lead SNP rs4888378; multiplexed competitor electrophoretic mobility shift assays implica

146 acteria live in a toxic world in which their competitors excrete hydrogen peroxide or superoxide-gene

147 y intransitive communities comprising strong competitors exhibited a negative relationship.

148 hly intransitive communities comprising weak competitors exhibited a positive diversity-function rela

149 b, which explains why infliximab is a better competitor for endogenous IgG1 in G1m3,-1 allotype-beari

150 By using recombinant FH19-20 as a competitor for FH and measuring erythrocyte lysis and de

151 o extract heme from Hb-Hp, and it was a poor competitor for Hb-Hp binding to CD163.

152 Roots proved to be poor competitors for (1)(5)N-glutamate and took up N mainly a

153 o CCR5, weak modulators of CCL4 binding, and competitors for CCL5 binding.

154 ne expression are therefore direct molecular competitors for different functional folds of the same R

155 to foliar shade and neighbors who may become competitors for light resources by elongation growth to

156 /toxins into eukaryotic hosts or prokaryotic competitors for survival and fitness.

157 e they feed in locations from which dominant competitors formerly excluded them.

158 Although spontaneous (i.e., competitor-free) dissociation shows a strong salt depend

159 he sensor displaces the tethered fluorescent competitor from the binding protein and disrupts fluores

160 s a strong shift in taxonomic relatedness of competitors, from interactions between species of differ

161 Removing competitors generated a strong increase in mean fitness,

162 tely 10 mumol g(-1)), whereas binding of the competitor glucuronic acid (GA) and other monosaccharide

163 petitive environment to novel high-elevation competitors had little to no effect.

164 However, clear coevolution between plant competitors has been rarely documented.

165 Critically, historical declines in resident competitors have made water more available for introduce

166 nd maintain social contact with reproductive competitors highlights the importance of increased focus

167 ) and hippuric acid (HIPA) and their binding competitors, ibuprofen (IBU), furosemide (FUR) and trypt

168 This asymmetry in the importance of changing competitor identity at the leading versus trailing range

169 icantly more at named target images when the competitor images were semantically unrelated (e.g., mil

170 licitly include the induction profile of the competitor in the model, we are able to estimate yeast T

171 e architecture of the cell wall by acting as competitors in carbohydrate-carbohydrate or carbohydrate

172 e library and were blocked by small-molecule competitors in cells.

173 in competition binding assays with unlabeled competitors in order to demonstrate their suitability fo

174 hat outperforms state-of-the-art image-based competitors in predicting the sequences of fixations mad

175 r method, which outperforms state-of-the-art competitors in reconstruction accuracy, and additionally

176 d addition can effectively suppress superior competitors in stressful environments.

177 hought to limit sexual dimorphism, as larger competitors in the community will prevent the larger sex

178 ong to different subfamilies and function as competitors in the control of certain receptors and sign

179 Microcin-producing EcN limits the growth of competitors in the inflamed intestine, including commens

180 Physiological mechanisms used to exclude competitors include physical and biochemical factors tha

181 imed to adapt to eventual shading from plant competitors, include a reduced accumulation of carotenoi

182 their abundance, whereas S. mutans' natural competitors, including health-associated Streptococci, b

183 According to the model, the salient competitor induced a stimulus-driven attentional modulat

184 But large competitors induced a contrast-gain change, even when th

185 Contrary to common assumptions, competitor-induced acceleration of dissociation can occu

186 The effect of binding competitor infusion on fractional removal of PBUT was th

187 By contrast, in the absence of a competitor, insecticide effects on the more sensitive sp

188 Pre-dialyzer infusion of PBUT binding competitors into the blood stream can increase the HD re

189 riation in the direct effects experienced by competitors is large, but empirical tests are lacking.

190 The identity of the binding competitor leads to different qualitative trends, motiva

191 was 0.09 +/- 0.01 min(-1) in the absence of competitor ligands, and this was enhanced 2.2- and 2.1-f

192 speckle RNA-binding protein (NSR) and the AS competitor long noncoding RNA (or ASCO-lncRNA) constitut

193 , that enabled citT mutants to persist among competitors long enough to obtain dctA or equivalent mut

194 orth Atlantic basin scale, (i) predators and competitors may respond to climate change together; (ii)

195 or rapid evolutionary responses; conversely, competitors may restrict niche evolution, contributing t

196 orks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence.

