ライフサイエンスコーパス: concordance rate

1 ria for interpretation of interim PET and on concordance rates.

2 however, extended biopsy schemes may improve concordance rates.

3 win sets, both individuals had PBC (pairwise concordance rate, 0.63).

4 zone were detected in six of eight patients (concordance rate, 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.40, 0

5 meat at the 5-y follow-up than at baseline (concordance rate: 39%; kappa-value: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.07,

6 breast density on prior mammograms (overall concordance rate, 73% [95% CI, 71%-75%] for higher vs 77

7 iopsy confirmed BK polyomavirus nephropathy (concordance rate 99%).

8 ages and with the secondary aim of measuring concordance rates among reviewers using the same 5-point

9 Proband-wise concordance rates and biometric modeling were used to an

10 Probandwise concordance rates and correlations in liability were cal

11 Concordance rates and heritability estimates for spontan

12 weighting were used to estimate probandwise concordance rates and heritability of the diagnoses of S

13 The positive- and negative-result concordance rates and overall concordance of BD-MRSA and

14 Concordance rates and sibling risk ratios were used as i

15 The concordance rate between buccal and tumor genotype was 1

16 Overall, we found a 98.8% concordance rate between DHPLC and sequence analyses.

17 assurance study was undertaken to define the concordance rate between immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluo

18 The primary outcome was concordance rate between minimally invasive and conventi

19 Repeat testing produced a final 100% concordance rate between the two master mix preparations

20 s, mainly because of the large difference in concordance rates between monozygotic and dizygotic twin

21 ted that the two assays have similar overall concordance rates but may have different roles as potent

22 Concordance rates did not change for longer imaging dura

23 d age conversion gives a rate similar to the concordance rate for Canadian monozygotic twins.

24 The concordance rate for carriage did not differ significant

25 The concordance rate for HIV DNA PCR-negative and -positive

26 The modest concordance rate for leukemia in identical twins ( appro

27 The concordance rate for methanogen carriage was significant

28 The proband-wise concordance rate for monozygotic twins was double that o

29 Similarly, the concordance rate for treatment-related viral clearance w

30 Concordance rates for ADHD were greater for monozygotic

31 Concordance rates for anti-CCP antibodies among ASPs wer

32 The present study examined probandwise concordance rates for attention deficit hyperactivity di

33 Concordance rates for guidelines with lower-level eviden

34 In contrast, concordance rates for low ABI values (ABI< or =0.9) for

35 ommon (0.1-2% prevalence) and that have high concordance rates for monozygotic twins (30-50%) and hig

36 r siblings versus the general population and concordance rates for monozygotic versus dizygotic twin

37 judicated cardiovascular events in MESA, the concordance rates for myocardial infarction, stroke, and

38 The lifetime prevalence and probandwise concordance rates for temperance board registrations wer

39 was equivalent to that of HC2-M; the overall concordance rates for the detection of chlamydia and gon

40 P conversion rates of approximately 90% with concordance rates >99.6% and completeness levels >98% fo

41 e genetic component is suggested by a higher concordance rate in monozygotic (28%) versus dizygotic (

42 eral population (lambda s), and an increased concordance rate in monozygotic compared to dizygotic tw

43 Acute leukemia has a high concordance rate in young identical twins and in infants

44 that chlamydia prevalence,organism load, and concordance rates in couples decrease with age, and orga

45 be adequately explained by the high ratio of concordance rates in monozygotic (MZ) twins versus sibli

46 ences on the development of IBS by comparing concordance rates in monozygotic and dizygotic twins to

47 bution of these disorders as well as the low concordance rates in monozygotic twins suggest that a co

48 Epidemiological studies, particularly concordance rates in twin pairs and siblings, strongly i

49 s yielded moderate monozygotic and dizygotic concordance rates, in contrast to mothers' reports, whic

50 Increased monozygotic versus dizygotic twin concordance rates indicate that heredity, not just share

51 The low concordance rate is consistent with the low penetrance d

52 that a lower limit of 0.5 for the replicate concordance rate is needed in order to be certain of tru

53 The low concordance rate of 33% in monozygotic twins demonstrate

54 in 31 ovarian cancers by both methods, for a concordance rate of 81%.

55 mary tumor and matched metastasis revealed a concordance rate of 94% compared with 63% for likely pas

56 d 74 out of 75 allelic pairs with an overall concordance rate of 99% compared with conventional typin

57 sus-derived reference diagnosis, the overall concordance rate of diagnostic interpretations of partic

58 Concordance rate of EBV positivity was evaluated among 3

59 The concordance rate of PBC in identical twins is among the

60 The concordance rate of PD in pairs of dizygotic twins is si

61 The probandwise concordance rate of SZ is 33% in monozygotic twins and 7

62 e not correlated (r = 0.14; p > .05) and the concordance rate of the direction of change in cardiac o

63 s to either the genus or species level, with concordance rates of 89.7% and 87.4%, respectively, to p

64 The concordance rates of classification were only 47.7% (ver

65 The concordance rates of different types of CHD vary widely.

66 Concordance rates, sensitivity, specificity, positive pr

67 here were two or more recurrences, the exact concordance rate was 55%.

68 The concordance rate was 68% (39 out of 57 images).

69 The concordance rate was 95%.

70 Concordance rates were 96.6% (476/493; kappa = 0.91), 97

71 lts were compared, the positive and negative concordance rates were 99.2% (122/123) and 89.5% (94/105

72 Concordance rates were calculated and parametric models

73 For all species examined, the concordance rates were not significantly different (P >

74 Exact concordance rates were particularly high for isolated at

75 splicing assay (MaPSy), which showed an 81% concordance rate with splicing in patient tissue.

76 We demonstrate that high concordance rates with HapMap calls can be achieved with

77 The concordance rates with the single base extension referen

78 ared to 99.4% for genomic DNA) and excellent concordance rates with their corresponding genomic DNA s

79 ing step, we have obtained higher genotyping concordance rates, without requiring large sample sizes.