197 cies, serving as both foundation species and competitors, mediating the diversity and dispersal poten

198 onses to climate warming depend on how their competitors migrate to track climate, we transplanted al

199 models of complex dissociation predict that competitor molecules will, in general, accelerate the br

200 hydrothermal vent archaeon with a bacterial competitor, muramidase transcription is upregulated.

201 , in the presence of a temporarily-ambiguous competitor object (e.g. a "teapot with stars on").

202 ns during treatment with salicylate, a known competitor of required chloride binding.

203 at singlet-singlet annihilation is a primary competitor of singlet fission at higher fluence and that

204 inding protein is labeled with a fluorescent competitor of the analyte using SNAP-tag in conjugation

205 Small-molecule competitors of protein-protein interactions are urgently

206 ibitors that prevent apoptosis together with competitors of RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM)-de

207 tes of the SH2 domains and thus can serve as competitors of SH2-phosphotyrosine interactions.

208 or capturing target guests selectively among competitors of similar size, shape, and charge.

209 nd various taxa in Squamata, one of the main competitors of the temporal niches of the ancestral mamm

210 t 80 mM NaCl depends on the concentration of competitor oligonucleotide suggesting that direct transf

211 or, antiterminator or terminator function by competitor oligonucleotides in vitro and by mutations in

212 competition with functionally similar native competitors on the dietary niche breadths of invasive sp

213 that they could limit subsequent mating with competitors or hasten post-reproductive demise, thus dec

214 aded for over 200 years and whether removing competitors or herbivores influences coexistence.

215 ms, particularly if combined with culling of competitors or stock enhancement of adult predators.

216 ively) compared with members with FCOIs with competitors (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.44; P = .72 and OR

217 to visitation and scent marking by potential competitors (other male pumas) and potential mates (fema

218 esults demonstrate the benefits of excluding competitors out-weigh the incentives associated with a f

219 nformatics, mutational analyses, a substrate competitor peptide, and a specific NCX1-Met(369) antibod

220 related Ags in the presence of high-affinity competitor peptide.

221 The impact of K. brevis allelopathy on competitor physiology was reflected in the metabolomes a

222 asive forb, Alliaria petiolata, and a native competitor, Pilea pumila, may affect their long-term coe

223 which increases the likelihood of outgrowing competitor plants.

224 nt was allelopathic against a heterospecific competitor, Poa pratensis, but not against conspecifics.

225 those of others, including potential mates, competitors, prey and predators.

226 Indeed, when faced with virtual competitors, primates resort to strategic counter predic

227 often assume that trait differences between competitors promote diversity, empirical evidence connec

228 ound proteins are susceptible to invasion by competitor proteins in solution.

229 ve binding to rootworm BBMV was observed for competitor proteins when used in excess with (125)I-Cry3

230 When compared to competitors, realistic simulations suggest that FIQT is

231 Moreover, RCD can cause divergence in competitor recognition, but ACD cannot cause divergence

232 ions screened as putative FSC hypo- or hyper-competitors, respectively.

233 t to which higher-affinity cells eliminating competitors restricts clonal diversity is unknown.

234 t can be outcompeted by faster proliferating competitors, resulting in tumour collapse.

235 During clinical responses to the m(7)G-cap competitor ribavirin, eIF4E is mainly cytoplasmic.

236 nced dimorphism, is thought to increase with competitor richness.

237 f the HIV-1 genome in the presence of excess competitor RNA.

238 Studies using various competitor RNAs with modifications to S1 RNA oligonucleo

239 d competition through active disruption of a competitor's sensing during food acquisition.

240 The capacity to detoxify a major competitor's venom probably contributes substantially to

241 Interspecific interactions and competitor sensing are among the main biotic factors aff

242 erves as a tuning mechanism: the presence of competitors shifts and sharpens the Ca2+ frequency-depen

243 mographic studies of contact regions between competitors should greatly improve our ability to unders

244 Intriguingly, the introduction of competitor sites can transform a unimodal mRNA distribut

245 ngle gene copy shares it's TFs with multiple competitor sites, the mRNA variance as a function of the

246 ve independent of the strength and number of competitor sites.

247 rlaps with the disappearance of their sister competitor species O. nancyi (the organ-pipe Orbicella).

248 sociated with reduced abundance of a smaller competitor species, the nine-spined stickleback Pungitiu

249 arget can be rendered invisible by a salient competitor stimulus presented in the other eye.

250 instead be interpreted as a signature of the competitor strategies, yielding competition dynamics on

251 that phosphorylated AurA(Thr-295) acts as a competitor substrate with a CDK1-activating phosphatase

252 nts through uptake by target cells or strong competitors, such as regulatory T cells.

253 ing different concentrations of selenate and competitor sulfate.

254 c nematodes/fungi, and bacterial pathogens), competitors, symbiotic microbes, and detritivores.

255 while there is an optimal strategy in a two competitor system, three competitor systems have no such

256 l strategy in a two competitor system, three competitor systems have no such solution; the introducti

257 ct endopeptidases from the host or microbial competitors, T. forsythia possesses a serpin-type protei

258 e was synthesized to serve as an immobilized competitor that overcame constraints imposed by the deep

259 o a "stochastic" mode when challenged with a competitor that they cannot defeat by counter prediction

260 the effects of changing interactions between competitors that co-occur today.

261 ir performance was strongly reduced by novel competitors that could migrate upwards from lower elevat

262 tely captures short-term dynamics of the two competitors that have been observed empirically and we u

263 ons can produce temporal niches for inferior competitors that mitigate effects of interspecific compe

264 s: The medium ground finch diverged from its competitor, the large ground finch, during a severe drou

265 To discriminate against abundant competitors, the Nramp metal-binding site should favor s

266 tive for the location and orientation of the competitor, thereby increasing the gain of neural respon

267 and shaped by the community of interspecific competitors, thereby documenting a distinct mechanism fo

268 gens to suppress the growth of their closest competitors, thereby enhancing pathogen colonization of

269 (ii) by suppressing antibiotic production in competitors, thereby reducing direct threats to themselv

270 ial weapon that allows for direct killing of competitors through the translocation of proteinaceous t

271 ation or the covalent probe can be used as a competitor to develop noncovalent drug candidates.

272 that T. tabaci is an intrinsically superior competitor to F. occidentalis, but its competitive advan

273 them to hit the market as a serious low-cost competitor to silicon based solar cell technologies.

274 devices could render CuI as a cost-effective competitor to spiro-OMeTAD in perovskite solar cells.

275 lines in the UK, A. bipunctata is a superior competitor to the intraguild predator H. axyridis.

276 and have garnered much interest as potential competitors to conventional semiconductor quantum dots.

277 Our framework outperforms its competitors to correctly identify pathways relevant to t

278 e developed an assay in which small molecule competitors to MA-RNA binding can be characterized, with

279 When reproductive competitors tolerate or cooperate with one another, they

280 rans-T(m) also reduces the efficiency of its competitor trans-T(p) by sequestering trans-T(p) in a he

281 reate conditions under which the loss of one competitor triggers the loss of others, we lack the know

282 brevis is variably allelopathic to multiple competitors, typically causing sublethal suppression of

283 The IMVT outperformed its competitors under comprehensive simulations of normality

284 ize/maize) or faba bean (maize/faba bean) as competitors under five levels of phosphorus (P) supply,

285 ibrio cholerae, we show how killing adjacent competitors via the Type VI secretion system (T6SS) prec

286 Thus, M45-encoded RHIM competitor, viral inhibitor of RIP activation, sustains

287 ble to the participant, compared to when the competitor was mutually available to the participant and

288 faster to select the target object when the competitor was only available to the participant, compar

289 nduced a contrast-gain change, even when the competitor was split between the two eyes.

290 h both the size and the eye-of-origin of the competitor were manipulated.

291 Predators and competitors were more attracted to volatiles from herbiv

292 fore, relaxed selection on plant traits when competitors were present.

293 ith the native state, putrescine2+ is a weak competitor when the ratio of the excess Mg2+ (which neut

294 ely undisturbed by the presence of potential competitors when antigens expressed in the same tissue w

295 se antibiotics as weapons to kill or inhibit competitors, whereas a recent alternative hypothesis sta

296 moderate concentrations of non-specific RNA competitors, which considerably delay the Cas9/sgRNA com

297 hythmic information to individually identify competitors, which facilitates navigation within the soc

298 e played by the T6SS, dealing death to local competitors while simultaneously creating conditions pot

299 not necessarily imply ternary association of competitor with the bimolecular complex.

300 ed suppression of motor-cortex activation by competitor words with incompatible semantics, documentin